Pro-Kontra dan Prospektif Kewenangan Uji Konstitusionalitas Perpu
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.31078/jk1014Keywords:
Judicial Review on the Constitutionaity of Perpu, Pros and Cons, ProspectiveAbstract
Pros and cons of the authority to deal with judicial constitutionality review of Government Regulation in Lieu of Law (Perpu) either from fellow judges of the Constitutional Court (MK) or from the world of legal science is acceptable. The pros and cons is not due to the differences in interests between them, but it is caused by the differences in schools or schools of thought and interpretation methodologies adopted. The authority of the Constitutional Court to review the constitutionality of Perpu is in line with the philosophy of Judicial Activism (the concept of active understanding) which is identical to the "Statue of the Goddess of Justice" whose eyes are not closed in order to be able to watch and absorb the "sense of social justice", to incorporate the living legal values in the society, respond to the demand and aspiration of the people and, furthermore, to create “the thinking judges” which make their decisions responsive. However, the authority of the Court to review the constitutionality of the Perpu might cause “broader impacts” in the future which means that the impact will not be only on the constitutionality review of the Perpu but also on the other decisions of Constitutional Court.
References
Achmad Ali, 2009, Menguak Teori Hukum (Legal Theory) & Teori Peradilan (Judicialprudence): Termasuk Intepretasi Undang-Undang (Legisprudence) Volume 1 Pemahaman Awal, Jakarta: Kencana Prenada Media Group.
Ade Maman Suherman, 2006, Pengantar Perbandingan Sistem Hukum, Jakarta: RajaGrafindo.
Ahmad Kamil, 2012, Filsafat Kebebasan Hakim, Jakarta: Kencana Prenada Media Group.
Bara Hasibuan, 2002, ”Komisi Konstitusi, Suatu Keharusan”, Konstitusi Baru melalui Komisi Konstitusi Independen, ed. Bambang Widjoyanto dkk., Jakarta: Pustaka Sinar Harapan, h. 187 – 191.
Cornelis Lay, 2004, Presiden, Civil Society, dan HAM, Jakarta: Pensil-324.
Ibnu Sina Chandranegara, 2012, “Pengujian Perppu Terkait Sengketa Kewenangan Konstitusional Antar Lembaga Negara: Kajian Atas Putusan MK Nomor 138/ PUU-VII/2009”, Jurnal Yudisial, Volume 5. Nomor 1, April, h. 1 – 16.
Iskandar Muda, 2012, ”The Living Constitution (Suatu Tinjauan Kewenangan Uji Konstitusionalitas Perpu)”, Radar Lampung, 19 November.
Jimly Asshiddiqie, 2010, Perihal Undang-Undang, Jakarta: PT RajaGrafindo Perkasa.
_______, 2009, Pengantar Ilmu Hukum Tata Negara, Jakarta: RajaGrafindo Persada.
Moh. Mahfud MD., 2009, Konstitusi Dan Hukum dalam Kontroversi Isu, Jakarta: RajaGrafindo Perkasa.
Ni’matul Huda, 2010, “Pengujian Perpu Oleh Mahkamah Konstitusi”, Jurnal Konstitusi, Volume 7, Nomor 5, Oktober, h. 73 - 92.
Nonet, Philippe & Selznick, Philip, 2010, Law and Society in Transition: Toward Responsive Law, diterjemahkan Raisul Muttaqien, Hukum Responsif, Bandung: Nusamedia.
Saldi Isra, 2010, Pergeseran Fungsi Legislasi (Menguatnya Model Legislasi Parlementer Dalam Sistem Presidensial Indonesia), Jakarta: RajaGrafindo Perkasa.
_______, 2002, ”Mewaspadai Rencana Pembatalan Amandemen UUD”, Konstitusi Baru melalui Komisi Konstitusi Independen, ed. Bambang Widjoyanto dkk., Jakarta: Pustaka Sinar Harapan, h. 268 – 272.
Ade Maman Suherman, 2006, Pengantar Perbandingan Sistem Hukum, Jakarta: RajaGrafindo.
Ahmad Kamil, 2012, Filsafat Kebebasan Hakim, Jakarta: Kencana Prenada Media Group.
Bara Hasibuan, 2002, ”Komisi Konstitusi, Suatu Keharusan”, Konstitusi Baru melalui Komisi Konstitusi Independen, ed. Bambang Widjoyanto dkk., Jakarta: Pustaka Sinar Harapan, h. 187 – 191.
Cornelis Lay, 2004, Presiden, Civil Society, dan HAM, Jakarta: Pensil-324.
Ibnu Sina Chandranegara, 2012, “Pengujian Perppu Terkait Sengketa Kewenangan Konstitusional Antar Lembaga Negara: Kajian Atas Putusan MK Nomor 138/ PUU-VII/2009”, Jurnal Yudisial, Volume 5. Nomor 1, April, h. 1 – 16.
Iskandar Muda, 2012, ”The Living Constitution (Suatu Tinjauan Kewenangan Uji Konstitusionalitas Perpu)”, Radar Lampung, 19 November.
Jimly Asshiddiqie, 2010, Perihal Undang-Undang, Jakarta: PT RajaGrafindo Perkasa.
_______, 2009, Pengantar Ilmu Hukum Tata Negara, Jakarta: RajaGrafindo Persada.
Moh. Mahfud MD., 2009, Konstitusi Dan Hukum dalam Kontroversi Isu, Jakarta: RajaGrafindo Perkasa.
Ni’matul Huda, 2010, “Pengujian Perpu Oleh Mahkamah Konstitusi”, Jurnal Konstitusi, Volume 7, Nomor 5, Oktober, h. 73 - 92.
Nonet, Philippe & Selznick, Philip, 2010, Law and Society in Transition: Toward Responsive Law, diterjemahkan Raisul Muttaqien, Hukum Responsif, Bandung: Nusamedia.
Saldi Isra, 2010, Pergeseran Fungsi Legislasi (Menguatnya Model Legislasi Parlementer Dalam Sistem Presidensial Indonesia), Jakarta: RajaGrafindo Perkasa.
_______, 2002, ”Mewaspadai Rencana Pembatalan Amandemen UUD”, Konstitusi Baru melalui Komisi Konstitusi Independen, ed. Bambang Widjoyanto dkk., Jakarta: Pustaka Sinar Harapan, h. 268 – 272.
Downloads
Published
2016-05-20
How to Cite
Muda, Iskandar. 2016. “Pro-Kontra Dan Prospektif Kewenangan Uji Konstitusionalitas Perpu”. Jurnal Konstitusi 10 (1):69-88. https://doi.org/10.31078/jk1014.
Issue
Section
Articles
License
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Copyright of the published articles will be transferred to the journal as the publisher of the manuscripts. Therefore, the author confirms that the copyright has been managed by the publisher.
- The publisher of Jurnal Konstitusi is The Registrar and Secretariat General of the Constitutional Court of the Republic of Indonesia.
- The copyright follows Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License: This license allows reusers to distribute, remix, adapt, and build upon the material in any medium or format for noncommercial purposes only, and only so long as attribution is given to the creator. If you remix, adapt, or build upon the material, you must license the modified material under identical terms.
