The Proposal of Constitutional Complaint for the Indonesian Constitutional Court
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.31078/jk1939Keywords:
Complaints, Constitutional, Constitutional Court, Opportunity, Problem, ProposalAbstract
The research focuses on the proposal of a Constitutional Complaint for the Indonesian Constitutional Court. The background causes of the constitutional weakness to protection and fulfilment of constitutional rights, especially the absence of a Constitutional Complaint mechanism. Research methods used normative legal research methods with statutory, analytical, and case approaches. The study results show that legal thinking, including an embodiment of the values of constitutionalism in the rule of law of Pancasila, complements a checks and balances system, the basis for protecting fundamental rights, and aims to realize good governance. There are several steps/ methods to giving this authority, amendments to the 1945 Constitution, non-original interpretations, and revision of the Constitutional Court Act. Several objects of dispute are the Court’s verdict, the problems of interpreting the 1945 Constitution and law by a state official, People Consultative Assembly decisions, and others.
References
Books
Asshiddiqie, Jimly. Konstitusi dan Konstitusionalisme Indonesia. Jakarta: Konstitusi Press, 2005.
Palguna, I Dewa Gede. Pengaduan Konstitusional (Constitutional Complaint): Upaya Hukum terhadap Pelanggaran Hak-hak Konstitusional Warga Negara. Jakarta: Sinar Grafika, 2013.
Lailam, Tanto. Pertentangan Norma Hukum dalam Pratik Pengujian Undang-undang di Indonesia. Yogyakarta: LP3M UMY, 2015.
Journals
Butt, Simon. “The Indonesian Constitutional Court: Reconfiguring Decentralization for Better or Worse?.” Asian Journal of Comparative Law 14, No. 1 (2019): 147-174. https://doi.org/10.1017/asjcl.2018.19.
Goldmann, M., “The European Economic Constitution After the PSPP Judgment: Towards Integrative Liberalism?”. German Law Journal Vol. 21 (5), (2020): 1058-1077. https://doi.org/10.1017/glj.2020.64
Marzuki, Laica.,“Uji Konstitusionalitas Peraturan Perundang-Undangan Negara Kita: Masalah dan Tantangan”. Jurnal Konstitusi, Volume 7, Nomor 4, Agustus 2010: 9-47. https://doi.org/10.31078/jk742.
Chakim, M. Luthfi., “A Comparative Perspective on Constitutional Complaint: Discussing Models, Procedures, and Decisions”. Constitutional Review, Volume 5, Number 1, May 2019: 96-133. https://doi.org/10.31078/consrev514.
Faiz, Pan Muhammad. “A Prospect and Challenges for Adopting Constitutional Complaint and Constitutional Question in the Indonesian Constitutional Court.” Constitutional Review, 2(1), 2016:103-128. https://doi.org/10.31078/consrev215.
Karim, Said. Baharuddin Badaru, Askari Razak, Sukmawati., “The Essence of Law Enforcement for Corruption in West Sulawesi,” IOSR Journal of Humanities and Social Science (IOSR-JHSS) Volume 24, Issue 6, Ser. 3 (June. 2019): 10-14 https://doi.org/10.9790/0837-2406031014 .
Lailam, Tanto. “Penataan Kelembagaan Pengujian Norma Hukum di Indonesia.” Jurnal Konstitusi, Volume 15, Nomor 1, (Maret 2018): 206-230. https://doi.org/10.31078/jk15110
Lailam, Tanto. “Membangun Constitutional Morality Hakim Konstitusi di Indonesia.” Jurnal Penelitian Hukum De Jure Volume 20, Nomor 4, (Desember 2020): 511-530. https:..dx.doi.org/10.30641/dejure.2020.V20.
Lailam, Tanto. “Problem dan Solusi Penataan Checks and Balances System dalam Pembentukan dan Pengujian Undang-Undang di Indonesia.” Jurnal Negara Hukum, Vol. 12, No. 1, (Juni 2021): https://doi.org/10.22212/jnh.v12i1.1721.
Lailam, Tanto. “Peran Mahkamah Konstitusi Federal Jerman Dalam Perlindungan Hak Fundamental Warga Negara Berdasarkan Kewenangan Pengaduan Konstitusional,” Jurnal Hak Asasi Manusia Volume 13, Nomor 1, (April 2022): 65-80. https://doi.org/10.30641/ham.2022.
Palguna, I Dewa Gede. “Constitutional Complaint and the Protection of Citizens the Constitutional Rights.” Constitutional Review Volume 3 No.1(Juni 2017): 1-23. https:doi.org/10.31078/consrev311.
Poli, S., & Cisotta, R. “The German Federal Constitutional Court’s Exercise Of Ultra Vires Review And The Possibility To Open An Infringement Action For The Commission.” German Law Journal, 21(5) (2020): 1078-1089. https://doi.org/10.1017/glj.2020.57.
Subiyanto, Achmad Edi. “Perlindungan Hak Konstitusional Melalui Pengaduan Konstitusional.” Jurnal Konstitusi, Volume 8, Nomor 5, (Oktober 2011): 707-731. https://doi.org/10.31078/jk854.
Siahaan, Maruarar. “Integrasi Konstitusional Kewenangan Judicial Review Mahkamah Konstitusi dan Mahkamah Agung.” Jurnal Konstitusi, Volume 17, Nomor 4, (Desember 2020):729-732. https://doi.org/10.31078/jk1742.
Zoelva, Hamdan. “Constitutional Complaint dan Constitutional Question dan Perlindungan Hak-Hak Konstitusional Warga Negara.“ Jurnal Media Hukum, Volume 19, Nomor 1 (2012): 153-165. https://doi.org/10.18196/jmh.v19i1.1984.
Dissertation
Faiz, Pan Mohamad. “The Role of the Constitutional Court in Securing Constitutional Government in Indonesia.” (Australia, Dissertation University of Queensland, 2016).
Court Decisions
Germany. Bundesverfassungsgericht Order No 1 BvR 2656/18, 1 BvR 96/20, 1 BvR 78/20, 1 BvR 288/20, 1 BvR 96/20, 1 BvR 78/20 on Constitutional Complaint against the Federal Climate Change Act.
Indonesia. Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi No.001/PUU-IV/2006 perihal pengujian Undang-undang Nomor 32 Tahun 2004 tentang Pemerintahan Daerah.
____________. Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi No.013-022/PUU-IV/2006 perihal Pengujian Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Pidana.
___________. Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi No.21/PUU-VI/2008 perihal Pengujian Undang-undang No.2/PNPS/1964 tentang Tata Cara Pelaksanaan Pidana Mati.
____________. Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi No.110-111-112-113/PUU-VII/2009 perihal Pengujian Undang-undang No.10 Tahun 2008 tentang Pemilihan Umum.
___________. Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi No.133/PUU-VII/2009 perihal Pengujian Undang-undang No.30 Tahun 2002 tentang Komisi Pemberantasan Korupsi.
____________. Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi No No.28/PUU-XVII/2019 perihal pengujian Undang-Undang Nomor 48 Tahun 2009 tentang Kekuasaan Kehakiman.
Internet
“Constitutional Complaint” https://www.ecchr.eu/en/glossary/constitutional-complaint. Accessed on June 5th 2021.
Asshiddiqie, Jimly. Konstitusi dan Konstitusionalisme Indonesia. Jakarta: Konstitusi Press, 2005.
Palguna, I Dewa Gede. Pengaduan Konstitusional (Constitutional Complaint): Upaya Hukum terhadap Pelanggaran Hak-hak Konstitusional Warga Negara. Jakarta: Sinar Grafika, 2013.
Lailam, Tanto. Pertentangan Norma Hukum dalam Pratik Pengujian Undang-undang di Indonesia. Yogyakarta: LP3M UMY, 2015.
Journals
Butt, Simon. “The Indonesian Constitutional Court: Reconfiguring Decentralization for Better or Worse?.” Asian Journal of Comparative Law 14, No. 1 (2019): 147-174. https://doi.org/10.1017/asjcl.2018.19.
Goldmann, M., “The European Economic Constitution After the PSPP Judgment: Towards Integrative Liberalism?”. German Law Journal Vol. 21 (5), (2020): 1058-1077. https://doi.org/10.1017/glj.2020.64
Marzuki, Laica.,“Uji Konstitusionalitas Peraturan Perundang-Undangan Negara Kita: Masalah dan Tantangan”. Jurnal Konstitusi, Volume 7, Nomor 4, Agustus 2010: 9-47. https://doi.org/10.31078/jk742.
Chakim, M. Luthfi., “A Comparative Perspective on Constitutional Complaint: Discussing Models, Procedures, and Decisions”. Constitutional Review, Volume 5, Number 1, May 2019: 96-133. https://doi.org/10.31078/consrev514.
Faiz, Pan Muhammad. “A Prospect and Challenges for Adopting Constitutional Complaint and Constitutional Question in the Indonesian Constitutional Court.” Constitutional Review, 2(1), 2016:103-128. https://doi.org/10.31078/consrev215.
Karim, Said. Baharuddin Badaru, Askari Razak, Sukmawati., “The Essence of Law Enforcement for Corruption in West Sulawesi,” IOSR Journal of Humanities and Social Science (IOSR-JHSS) Volume 24, Issue 6, Ser. 3 (June. 2019): 10-14 https://doi.org/10.9790/0837-2406031014 .
Lailam, Tanto. “Penataan Kelembagaan Pengujian Norma Hukum di Indonesia.” Jurnal Konstitusi, Volume 15, Nomor 1, (Maret 2018): 206-230. https://doi.org/10.31078/jk15110
Lailam, Tanto. “Membangun Constitutional Morality Hakim Konstitusi di Indonesia.” Jurnal Penelitian Hukum De Jure Volume 20, Nomor 4, (Desember 2020): 511-530. https:..dx.doi.org/10.30641/dejure.2020.V20.
Lailam, Tanto. “Problem dan Solusi Penataan Checks and Balances System dalam Pembentukan dan Pengujian Undang-Undang di Indonesia.” Jurnal Negara Hukum, Vol. 12, No. 1, (Juni 2021): https://doi.org/10.22212/jnh.v12i1.1721.
Lailam, Tanto. “Peran Mahkamah Konstitusi Federal Jerman Dalam Perlindungan Hak Fundamental Warga Negara Berdasarkan Kewenangan Pengaduan Konstitusional,” Jurnal Hak Asasi Manusia Volume 13, Nomor 1, (April 2022): 65-80. https://doi.org/10.30641/ham.2022.
Palguna, I Dewa Gede. “Constitutional Complaint and the Protection of Citizens the Constitutional Rights.” Constitutional Review Volume 3 No.1(Juni 2017): 1-23. https:doi.org/10.31078/consrev311.
Poli, S., & Cisotta, R. “The German Federal Constitutional Court’s Exercise Of Ultra Vires Review And The Possibility To Open An Infringement Action For The Commission.” German Law Journal, 21(5) (2020): 1078-1089. https://doi.org/10.1017/glj.2020.57.
Subiyanto, Achmad Edi. “Perlindungan Hak Konstitusional Melalui Pengaduan Konstitusional.” Jurnal Konstitusi, Volume 8, Nomor 5, (Oktober 2011): 707-731. https://doi.org/10.31078/jk854.
Siahaan, Maruarar. “Integrasi Konstitusional Kewenangan Judicial Review Mahkamah Konstitusi dan Mahkamah Agung.” Jurnal Konstitusi, Volume 17, Nomor 4, (Desember 2020):729-732. https://doi.org/10.31078/jk1742.
Zoelva, Hamdan. “Constitutional Complaint dan Constitutional Question dan Perlindungan Hak-Hak Konstitusional Warga Negara.“ Jurnal Media Hukum, Volume 19, Nomor 1 (2012): 153-165. https://doi.org/10.18196/jmh.v19i1.1984.
Dissertation
Faiz, Pan Mohamad. “The Role of the Constitutional Court in Securing Constitutional Government in Indonesia.” (Australia, Dissertation University of Queensland, 2016).
Court Decisions
Germany. Bundesverfassungsgericht Order No 1 BvR 2656/18, 1 BvR 96/20, 1 BvR 78/20, 1 BvR 288/20, 1 BvR 96/20, 1 BvR 78/20 on Constitutional Complaint against the Federal Climate Change Act.
Indonesia. Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi No.001/PUU-IV/2006 perihal pengujian Undang-undang Nomor 32 Tahun 2004 tentang Pemerintahan Daerah.
____________. Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi No.013-022/PUU-IV/2006 perihal Pengujian Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Pidana.
___________. Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi No.21/PUU-VI/2008 perihal Pengujian Undang-undang No.2/PNPS/1964 tentang Tata Cara Pelaksanaan Pidana Mati.
____________. Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi No.110-111-112-113/PUU-VII/2009 perihal Pengujian Undang-undang No.10 Tahun 2008 tentang Pemilihan Umum.
___________. Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi No.133/PUU-VII/2009 perihal Pengujian Undang-undang No.30 Tahun 2002 tentang Komisi Pemberantasan Korupsi.
____________. Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi No No.28/PUU-XVII/2019 perihal pengujian Undang-Undang Nomor 48 Tahun 2009 tentang Kekuasaan Kehakiman.
Internet
“Constitutional Complaint” https://www.ecchr.eu/en/glossary/constitutional-complaint. Accessed on June 5th 2021.
Downloads
Published
2022-08-30
How to Cite
Lailam, Tanto, Putri Anggia, and Irwansyah Irwansyah. 2022. “The Proposal of Constitutional Complaint for the Indonesian Constitutional Court”. Jurnal Konstitusi 19 (3):693-719. https://doi.org/10.31078/jk1939.
Issue
Section
Articles
License
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Copyright of the published articles will be transferred to the journal as the publisher of the manuscripts. Therefore, the author confirms that the copyright has been managed by the publisher.
- The publisher of Jurnal Konstitusi is The Registrar and Secretariat General of the Constitutional Court of the Republic of Indonesia.
- The copyright follows Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License: This license allows reusers to distribute, remix, adapt, and build upon the material in any medium or format for noncommercial purposes only, and only so long as attribution is given to the creator. If you remix, adapt, or build upon the material, you must license the modified material under identical terms.
