Measuring the Compatibility of Conditional Decision in Formal Constitutional Review by the Constitutional Court

Menakar Kompatibilitas Putusan Bersyarat dalam Pengujian Formil Undang-Undang oleh Mahkamah Konstitusi

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.31078/jk2036

Keywords:

Compatibility, Conditional Decision, Constitutional Review, Formal Constitutional Review

Abstract


The existence of conditional decisions becomes dynamic in constitutional review, including their use in procedural constitutional reviews. Constitutional Court Decision No. 91/PUU-XVIII/2020 is the first decision to grant the petition and use a conditional decision model. Unfortunately, as mentioned earlier, using the conditional decision model in the decision results in discourse among various parties, including government institutions, law enforcers, academics, and the general public. With the growing discourse, this research aims to analyze the compatibility of the conditional decision model in formal constitutional reviews by examining various formal constitutional review decisions and the conditional decisions handed down by the Constitutional Court. This research indicates that the conditional decision is incompatible with formal constitutional review. This can be observed from the incompatibility of conditional decisions with the regulatory design of formal constitutional reviews and their legal consequences.

Author Biographies

Faiz Rahman, The Van Vollenhoven Institute for Law, Governance and Society, Leiden Law School, Universiteit Leiden, the Netherlands

Faiz Rahman is an Assistant Professor at the Department of Constitutional Law, Faculty of Law, Universitas Gadjah Mada. He obtained his Bachelor of Laws (S.H.) from the Faculty of Law, Universitas Gadjah Mada, in 2016, and his Master of Laws (LL.M.) in Media and Technology Law from the University of New South Wales, Australia, in 2018. He is currently a PhD Scholar at the Van Vollenhoven Institute for Law, Governance and Society (VVI), Leiden Law School, Universiteit Leiden, the Netherlands, with financial support from the Indonesia Endowment Fund for Education (LPDP), Ministry of Finance, Republic of Indonesia. He published many articles and research relating to conditional decisions by the Constitutional Court. In 2022, he published a book titled “Putusan Bersyarat oleh Mahkamah Konstitusi (Karakteristik dan Dinamika Perkembangannya)” [Conditional Decision by Constitutional Court (Characteristics and its Dynamics)].

Dian Agung Wicaksono, Faculty of Law, Gadjah Mada University, Yogyakarta, Indonesia

Dian Agung Wicaksono holds a Bachelor of Law (S.H.) from the Department of Constitutional Law, Faculty of Law Universitas Gadjah Mada, Yogyakarta in 2011 with Cum Laude predicate. In 2011 he was awarded the Best Young Researcher at the MOST UNESCO LIPI Award 2011. In 2012, he was granted the recipient of the Ministry of Education and Culture Excellence Scholarship to continue his studies at the Master Program in State Law, Faculty of Law, Universitas Gadjah Mada, in collaboration with Den Norske Ambassador in Indonesia (The Royal Norwegian Embassy in Indonesia). In 2013, he received a Master of Laws (LL.M.) with a Summa Cum Laude predicate. In 2019 he began taking doctoral studies at the Doctoral Program in the Faculty of Law, Universitas Gadjah Mada with support from the Doctoral Program Scholarships managed by the Indonesia Endowment Fund for Education (LPDP) of the Ministry of Finance of the Republic of Indonesian. In 2023, he received a Doctor of Laws (Dr.) with a Magna Cum Laude predicate. Currently serving as an Assistant Professor of Constitutional Law at the Department of Constitutional Law, Faculty of Law Universitas Gadjah Mada, and Secretary of the Undergraduate Program of the Bachelor in Law, Faculty of Law, Universitas Gadjah Mada.

References

Asshiddiqie, Jimly. Hukum Acara Pengujian Undang-Undang. Konstitusi Press, 2006.

Asy’ari, Syukri, Meyrinda Rahmawaty Hilipito, and Mohammad Mahrus Ali. “Model Dan Implementasi Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Dalam Pengujian Undang-Undang (Studi Putusan Tahun 2003 – 2012).” Jurnal Konstitusi 10, no. 4 (2013): 675–708. https://doi.org/10.31078/jk1046.

Bar-Siman-Tov, Ittai. “Semiprocedural Judicial Review.” Legisprudence 6, no. 3 (2012): 271–300. https://doi.org/10.5235/17521467.6.3.271.

Bar-Siman-Tov, Ittai. “The Dual Meaning of Evidence-Based Judicial Review of Legislation.” Theory and Practice of Legislation 4, no. 2 (2016): 107–34. https://doi.org/10.1080/20508840.2016.1249679.

Bar-Siman-Tov, Ittai. “The Puzzling Resistance to Judicial Review of the Legislative Process.” Boston University Law Review 91, no. 6 (2011): 1915–74.

Bisariyadi. “Legal Transplant and the Model of Constitutional Court Decision.” Padjajaran Jurnal Ilmu Hukum 5, no. 1 (2018): 1–23. https://doi.org/10.22304/pjih.v5n1.a1.

Butt, Simon, and Prayekti Murharjanti. “What Constitutes Compliance? Legislative Responses to Constitutional Court Decisions in Indonesia.” International Journal of Constitutional Law 20, no. 1 (2022): 428–453. https://doi.org/10.1093/icon/moac014.

Constitutional Court of Korea. “Statistics (as of Jun 30, 2023).” Constitutional Court of Korea, 2023. https://english.ccourt.go.kr/site/eng/jurisdiction/caseLoadStatic.do.

Faiz, Pan Mohamad. “Legal Problems of Dualism of Judicial Review System in Indonesia.” Jurnal Dinamika Hukum 16, no. 2 (2016): 187–95. https://doi.org/10.20884/1.jdh.2016.16.2.535.

Fox-Decent, Evan. Sovereignty’s Promise: The State as Fiduciary. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2011.

Gardbaum, Stephen. “Pushing the Boundaries: Judicial Review of Legislative Procedures in South Africa.” Constitutional Court Review 9, no. 1 (2019): 1–18. https://doi.org/10.2989/ccr.2019.0001.

Graca, Luis Otavio Barroso da. “Judicial Review of the Legislative Process in Brazil.” UCL Journal of Law and Jurisprudence 7, no. 1 (2018): 55–81. https://doi.org/10.14324/111.2052-1871.096.

Guilds, Ryan. “A Jurisprudence of Doubt: Generalized Grievances As a Limitation to Federal Court Access.” North Carolina Law Review 74, no. 6 (1996): 1863–1911.

Ilan, Gonen. “Response: Recent Development Regarding Judicial Review of Legislative Process in Israel.” Statute Law Review 42, no. 2 (2021): 176–82. https://doi.org/10.1093/slr/hmz029.

Kapiszewski, Diana, and Matthew M. Taylor. “Compliance: Conceptualizing, Measuring, and Explaining Adherence to Judicial Rulings.” Law and Social Inquiry 38, no. 4 (2013): 803–35. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1747-4469.2012.01320.x.

Kelsen, Hans. General Theory of Law and State. Harvard University Press, 1949.

Kelsen, Hans. “Judicial Review of Legislation: A Comparative Study of the Austrian and the American Constitution.” The Journal of Politics 4, no. 2 (1942): 183–200. https://doi.org/10.2307/2125770.

Kelsen, Hans. “Wesen Und Entwicklung Der Staatsgerichtsbarkeit.” In Die Wiener Rechtstheoretische Schule. Schriften von Hans Kelsen, Adolf Merkl, Alfred Verdross, edited by Hans R. Klecatsky, Rene Marcic, and Herbert Schambeck, 1485–1532. Vienna: Verlag Österreich, 2010.

Lailam, Tanto. “Analisis Praktik Pengujian Formil Undang-Undang Terhadap Undang-Undang Dasar 1945.” Pranata Hukum 6, no. 2 (2011): 143–60. https://doi.org/10.36448/pranatahukum.v6i2.104.

Lee, Chulwoo. “The Judicialization of Politics in South Korea.” Journal of Comparative Law 11, no. 2 (2016): 100–113.

Lee, Evan Tsen, and Josephine Mason Ellis. “The Standing Doctrine’s Dirty Little Secret.” Northwestern University Law Review 107, no. 1 (2012): 169–236.

Lin, Chien-Chih. “Dialogic Judicial Review and Its Problems in East Asia.” International Journal of Constitutional Law 17, no. 2 (2019): 701–13. https://doi.org/10.1093/icon/moz044.

Mahkamah Konstitusi Republik Indonesia. “Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi,” 2023. https://www.mkri.id/index.php?page=web.Putusan&id=1&kat=1&menu=5.

Mahkamah Konstitusi Republik Indonesia. “Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi,” 2023. https://www.mkri.id/index.php?page=web.Putusan&id=1&kat=2&cari=pengujian+formil.

Mahkamah Konstitusi Republik Indonesia. Putusan Nomor 001-021-022/PUU-I/2003 perihal pengujian Undang-Undang Nomor 20 Tahun 2002 tentang Ketenagalistikan (2004).

Mahkamah Konstitusi Republik Indonesia. Putusan Nomor 012-016-019/PUU-IV/2006 perihal Pengujian Undang-Undang Nomor 30 Tahun 2002 tentang Komisi Pemberantasan Tindak Pidana Korupsi (2006).

Mahkamah Konstitusi Republik Indonesia. Putusan Nomor 058-059-060-063/PUU-II/2004 dan 008/PUU-III/2005 perihal Pengujian Undang-Undang Nomor 7 Tahun 2004 tentang Sumber Daya Air (2005).

Mahkamah Konstitusi Republik Indonesia. Putusan Nomor 22/PUU-XV/2017 perihal Pengujian Undang-Undang Nomor 1 Tahun 1974 tentang Perkawinan (2018).

Mahkamah Konstitusi Republik Indonesia. Putusan Nomor 27/PUU-VII/2009 perihal Pengujian Formil Undang-Undang Nomor 3 Tahun 2009 tentang Perubahan Atas Undang-Undang Nomor 5 Tahun 2004 tentang Perubahan Atas Undang-Undang Nomor 14 Tahun 1985 tentang Mahkamah Agung (2009).

Mahkamah Konstitusi Republik Indonesia. Putusan Nomor 27/PUU-VII/2009 perihal Pengujian Formil Undang-Undang Nomor 3 Tahun 2009 tentang Perubahan Atas Undang-Undang Nomor 5 Tahun 2004 tentang Perubahan Atas Undang-Undang Nomor 14 Tahun 1985 tentang Mahkamah Agung (2010).

Mahkamah Konstitusi Republik Indonesia. Putusan Nomor 48/PUU-IX/2011 perihal Pengujian Undang-Undang Nomor 8 Tahun 2011 perihal perubahan Undang-Undang Nomor 24 Tahun 2003 tentang Mahkamah Konstitusi dan Undang-Undang Nomor 35 Tahun 2009 tentang Narkotika (2011).

Mahkamah Konstitusi Republik Indonesia. Putusan Nomor 54/PUU-VI/2008 perihal Pengujian Undang-Undang Nomor 39 Tahun 2007 tentang Perubahan Atas Undang-Undang Nomor 11 Tahun 1995 tentang Cukai (2009).

Mahkamah Konstitusi Republik Indonesia. Putusan Nomor 80/PUU-XV/2017 perihal pengujian Undang-Undang Nomor 28 Tahun 2009 tentang Pajak Daerah dan Retribusi Daerah (2018).

Mahkamah Konstitusi Republik Indonesia. Putusan Nomor 85/PUU-XI/2013 perihal pengujian Undang-Undang Nomor 7 Tahun 2004 tentang Sumber Daya Air (2015).

Mahkamah Konstitusi Republik Indonesia. Putusan Nomor 91/PUU-XVIII/2020 perihal pengujian formil Undang-Undang Nomor 11 Tahun 2020 tentang Cipta Kerja (2021).

Mahkamah Konstitusi Republik Indonesia. Peraturan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 2 Tahun 2021 tentang Tata Beracara dalam Perkara Pengujian Undang-Undang (2021).

Mahkamah Konstitusi Republik Indonesia. Peraturan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 9 Tahun 2020 tentang Tata Beracara dalam Perkara Pengujian Undang-Undang (2020).

Mank, Bradford C. “Prudential Standing Doctrine Abolished or for a Comeback?: Lexmark International, Inc. v. Static Control Components, Inc.” University of Pennsylvania Journal of Constitutional Law 18, no. 1 (2015): 213–330.

Maulidi, Mohammad Agus. “Problematika Hukum Implementasi Putusan Final Dan Mengikat Mahkamah Konstitusi Perspektif Negara Hukum.” Jurnal Hukum IUS QUIA IUSTUM 24, no. 4 (2017): 535–57. https://doi.org/10.20885/iustum.vol24.iss4.art2.

Navot, Suzie. “Judicial Review of the Legislative Process.” Israel Law Review 39, no. 2 (2006): 182–247. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0021223700013066.

Nurhayati, Yati, Mohd Zamre Mohd Zahir, Ifrani, and Parman Komarudin. “Investment in Indonesia After Constitutional Court’s Decision in the Review of Job Creation Law.” Lentera Hukum 9, no. 3 (2022): 435–58. https://doi.org/10.19184/ejlh.v9i3.32368.

Okpaluba, Chuks. “Can a Court Review the Internal Affairs and Processes of the Legislature? Contemporary Developments in South Africa.” The Comparative and International Law Journal of Southern Africa 48, no. 2 (2015): 183–218.

Rahman, Faiz. “Anomali Penerapan Klausul Bersyarat Dalam Putusan Pengujian Undang-Undang Terhadap Undang-Undang Dasar.” Jurnal Konstitusi 17, no. 1 (2020): 27–53. https://doi.org/10.31078/jk1712.

Rahman, Faiz. “Penerapan Klausul Bersyarat Dalam Putusan Pengujian Formil Undang-Undang.” Jurnal Konstitusi 19, no. 2 (2022): 381–405. https://doi.org/10.31078/jk1926.

Rahman, Faiz, and Dian Agung Wicaksono. “Eksistensi Dan Karakteristik Putusan Bersyarat Mahkamah Konstitusi.” Jurnal Konstitusi 13, no. 2 (2016): 348–78. https://doi.org/10.31078/jk1326.

Rahman, Faiz, and Dian Agung Wicaksono. Putusan Bersyarat Oleh Mahkamah Konstitusi: (Karakteristik Dan Dinamika Perkembangannya). Gadjah Mada University Press, 2022.

Rhee, Woo-Young. “Decision of the Korean Constitutional Court of Nonconformity of Statute with the Constitution and the Subsequent National Assembly Legislative Process in Korea’s Constitutional Democracy.” Journal of Korean Law 20, no. 1 (2021): 1–55. https://doi.org/10.23110/jkl.2021.20.1.001.

Rishan, Idul. “Konsep Pengujian Formil Undang-Undang Di Mahkamah Konstitusi.” Jurnal Konstitusi 18 (2021): 1–21. https://doi.org/10.31078/jk1811.

Safa’at, Muchamad, and Aan Widiarto. “Conditional Decisions as Instrument Guarding the Supremacy of the Constitution (Analysis of Conditional Decisions of Indonesian Constitutional Court in 2003 – 2017).” Brawijaya Law Journal 8, no. 1 (2021): 91–112. https://doi.org/10.21776/ub.blj.2021.008.01.06.

Safjan, Marek. “Poland - The Constitutional Court as a Positive Legislator.” In Constitutional Courts As Positive Legislators: A Comparative Law Study, edited by Allan R. Brewer-Carías, 701–20. Cambridge University Press, 2017.

Simanjuntak, Samuel Hamonangan, and Lita Tyesta A.L.W. “Procedural Justice or Substantive Justice: Review of Constitutional Court Decision Number: 91/PUU/XVIII/2020.” Jurnal Ilmiah Kebijakan Hukum 16, no. 2 (2022): 341–62. https://doi.org/10.30641/kebijakan.2022.V16.341-362.

Soemantri, Sri. Hak Mengui Material Di Indonesia. Alumni, 1982.

Sumardjono, Maria S. W., Mahaarum Kusuma Pertiwi, Yance Arizona, Herlambang P. Wiratraman, I Gusti Agung Made Wardana, Karina Dwi Nugrahati Putri, Taufiq Adiyanto, Muhammad Fatahillah Akbar, Hendry Julian Noor, and Susilo Andi Darma. Policy Paper: Putusan MK Terkait UU Cipta Kerja. Fakultas Hukum Universitas Gadjah Mada, 2022.

Sungkar, Lailani, Wicaksana Dramanda, Susi Dwi Harijanti, and Adnan Yasar Zulfikar. “Urgensi Pengujian Formil Di Indonesia: Menguji Legitimasi Dan Validitas.” Jurnal Konstitusi 18, no. 4 (2021): 748–73. https://doi.org/10.31078/jk1842.

Tim Penyusun Hukum Acara Mahkamah Konstitusi. Hukum Acara Mahkamah Konstitusi. Sekretariat Jenderal dan Kepaniteraan Mahkamah Konstitusi, 2010.

Tim Penyusun Naskah Komprehensif. Naskah Komprehensif Perubahan Undang-Undang Dasar Negara Republik Indonesia Tahun 1945: Latar Belakang, Proses, dan Hasil Pembahasan 1999-2002 – Buku VI Kekuasaan Kehakiman (Edisi Revisi). Sekretariat Jenderal dan Kepaniteraan Mahkamah Konstitusi, 2008.

Tohadi, and Dian Eka Prastiwi. “Rekonstruksi Hukum Dalam Mewujudkan Kepatuhan Pembentuk Undang-Undang Terhadap Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Sebagai Mekanisme Checks and Balances.” Rechtsvinding 11, no. 1 (2022): 19–36. https://doi.org/10.33331/rechtsvinding.v11i1.849.

Undang-Undang Nomor 24 Tahun 2003 tentang Mahkamah Konstitusi (2003).

Vinx, Lars. The Guardian of the Constitution: Hans Kelsen and Carl Schmitt on the Limits of Constitutional Law. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2015.

Wang, Shucheng. “Judicial Review of the Legislative Process in Hong Kong: A Comparative Perspective.” Statute Law Review 42, no. 3 (2021): 291–304. https://doi.org/10.1093/slr/hmz018.

Wicaksono, Dian Agung. “Dinamika Pemberian Kedudukan Hukum Pemohon Dalam Pengujian Formil Undang-Undang Oleh Mahkamah Konstitusi (Laporan Penelitian).” Yogyakarta, 2022.

Wicaksono, Dian Agung. “Quo Vadis Pendirian Mahkamah Konstitusi Dalam Menguji Undang-Undang Cipta Kerja Dan Implikasinya Terhadap Kegamangan Pemerintah Daerah Dalam Melaksanakan Kewenangan Mengatur.” Rechtsvinding 11, no. 1 (2022): 77–98. https://doi.org/10.33331/rechtsvinding.v11i1.846.

Wicaksono, Dian Agung, and Enny Nurbaningsih. “Ratio Legis Penetapan Pembayar Pajak (Taxpayer) Sebagai Kedudukan Hukum Dalam Pengujian Undang-Undang Oleh Mahkamah Konstitusi.” Jurnal Konstitusi 17, no. 3 (2020): 461–94. https://doi.org/10.31078/jk1731.

Widiastuti, Retno, and Ahmad Ilham Wibowo. “Pola Pembuktian Dalam Putusan Pengujian Formil Undang-Undang Di Mahkamah Konstitusi.” Jurnal Konstitusi 18, no. 4 (2021): 803–27. https://doi.org/10.31078/jk1844.

Yoon, Dae-Kyu. “The Constitutional Court System of Korea: The New Road for Constitutional Adjudication.” Journal of Korean Law 1, no. 2 (2001): 1–16.

Zipper, Tzipi, and Reut Dahan. “To Review, or Not to Review? A Comparative Perspective of Judicial Review Over the Legislative Process.” The Indonesian Journal of International & Comparative Law 7, no. 3 (2020): 329–84.

Downloads

Published

2023-09-01

How to Cite

Rahman, Faiz, and Dian Agung Wicaksono. 2023. “Measuring the Compatibility of Conditional Decision in Formal Constitutional Review by the Constitutional Court: Menakar Kompatibilitas Putusan Bersyarat Dalam Pengujian Formil Undang-Undang Oleh Mahkamah Konstitusi”. Jurnal Konstitusi 20 (3):468-93. https://doi.org/10.31078/jk2036.

Issue

Vol. 20 No. 3 (2023)

Section

Articles

License

Copyright (c) 2023 Jurnal Konstitusi

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:

  1. Copyright of the published articles will be transferred to the journal as the publisher of the manuscripts. Therefore, the author confirms that the copyright has been managed by the publisher.
  2. The publisher of Jurnal Konstitusi is The Registrar and Secretariat General of the Constitutional Court of the Republic of Indonesia.
  3. The copyright follows Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License: This license allows reusers to distribute, remix, adapt, and build upon the material in any medium or format for noncommercial purposes only, and only so long as attribution is given to the creator. If you remix, adapt, or build upon the material, you must license the modified material under identical terms. 

Most read articles by the same author(s)