Telaah Putusan MK dalam Sengketa PHPU Pilpres 2004 (Perspektif Negara Demokrasi Konstitusional)

Authors

  • Rahman Yasin Direktur Bidang Kajian PolitikHukum di Lembaga Studi Pembangunan Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.31078/jk1143

Keywords:

Decision, Constitutional Court, Democracy

Abstract


This paper aims to examine the extent of the impact of the decision of the Constitutional Court of the Republic of Indonesia No. 1/PHPU.PRES-XII/2014 related PHPU 2014 presidential election dispute  in relation to  the  strengthening  of the constitutional legitimacy of the democratic state based on law and the constitution. Constitutional Court Decision No. 1/PHPU.PRES-XII/2014 gives importance to the development of our constitutional democratic system of government in the modern era. The Constitutional Court’s decision gives the meaning of democracy in a substantial sense of justice substantive. As a state agency to maintain and oversee the constitution, the Constitutional Court has been performing its functions and powers under the provisions of Section 24C of the 1945 Constitution and Law No. 24 of 2003 on the Constitutional Court. The Constitutional Court is a high state institution that is authorized through Section 24C of the 1945 Constitution, which is the authority to hear at the first and last are the final and binding nature of the decision, which among other things PHPU deciding the case, and based on Law No. 24 of 2003 as amended by Law Law No. 8 of 2011 concerning Amendment to Law Number 24 of 2003 on the Constitutional Court, and Article 29 paragraph (1) letter d Act No. 48 of 2009 on Judicial Power of the Constitutional Court, in essence the same, which is authorized to hear at the The first and last are the final and binding nature of the decision, including the case PHPU. In this sense the decision of the Constitutional Court put an end to various political opposition including the closing of all the dynamics of the political interpretation of the law that developed in the community.

References

Asshiddiqie, Jimly, 2008. Menegakkan Tiang Konstitusi, Sekretariat Jenderal dan Kepaniteraan Mahkamah Konstitusi: Jakarta.
_______, 2011. Peradilan Konstitusi di 10 Negara, Sinar Grafika: Jakarta.
_______, 2012. Prinsip-Prinsip Negara Hukum Indonesia, dalam (et al.), Muhammad Tahir Azhary, Beberapa Aspek Hukum Tata Negara, Hukum Pidana, dan Hukum Islam: Menyambut 73 Tahun Prof. Dr. H. Muhammad Tahir Azhary, Kencana: Jakarta.
Fauzi Achmad, Abdillah, 2012. Tata Kelola Bernegara dalam Perspektif Politik, Golden Terayon Press: Jakarta.
Hartono, M. Dimyati, 2007. Landasan Berpikir dan Strategi Perjuangan Gerakan Politik: Restorasi Amandemen UUD 1945, Era Global Publisher: Jakarta.
Ismatullah, Dedi, 2009. Hukum Tata Negara: Refleksi Kehidupan Ketatanegaraan Di Negara Republik Indonesia, Pustaka Setia: Bandung.
Mahfud MD, Moh, 2012. Konstitusi dan Hukum dalam Kontroversi Isu, RajaGrafindo Persada: Jakarta.
Martosoegwignyo, Sri Soemantri,1986. Masalah Kedaulatan Rakyat Berdasarkan UUD 1945, dalam (ed)., Padmo Wahjono, Masalah Ketatanegaraan Indonesia Dewasa Ini, Ghalia Indonesia: Jakarta.
Strong, C.F., 2008.Modern Political Constitution: An Introduction to the Comparative Study of Their History and Existing Form, dalam (terj.), SPA Teamwork, Konstitusi-Konstitusi Politik Modern: Studi Perbandingan tentang Sejarah dan Bentuk-Bentuk Konstitusi Dunia, Nusa Media: Bandung.
Wahjono, Padmo, “Indonesia ialah Negara yang Berdasarkan Atas Hukum”,Naskah Pidato Pengukuhan Jabatan Guru Besar pada Fakultas Hukum Universitas Indonesia, Jakarta: Universitas Indonesia, 17 November 1979.
_______, Masalah Ketatanegaraan Indonesia Dewasa Ini, Ghalia Indonesia, Jakarta.
Zoelva, Hamdan, 2012. Mahkamah Konstitusi dan Masa Depan Negara Hukum Demokrasi Indonesia, dalam (et al.), Muhammad Tahir Azhary, Beberapa Aspek Hukum Tata Negara, Hukum Pidana, dan Hukum Islam, Kencana: Jakarta.
_______, “Memaknai Demokrasi Kita”, Buku Khutbah Idul Fitri 1435 H/2014 M, di Masjid Agung Al Azhar, Kebayoran Jakarta Selatan, Hari Senin tanggal 28 Juli 2014.

Downloads

Published

2016-05-20

How to Cite

Yasin, Rahman. 2016. “Telaah Putusan MK Dalam Sengketa PHPU Pilpres 2004 (Perspektif Negara Demokrasi Konstitusional)”. Jurnal Konstitusi 11 (4):650-70. https://doi.org/10.31078/jk1143.

Issue

Section

Articles

Similar Articles

1 2 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.