The Scope of Competence of the Constitutional Court in Deciding Disputes of General Election Results
Ruang Lingkup Kompetensi Mahkamah Konsititusi Memutus Perselisihan Hasil Pemilihan Umum
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.31078/jk2129Keywords:
Competence, Court, Elections, Election Results and DisputesAbstract
The 1945 Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia (UUD 1945) does not explicitly define “election result disputes.” This definition is only found in several laws and Constitutional Court (MK) Regulations, limited to the context of “vote counting errors.” This research aims to reformulate the concept of election results as an object of dispute in the MK to ensure certainty and justice for candidates and/or candidate pairs. This study uses a normative juridical research method. Elections, as an embodiment of the people’s sovereignty, result in the acquisition of votes and the determination of elected candidates and/or candidate pairs to occupy political positions in government. The resolution of election result disputes in the MK relates to objections to the validity of the vote count, both quantitatively and qualitatively. The examination of the validity of vote acquisition maps the MK’s authority into two scopes: absolute competence and relative competence. The MK’s absolute competence relates to resolving disputes over vote acquisition, while relative competence pertains to ensuring constitutionality, including adherence to election regulations by election organizers during the election stages.
References
Barak, Aharon. The Judge in a Democracy. New Jersey: Princeton University Press, 2006.
Berenschot, Ward. “Incumbent Bureaucrats: Why Elections Undermine Civil Service Reform in Indonesia.” Public Administration and Development Journal 38, no. 4 (2019): 135-43.
Dedi, Agus. “Social Contract Implementation in Election in Indonesia.” Jurnal Ilmiah Ilmu Pemerintahan 9, no. 1 (February 2023): 1–12.
Gordon, Nicole A. “The Constitutional Right to Candidacy.” Political Science Quarterly 91, no. 3 (1976): 471-87.
Hadjon, Philipus M., et al. Pengantar Hukum Administrasi Indonesia, Cetakan ke-IX. Yogyakarta: Gadjah Mada University Press, 2025.
Hamburger, Philip. Law and Judicial Duty. Cambridge, Massachusetts, and London, England: Harvard University Press, 2008.
Helmi, Zul. “Konsep Khalifah Fil Ardhi Dalam Perspektif Filsafat; Kajian Eksistensi Manusia Sebagai Khalifah.” Jurnal Intisar 24, no. 1 (2018): 37–53.
Jenniver, Graceyana. “Kedudukan Bawaslu Dalam Menangani Perselisihan Hasil Pemilu; Perspektif Electoral Dan Constitutional Democracy.” Awasia, Jurnal Pemilu Dan Demokrasi 2, no. 1 (2022).
Kasim, Helmi. “Kompatibilitas Metode Pembuktian Dan Penafsiran Hakim Konstitusi Dalam Putusan Pemilukada.” Jurnal Konstitusi 9, no. 4 (December 2012): 731-42.
Kühne, Winrich. The Role of Election in Emerging Democracies and Post-Conflict Countries: Key Issues, Lessons Learned, and Dilemmas. International Policy Analysis, Friedrich Ebert Stiftung, 2010.
Madda, Syafrijal Mughni. “Problematika Pengawasan Tindak Lanjut Putusan Bawaslu Dan DKPP Dalam Penegakan Hukum Pemilu.” Jurnal Konstitusi 19, no. 4 (2022).
Miller, Michael K. “Democratic Pieces: Autocratic Election and Democratic Development Since 1815.” British Journal of Political Science 45, no. 3 (July 2015): 504 15.
Rahman, Irfan Nur. “Politik Hukum Pengaturan Right to Vote and Right to Be Candidate Dalam Undang-Undang Pasca Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi.” Jurnal Konstitusi 10, no. 2 (June 2013): 311–30.
Republik Indonesia, Undang-Undang Dasar Negara Republik Indonesia Tahun 1945.
Republik Indonesia, Undang-Undang No. 7 Tahun 2017 tentang Pemilihan Umum.
Rohana. “Growing Leadership Spirit in Student Through the Concept of Khalifah Fill Ardhi.” Al Iltizam: Jurnal Pendidikan Agama Islam 8, no. 1 (June 2023): 66–9.
Sahid, Asep Abdul. “Political Right of Citizen in The 2014 Election and Democracy Index in West Java; The Importance to Strengthen in Accessibilities.” Politik Indonesia: Indonesia Political Science Review 3, no. 2 (July 2018): 173-175.
Satriawan, Iwan. Studi Efektifitas Penyelesaian Sengketa Hasil Pemilukada Oleh Mahkamah Konstitusi. Pusat Penelitian Dan Pengkajian Perkara Pengelolaan Tehnologi Informasi Dan Komunikasi Kepanitraan, Dan Sekretariat Jenderal Mahkamah Konstitusi Republik Indonesia, 2012.
Sunarsih, Siti. “Sistem Pemilu Proporsional Terbuka Terhadap Money Politik di Indonesia.” Al-Balad: Journal of Constitutional Law 3, no. 1 (2021): 1–10.
Thomas, E.W. The Judicial Process: Realism, Pragmatism, Practical Reasoning and Principles. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2005.
Wojtasik, Waldemar. “Functions of Elections in Democratic Style.” Political Preferences 4 (2013): 27–32.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Jurnal Konstitusi
![Creative Commons License](http://i.creativecommons.org/l/by-nc-sa/4.0/88x31.png)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Copyright of the published articles will be transferred to the journal as the publisher of the manuscripts. Therefore, the author confirms that the copyright has been managed by the publisher.
- The publisher of Jurnal Konstitusi is The Registrar and Secretariat General of the Constitutional Court of the Republic of Indonesia.
- The copyright follows Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License: This license allows reusers to distribute, remix, adapt, and build upon the material in any medium or format for noncommercial purposes only, and only so long as attribution is given to the creator. If you remix, adapt, or build upon the material, you must license the modified material under identical terms.