Integrasi Konstitusional Kewenangan Judicial Review Mahkamah Konstitusi dan Mahkamah Agung
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.31078/jk1742Keywords:
Judicial Review, Constitutional Court, Supreme CourtAbstract
The separation of judicial review authority of the rules and regulation between the Supreme Court and the Constitutional Court raises many questions, what is the reason for the Reform of the 1945 Constitution to make this separation. The results of the study state that in countries that adopt the civil law system submit all judicial review authority to the MK, so that the separation of testing or judicial review that separates between the law that is the authority of the MK, and the testing of legislation under the law becomes the authority MA, is considered an awkward thing. Implications of the MK’s decision to test the legal norms of the 1945 Constitution, the scope of which may be horizontal to the same norms in the law, and vertically down to the rule of law as the implementation of the law that has been tested and stated to have no binding legal force. Conceptually the judicial review of the legislation should be under one roof. The burden of handling matters in the Supreme Court, can be a sufficient basis that the handling of judicial review under one roof system by the Constitutional Court, requires new interpretation or amendment to the 1945 Constitution, However, the conception will be difficult to realize except with the amendment of the 1945 Constitution because the divided judicial review authority is explicitly regulated in the 1945 Constitution. This will change if the MK’s decision with “courage” can give a new interpretation of the constitution, or through application of inherent/implied power jurisdiction of judicial constitutional review ”, then the granting and regulation of separate authorities made explicitly and expressively verbis in Article 24A and 24C, can be realized without demanding amendment to the 1945 Constitution concerning Article 24A paragraph (1) and Article 24C paragraph (1) of the 1945 Constitution.
References
DAFTAR PUSTAKA
Black, Henry Campbell, Black’s Law Dictionary, St. Paul. Minn, West Publishing co.
Hardjono, 2009, Legitimasi Perubahan Konstitusi, Kajian Terhadap Perubahan UUD
1945, Pustaka Pelajar.
Komnas Perempuan, Atas Nama Otonomi Daerah: Pelembagaan Diskriminasi Dalam
Tatanan Negara-Bangsa Indonesia, Laporan Pemantauan Kondisi Pemenuhan
Hak-Hak Konstitusional Perempuan di 16 Kabupaten/Kota Pada 7 Provinsi,
2012.
Komnas Perempuan, Menggugah Komitmen Negara Terhadap Perlindungan
Perempuan Korban Kekerasan – Himpunan Naskah Usulan Terhadap Rancangan
Peraturan Perundang-Undangan dan Kajian Implementasi Kebijakan, Cetakan
I, 2012
Limbach, Jutta, 2001, “The Concept of the Supremacy of the Constitution”, Modern
Law Review, Vol. 64, No. 1, Januari.
Mahkamah Agung R.I., Cetak Biru Pembaharuan Mahkamah Agung R.I.Cetak Biru
Pembaharuan Mahkamah Agung R.I. 2003
Naskah Komprehensif Perubahan Undang-Undang Dasar 1945, Latar Belakang,
Proses, dan Hasil Pembahasan, Buku I, Sekretariat Jenderal dan Kepaniteraan
Mahkamah Konstitusi, 2008
Putusan Mahkamah Agung tanggal Maret 2007 Nomor 16P/HUM/2006.
Syahrizal, Achmad, 2007, “Problematik Implementasi Putusan MK”, Jurnal Konstitusi
Volume 4 Nomor 1, Maret.
Stein, Mr. P., 1977, Compendium Van Het Burgelijke Processrecht”, 4e druk, Kluwer.
Schmitt, Carl, 2008, Constitutional Theory, translated and edited by Jeffrey Seitzer
from Vervassungs Lehre, Duke University Press.
Schwartz, Herman, 2002, The Struggle For Constitutional Justice in Post Communist
Europe.
Sekretariat Jenderal MPR R.I., Panduan Dalam Memasyarakatkan Undang-Undang
Dasar Negara Republik Indonesia Tahun 1945, Latar Belakang, Proses dan
Hasil Perubahan Undang-Undang Dasar Negara Republik Indonesia Tahun
1945 (Jakarta: Sekretariat Jenderal MPR R.I. 2003)
Tim Lindsey, 2018, “Filling The Hole in Indonesia’s Constitutional System:
Constitutional Courts And The Review of Regulations in A Split Jurisdiction”,
Constitutional Review Volume 4 Number 1 May.
Tjandra, W. Riawan, 2014, Hukum Sarana Pemerintahan, Cahaya Atma Pusaka.
Black, Henry Campbell, Black’s Law Dictionary, St. Paul. Minn, West Publishing co.
Hardjono, 2009, Legitimasi Perubahan Konstitusi, Kajian Terhadap Perubahan UUD
1945, Pustaka Pelajar.
Komnas Perempuan, Atas Nama Otonomi Daerah: Pelembagaan Diskriminasi Dalam
Tatanan Negara-Bangsa Indonesia, Laporan Pemantauan Kondisi Pemenuhan
Hak-Hak Konstitusional Perempuan di 16 Kabupaten/Kota Pada 7 Provinsi,
2012.
Komnas Perempuan, Menggugah Komitmen Negara Terhadap Perlindungan
Perempuan Korban Kekerasan – Himpunan Naskah Usulan Terhadap Rancangan
Peraturan Perundang-Undangan dan Kajian Implementasi Kebijakan, Cetakan
I, 2012
Limbach, Jutta, 2001, “The Concept of the Supremacy of the Constitution”, Modern
Law Review, Vol. 64, No. 1, Januari.
Mahkamah Agung R.I., Cetak Biru Pembaharuan Mahkamah Agung R.I.Cetak Biru
Pembaharuan Mahkamah Agung R.I. 2003
Naskah Komprehensif Perubahan Undang-Undang Dasar 1945, Latar Belakang,
Proses, dan Hasil Pembahasan, Buku I, Sekretariat Jenderal dan Kepaniteraan
Mahkamah Konstitusi, 2008
Putusan Mahkamah Agung tanggal Maret 2007 Nomor 16P/HUM/2006.
Syahrizal, Achmad, 2007, “Problematik Implementasi Putusan MK”, Jurnal Konstitusi
Volume 4 Nomor 1, Maret.
Stein, Mr. P., 1977, Compendium Van Het Burgelijke Processrecht”, 4e druk, Kluwer.
Schmitt, Carl, 2008, Constitutional Theory, translated and edited by Jeffrey Seitzer
from Vervassungs Lehre, Duke University Press.
Schwartz, Herman, 2002, The Struggle For Constitutional Justice in Post Communist
Europe.
Sekretariat Jenderal MPR R.I., Panduan Dalam Memasyarakatkan Undang-Undang
Dasar Negara Republik Indonesia Tahun 1945, Latar Belakang, Proses dan
Hasil Perubahan Undang-Undang Dasar Negara Republik Indonesia Tahun
1945 (Jakarta: Sekretariat Jenderal MPR R.I. 2003)
Tim Lindsey, 2018, “Filling The Hole in Indonesia’s Constitutional System:
Constitutional Courts And The Review of Regulations in A Split Jurisdiction”,
Constitutional Review Volume 4 Number 1 May.
Tjandra, W. Riawan, 2014, Hukum Sarana Pemerintahan, Cahaya Atma Pusaka.
Downloads
Published
2021-01-25
How to Cite
Siahaan, Maruarar. 2021. “Integrasi Konstitusional Kewenangan Judicial Review Mahkamah Konstitusi Dan Mahkamah Agung”. Jurnal Konstitusi 17 (4):729-52. https://doi.org/10.31078/jk1742.
Issue
Section
Articles
License
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Copyright of the published articles will be transferred to the journal as the publisher of the manuscripts. Therefore, the author confirms that the copyright has been managed by the publisher.
- The publisher of Jurnal Konstitusi is The Registrar and Secretariat General of the Constitutional Court of the Republic of Indonesia.
- The copyright follows Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License: This license allows reusers to distribute, remix, adapt, and build upon the material in any medium or format for noncommercial purposes only, and only so long as attribution is given to the creator. If you remix, adapt, or build upon the material, you must license the modified material under identical terms.
