Logika Hukum Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Terkait Uji Konstitusional Undang-Undang Jabatan Notaris

Authors

  • Iskandar Muda Magister Kenotariatan, Universitas YARSI, Jakarta, Indonesia.

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.31078/jk1725

Keywords:

Logic, Testing, Notary Position

Abstract


Settlement of the problem of testing the law in the Constitutional Court (constitutional review) is also needed to find out the logic of the law and its relationship. If two statements are displayed simultaneously it will give rise to what by logic is called “logic relationship.” In the settlement of the six cases of constitutional review of the law on the Position of Notary Public (Law No. 30 Year 2004) and its Amendments (Law No. 2 Year 2014) revealed the use of various kinds of legal logic in legal considerations (ratio decidendi) of the Court. This research is a legal research using normative approach. The results showed that: (i) Constitutional Court Decision No. 009-014/PUU-III/2005 uses the legal logic of “equivalence relations,” (ii) Constitutional Court Decision No. 52/PUU-VIII/2010 uses the legal logic of “independent relationship,” (iii) Constitutional Court Decision No. 49/PUU-X/2012 uses the legal logic of “contradictory relationship,” (iv) Constitutional Court Decision No. 72/PUU-XII/2014 uses the legal logic of “independent relationship,” (v) Constitutional Court Decision No. 43/PUU-XV/2017 uses the legal logic of “independent relationship,” and (vi) in Constitutional Court Decision No. 22/PUU-XVII/2019 uses the legal logic of “contradictory relationship.”

References

Adjie, Habib, 2009, Meneropong Khazanah Notaris dan PPAT Indonesia (Kumpulan
Cerita tentang Notaris dan PPAT), Cetakan Ke I, Bandung: PT. Citra Aditya Bakti.
Agustin, Yusti Nurul & Ana, Nur Rosihin, 2013, “Pemanggilan Notaris Tak Perlu
Persetujuan Majelis Pengawas Daerah,” Majalah Konstitusi No. 76, Juni.
Anonim, 2005, “MK Tolak Permohonan PERNORI dan HNI,” Berita Mahkamah
Konstitusi No. 12, September-Oktober.
H. Mundiri, 2011, Logika, Cetakan ke-14, Jakarta: RajaGrafindo Persada.
Kelsen, Hans, 2011, “Essay in Legal and Moral Philosophy,” alih bahasa, B. Arif
Sidharta, Hukum Dan Logika, Cetakan ke-4, Bandung: Alumni.
M. Syamsudin, 2015, Konstruksi Baru Budaya Hukum Hakim, Cetakan ke-2, Jakarta:
Kencana Prenada Media Group.
Mappiasse, Syarif, 2017, Logika Hukum Pertimbangan Putusan Hakim, Cetakan
ke-2, Jakarta: Kencana Prenada Media Group.
Muda, Iskandar, 2019, Perkembangan Kewenangan Konstitusional Mahkamah
Konstitusi Berdasarkan Putusannya, Disertasi, Jakarta: Program Doktor Ilmu
Hukum Universitas Trisakti.
-------------------, 2018, “Tidak Dinamis Namun Terjadi Dinamika Dalam Hal Uji
Konstitusional Norma Zina,” Jurnal Yudisial, Vol. 11 No. 3, Desember.
-------------------, 2017, “The Legal Logic of the Collapse on Non-Retroactive Doctrine
in the Constitutional Court Decision,” Journal Constitutional Review, Vol. 3
No. 1, May.
Muhammad, Abdulkadir 2004, Hukum dan Penelitian Hukum, Cet. ke-1, Bandung:
PT Citra Aditya Bakti.
OFM, Alex Lanur, 1983, Logika Selayang Pandang, Cetakan ke-27, Yokyakarta:
Kanisius.
Program Doktor Ilmu Hukum Universitas Trisakti, 2016, Pedoman Penyusunan
Disertasi Tahun Akademik 2016/2017, Jakarta: Fakultas Hukum Universitas
Trisakti.
Aida Mardatillah, 2020, “Ikatan Notaris Bakal Jadi Pihak Terkait di Uji
Konstitusionalitas MKN, diakses dari: https://www.hukumonline.com/
berita/baca/lt5e4c34c31d33f/ikatan-notaris-bakal-jadi-pihak-terkait-di-ujikonstitusionalitas-mkn/?&utm_source=dable, 13 Maret.
ASH, 2020, “Pengujian UU Jabatan Notaris Kandas Pemohon tak miliki legal
standing,” diakses dari: https://www.hukumonline.com/berita/baca/
lt55dd7cde11b0d/pengujian-uu-jabatan-notaris-kandas/, 13 Maret.
Republik Indonesia, Undang-Undang Dasar Negara Republik Indonesia Tahun 1945.
Republik Indonesia. Undang-Undang tentang Perubahan Atas Undang-Undang
No. 30 Tahun 2004 tentang Jabatan Notaris. Undang-Undang Nomor 2 Tahun
2014. Lembaran Negara Republik Indonesia Tahun 2014 Nomor 3. Tambahan
Lembaran Negara Republik Indonesia Nomor 5491.
Republik Indonesia. Undang-Undang tentang Jabatan Notaris. Undang-Undang
Nomor 30 Tahun 2004. Lembaran Negara Republik Indonesia Tahun 2004
Nomor 117. Tambahan Lembaran Negara Republik Indonesia Nomor 4432.
Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi No. 009-014/PUU-III/2005.
Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi No. 52/PUU-VIII/2010.
Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi No. 49/PUU-X/2012.
Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi No. 72/PUU-XII/2014.
Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi No. 43/PUU-XV/2017.
Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi No. 22/PUU-XVII/2019.
Perkara Mahkamah Konstitusi No. 16/PUU-XVIII/2020.

Downloads

Published

2020-08-19

How to Cite

Muda, Iskandar. 2020. “Logika Hukum Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Terkait Uji Konstitusional Undang-Undang Jabatan Notaris”. Jurnal Konstitusi 17 (2):330-54. https://doi.org/10.31078/jk1725.

Issue

Vol. 17 No. 2 (2020)

Section

Articles

License

Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:

  1. Copyright of the published articles will be transferred to the journal as the publisher of the manuscripts. Therefore, the author confirms that the copyright has been managed by the publisher.
  2. The publisher of Jurnal Konstitusi is The Registrar and Secretariat General of the Constitutional Court of the Republic of Indonesia.
  3. The copyright follows Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License: This license allows reusers to distribute, remix, adapt, and build upon the material in any medium or format for noncommercial purposes only, and only so long as attribution is given to the creator. If you remix, adapt, or build upon the material, you must license the modified material under identical terms.