Aspek Keadilan dalam Sifat Final Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi
Keywords:Justice, Final decisions, The Decision of Constitutional Court
The final nature of the Constitutional Court’s decisions is often questioned. The main problem, among others, when the justice seekers of Constitutional Court, there is nothing else to do but to accept and implement the Court’s decision although shackled and deprived of justice by the Constitutional Court. This paper confirms the absence of the issue of the fairness aspect of the Constitutional Court when the justice seekers recognize and understand at least three (3) terms, namely (1) the nature of the final position is attached to the nature of the Constitution as the supreme law so that there is no other commandment greater height of it is an effort to keep constitutional judicial authority and legal certainty; (2) the nature of the final decision of the Constitutional Court is an attempt to preserve the constitutional authority of the courts so different from the general court; and (3) possibility Constitutional Court contains the error persists considering Constitutional Court Judges are human beings, but until now, there is no better alternative replaces the final nature of the Decision.
Charles Sampford (Ed.), 1996, Interpreting Constitutions Theories, Principles and Institutions, Sydney: The Federation Press.
Darji Darmodiharjo dan Shidarta, 2002, Pokok-Pokok Filsafat Hukum: Apa dan Bagaimana Filsafat Hukum Indonesia, Jakarta: Gramedia Pustaka Utama.
Irfan Fachruddin, 2004, Pengawasan Peradilan Administrasi terhadap Tindakan Pemerintah, Bandung: PT Alumni.
Jimly Asshiddiqie, 2008, Menegakkan Tiang Konstitusi, Memoar Lima Tahun Kepemimpinan Prof. Dr. Jimly Asshiddiqie, S.H., di Mahkamah Konstitusi 2003- 2008, Jakarta: Sekretariat Jenderal dan Kepaniteraan Mahkamah Konstitusi.
Malik, 2009, Telaah Makna Hukum Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi yang Final dan Mengikat, Sekretariat Jenderal dan Kepaniteraan Mahkamah Konstitusi: Jurnal Konstitusi, Vol. 6 No. 1, April 2009.
Maruarar Siahaan, 2006, Hukum Acara Mahkamah Konstitusi, Jakarta Mahkamah Konstitusi RI.
Satjipto Rahardjo, “Tidak Menjadi Tawanan Undang-undang”, Kompas, 24 Mei 2000.
Steven D. Smith, That Old-Time Originalism, University of San Diego School of Law Legal Studies Research Paper Series, Paper No. 08-028, 2008.
Van Apeldoorn, 1990, Pengantar Ilmu Hukum, Cet. XXIV, terjemahan Oetarid Sadino, Jakarta: Pradnya Paramita.
How to Cite
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Copyright of the published articles will be transferred to the journal as the publisher of the manuscripts. Therefore, the author confirms that the copyright has been managed by the publisher.
- The publisher of Jurnal Konstitusi is The Registrar and Secretariat General of the Constitutional Court of the Republic of Indonesia.
- The copyright follows Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License: This license allows reusers to distribute, remix, adapt, and build upon the material in any medium or format for noncommercial purposes only, and only so long as attribution is given to the creator. If you remix, adapt, or build upon the material, you must license the modified material under identical terms.