Pemilihan Umum Serentak yang Berintegritas sebagai Pembaruan Demokrasi Indonesia


  • Achmad Edi Subiyanto Panitera Pengganti Mahkamah Konstitusi



Election, Democracy, The Constitutional Court


The implementation of the General Election of the President and Vice President after the General Election of Members of the House of Representatives, the Regional Representatives Council, and the Regional People’s Legislative Assembly turned out to be unable to become a tool for transforming social change in the desired direction. The experience of these constitutional practices did not strengthen the governance system desired by the 1945 Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia. That, through the Decision of the Constitutional Court General Elections are held simultaneously. However, there are weaknesses in the preparation of the policy for implementing general elections simultaneously. The decision of the Constitutional Court should be followed by an evidence-based policy making process with strong data and based on simulations of implementation. Therefore, the burden of organizing General Elections can be identified from the start and steps to minimize risk can be considered if things happen that are not desirable. Then what is equally important is that it needs to be evaluated on the issue of the integrity of the organizers or participants of the General Election, for example by tightening the recruitment system, so that it can create simultaneous elections with integrity in the future


Manan, Bagir, 2012, Membedah UUD 1945, Editor: Moh. Fadli, Malang: Universitas Brawijaya Press (UB Press).

Asshiddiqie, Jimly, 2008. Menuju Negara Hukum Yang Demokratis, Jakarta: Sekretariat Jenderal dan Kepaniteraan Mahkamah Konstitusi.

Asshiddiqie, Jimly, 2006. Parpol dan Pemilu sebagai Instrumen Demokrasi, Jurnal Konstitusi, Volume 3, Nomor 4, Desember 2006.

Asshiddiqie, Jimly, 2005. Implikasi Perubahan UUD 1945 Terhadap Pembangunan Hukum Nasional, Jakarta: Mahkamah Konsitusi RI, 2005.

Asshiddiqie, Jimly, 2006. Pengantar Hukum Tata Negara Jilid II, Jakarta: Sekretariat Jenderal dan Kepaniteraan MK RI.

Mahkamah Konstitusi, 2008. Menata Ulang Sistem Peraturan Perundang-undangan Indonesia, Jejak Langkah dan Pemikiran Hukum Hakim Konstitusi Prof. HAS. Natabaya, S.H., LLM, Jakarta: Sekretariat Jenderal dan Kepaniteraan Mahkamah Konstitusi, 2008.

Mahfud MD., Moh., 2011. Perdebatan Hukum Tata Negara Pasca Amandemen Konstitusi, Jakarta: Rajawali Press.

Mahfud MD., Moh., 2011. Politik Hukum Di Indonesia, Jakarta: Rajawali Pers.

Isra, Saldi, 2019, Sistem Pemerintahan Indonesia, Pergulatan Ketatanegaraan Menuju Sistem Pemerintahan Presidensial, Depok: PT RajaGrafindo Persada.

Majelis Permusyawaratan Rakyat, Panduan Dalam Memasyarakatkan Undang-Undang Dasar Negara Republik Indonesia Tahun 1945, Latar Belakang Proses dan Hasil Perubahan Undang-Undang Dasar Negara Republik Indonesia Tahun 1945, Jakarta: Sekretariat Jenderal MPR RI, 2003.


Undang-Undang Dasar Negara Republik Indonesia Tahun 1945;

Undang-Undang Nomor 7 Tahun 2017 tentang Pemilihan Umum;

Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi:
Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 14/PUU-XI/2013 perihal Pengujian Undang-Undang Nomor 42 Tahun 2008 tentang Pemilihan Umum Presiden dan Wakil Presiden terhadap Undang-Undang Dasar Negara Republik Indonesia Tahun 1945;





How to Cite

Subiyanto, Achmad Edi. 2020. “Pemilihan Umum Serentak Yang Berintegritas Sebagai Pembaruan Demokrasi Indonesia”. Jurnal Konstitusi 17 (2):355-71.




Similar Articles

1 2 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.