Konsep Pengujian Formil Undang-Undang di Mahkamah Konstitusi

Authors

  • Idul Rishan FH UII

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.31078/jk1811

Keywords:

Constitutional Court, Judicial Review of Legislative Process

Abstract


This study focuses on the concept of judicial review of the legislative process in the Constitutional Court. There are two research objectives to be obtained. First, the reasons for the need for judicial review of the legislative process in the Constitutional Court. Second, to offer the concept of judicial review of the legislative process in the Constitutional Court. This doctrinal legal research uses secondary data. The results of this research show that there were three factual reasons for the need for judicial review of the legislative process in the Constitutional Court. First, related to the reasons for the conception of the review. Second, the development of democracy. Third, the need for praxis. The results of this research refute the perception that judicial review of the legislative process does not have an obvious coordinate point under the constitution. Using the Rubenfeld approach, the constitution also accommodates the protection of the citizens’ constitutional rights in the due process of law-making.

References

Buku:
Asshidiqqie, Jimly, 2006, Hukum Acara Pengujian Undang-Undang, Jakarta, Konpress.
Asshidiqqie, Jimly, 2006, Model-Model Pengujian Konstitusional di Berbagai Negara, Jakarta, Konpress.
Asshidiqqie, Jimly, 2007, Pokok-Pokok Hukum Tata Negara Indonesia-Pasca Reformasi, Jakarta, Bhuana Ilmu Populer (BIP).
Asshidiqqie, Jimly, 2010, Perihal Undang-Undang, Jakarta, Rajawali Press.
Barak, Aharon, 2006, The Judge in a Democracy. Oxford: Princeton University Press.
Buyung, Adnan Nasution, 1995, Aspirasi Pemerintahan Konstitusional di Indonesia: Studi Sosio Legal atas Konstituante 1956-1959, Jakarta, Pustaka Utama Grafiti.
Bobbitt, Philip, 1982, Constitutional Fate, Theory of Constitution, New York, Oxford University Press.
Carolan, Eoin, 2009, The New Saparation of Powers: Theory For The Modern State, New York, Oxford University Press.
Chomsky, Noam, 2016, How The World Works, Bandung, Mizan Media Utama.
Dworkin, Ronald, 1996, Freedom’s Law: A Moral Reading of the American Constitution, Cambridge, Harvard University Press.
Fallon, H. Richard 2004, The Dynamic Constitution: An Introduction to American Constitutional Law, New York, Cambridge University Press.
Gerhard van der Schyff, 2010, Judicial Review of Legislation: Comparative Study of United Kingdom, Netherlands, and South Africa, New York, Springer Publishing.
Ginsburg, Tom, 2003, Judicial Review in new Democracies:Constitutional Court in Asian Case, Cambridge University Press.
Holland, A. James and Webb, S. Julian, 1991, Learning Legal Rules, Britain, Blackstone Limited.
Holland, M. Kenneth, 1991, Judicial Activism in Comparative Perspective, New York, Martin’s Press.
Indrayana, Denny, 2007, Amandemen UUD 1945; Antara Mitos dan Pembongkaran, Bandung, Mizan.
Levitsky Steven, dan Ziblatt, Daniel, 2018, How Democracies Die, Jakarta, Kompas Gramedia.
Lev, S. Daniel, 2013, Hukum dan Politik di Indonesia, Kesinambungan dan Perubahan, Jakarta, Cetakan Ketiga LP3ES.
Masterman, Roger, 2011, The Separation of Power in The Contemporary Constitution, New York, Cambridge University Press.
Najib, Muhammad, 2019, Jalan Demokrasi: Pengalaman Indonesia, Turki dan Mesir, Jakarta, Republika.
Naskah Komperhensif Buku (VI) Perubahan UUD 1945, 2010, “Risalah Perubahan Kekuasaan Kehakiman”, Jakarta, Sekretariat Jendral dan Kepaniteraan Mahkamah Konstitusi.
Oliver A. Daniel Lalana, “Legislative Deliberation and Judicial Review: Between Respect and Disrespect for Elected Lawmakers”, Conception and Misconception of Legislation, Legisprudence Library, Studies on the Theory and Practice of Legislation Volume 5, 2019, Springer Publishing.
Palguna, I Dewa Gede, 2013, Pengaduan Konstitusional: Upaya Hukum Terhadap Pelanggaran Hak-Hak Warga Negara, Jakarta, Sinar Grafika.
Palguna, I Dewa Gede, 2018, Mahkamah Konstitusi: Dasar Pemikiran, Kewenangan, dan Perbandingan Dengan Negara Lain, Konpress, Jakarta.
Rubenfeld, Jed, 2001, Freedom and Time: Theory of Constitutional Self Government, London, Yale University Press.
Rubenfeld, Jed,2005, Revolution by Judiciary The Structure of American Constitutional Law, Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Soemantri, Sri, 1986, Hak Menguji Material di Indonesia, Bandung, Penerbit Alumni.
Soemantri, Sri, 2014, Hukum Tata Negara Indonesia: Pemikiran dan pandangan, Bandung, Rosdakarya.
Strauss A. David, 2010, The Living Constitution, New York, Oxford University Press.
Suseno, Frans Magnis, 2016, Etika Politik, Jakarta, Gramedia.
Thusnet, Mark, 2014, Advanced Introduction Comparative Constitutional Law, United State America, Edward Elgar Publishing.
Wintgens, J. Luc, 2012, Legisprudence Practical Reason In Legislation, Union Road England, Ashgate publishing Limited.
Zurn F. Christopher, 2007, Deliberative Democracy and the Institutions of Judicial Review, New York, Cambridge University Press.
Jurnal:
Ali, Mahrus Mohammad, 2015, “Konstitusionalitas dan Legalitas Norma dalam Pengujian Undang- Undang Terhadap Undang-Undang Dasar 1945”, Jurnal Konstitusi, Volume 12, Nomor 1, Maret.
Asshidiqqie, Jimly, 2004, “Mahkamah Konstitusi dan Pengujian Undang-Undang” Jurnal Ius Quia Iustum Nomor 27 Volume 11 September.
Isra, Saldi, 2014, “Peran Mahkamah Konstitusi dalam Penguatan Hak Asasi Manusia Di Indonesia”Jurnal Konstitusi, Volume 11, Nomor 3, September.
Isra, Saldi, 2015, “Titik Singgung Wewenang Mahkamah Agung dan Mahkamah Konstitusi”, Jurnal Hukum dan Peradilan, Volume 4, Nomor 1 Maret.
Mochtar, Zainal Arifin, 2015, “Antinomi dalam Peraturan Perundang-undangan di Indonesia” Hasanuddin Law Review Vol. 1 Issue 3, December.
Palguna, I Dewa Gede, 2010, “Constitutional Question: Latar Belakang dan Praktik Di Negara Lain Serta Kemungkinan Penerapannya Di Indonesia”, JURNAL HUKUM Ius Quia Iustum, No. 1 Vol. 17 Januari.
Putra, Antoni, 2018, “Dualisme Pengujian Peraturan Perundang-undangan”, Jurnal Legislasi Vol 15 No.2, Juli.
Satriawan, Iwan, dan Lailam, Tanto, 2019, “Open Legal Policy dalam Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi dan Pembentukan Undang-Undang”, Jurnal Konstitusi, Volume 16, Nomor 3, September.
Soeroso, Fajar Laksono, 2013, “Pembangkangan Terhadap Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi” Jurnal Yudisial Vol. 6 No. 3 Desember.
Strauss A. David, 2011, “Do We Have a Living Constitution?” Drake Law Review, Volume 59 Nomor 4.
Penelitian, Makalah & Artikel:
Arjomand, Said Amir, 2007, “Constitutional Development and Political Reconstruction From Nation Building to New Constitutionalism” Procedings Constitutionalism and Political Reconstruction, Volume 14, Brill, Leiden.
Isra, Saldi, 2010, “Purifikasi Proses Legislasi Melalui Pengujian Undang-Undang”, Pidato Pengukuhan sebagai Guru Besar Tetap dalam Bidang Ilmu Hukum Tata Negara pada Fakultas Hukum Universitas Andalas, Padang, 11 Februari.
Isra, Saldi, 2020, “Melepas Hakim Palguna”, Opini Harian Media Indonesia, 7 Januari.
Irianto, Sulistiyowati, 2020, “Pendidikan Hukum Untuk Masa Depan Indonesia: Sebuah Catatan Kritis”, Makalah Pada Orasi Ilmiah Sulistyowati Irianto Dies Natalis FH UGM ke-74, Yogyakarta, Februari.
Irianto, Sulistiyowati, 2019, “Reformasi Hukum Untuk Siapa?”, Opini Harian Kompas, 9 Oktober.
Rilis Survei Lembaga Survei Indonesia, 2019, “Kepercayaan Publik Terhadap Lembaga Negara”, Agustus, Jakarta.
Teitel, Ruti, 2011, “Transitional justice and the Transformation of Constitutionalism” Reseacrch Handbook in Comparative Constitutional Law, Edited by Tom Ginsburg and Rosalind Dixon, Edward Elgar Publishing, USA.
Wiratraman, P. Airlangga, 2020, “Krisis Politik Legisprudensi”, Kolom Opini Harian Kompas, 14 April.
Dokumen Hukum:
Undang-Undang Dasar Negara Republik Indonesia Tahun 1945
Undang-Undang Nomor 15 Tahun 2019 Tentang Perubahan Atas Undang-Undang Nomor 12 tahun 2011 Tentang Pembentukan Peraturan Perundang- undangan. Lembaran Negara Republik Indonesia Tahun 2019 Nomor 183,Tambahan Lembaran Negara RI Tahun 6398.
Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 009-014/PUU-III/2005, Sekretariat Mahkamah Konstitusi Republik Indonesia.
Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 79/PUU- XII/2014, Sekretariat Mahkamah Konstitusi Republik Indonesia.
Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 27/PUU-VII/2009, Sekretariat Mahkamah Konstitusi Republik Indonesia.
Risalah Sidang Perkara Nomor 79/PUU-XVII/2019, Sekretariat Mahkamah Konstitusi Republik Indonesia. 19 Februari 2020, Jakarta.
Risalah Sidang Perkara Nomor 79/PUU-XVII/2019, Sekretariat Mahkamah Konstitusi Republik Indonesia. 4 Maret 2020, Jakarta.

Downloads

Published

2021-05-27

How to Cite

Rishan, Idul. 2021. “Konsep Pengujian Formil Undang-Undang Di Mahkamah Konstitusi”. Jurnal Konstitusi 18 (1):001-021. https://doi.org/10.31078/jk1811.

Issue

Section

Articles