Penetapan Anggota Panwaslu oleh Bawaslu: Analisis Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 11/Puu-Viii/2010
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.31078/jk822Keywords:
Constitutional Court, the General Elections Commission, Supervisory Committee for the Election, the principle of checks and balancesAbstract
The Constitutional Court of Indonesia in Decision Number 11/PUU- VIII/2010 stated that the provisions regarding the recruitment of members of the Supervisory Committee for the Election must be nominated by the Provincial/District General Elections Commission is contrary to Article 22E Paragraph (1) and paragraph (5), and Article 28D Paragraphs (1) of the 1945 Constitution. Therefore, to ensure a fair legal certainty and avoid disruption of the elections, the nomination and appointment of members of Supervisory Committee for the Election is conducted by one institution, namely the General Elections Supervisory Body (Bawaslu) or Supervisory Committee for the Election. The decision contains two legal meanings. First, the view that the principle of checks and balances are not only connected with separation of power at the legislative branch, executive branch, and judiciary branch, but also the relationship between “supervisors and the supervised” that based on the proportional rationality inter-state relations. Second, the case number 11/PUU-VIII /2010 actually contain elements of the dispute between the two state institutions, namely the General Elections Commission and Bawaslu because not only related to the interpretation of norms, but also the fate of members of 192 Supervisory Committee Election that not recognized and approved by the General Elections Commission. The problem handled by Constitutional Court using judicial review case against the 1945 Constitution.
References
Buku
Arifin, Firmansyah et al. Lembaga Negara dan Sengketa Kewenangan Antarlembaga Negara. Jakarta: Konsorsium Reformasi Hukum Nasional (KRHN) dan Mahkamah Konstitusi, 2005.
Asshiddiqie, Jimly. Menuju Negara Hukum yang Demokratis. Jakarta: Setjen dan Kepaniteraan MK RI, 2008.
__________. Konstitusi dan Konstitusionalisme Indonesia. Jakarta: Mahkamah Konstitusi RI dan Pusat Studi Hukum Tata Negara FH UI, 2004.
Harjono. Transformasi Demokrasi. Jakarta: Sekretariat Jenderal dan Kepaniteraan Mahkamah Konstitusi, 2009.
Huda, Miftahul et.all. Naskah Komprehensif Perubahan Undang-Undang Dasar negara Republik Indonesia Tahun 1945; Latar Belakang, Proses, dan Hasil Pembahasan 1999-2002; Buku I Latar Belakang, Proses, dan Hasil Perubahan UUD 1945 Edisi Revisi. Jakarta: Sekretariat Jenderal dan Kepaniteraan Mahkamah Konstitusi, 2010.
Kansil, C.S.T. Christine S.T. Kansil. Hukum Tata Negara Republik Indonesia. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta, 2000.
Riyanto, Astim. Teori Konstitusi. Bandung: Yapemdo. 2009.
Soedarsono. Mahkamah Konstitusi Sebagai Pengawal Demokrasi, Penyelesaian Sengketa Hasil Pemilu 2004 Oleh Mahkamah Konstitusi. Jakarta: Setjen dan Kepaniteraan MKRI, 2004.
Zaini, Hasan. Pengantar Hukum Tata Negara Indonesia. Bandung: Alumni, 1985.
Makalah
Maruarar Siahaan, “Sengketa Kewenangan Antarlembaga Negara”. Makalah disampaikan pada Diklat Panitera Pengganti Mahkamah Konstitusi, 2008.
Laman
The International Foundation for Electoral Systems (IFES) “Laporan Evaluasi tentang Pengawas Pemilu”, (tanggal 8 April 2011)
<http://www.ifes.org/publication/83276440f271398b5f5ced92255324ae/Panwas_Evaluation_Report_Bahasa.pdf> diakses.
Putusan Pengadilan
Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 191/PHPU.D-VIII/2010.
Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 11/PUU-VIII/2010. Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 230/PHPU.D-VIII/2010. Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 3/PUU-VI/2008.
Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 21-22/PUU-V/2007 Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 004/SKLN-IV/2006 Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 005/PUU-IV/2006
Arifin, Firmansyah et al. Lembaga Negara dan Sengketa Kewenangan Antarlembaga Negara. Jakarta: Konsorsium Reformasi Hukum Nasional (KRHN) dan Mahkamah Konstitusi, 2005.
Asshiddiqie, Jimly. Menuju Negara Hukum yang Demokratis. Jakarta: Setjen dan Kepaniteraan MK RI, 2008.
__________. Konstitusi dan Konstitusionalisme Indonesia. Jakarta: Mahkamah Konstitusi RI dan Pusat Studi Hukum Tata Negara FH UI, 2004.
Harjono. Transformasi Demokrasi. Jakarta: Sekretariat Jenderal dan Kepaniteraan Mahkamah Konstitusi, 2009.
Huda, Miftahul et.all. Naskah Komprehensif Perubahan Undang-Undang Dasar negara Republik Indonesia Tahun 1945; Latar Belakang, Proses, dan Hasil Pembahasan 1999-2002; Buku I Latar Belakang, Proses, dan Hasil Perubahan UUD 1945 Edisi Revisi. Jakarta: Sekretariat Jenderal dan Kepaniteraan Mahkamah Konstitusi, 2010.
Kansil, C.S.T. Christine S.T. Kansil. Hukum Tata Negara Republik Indonesia. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta, 2000.
Riyanto, Astim. Teori Konstitusi. Bandung: Yapemdo. 2009.
Soedarsono. Mahkamah Konstitusi Sebagai Pengawal Demokrasi, Penyelesaian Sengketa Hasil Pemilu 2004 Oleh Mahkamah Konstitusi. Jakarta: Setjen dan Kepaniteraan MKRI, 2004.
Zaini, Hasan. Pengantar Hukum Tata Negara Indonesia. Bandung: Alumni, 1985.
Makalah
Maruarar Siahaan, “Sengketa Kewenangan Antarlembaga Negara”. Makalah disampaikan pada Diklat Panitera Pengganti Mahkamah Konstitusi, 2008.
Laman
The International Foundation for Electoral Systems (IFES) “Laporan Evaluasi tentang Pengawas Pemilu”, (tanggal 8 April 2011)
<http://www.ifes.org/publication/83276440f271398b5f5ced92255324ae/Panwas_Evaluation_Report_Bahasa.pdf> diakses.
Putusan Pengadilan
Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 191/PHPU.D-VIII/2010.
Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 11/PUU-VIII/2010. Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 230/PHPU.D-VIII/2010. Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 3/PUU-VI/2008.
Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 21-22/PUU-V/2007 Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 004/SKLN-IV/2006 Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 005/PUU-IV/2006
Downloads
Published
2016-05-20
How to Cite
Eddyono, Luthfi Widagdo. 2016. “Penetapan Anggota Panwaslu Oleh Bawaslu: Analisis Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 11 Puu-Viii 2010”. Jurnal Konstitusi 8 (2):23-44. https://doi.org/10.31078/jk822.
Issue
Section
Articles
License
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Copyright of the published articles will be transferred to the journal as the publisher of the manuscripts. Therefore, the author confirms that the copyright has been managed by the publisher.
- The publisher of Jurnal Konstitusi is The Registrar and Secretariat General of the Constitutional Court of the Republic of Indonesia.
- The copyright follows Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License: This license allows reusers to distribute, remix, adapt, and build upon the material in any medium or format for noncommercial purposes only, and only so long as attribution is given to the creator. If you remix, adapt, or build upon the material, you must license the modified material under identical terms.
