Positivisme dan Implikasinya terhadap Ilmu dan Penegakan Hukum oleh Mahkamah Konstitusi (Analisa Putusan Nomor 46/PUU-XIV/2016)
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.31078/jk1715Keywords:
Positivism, Legal Positivism School, Legal Science, Law EnforcementAbstract
This paper reveals fundamental questions about the implications of the school of positivism for science and law enforcement in the Constitutional Court. The study results show First, at the level of jurisprudence, this school understands its adherents that jurisprudence as “a normological understanding of the meaning of positive law (normological apprehension of the meaning of positive law)”. The development of jurisprudence is then carried out through the activities of studying, researching and teaching various positive laws, “which in the end the development of jurisprudence is more towards” dogmatic jurisprudence “. Second, at the level of law enforcement in the Constitutional Court, the implication of judges is to base the process of law enforcement as stipulated in the positive norms of statutory regulations. Upholding the law becomes synonymous with enforcing positive rules. Judges as legal bearers are practically proficient in reading and sounding positive law in their legal decisions. Decision of the Constitutional Court Number 46/PUUXIV/2016 related to the existence of adultery in the Criminal Code is one of the decisions that have a strong influence from this school.
References
Buku:
Aburaera, Sukarno; Muhadar dan Maskun, 2013, Filsafat Hukum: Teori dan Praktik, Jakarta: Kencana.
Arifin dan Sambas, Leonarda K, 2016, Teori-Teori Hukum Klasik dan Temporer, Bogor: Ghalia Indonesia.
Bakhtiar, Amsal, 2008, Filsafat Ilmu, Jakarta: Raja Grafindo Persada.
Darmodiharjo, Darji dan Shidarta, 1996, Pokok-Pokok Filsafat Hukum: Apa dan Bagaimana Filsafat Hukum Indonesia, Jakarta: Gramedia Pustaka Utama.
Efendi, A’an; Poernomo, Freddy dan Ranuh, NG Indra S., 2016, Teori Hukum, Jakarta: Sinar Grafika.
Friedmann, W., 1990, Teori dan Filsafat Hukum: Telaah Kritis atas Teori-Teori Hukum (Susunan I), Jakarta: Rajawali Pers.
Hart, H.L.A., 2009 Konsep Hukum (The Concept of Law), diterjemahkan oleh M. Khozim, Bandung: Nusa Media.
Jurdi, Fajlurrahman, 2019, Logika Hukum, Jakarta: Prenadamedia Group.
Putro, Widodo Dwi, 2011, Kritik terhadap Paradigma Positivisme Hukum, Yogyakarta: Genta Publishing.
Rahardjo, Satjipto, 2010, Sosiologi Hukum: Perkembangan Metode dan Pilihan Masalah, Yogyakarta: Genta Publishing.
Rasjidi, Lili dan Sidharta, B. Arief, 1989, Filsafat Hukum, Mazhab dan Refleksinya, Bandung: Remadja Karya CV Bandung.
Rhiti, Hyronimus, 2011, Filsafat Hukum, Yogyakarta: Universitas Atma Jaya Yogyakarta.
Shidarta, 2007, Positivisme Hukum. Jakarta: UPT Penerbitan Universitas Tarumanagara.
Shidarta, 2013, Hukum Penalaran dan Penalaran Hukum: Buku 1 Akar Filosofis, Yogyakarta: Genta Publishing.
Sidharta, B. Arief, 2018, Pengantar Logika: Sebuah Langkah Pertama Pengenalan Medan Telaah, Bandung: PT Refika Aditama.
Sumaryono, E., 1999, Dasar-Dasar Logika, Yogyakarta: Kanisius.
Suriasumantri, Jujun S., 1996, Filsafat Ilmu: Sebuah Pengantar Populer, Jakarta: Sinar Harapan.
Warassih, Esmi, 2011, Pranata Hukum: Sebuah Telaah Sosiologis, Semarang: Badan Penerbit Universitas Diponegoro.
Wignjosoebroto, Soetandyo, 2002, Hukum: Paradigma, Metode dan Masalah, Jakarta: ELSAM dan HUMA.
Wignjosoebroto, Soetandyo, 2012, “Hukum yang Tak Kunjung Tegak: Apa yang Salah dengan Kerja Penegakan Hukum di Negeri ini?” dalam Komisi Yudisial Republik Indonesia, Dialektika Pembaruan Sistem Hukum Indonesia, Jakarta: Sekretariat Jenderal Komisi Yudisial Republik Indonesia.
Jurnal,
Haldemann, Frank, “Gustav Radbruch vs. Hans Kelsen: A Debate on Nazi Law”, Ratio Juris. Vol. 18 No. 2 June 2005, h. 162-178.
Leawoods, Heather, 2000 “Gustav Radbruch: An Extraordinary Legal Philosopher”, Whasington University Jurnal of Law and Policy, Volume 2, Januari, h. 489-515.
Maruapey, M. Husein, 2017, “Penegakan Hukum dan Perlindungan Negara: Analisis Kritis Terhadap Kasus Penistaan Agama oleh Patahana Gubernur DKI Jakarta” Jurnal Ilmu Politik dan Komunikasi, Volume VII, Nomor 1, Juni.
Nonett, Philippe, 1990, “What is Positive Law?” The Yale Law Journal Vol. 100, h. 667-699.
Sanyoto, 2008, “Penegakan Hukum di Indonesia” Jurnal Dinamika Hukum, Volume 8, Nomor 3, September.
Spaak, Torben, 2005, “Kelsen and Hart on the Normative of Law”, Stockholm Institute for Scandinavian Law, h. 1957-2010.
Makalah dan Sumber Lainnya
Chambers, Jonathan Brett, 2011, “Legal Positivism: An Analysis” Undergraduate Honors Theses Paper 79, Utah State University.
Hlawatsch, Stephan, 2010, Separation of Law and Morals? A Debate about Legal Validity and It’s Impications for Moral Criticsm, Universität Wien Institut für Philosophie.
Indarti, Erlyn, 2010, Diksresi dan Paradigma: Sebuah Telaah Filsafat Hukum, Pidato Pengukuhan Guru Besar dalam Filsafat Hukum pada Fakultas Hukum Universitas Diponegoro.
Wendel, W. Bradley, “Legal Ethics and the Separation of Law and Morals” Cornell Law School Legal Studies Research Paper, Series No. 05-011.
World Economic Forum, 2019, The Global Risk Report 2019: 14th Edition, Geneva: World Economic Forum.
Aburaera, Sukarno; Muhadar dan Maskun, 2013, Filsafat Hukum: Teori dan Praktik, Jakarta: Kencana.
Arifin dan Sambas, Leonarda K, 2016, Teori-Teori Hukum Klasik dan Temporer, Bogor: Ghalia Indonesia.
Bakhtiar, Amsal, 2008, Filsafat Ilmu, Jakarta: Raja Grafindo Persada.
Darmodiharjo, Darji dan Shidarta, 1996, Pokok-Pokok Filsafat Hukum: Apa dan Bagaimana Filsafat Hukum Indonesia, Jakarta: Gramedia Pustaka Utama.
Efendi, A’an; Poernomo, Freddy dan Ranuh, NG Indra S., 2016, Teori Hukum, Jakarta: Sinar Grafika.
Friedmann, W., 1990, Teori dan Filsafat Hukum: Telaah Kritis atas Teori-Teori Hukum (Susunan I), Jakarta: Rajawali Pers.
Hart, H.L.A., 2009 Konsep Hukum (The Concept of Law), diterjemahkan oleh M. Khozim, Bandung: Nusa Media.
Jurdi, Fajlurrahman, 2019, Logika Hukum, Jakarta: Prenadamedia Group.
Putro, Widodo Dwi, 2011, Kritik terhadap Paradigma Positivisme Hukum, Yogyakarta: Genta Publishing.
Rahardjo, Satjipto, 2010, Sosiologi Hukum: Perkembangan Metode dan Pilihan Masalah, Yogyakarta: Genta Publishing.
Rasjidi, Lili dan Sidharta, B. Arief, 1989, Filsafat Hukum, Mazhab dan Refleksinya, Bandung: Remadja Karya CV Bandung.
Rhiti, Hyronimus, 2011, Filsafat Hukum, Yogyakarta: Universitas Atma Jaya Yogyakarta.
Shidarta, 2007, Positivisme Hukum. Jakarta: UPT Penerbitan Universitas Tarumanagara.
Shidarta, 2013, Hukum Penalaran dan Penalaran Hukum: Buku 1 Akar Filosofis, Yogyakarta: Genta Publishing.
Sidharta, B. Arief, 2018, Pengantar Logika: Sebuah Langkah Pertama Pengenalan Medan Telaah, Bandung: PT Refika Aditama.
Sumaryono, E., 1999, Dasar-Dasar Logika, Yogyakarta: Kanisius.
Suriasumantri, Jujun S., 1996, Filsafat Ilmu: Sebuah Pengantar Populer, Jakarta: Sinar Harapan.
Warassih, Esmi, 2011, Pranata Hukum: Sebuah Telaah Sosiologis, Semarang: Badan Penerbit Universitas Diponegoro.
Wignjosoebroto, Soetandyo, 2002, Hukum: Paradigma, Metode dan Masalah, Jakarta: ELSAM dan HUMA.
Wignjosoebroto, Soetandyo, 2012, “Hukum yang Tak Kunjung Tegak: Apa yang Salah dengan Kerja Penegakan Hukum di Negeri ini?” dalam Komisi Yudisial Republik Indonesia, Dialektika Pembaruan Sistem Hukum Indonesia, Jakarta: Sekretariat Jenderal Komisi Yudisial Republik Indonesia.
Jurnal,
Haldemann, Frank, “Gustav Radbruch vs. Hans Kelsen: A Debate on Nazi Law”, Ratio Juris. Vol. 18 No. 2 June 2005, h. 162-178.
Leawoods, Heather, 2000 “Gustav Radbruch: An Extraordinary Legal Philosopher”, Whasington University Jurnal of Law and Policy, Volume 2, Januari, h. 489-515.
Maruapey, M. Husein, 2017, “Penegakan Hukum dan Perlindungan Negara: Analisis Kritis Terhadap Kasus Penistaan Agama oleh Patahana Gubernur DKI Jakarta” Jurnal Ilmu Politik dan Komunikasi, Volume VII, Nomor 1, Juni.
Nonett, Philippe, 1990, “What is Positive Law?” The Yale Law Journal Vol. 100, h. 667-699.
Sanyoto, 2008, “Penegakan Hukum di Indonesia” Jurnal Dinamika Hukum, Volume 8, Nomor 3, September.
Spaak, Torben, 2005, “Kelsen and Hart on the Normative of Law”, Stockholm Institute for Scandinavian Law, h. 1957-2010.
Makalah dan Sumber Lainnya
Chambers, Jonathan Brett, 2011, “Legal Positivism: An Analysis” Undergraduate Honors Theses Paper 79, Utah State University.
Hlawatsch, Stephan, 2010, Separation of Law and Morals? A Debate about Legal Validity and It’s Impications for Moral Criticsm, Universität Wien Institut für Philosophie.
Indarti, Erlyn, 2010, Diksresi dan Paradigma: Sebuah Telaah Filsafat Hukum, Pidato Pengukuhan Guru Besar dalam Filsafat Hukum pada Fakultas Hukum Universitas Diponegoro.
Wendel, W. Bradley, “Legal Ethics and the Separation of Law and Morals” Cornell Law School Legal Studies Research Paper, Series No. 05-011.
World Economic Forum, 2019, The Global Risk Report 2019: 14th Edition, Geneva: World Economic Forum.
Downloads
Published
2020-05-06
How to Cite
Sitabuana, Tundjung Herning, and Ade Adhari. 2020. “Positivisme Dan Implikasinya Terhadap Ilmu Dan Penegakan Hukum Oleh Mahkamah Konstitusi (Analisa Putusan Nomor 46 PUU-XIV 2016)”. Jurnal Konstitusi 17 (1):104-29. https://doi.org/10.31078/jk1715.
Issue
Section
Articles
License
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Copyright of the published articles will be transferred to the journal as the publisher of the manuscripts. Therefore, the author confirms that the copyright has been managed by the publisher.
- The publisher of Jurnal Konstitusi is The Registrar and Secretariat General of the Constitutional Court of the Republic of Indonesia.
- The copyright follows Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License: This license allows reusers to distribute, remix, adapt, and build upon the material in any medium or format for noncommercial purposes only, and only so long as attribution is given to the creator. If you remix, adapt, or build upon the material, you must license the modified material under identical terms.
