Tafsir Konstitusional Pengujian Peraturan di Bawah Undang-Undang

Authors

  • Inna Junaenah Fakultas Hukum Universitas Padjadjaran

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.31078/jk1332

Keywords:

Constitutional Interpretation, Review, Regulation

Abstract

Particular problem in judicial review frequently found is there a contradiction between the subsidiary legislation and the constitution. Unfortunately, in several Supreme Court verdict on judicial review, there is no usage of constitutional interpretation on their legal reasoning. However within domain of Supreme Court authority, constitution is not the touchstone, but constitution perspective must be included to maintain consistency of legislation hierarchy. There are two reasons on that posibilities, first the approximation of constitutional review by the court and second, the consequences of Indonesian’s legal system that implementing legislation hierarchy. Responsibility as the guardian of constitution not only applied on Constitutional Court, but on all the state institutions including every citizen. In the context of guarding consistency of legislation hierarchy, Supreme Court might also develop constitutional interpretation in order to ensure conformity regulations that is examined to the constitution. In addition, meaning of the constitution can be developed by a judge that can be found in accordance with contextuality. The perspective is assessed to highlight more detailed the mapping of the use of constitutional interpretation on Judicial Review in supreme court post amandment of Constitution of Republic Indonesia 1945. This article formulatesthe notion of constitutional interpretation on Judicial Review. Within this concept, will be prepared by the use of mapping of constitutional interpretation on Judicial Review in supreme court post amandment of Constitution of Republic Indonesia 1945. Thus this research was intended to make the judge use constitutional interpretation. Of course if the recommendations are applied, it can be achieved not instantly in a short time. With the use of Constitutional interpretation on Judicial review in supreme court, the constitutionallity can be reflected later on legislation hierarchy as a whole legal system.

References

Jimly Asshiddiqie, 2006, Hukum Acara Pengujian Undang-Undang, Jakarta: Konstitusi Press.
Kelsen, Hans, 2006,The General Theory of Law and State, with a new introduction by A. Javier Trevino, New Brunswick (USA) and London (UK): Transaction Publishers.
Jimly Ashiddiqie dan M. Ali Safa’at, 2006, TeoriHans Kelsen tentang Hukum, Jakarta: Konstitusi Press.
Kelsen, Hans., 2006, The General Theory of Law and State, with a new introduction by A. Javier Trevino, New Brunswick (USA) and London (UK): Transaction Publishers.
Motala,Ziyad.& Ramaphosa, Cyril.,2002, Constitutional Law Analysis and Cases, Cape Town: Oxford University Press Southern Africa.
Whittington, Keith E.,1999, Constitutional Interpretation, Textual Meaning, Original Intent,and Judicial Review, Kansas: University Press of Kansas.
Zainal Arifin Hosein, 2009, Judicial Review di Mahkamah Agung Republik Indonesia, Jakarta: Rajawali Press.

Produk Hukum
Undang-Undang Dasar 1945 Perubahan
Undang-Undang Republik Indonesia Nomor 14 Tahun 1985 Tentang Mahkamah Agung
Undang-Undang Republik Indonesia Nomor 24 Tahun 2003
Undang-Undang Republik Indonesia Nomor 4 Tahun 2004 tentang Kekuasaan Kehakiman
Undang-Undang Republik Indonesia Nomor 3 Tahun 2009 tentang Mahkamah Agung
Undang-Undang Republik Indonesia Nomor 48 Tahun 2009 tentang Kekuasaan Kehakiman
Undang-Undang Republik Indonesia Nomor 12 Tahun 2011 tentang Pembentukan Peraturan Perundang-undangan.
Undang-Undang Republik Indonesia Nomor 8 Tahun 2011 tentang Perubahan
Undang-Undang Nomor 24 Tahun 2003 tentang Mahkamah Konstitusi.
Peraturan Mahkamah Agung Nomor 1 Tahun 2011 tentang Hak Uji Materiil.
Peraturan Mahkamah Agung 1 Tahun 2011 tentang Hak Uji Materiil
Risalah Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor30/PUU-XIII/2015
Keputusan Ketua Mahkamah Agung Nomor: 144/KMA/SKNIII/2007 Tentang Keterbukaan Informasi di Pengadilan

Sumber Lain
Achmad dan Mulyanto, “Problematika Pengujian Peraturan Perundang-undangan (Judicial Review) Pada Mahkamah Agung dan Mahkamah Konstitusi”, Jurnal Yustisia, Edisi 85 Januari-April 2013.
Ashadi, Panitera Muda Tata Usaha Negara Mahkamah Agung Republik Indonesia.
Bagir Manan, Beberapa Catatan tentang Penafsiran, makalah, disampaikan pada workshop yang diselenggarakan Direktorat Jenderal Perundang-undangan, Departemen Hukum Hak Asasi Manusia, Jakarta, 20 April 2009.
Fajar, Keterangan seorang Staf di Panitera Muda Tata Usaha Negara Mahkamah Agung, Jakarta, 4 November 2015.
http://putusan.mahkamahagung.go.id/pengadilan/mahkamah-agung/direktori/tun/hak-uji-materiil/index-7.html, pada tanggal 15/11/2015 12:59:09
Kepaniteraan dan Kesekretariatan Jenderal Mahkamah Konstitusi Republik Indonesia, Model dan Impelementasi Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi dalam Pengujian Undang-Undang (Studi Putusan Tahun 2003-2012), Jakarta: Pusat Penelitian dan Pengkajian Perkara, Pengelolaan Teknologi Informasi dan Komunikasi Kepaniteraan dan Sekretariat Jenderal Mahkamah Konstitusi Republik Indonesia, 2013.
Lili Rasjidi dan Liza Sonia Rasjidi, Menggunakan Teori dan Konsep Dalam Analisis di Bidang Ilmu Hukum, Monograf, penerbit, kota, dan tahun penerbitan tidak tercantum.
Rahayu Prasetianingsih,”Penafsiran Konstitusi oleh Mahkamah Konstitusi Menuju Keadilan Substantif”, Jurnal Konstitusi, PSKN-FH Universitas Padjadjaran, Volume III No. 1 Juni 2011.

Published

2016-11-22

How to Cite

Junaenah, Inna. 2016. “Tafsir Konstitusional Pengujian Peraturan Di Bawah Undang-Undang”. Jurnal Konstitusi 13 (3):503-29. https://doi.org/10.31078/jk1332.

Issue

Section

Articles