Legal Policy of President Joko Widodo and the Independence of Constitutional Court
Politik Legislasi Presiden Joko Widodo dan Independensi Mahkamah Konstitusi
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.31078/jk2113Keywords:
Legal Policy, Independence of the Judiciary , Joko Widodo, Constitutional Court, Judicial ReviewAbstract
This article discusses the independence of the Constitutional Court in reviewing legislation created by President Joko Widodo. There are three main questions posted: What is the character of legal policy under President Joko Widodo, how has the role of the Constitutional Court shifted in the last decade and what is the character of the Constitutional Court’s decisions in reviewing legislation enacted by President Joko Widodo. These questions are discussed using normative research on Constitutional Court decisions. Data from the results of this research are deployed quantitatively and qualitatively. Quantitative data is displayed to show legislative trends and Constitutional Court decisions. Analysis was carried out on 78 laws and 277 Constitutional Court Decisions. Meanwhile, qualitative research is to assess the character of legislation and Constitutional Court decisions through case studies of several Constitutional Court decisions related to politics, economics, law enforcement institutions and civil liberties. This article shows that the Constitutional Court has not been effective in exercising judicial review of legislation enacted under President Joko Widodo, amidst an increasingly abusive legislative process.
References
Adonara, Firman Floranta. “Prinsip Kebebasan Hakim dalam Memutus Perkara Sebagai Amanat Konstitusi.” Jurnal Konstitusi 12, no. 2 (2016): 217–36. https://doi.org/10.31078/ jk1222.
Ali, Mahrus. “Mahkamah Konstitusi dan Penafsiran Hukum yang Progresif.” Jurnal Konstitusi 7, no. 1 (2016): 067–090. https://doi.org/10.31078/jk715.
Asshiddiqie, Jimly. Konstitusi dan Konstitusionalisme di Indonesia. Jakarta: Sinar Grafika, 2021.
Fajriyah, Mira. “Refraksi dan Alinasi Pengangkatan Hakim Konstitusi.” Jurnal Konstitusi 12, no. 2 (2016): 237–63. https://doi.org/10.31078/jk1223.
Ginsburg, Tom. Judicial review in new democracies: Constitutional courts in asian cases. Judicial Review in New Democracies: Constitutional Courts in Asian Cases. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2013. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511511189.
Hamidi, Jazim, dan Mustafa Lutfi. “Constitutional Question (Antara Realitas Politik dan Implementasi Hukumnya).” Jurnal Konstitusi 7, no. 1 (2016): 029–048. https://doi. org/10.31078/jk713.
Hendrianto, Stefanus. “Early Warning Signs of Abusive Constitutionalism in Indonesia: Pandemic as Pretext.” Int’l J. Const. L. Blog, 2020. http://www.iconnectblog.com/2020/06/ early-warning-signs-of-abusive-constitutionalism-in-indonesia-pandemic-as-pretext/.
Kasim, Helmi, Syukri Asy’ari, Meyrinda R. Hilipito, dan Rio Tri Juli Putranto. “Kompatibilitas Metode Pembuktian dan Penafsiran Hakim Konstitusi dalam Putusan Pemilukada.” Jurnal Konstitusi 9, no. 4 (2016): 713–42. https://doi.org/10.31078/jk946.
Krisdanar, Vino Devanta Anjas. “Menggagas Constitutional Complaint Dalam Memproteksi Hak Konstitusional Masyarakat Mengenai Kehidupan dan Kebebasan Beragama Di Indonesia.” Jurnal Konstitusi 7, no. 3 (2016): 185–208. https://doi.org/10.31078/jk737.
Maharani, Tsarina, dan Fabian Januarius Kuwado. “92 Akademisi Teken Petisi Tolak Omnibus Law RUU Cipta Kerja.” Kompas.com, 2020. https://nasional.kompas.com/ read/2020/04/22/17222001/92-akademisi-teken-petisi-tolak-omnibus-law-ruu-cipta-kerja.
Mahkamah Konstitusi Republik Indonesia. Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 91/PUU-XVIII/2020 (2021).
Mochtar, Zainal Arifin, dan Idul Rishan. “Autocratic Legalism: the Making of Indonesian Omnibus Law.” Yustisia 11, no. 1 (2022): 29–41. https://doi.org/10.20961/yustisia. v11i1.59296.
Prawira, Adam. “1,3 Juta Orang Teken Petisi Tolak Omnibus Law Cipta Kerja.” Sindo News, 2020. https://nasional.sindonews.com/read/188594/12/13-juta-orang-teken-petisi-tolak-omnibus-law-cipta-kerja-1602051024.
Ramdan, Ajie. “Problematika Legal Standing Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi.” Jurnal Konstitusi 11, no. 4 (2016): 737–58. https://doi.org/10.31078/jk1147.
Republik Indonesia. Undang-Undang Nomor 23 Tahun 2003 tentang Pemilihan Umum Presiden dan Wakil Presiden (2003).
Republik Indonesia. Undang-Undang Nomor 42 Tahun 2008 tentang Pemilihan Umum Presiden dan Wakil Presiden (2008).
Scheppele, Kim Lane. “Autocratic legalism.” University of Chicago Law Review 85, no. 2 (2018): 545–83.
Soetiyoso, Bambang, dan Sri Hastuti Puspitasari. Aspek-Aspek Perkembangan Kekuasaan Kehakiman di Indonesia. Yogyakarta: UII Press, 2005.
Wantu, Fence, Novendri Mohamad Nggilu, Suwitno Imran, dan Rahmat Teguh Santoso Gobel. “Proses Seleksi Hakim Konstitusi: Problematika dan Model Ke Depan.” Jurnal Konstitusi 18, no. 2 (2021): 241–61. https://doi.org/10.31078/jk1820.
Warburton, Eve. “Jokowi and the New Developmentalism.” Bulletin of Indonesian Economic Studies, 2016. https://doi.org/10.1080/00074918.2016.1249262.
Wijayanti, Winda, Nuzul Quraini M, dan Siswantana Putri R. “Transparansi dan Partisipasi Publik dalam Rekrutmen Calon Hakim Konstitusi.” Jurnal Konstitusi 12, no. 4 (2016): 663–90. https://doi.org/10.31078/jk1241.
Wiryanto, Wiryanto. “Penguatan Dewan Etik dalam Menjaga Keluhuran Martabat Hakim Konstitusi.” Jurnal Konstitusi 13, no. 4 (2016): 720–42. https://doi.org/10.31078/jk1342.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Jurnal Konstitusi
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Copyright of the published articles will be transferred to the journal as the publisher of the manuscripts. Therefore, the author confirms that the copyright has been managed by the publisher.
- The publisher of Jurnal Konstitusi is The Registrar and Secretariat General of the Constitutional Court of the Republic of Indonesia.
- The copyright follows Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License: This license allows reusers to distribute, remix, adapt, and build upon the material in any medium or format for noncommercial purposes only, and only so long as attribution is given to the creator. If you remix, adapt, or build upon the material, you must license the modified material under identical terms.