Tafsir Misoginisme dan Inkonsistensi Birokrat (Implikasi Putusan MK No. 4/PUU-VIII/2010)

Authors

  • Abdul Wahid Fakultas Hukum Universitas Islam Malang Jl. M.T Haryono Malang

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.31078/jk821

Keywords:

bureaucracy, Constitutional Court, justice

Abstract


The verdict of Constitutional Court (MK) Number 4/PUU-VIII/2010 can be described as a verdict blocking chances for the civil servant (Pegawai Negeri Sipil) to represent himself/herself as the head of executive in the district such as governor, mayor, regent, and any others in the mayor general  election  (Pemilukada)  because  one  of  the  prerequisites  to  be a civil servant must be followed by a resignation letter. This prerequisite cannot be considered as a form of discrimination and injustice for the civil servant, yet as a kind of protection through the strategic role of the civil servant. If the civil servant still keeps going on its track, as a bureaucracy devotee, then people’s civil rights must have been fulfilled.

References

Buku
Budiarjo, Miriam. Dasar-dasar Ilmu Politik. Jakarta: Gramedia Pustaka Utama, 1983.
Bustomi, Ali. Menuju Kebangkitan Indonesia. Jakarta: LKP2I, 2009.
F Thompson, Dennis. Etika Politik Pejabat Negara. Jakarta: Yayasan Obor Indonesia, 2000.
Kabul, Imam. Dari Langit Menjadi Negarawan. Jakarta: Nirmana Media, 2007.
Komarudin, Ahmad. Hukum dan Keadilan. Malang: Permata Hati, 2009.
Magnis Suseno, Franz. Etika Politik; Prinsip-prinsip Moral Dasar Kenegaraan Modern. Jakarta: Gramedia Pustaka Utama, 1994.
M Blau, Peter & W. Meyer, Marshall. Bureaucracy in Modern Society. New York: Random House, 1987.
Purbacaraka, Purnadi & Chaidir Ali, M. Disiplin Hukum. Bandung: Alumni, 1986.
Satriya, B. Keadilan dalam Filsafat Sosial. Surabaya : Visipress, 2009.
Steinberg, S.S. & David T, Austern. Government, Ethics, and Managers: A Guide to Solving Dilemmas in the Public Sector. Westport, CT, USA: Greenwood Publishing Group, 1990.
Zahra, Fatya. Demokrasi di Tangan MK. Malang: K3-Peradaban, 2010.

Makalah, Jurnal, Koran
Abdul Aziz, Etika Birokrasi, Jurnal Buana, Universitas Islam Malang, 2004.
Abdul Halim, Misoginisme Bernegara (Menggugat Tafsir Politik), makalah disampaikan dalam diskusi di Yayasan Permata Hati tanggal 11 Desember 2010, Malang, 2010.
M Bashori Muchsin, Dari Plato untuk SBY, Jawa Pos 28 Januari 2011.

Laman
http://www.mahkamahkonstitusi.go.id/putusan/putusan_sidang_Putusan%20PUU%204-VIII-2010.pdf, diakses tanggal 21 Pebruari 2011.
http://www.mahkamahkonstitusi.go.id, Mengawal Demokrasi, Menegakkan Keadilan Substantif, diakses tanggal 10 Maret 2011.
http://gitaanggeliya.blogspot.com/2010/11/pengertian-keadilan.html
http://esqmagazine.com/2009/06/16/174/menegakkan-hukum-dan-keadilan.html, diakses tanggal 27 Pebruari 2011.
Wijayanto Setiawan, Keadilan dan Hukum Progresif, http://gagasanhukum.wordpress.com/2010/04/12/keadilan-dan-hukum-progresif/, diakses tanggal 21 Pebruari 2011

Downloads

Published

2016-05-20

How to Cite

Wahid, Abdul. 2016. “Tafsir Misoginisme Dan Inkonsistensi Birokrat (Implikasi Putusan MK No. 4 PUU-VIII 2010)”. Jurnal Konstitusi 8 (2):1-22. https://doi.org/10.31078/jk821.

Issue

Section

Articles

Similar Articles

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.