“Benturan Asas Nemo Judex Idoneus In Propria Causa dan Asas Ius Curia Novit” (Telaah Yuridis Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 005/ Puu-Iv/2006)

Authors

  • Yanis Maladi Dosen tetap Fakultas Hukum, Pascasarjana, Universitas Mataram

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.31078/jk721

Keywords:

Constitutional Court, Principle, Interpretation

Abstract


Constitutional court as the guardian and the interpreter of the constitution has been providing solutions to address the constitutionality issues raised by the justices, the constitutional court in this case has done a comprehensive interpretation of the relevance of procedural law Nemo judex idoneus in propria causa in this case, which in the end use of the principle of constitutional court to answer Nemo in propria causa judex idoneus irrelevant to provide clarity of the constitutional issues raised.

References

Abdul Malik,2008, “Perspektif fungsi pengawasan komisi Yudisial pasca putusan MK No.005/PUU-IV/2006”,Dalam Jurnal Konstitusi vol.6, hal.4
Achmad, Mas Santosa dan Sulaiman Sembiring, 1997, Hak Gugat Organisasi Lingkungan (Environmental Legal Standing), Jakarta ICEL
Ikhsan Rosyada Parluhutan Daulay. 2006. Mahkamah Konstitusi; Memahami Keberadaannya Dalam Sistem Ketatanegaraan Republik Indonesia. Jakarta: PT. Rineka Cipta. Hlm 25.
Jimly Asshiddiqie. 2005. Dalam Kata Pengantar buku yang berjudul Undang Undang dasar Negara Republik Indonesia tahun 1945 dan Undang undang Republik Indonesia No. 24 tahun 2003 tentang Mahkamah Konstitusi. Jakarta: Sekretariat Jenderal Mahkamah Konstitusi Republik Indonesia.
Louis Henkin, 1978.“The Rights of Man Today”, westview Press, Boulder, Colorado,
Luthfi Widagdo Eddyono,2005, “Catatan Eksplorative Perkembangan Constitutional Review”, dalam Jurnal Konstitusi Mahkamah Konstitusi Republik Indonesia, Volume 2, Nomor 1 Ni’matul Huda, 2006. Hukum Tata Negara Indonesia. Jakarta: Rajawali Press.
Vicki C. Jackson dan Mark Tushnet,1999, Comparative Constitutional Law, (New York: New York Foundation Press
Walter Murphy, Constitutional Interpretation as Constitutional Creation: The 1999-2000 Harry Eckstein Lecture, http://repositories.cdlib.org/csd/00-05. diakses tanggal 21 Januari 2010
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Judicial_interpretation. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Judicial_interpretation. http://www.usconstitution.net/consttop_intr. http://www.usconstitution.net/consttop_intr.

Downloads

Published

2016-05-20

How to Cite

Maladi, Yanis. 2016. “‘Benturan Asas Nemo Judex Idoneus In Propria Causa Dan Asas Ius Curia Novit’ (Telaah Yuridis Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 005 Puu-Iv 2006)”. Jurnal Konstitusi 7 (2):001-018. https://doi.org/10.31078/jk721.

Issue

Vol. 7 No. 2 (2010)

Section

Articles

License

Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:

  1. Copyright of the published articles will be transferred to the journal as the publisher of the manuscripts. Therefore, the author confirms that the copyright has been managed by the publisher.
  2. The publisher of Jurnal Konstitusi is The Registrar and Secretariat General of the Constitutional Court of the Republic of Indonesia.
  3. The copyright follows Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License: This license allows reusers to distribute, remix, adapt, and build upon the material in any medium or format for noncommercial purposes only, and only so long as attribution is given to the creator. If you remix, adapt, or build upon the material, you must license the modified material under identical terms.