The Law of Lawmaking as Quasi Constitutional Legislation
Undang-Undang Pembentukan PeraturanPerundang-Undangan Sebagai LegislasiKuasi Konstitusional
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.31078/jk2013Keywords:
Quasi Constitutional Legislation, Judicial Review of Legislative Process, the Lawmaking ActAbstract
Constitutional Court Decision No. 91/PUU-XVIII/2020 regarding the judicial review of the Job Creation Act, marked for the first time Court decide prevailed on behalf of petitioners in a procedural judicial review case. The Decision erects a legal discourse relating to the superiority of the Lawmaking Act against other statutes, in terms of its position as a ground for conducting a procedural judicial review. It departs from the common understanding that all statutes are equal, no one statute could be superior to others. Normatively researched while laboring statutory, conceptual, and comparative approaches, the study resulting two answers. First, the superiority of the Lawmaking Act would be best described by quasi constitutional legislation theory. Second, the majority opinions in recent Constitutional Court Decisions reflected the entrenchment of the Lawmaking Act, which fit the quasi constitutional legislation theory
References
Ahmed, Farrah, dan Adam Perry. “Constitutional Statutes.” Oxford Journal of Legal Studies 37, no. 2 (1 Juni 2017): 461–81. https://doi.org/10.1093/ojls/gqw030.
———. “The Quasi-Entrenchment of Constitutional Statute.” The Cambridge Law Journal 73, no. 3 (14 November 2014): 514–35. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0008197314000841.
Albert, Richard. “Constitutional Handcuffs.” Intergenerational Justice Review 10, no. 1 (2017): 18–31. https://doi.org/10.24357/igjr.10.1.585.
Amirullah. “Fraksi PKS Apresiasi Putusan MK Soal UU Cipta Kerja.” Tempo, 2021. https://nasional.tempo.co/read/1532794/fraksi-pks-apresiasi-putusan-mk-soal-uu-cipta-kerja.
Andi Saputra. “Penggugat Apresiasi MK yang Perintahkan UU Cipta Kerja Diperbaiki.” detikNews, 2021. https://news.detik.com/berita/d-5826868/penggugat-apresiasi-mk-yang-perintahkan-uu-cipta-kerja-diperbaiki.
Aryanto, Bayu, Susi Dwi Harijanti, dan Mei Susanto. “Menggagas Model Fast-Track Legislation Dalam Sistem Pembentukan Undang-Undang Di Indonesia.” Jurnal Rechts Vinding: Media Pembinaan Hukum Nasional 10, no. 2 (27 Agustus 2021): 187. https://doi.org/10.33331/rechtsvinding.v10i2.703.
Bar-Siman-Tov, Ittai. “Semiprocedural Judicial Review.” Legisprudence 6, no. 3 (14 Desember 2012): 271–300. https://doi.org/10.5235/17521467.6.3.271.
———. “The Puzzling Resistance to Judicial Review of the Legislative Process.” Boston University Law Review 91 (11 Mei 2011): 1925–27.
Barber, N. W. “Why entrench?” International Journal of Constitutional Law 14, no. 2 (11 April 2016): 325–50. https://doi.org/10.1093/icon/mow030.
Bruhl, Aaron-Andrew P. “Using Statues to Set Legislative Rules: Entrenchment, Separation of Powers, and the Rules of the Proceedings Clause.” Journal of Law & Politics 19 (2003): 345.
Chandranegara, Ibnu Sina. “Pengadopsian Mekanisme Fast-Track Legislation dalam Pengusulan Rancangan Undang-Undang oleh Presiden.” Jurnal Penelitian Hukum De Jure 21, no. 1 (22 Februari 2021): 123. https://doi.org/10.30641/dejure.2021.V21.123-140.
Cormack, Mary Mc. “Judicial Deliberation Unmasked”, Amricanbar.org Litigation Journal (Summer, 2019).” americanbar.org, 2019. https://www.americanbar.org/groups/litigation/publications/litigation_journal/2018-19/summer/judicial-deliberation-unmasked/.
CR-8. “Riwayat Panjang Pedoman Pembentukan Peraturan Perundang-Undangan.” Hukumonline.com, 13 Februari 2022. https://www.hukumonline.com/berita/a/riwayat-panjang-pedoman-pembentukan-peraturan-perundang-undangan-lt6208a2d177c9e/.
Efendi, A’an, dan Fradhana Putra Disantara. “Post Conditionally Unconstitutional of Job Creation Law: Quo Vadis Legal Certainty?” Yuridika 37, no. 2 (5 Agustus 2022): 345–82. https://doi.org/10.20473/ydk.v37i2.33364.
Erika Kurnia, dan Aguido Adri. “Buruh Apresiasi Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Terkait UU Cipta Kerja.” Kompas, 2021. https://www.kompas.id/baca/metro/2021/11/25/harapan-pekerja-terhadap-uu-cipta-kerja-ditanggapi-pemerintah-kota.
Eskridge, William N., dan John Ferejohn. “Super-Statutes.” Duke Law Journal 50, no. 5 (Maret 2001): 1216. https://doi.org/10.2307/1373022.
Eskridge, William N, dan John Ferejohn. “Super-Statutes: The New American Constitutionalism.” In The Least Examined Branch: The Role of Legislatures in the Constitutional State, diedit oleh Richard W Bauman dan Tsvi Kahana, 320–54. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2006. https://doi.org/DOI: 10.1017/CBO9780511511035.017.
Eule, Julian N. “Temporal Limits on the Legislative Mandate: Entrenchment and Retroactivity.” American Bar Foundation Research Journal 12, no. 2/3 (1987): 379–459. https://doi.org/10.1086/492191.
Gardbaum, Stephen. “Pushing The Boundaries : Judicial Review of Legislative procedures in South Africa.” Constitutional Court Review 9, no. 1 (Desember 2019): 1–18. https://doi.org/10.2989/CCR.2019.0001.
Gluck, Abbe. “Due Process of Lawmaking and the Obamacare Repeal.” Diakses 25 Juli 2017. https://balkin.blogspot.com/2017/07/due-process-of-lawmaking-and-obamacare.html.
Gould, Jonathans. “Law Within Congress.” Yale Law Journal 129, no. 7 (2020): 1946–2028.
“Hamdan Zoelva Apresiasi Putusan MK soal UU Cipta Kerja.” Diakses 27 Februari 2023. https://inisiatifnews.com/hukum/2021/11/27/hamdan-zoelva-apresiasi-putusan-mk-soal-uu-cipta-kerja/.
Harijanti, Susi Dwi. “Menjaga Demokrasi Pembentukan UU,” n.d. https://www.academia.edu/44013399/MENJAGA_DEMOKRASI_PEMBENTUKAN_UU.
Harijanti, Susi Dwi, Wicaksana Dramanda, dan Lailani Sungkar. “Pengujian Formil Undang-Undang oleh Mahkamah Konstitusi: Urgensi dan Batu Uji.” Laporan Hasil Penelitian Kerjasama Mahkamah Konstitusi Republik Indonesia dan Fakultas Hukum Universitas Padjadjaran. Bandung, 2020.
Helis, John. “Expanding Our Constitutional Horizons: A Comprehensive Study of Quasi-Constitutionality in Canada.” Ph.D. Thesis. Queen’s University, 2016.
Herlambang P. Wiratraman. “Menguji Arah Tafisr ‘Uji Formal’ Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Terhadap Undang-Undang Cipta Kerja.” In Policy Paper: Putusan MK Terkait UU Cipta Kerja, diedit oleh Aqshal Muhammad Arsyah. Yogyakarta: Fakultas Hukum, Universitas Gadjah Mada, 2022. https://law.ugm.ac.id/policy-paperputusan-mk-terkait-uu-cipta-kerja/.
Ibrahim, Mohammad. “Pembatasan Kekuasaan Amendemen Konstitusi: Teori, Praktik di Beberapa Negara dan Relevansinya di Indonesia.” Jurnal Konstitusi 17, no. 3 (10 November 2020): 558. https://doi.org/10.31078/jk1735.
Ilan, Gonen. “Response: Recent Development regarding Judicial Review of Legislative Process in Israel.” Statute Law Review 42, no. 2 (30 Juni 2021): 176–82. https://doi.org/10.1093/slr/hmz029.
Iqbal Dwi Purnama. “Apresiasi Putusan MK, Pakar Hukum Tata Negara: UU Cipta Kerja Banyak Masalah.” IDXChannel, 2021. https://www.idxchannel.com/economics/apresiasi-putusan-mk-pakar-hukum-tata-negara-uu-cipta-kerja-banyak-masalah.
Isra, Saldi. “Purifikasi Proses Legislasi Melalui Pengujian Undang-Undang.” Jurnal Legislasi Indonesia 7, no. 1 (Maret 2010): 119–21.
Kovacs, Kathryn. “Superstatute Theory and Administrative Common Law.” Indiana Law Journal 90, no. 3 (1 Januari 2014): 1223–37. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2386025.
Lailam, Tanto. “Analisis Praktik Pengujian Formil Undang-Undang Terhadap Undang-Undang Dasar 1945.” Pranata Hukum 6, no. 2 (Juli 2011): 143–60.
Levinson, Daryl, dan Benjamin I. Sachs. “Political Entrenchment and Public Law.” The Yale Law Journal Online 125, no. 2 (November 2015): 400–482.
Linde, Hans A. “Due Process of Lawmaking.” Nebraska Law Review 55, no. 2 (1975): 197. https://core.ac.uk/download/pdf/33141144.pdf.
Macdonnell, Vanessa. “A Theory of Quasi-Constitutional Legislation.” Osgoode Hall Law Journal 53, no. 2 (2016): 508–39.
Mahkamah Konstitusi. Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi 69/PUU-XX/2022 (n.d.).
———. Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 27/PUU-VII/2009 (n.d.).
———. Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 73/PUU-XII/2014 (n.d.).
———. Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 91/PUU-XVIII/2020, 2021.
Marzuki, Peter Mahmud. Penelitian Hukum. Revisi. Jakarta: Kencana Prenada Media Group, 2014.
McCubbins, Mathew D, dan Daniel B Rodriguez. “Superstatutory Entrenchment: A Positive and Normative Interrogatory.” YALE Law Journal 120 (2011): 387–95.
Mcgarry, John, dan Samantha Spence. “Constitutional Statutes—Roots and Recognition.” Statute Law Review 41, no. 3 (26 Oktober 2020): 378–94. https://doi.org/10.1093/slr/hmz015.
Meßerschmidt, Klaus. “The Procedural Review of Legislation and the Substantive Review of Legislation: Opponents or Allies?,” 373–403, 2016. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-33217-8_15.
Muhaimin. Metode Penelitian Hukum. Mataram: Mataram University Press, 2020.
Okpaluba, Chuks. “Can a Court Review the Internal Affairs and Processes of the Legislature? Contemporary Developments in South Africa.” The Comparative and International Law Journal of Southern Africa 48, no. 2 (2015): 183–218. https://unisapressjournals.co.za/index.php/CILSA/article/view/10846.
Posner, Eric A., dan Adrian Vermeule. “Legislative Entrenchment: A Reappraisal.” The Yale Law Journal 111, no. 7 (Mei 2002): 1665. https://doi.org/10.2307/797534.
Psygkas, Athanasios. “The United Kingdom’s Statutory Constitution.” Oxford Journal of Legal Studies 40, no. 3 (1 September 2020): 449–81. https://doi.org/10.1093/ojls/gqaa024.
Redi, Ahmad. Hukum Pembentukan Peraturan Perundang-Undangan. Jakarta: Sinar Grafika, 2017.
Republik Indonesia. Undang-Undang tentang Perubahan Atas Undang-Undang Nomor 24 Tahun 2003 tentang Mahkamah Konstitusi (n.d.).
———. Undang-undang Nomor 8 Tahun 2011 tentang Perubahan Atas Undang-Undang Nomor 24 Tahun 2003 Tentang Mahkamah Konstitusi, Pub. L. No. 8 Tahun 2011 (2011).
———. Undang-undang Nomor 7 Tahun 2020 tentang Perubahan Ketiga atas Undang-Undang Nomor 24 Tahun 2003 tentang Mahkamah Konstitusi, Pub. L. No. 7 Tahun 2020 (2020).
Rishan, Idul. “Konsep Pengujian Formil Undang-Undang di Mahkamah Konstitusi.” Jurnal Konstitusi 18, no. 1 (27 Mei 2021): 001–021. https://doi.org/10.31078/jk1811.
Roberts, John C., dan Erwin Chemerinsky. “Entrenchment of Ordinary Legislation: A Reply to Professors Posner and Vermeule.” California Law Review 91, no. 6 (Desember 2003): 1773. https://doi.org/10.2307/3481403.
Rose-Ackerman, Susan, Stefanie Egidy, dan James Fowkes. Due Process of Lawmaking: The United States, South Africa, Germany, and the European Union. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2015. https://doi.org/DOI: 10.1017/CBO9781107338845.
Simanjuntak, Samuel Hamonangan, dan Lita Tyesta A.L.W. “Procedural Justice or Substantive Justice: Review of Constitutional Court Decision Number: 91/Puu/Xviii/2020.” Jurnal Ilmiah Kebijakan Hukum 16, no. 2 (28 Juli 2022): 341. https://doi.org/10.30641/kebijakan.2022.V16.341-362.
Sjarif, Fitriani Ahlan. “Diskusi Akademik RUU tentang Perubahan Kedua atas UU No. 12 Tahun 2011.” ICLD (Indonesia Center for Legislative Drafting). Youtube, 2022. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eYe4KKr2pgg&t=7211s.
———. “Webinar Nasional: Perubahan UU Pembentukan Peraturan Perundang-undangan | APHTN-HAN |2.” APHTN-HAN OFFICIAL. Youtube, 2022. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iOzmwe2tNTQ&t=2266s.
Skrentny, John D, dan Micah Gell-Redman. “Comprehensive Immigration Reform and the Dynamics of Statutory Entrenchment.” The Yale Law Journal Online 120 (2011): 325–44.
Stephen Gardbaum. “Due Process of Lawmaking Revisited.” Journal of Constitutional Law 21, no. 1 (2018): 1–32.
Stephenson, Scott. “The Rise and Recognition of Coonstitutional Statutes.” In Quasi-Constitutionality and Constitutional Statutes, diedit oleh Richard Albert dan Joel Colón-Ríos. Londong: Routledge, 2019. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781351201834.
Sungkar, Lailani, Wicaksana Dramanda, Susi Dwi Harijanti, dan Adnan Yasar Zulfikar. “Urgensi Pengujian Formil di Indonesia : Pengujian Legitimasi dan Validitas.” Jurnal Konstitusi 18, no. 4 (17 Februari 2022): 748. https://doi.org/10.31078/jk1842.
Tim Penyusun. Putusan Landmark Mahkamah Konstitusi 2019-2020. Diedit oleh Ida Ria Tambunan dan Tatang Garjito. Jakarta: Kepaniteraan dan Sekretariat Jenderal Mahkamah Konstitusi, 2021.
———. “Transformasi Digital Untuk Penegakan Konstitusi.” Laporan Tahunan Mahkamah Konstitusi. Jakarta, 2021.
Tremblay, Luc. B. “Rule of Law, Justice, and Interpretation.” McGill-Queen’s University Press, 1997. http://www.jstor.org/stable/j.ctt81bnq.
Vermeule, Adrian. “The constitutional law of congressional procedure.” The University of Chicago Law Review 71, no. 2 (2004): 361–437.
Wang, Shucheng. “Judicial Review of the Legislative Process in Hong Kong: A Comparative Perspective.” Statute Law Review 42, no. 3 (25 Oktober 2021): 291–304. https://doi.org/10.1093/slr/hmz018.
Widiastuti, Retno, dan Ahmad Ilham Wibowo. “Pola Pembuktian dalam Putusan Pengujian Formil Undang-Undang di Mahkamah Konstitusi.” Jurnal Konstitusi 18, no. 4 (17 Februari 2022): 803. https://doi.org/10.31078/jk1844.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Jurnal Konstitusi
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Copyright of the published articles will be transferred to the journal as the publisher of the manuscripts. Therefore, the author confirms that the copyright has been managed by the publisher.
- The publisher of Jurnal Konstitusi is The Registrar and Secretariat General of the Constitutional Court of the Republic of Indonesia.
- The copyright follows Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License: This license allows reusers to distribute, remix, adapt, and build upon the material in any medium or format for noncommercial purposes only, and only so long as attribution is given to the creator. If you remix, adapt, or build upon the material, you must license the modified material under identical terms.
