Strengthen Constitutional Court’s Decision as Political Legal Perspective in Legislative Branch

Penguatan Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi sebagai Politik Hukum Legislatif

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.31078/jk2025

Keywords:

Legislation, Political Legal Prespective, Constitutional Court

Abstract


The disobedience of the Constitutional Court’s decisions is founded in the law-making processes that contradict the decision. Those disobediences have been intentional in some cases. This paper aims to discuss reinforcing the implementation of the Constitutional Court decision, especially in law-making processes. There are two research questions: First, what is the urgency to emphasize the decision in law-making processes? Second, what is the solution to the disobedience of the decision? This research uses normative juridical research methods with a conceptual approach to analyze those issues. This study provides: first, the obstacles to enforcing the Constitutional Court decision and strengthens the decision to bond the legislative branch. Second, the solution to the disobedience phenomenon is also interpreted as a commitment to encourage awareness of the legislative branch. The other solution is to put the constitutional court’s decision in the Law Making Act as one of the considerations in the law-making process.

Author Biography

Aprilian Sumodiningrat, Faculty of Law, Gadjah Mada University, Yogyakarta, Indonesia

Aprilian Sumodiningrat was born in Bondowoso Regency on April 20, 1997. He completed his undergraduate degree at the University of Jember. He pursued a master's degree with a concentration in constitutional law at the Faculty of Law, Gadjah Mada University, Yogyakarta, and graduated in 2022. Currently, Aprilian, also known by his nickname, works as an advocate. In addition to his career as an advocate, he is a member of the Constitutional Studies Forum at the Faculty of Law, UGM. He serves as a Local Coordinator at a non-governmental organization called Students For Liberty Indonesia. He has also written opinion columns in several media outlets such as kawanhukum.id, rechtsvinding, and kompasiana.  

References

Andre Suryadinata and Toendjoeng Herning Sitaboeana, “Implikasi Hukum Tidak Dilaksanakannya Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Dalam Perkara Pengujian Undang-Undang,” Jurnal Hukum Adigama 2, no. 2 (December 13, 2019): 1–19.

Anggoro, Syahriza Alkohir. “Politik Hukum: Mencari Sejumlah Penjelasan.” Jurnal Cakrawala Hukum 10, no. 1 (August 7, 2019): 77–86.

Asmarudin, Imam, dan Imawan Sugiharto. Mahkamah Konstitusi RI dalam Bingkai Negara Hukum Indonesia. Cetakan Pertama. Brebes: Diya Media Group, 2020.

Benuf, Kornelius, and Muhamad Azhar. “Metodologi Penelitian Hukum Sebagai Instrumen Mengurai Permasalahan Hukum Kontemporer.” Gema Keadilan 7, no. 1 (2020): 20–33.

Editorial Tempo. “Mudarat Bank Tanah.” Tempo.co. 11 Januari 2022. https://koran.tempo.co/read/editorial/470974/mudarat-bank-tanah-dan-ancaman-terhadap-reforma-agraria.

Gie. “Hakim MK: Jangan Berpikir Terbalik Untuk Membaca Putusan MK.” hukumonline.com (blog), 29 April 2005. https://www.hukumonline.com/berita/a/hakim-mk-jangan-berpikir-terbalik-untuk-membaca-putusan-mk-hol12739?page=2.

Huda, Ni’matul. “Putusan MK Tak Dilaksanakan, Harus Bagaimana?,” 2 Desember 2021. https://www.hukumonline.com/klinik/a/putusan-mk-tak-dilaksanakan--harus-bagaimana-lt61a8cf22f09d4/.

Idris, Munawara, and Kusnadi Umar. “Dinamika Mahkamah Konstitusi Dalam Memutus Perkara Judicial Review.” Siyasatuna : Jurnal Ilmiah Mahasiswa Siyasah Syar’Iyyah 1, no. 2 (2020): 263–77. https://journal3.uin-alauddin.ac.id/index.php/siyasatuna/article/view/18740.

Jayadi, Ahkam. “Membuka Tabir Kesadaran Hukum.” Jurisprudentie : Jurusan Ilmu Hukum Fakultas Syariah Dan Hukum 4, no. 2 (December 5, 2017): 11–23.

Lathif, Nazaruddin. “Teori Hukum Sebagai Sarana Alat Untuk Memperbaharui Atau Merekayasa Masyarakat.” Palar | Pakuan Law Review 3, no. 1 (2017): 73–94.

Mahdi, M. Ivan. “Institusi Mana yang Paling Dipercaya Publik?,” 4 April 2022. https://dataindonesia.id/varia/detail/institusi-mana-yang-paling-dipercaya-publik.

Mahkamah Konstitusi. Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 003/PUU-IV/2006.

Mahkamah Konstitusi. Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 105/PUU-XIV/2016.

Mahkamah Konstitusi. Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 33/PUU-XIV/2016.

Mahkamah Konstitusi. Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 53/PUU-XV/2017.

Mahkamah Konstitusi. Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 57/PUU-XV/2017.

Mahkamah Konstitusi. Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 91/PUU-XVIII/2020.

Mahkamah Konstitusi. Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 92/PUU-X/2012.

Mahkamah Konstitusi. Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 98/PUU-XVI/2018.

Maulidi, M. Agus. “Menyoal Kekuatan Eksekutorial Putusan Final Dan Mengikat Mahkamah Konstitusi.” Jurnal Konstitusi 16, no. 2 (July 11, 2019): 339–62.

Maulidi, Mohammad Agus. “Problematika Hukum Implementasi Putusan Final Dan Mengikat Mahkamah Konstitusi Perspektif Negara Hukum.” Jurnal Hukum Ius Quia Iustum 24, no. 4 (Oktober 2017): 535–57.

MKD. “BK DPR Gelar Konsultasi Publik Revisi UU P3 Tindak Lanjut Putusan MK.” dpr.go.id (blog), 2 Februari 2022. https://www.dpr.go.id/berita/detail/id/37388/t/BK+DPR+Gelar+Konsultasi+Publik+Revisi+UU+P3+Tindak+Lanjut+Putusan+MK.

_____________. “Tindaklanjuti KePutusan MK, UU P3 Mendesak Diubah.” dpr.go.id. 6 Februari 2022. https://www.dpr.go.id/berita/detail/id/37462/t/Tindaklanjuti+Keputusan+MK%2C+UU+P3+Mendesak+Diubah.

Pitriyantini, Putu Eka, and Ni Luh Gede Astariyani. “Consequences of Non-Compliance with the Constitutional Court Decision in Judicial Review of the UUD 1945.” Jurnal Magister Hukum Udayana (Udayana Master Law Journal) 10, no. 4 (December 31, 2021): 702–15. https://ojs.unud.ac.id/index.php/jmhu/article/view/79423.

Prabowo, Bagus Surya. 2022. “Menggagas Judicial Activism Dalam Putusan Presidential Threshold Di Mahkamah Konstitusi”. Jurnal Konstitusi 19 (1):073-096.

Putri, Intan Permata, and Mohammad Mahrus Ali. 2020. “Karakteristik Judicial Order Dalam Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Dengan Amar Tidak Dapat Diterima”. Jurnal Konstitusi 16 (4):883-904.

Rahman, Faiz. 2020. “Anomali Penerapan Klausul Bersyarat Dalam Putusan Pengujian Undang-Undang Terhadap Undang-Undang Dasar”. Jurnal Konstitusi 17 (1):027-053.

Redaksi BBC News. “Demi legalkan UU Ciptaker, DPR dituding ‘rekayasa’ revisi regulasi lain.” bbc.com. 15 April 2022. https://www.bbc.com/indonesia/indonesia-61110186.

Redaksi Berita MKRI. “Perpu Cipta Kerja Dinilai Tak Memenuhi Syarat Kegentingan Memaksa | Mahkamah Konstitusi Republik Indonesia,” 19 Januari 2023. https://www.mkri.id/index.php?page=web.Berita&id=18845.

Redaksi CNN. “Akademisi Kritik Aturan Bank Tanah di UU Ciptaker.” CNN Indonesia. 11 Oktober 2020. https://www.cnnindonesia.com/ekonomi/20201010173428-92-556897/akademisi-kritik-aturan-bank-tanah-di-uu-ciptaker.

Sa’adah, Nabitatus. “Mahkamah Konstitusi Sebagai Pengawal Demokrasi Dan Konstitusi Khususnya Dalam Menjalankan Constitutional Review.” Administrative Law and Governance Journal 2, no. 2 (11 Juni 2019): 235–47.

Safa’at, Muchamad Ali, Widodo Eka Tjahjana, Fatmawati, Saifuddin, dan Feri Amsari. Hukum Acara Mahkamah Konstitusi Republik Indonesia. Jakarta: Sekretariat Jendral dan Kepaniteraan Mahkamah Konstitusi, 2010.

Safitri, Eva. “24 Putusan Tak Dipatuhi, MK: Pembangkangan Konstitusi, Awal Runtuhnya Bangsa.” detikNews. 28 Januari 2020. https://news.detik.com/berita/d-4876464/24-putusan-tak-dipatuhi-mk-pembangkangan-konstitusi-awal-runtuhnya-bangsa/2.

Siahaan, Maruarar. Hukum Acara Mahkamah Konstitusi Republik Indonesia. Cetakan Ke-3. Jakarta: Sinar Grafika, 2015.

Soeroso, Fajar Laksono. “‘Pembangkangan’ Terhadap Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi (Kajian Putusan Nomor 153/G/2011/PTUN-JKT).” Jurnal Yudisial 6, no. 3 (2013): 227–49. https://jurnal.komisiyudisial.go.id/index.php/jy/article/view/100.

Suhardi, Gaudensius. “Jejak Saran Saldi Isra.” Media Indonesia. 29 November 2021. https://mediaindonesia.com/podiums/detail_podiums/2315-jejak-saran-saldi-isra.

Sulistyowati, Tri, M. Imam Nasef, dan Ali Ridho. “Constitutional Compliance Atas Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Oleh Lembaga-Lembaga Negara.” Jakarta: Pusat Penelitian dan Pengkajian Perkara, dan Pengelolaan Perpustakaan Kepaniteraan dan Sekretariat Jenderal Mahkamah Konstitusi, 2019.

Sulistyowati, Tri, Muhammad Imam Nasef, and Ali Rido. 2021. “Constitutional Compliance Atas Putusan Pengujian Undang-Undang Di Mahkamah Konstitusi Oleh Adressat Putusan”. Jurnal Konstitusi 17 (4):699-728.

Sumardjono, Maria SW. “Menyoal Kepatuhan terhadap Putusan MK.” Kompas.id, 4 Januari 2022. https://www.kompas.id/baca/opini/2022/01/04/menyoal-kepatuhan-terhadap-putusan-mk.

Wahyudi, Rizki, and M Gaussyah. “Optimalisasi Pelaksanaan Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Dalam Hal Pengujian Undang-Undang Terhadap Undang-Undang Dasar Negara Republik Indonesia Tahun 1945.” Mercatoria 11, no. 2 (2018): 174–96.

Winata, Muhammad Reza. Pengujian Konstitusionalitas Undang-Undang : Rigiditas Tindak Lanjut dalam Pembentukan Undang-Undang. Depok: Raja Grafindo Persada, 2020.

Downloads

Published

2023-06-01

How to Cite

Sumodiningrat, Aprilian. 2023. “Strengthen Constitutional Court’s Decision As Political Legal Perspective in Legislative Branch : Penguatan Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Sebagai Politik Hukum Legislatif”. Jurnal Konstitusi 20 (2):257-78. https://doi.org/10.31078/jk2025.

Issue

Vol. 20 No. 2 (2023)

Section

Articles

License

Copyright (c) 2023 Jurnal Konstitusi

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:

  1. Copyright of the published articles will be transferred to the journal as the publisher of the manuscripts. Therefore, the author confirms that the copyright has been managed by the publisher.
  2. The publisher of Jurnal Konstitusi is The Registrar and Secretariat General of the Constitutional Court of the Republic of Indonesia.
  3. The copyright follows Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License: This license allows reusers to distribute, remix, adapt, and build upon the material in any medium or format for noncommercial purposes only, and only so long as attribution is given to the creator. If you remix, adapt, or build upon the material, you must license the modified material under identical terms.