Ketidakpastian Hukum Kewenangan Lembaga Pembentuk Undang-Undang Akibat Pengabaian Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi

Authors

  • Aan Eko Widiarto Fakultas Hukum Universitas Brawijaya - Malang Jl. Veteran, Kota Malang, Jawa Timur 65145

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.31078/jk1244

Keywords:

Legal Uncertainty, Act Maker Bodies, The Constitutional Court

Abstract

The Indonesian House of Representatives and the President has established    the Act Num. 17 Year 2014 on MPR, DPR, DPD, and the DPRD (Act MD3). The Act consists provisions that have been declared incompatible with the Constitution 1945 and does not have binding legal force by the Constitutional Court Decision Num. 92/PUU-X/2012. The result is a duality norm. The first norm is the norm authorizes the establishment of laws that have already been decided in the judgment of the Constitutional Court No. 92/PUU-X/2012. The second norm is the new norm about authority of making laws specified in the Act MD3. Both of norms are contrary, so in the implementation (rechtstoepassing), House of Representatives, and the President is faced with two choices provisions of legislation. DPD authority in making the draft law becomes blurred. Similarly for the House of Representatives and the President also no certainty authority in relationship with DPD in the act making process. Should the House of  Representatives  and  the  President  uphold the principle of self respect or self obidence (the government should respect the decisions of the  judiciary).

References

Abdul Mukthie Fadjar, Hukum Konstitusi dan Mahkamah Konstitusi, Jakarta: Konstitusi Press dan Citra Media (Yogyakarta), 2006
Enny Nurbaningsih, ”Implikasi Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomo 92/PUU-X/2012 dan Alternatif Model Hubungan Kelembagaan terkait Pembentukan Undang- Undang”, Mimbar Hukum, Volume 27, Nomor 1, Februari 2015
Jimly Asshiddiqie, Hukum acara Pengujian Undang-Undang, Jakarta: Konstitusi Press, 2006
_______, Menuju Negara Hukum yang Demokratis, Jakarta: PT Bhuana Ilmu Populer, 2009
Mahkamah Konstitusi, Putusan No. 92/PUU-X/2012, diucap tanggal 27 Maret 2013
Maruarar Siahaan, “Undang-Undang MD3 Pelanggaran Sumpah Jabatan, Krisis Konstitusi atau Contempt Of Court ?”, Naskah Keterangan Keahlian dalam Persidangan Mahkamah Konstitusi tanggal Senin, 13 Oktober 2014
Roger Cotterrell, The Politics of Jurisprudence; A Critical Introduction to Legal Philosophy, London: Butterworths, 1989
Ronald Dworkin, Freedom’s Law; The Moral Reading of The American Constitution, Massachusetts: Harvard University Press, 1996
Saldi Isra, “Peran Mahkamah Konstitusi dalam Penguatan Hak Asasi Manusia di Indonesia”, Jurnal Konstitusi, Volume 11 , Nomor 3, September 2014
_______, “Pengujian UU No 17/2014 tentang MPR, DPR, DPD, dan DPRD”, Naskah disampaikan sebagai ahli dalam persidangan Mahkamah Konstitusi tanggal 13 Oktober 2014Satjipto Rahardjo, Mendudukkan Undang-Udang Dasar; Suatu Pembahasan dari Optik Ilmu Hukum Umum, Semarang: Badan Penerbit Universitas Diponegoro, 2007
Yance Arizona, “Apa itu Kepastian Hukum?”, http://yancearizona.net/2008/04/13/apa-itu-kepastian-hukum/, diunduh 24 April 2015

Published

2016-05-20

How to Cite

Widiarto, Aan Eko. 2016. “Ketidakpastian Hukum Kewenangan Lembaga Pembentuk Undang-Undang Akibat Pengabaian Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi”. Jurnal Konstitusi 12 (4):735-54. https://doi.org/10.31078/jk1244.

Issue

Section

Articles