Implementasi Putusan No. 27/PhPu.D-VIII/2010 Mengenai Perselisihan hasil Pemilihan umum Kepala Daerah Kabupaten Lamongan
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.31078/jk811Keywords:
Implementation, interlocutory injunction, final verdict, constitutional courtAbstract
The objection of petitioner on the recount results by the Election Commission of Lamongan on the orders of the interlocutory injunction of the Court ,was not examined further and be heard simultaneously with the Commission report on the implementation of interlocutory injunction in a hearing open to the public, and thereafter immediately the Constitutional Court considered the objection has no juridical value. The final decision then confirmed the Commission’s decision on the result of the recounting. Nonetheless, the function of the interlocutory verdict must be understood as a mechanism to prepare the final verdict. Therefore, the results of the interlocutory verdict must be heard and examined in a session open to the parties and the public, to be used as the basis for a final decision. The hearing process before the final verdict has been decide, does not end with the announcement of the interlocutory verdict. Implementation of the Constitutional Court decision on the district election dispute has been uninhibited, but in one case. Although the number is quantitatively insignificant, it is qualitatively very important as a lesson learned in that the Court is still in need to improve its performance in guarding the consolidation of democracy.
References
Maruarar Siahaan, Hukum Acara Mahkamah Konstitusi Republik Indonesia, Penerbit Konpres 2006
Undang-Undang Dasar 1945
Undang-Undang Nomor 51 tahun 2009
Undang-Undang Nomor 24 Tahun 2003 tentang Mahkamah Konstitusi Undang-Undang Nomor 9 Tahun 2002
Undang-Undang Nomor 5 Tahun 1986 Tentang Peradilan Tata Usaha Negara
Peraturan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 15 Tahun 2008 Putusan MK Nomor 27/PHPU.D-VIII/2010
Putusan MK Nomor 45/PHPU.D/VIII/2010 Putusan MK Nomor 102/PUU-VII/2009 Putusan MK Nomor 41/PHPU.D-VI/2008
Berita Acara Pengalihan antara Ketua Mahkamah Agung dan Ketua Mahkamah Konstitusi
www.id.wikipedia.org
www.tribunNews.com
www.kompas.com
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Copyright of the published articles will be transferred to the journal as the publisher of the manuscripts. Therefore, the author confirms that the copyright has been managed by the publisher.
- The publisher of Jurnal Konstitusi is The Registrar and Secretariat General of the Constitutional Court of the Republic of Indonesia.
- The copyright follows Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License: This license allows reusers to distribute, remix, adapt, and build upon the material in any medium or format for noncommercial purposes only, and only so long as attribution is given to the creator. If you remix, adapt, or build upon the material, you must license the modified material under identical terms.