Activating Unconstitutional Norms in Law: An Analysis of the Principle of Checks and Balances
Menghidupkan Norma Inkonstitusional dalam Undang-Undang: Suatu Analisis Prinsip Checks and Balances
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.31078/jk2027Keywords:
Checks and balances, Unconstitutional, StatutoryAbstract
The existence of norms in the law that have been declared unconstitutional by the Constitutional Court, but re-included in the process of forming laws, can cause harm to the rights of citizens that have been guaranteed by the 1945 Constitution, especially if they are placed in the concept of checks and balances. This study has two objectives, namely, first, to analyze the concept of checks and balances and examples of norms that were canceled by the Constitutional Court but revived. Second, the implications of bringing unconstitutional norms to life. This research was conducted using normative juridical research. The results showed that the principle of checks and balances requires that legislative, executive, and judicial powers control each other. Some unconstitutional norms, but re-enacted, are spread through some statutes. The consequences if an unconstitutional article is reinserted into the law, it will threaten the system of checks and balances that have been agreed upon and affirmed in the 1945 NRI Constitution. In order to apply the principle of checks and balances, reviving an unconstitutional clause that has been overturned by the Constitutional Court must be rejected.
References
Al-Dulaimi, Ahmed Oudah. “From Negative to Positive Legislator ? Response to Unconstitutional Legislative Omission As a Case Study in the Changing Roles of Constitutional Courts Author From Negative to Positive Legislator ? Response to Unconstitutional Legislative Omission As a Ca.” Griffith University, 2018.
Andreescu, Marius, and Andra Puran. “Supremacy of the Constitution: Some Legal Consequences.” Journal of Law and Administrative Sciences 9, no. 1 (2018): 8–23.
Asshiddiqie, Jimly. Konstitusi Dan Konstitusionalisme Indonesia. Edited by Tarmizi. 2nd ed. Jakarta: Sinar Grafika, 2018.
Atmadja, I Dewa Gede. Teori Konstitusi Dan Konsep Negara Hukum. Malang: Setara Press, 2015.
Benhabib, Seyla. “Dialogic Constitutionalism and Judicial Review.” Global Constitutionalism 9, no. 3 (2020): 506–14.
Chaidir, Ellydar. “Sistem Pemerintahan Negara Republik Indonesia Setelah Perubahan Undang-Undang Dasar 1945.” Universitas Islam Indonesia, 2005.
Falaakh, M. Fajrul. Pertumbuhan Dan Model Konstitusi Serta Perubahan UUD 1945 Oleh Presiden, DPR, Dan Mahkamah Konstitusi. Yogyakarta: Gadjah Mada University Press, 2014.
Fudin, Hanif. “Aktualisasi Check and Balances Lembaga Negara: Antara Majelis Permusyawaratan Rakyat Dan Mahkamah Konstitusi.” Jurnal Konstitusi 19, no. 1 (2022): 202–24.
Hasani, Ismail. “Pengujian Konstitusionalitas Peraturan Daerah Dalam Sistem Ketatanegaraan Indonesia.” Universitas Gadjah Mada, 2019.
Huda, Ni’matul. “Problematika Pengaturan Tindak Lanjut Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Dalam Perkara Pidana Oleh Mahkamah Agung.” Jurnal Hukum Ius Quia Iustum 27, no. 3 (2020): 437–57.
Isra, Saldi. “Peran Mahkamah Konstitusi Dalam Penguatan Hak Asasi Manusia Di Indonesia.” Jurnal Konstitusi 11, no. 3 (2014): 409–27.
Isra, Saldi. Lembaga Negara: Konsep, Sejarah, Wewenang, Dan Dinamika Konstitusional. Depok: Rajawali Pers, 2020.
JR, Richard H. Fallon. Implementing the Constitution. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 2001.
Latief, Abdul. Mahkamah Konstitusi Dalam Upaya Mewujudkan Negara Hukum Demokrasi. Yogyakarta: Total Media, 2007.
Lalim, Tanto. “Problem Dan Solusi Penataan Checks and Balances System Dalam Pembentukan Dan Pengujian Undang-Undang Di Indonesia.” Negara Hukum: Membangun Hukum Untuk Keadilan Dan Kesejahteraan 12, no. 3 (2021): 123–42.
Limbach, Jutta, and Jutta Limbach. “The Concept of the Supremacy of the Constitution.” Modern Law Review 64, no. 1 (2001): 1–10.
Librayanto, Romi. Trias Politika Dalam Struktur Ketatanegaraan Indonesia. Makassar: Pukap, 2008.
Manan, Bagir dan Kuntana Magnar. Beberapa Masalah Hukum Tata Negara Indonesia. Bandung: Alumni, 1997.
M. Nggilu, Novendri. “Menggagas Sanksi Atas Tindakan Constitution Disobedience Terhadap Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi.” Jurnal Konstitusi 16, no. 1 (2019): 43–60.
Mochtar, Zainal Arifin. “Pasal Penghinaan, Hukum, Dan Demokrasi.” Kompas, 2022. https://www.kompas.id/baca/opini/2022/07/11/pasal-penghinaan-hukum-dan-demokras.
Palguna, I Dewa Gede. “Kedudukan Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Dan Perlindungan Hak Konstitusional Penghayat Kepercayaan.” Jurnal Magister Hukum Udayana (Udayana Master Law Journal) 10, no. 3 (2021): 495–515.
Pitoy, Hezky Fernando Pitoy. “Mekanisme Checks and Balances Antara Presiden Dan DPR Dalam Sistem Pemerintahan Presidensial Di Indonesia.” Jurnal Lex et Societatis 2, no. 5 (2014): 28–38.
Rahardjo, Satjipto. Ilmu Hukum. Bandung: Alumni, 1986.
Rachman, Irfan Nur. Politik Hukum Yudisial: Sumber Pembangunan Hukum Nasional. Depok: Rajawali Pers, 2020.
Rishan, Idul. “Kebijakan Reformasi Peradilan Dalam Pengelolaan Jabatan Hakim Setelah Perubahan Undang-Undang Dasar 1945.” Universitas Gadjah Mada, 2018.
Safa’at, Muchamad Ali. “Mahkamah Konstitusi Dalam Check and Balances.” Accessed November 20, 2021. http://safaat.lecture.ub.ac.id/files/2014/03/MAHKAMAH-KONSTITUSI-DALAM-SISTEM-CHECKS-AND-BALANCES.pdf.
Samsul, Inosentius. “Laporan Akhir Pengkajian Hukum Tentang Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi, Badan Pembinaan Hukum Nasional Kementerian Hukum Dan HAM.” Jakarta, 2009.
Soekanto, Soerjono dan Sri Mamudji. Penelitian Hukum Normatif Suatu Tinjauan Singkat. Jakarta: Raja Grafindo Persada, 2007.
Sunarto. “Prinsip Checks and Balances Dalam Sistem Ketatanegaraan Indonesia.” Masalah-Masalah Hukum, no. 2 (2016).
Strauss, Peter L.. “The Place of Agencies in Government: Separation of Powers and Fourth Branch.” Columbia Law School 84, no. 3 (1984): 573–669.
Sumardjono, Maria. SW.. Metodologi Penelitian Hukum (Bahan Kuliah). Yogyakarta: Universitas Gadjah Mada, 2019.
Yani, Ahmad. “Sistem Pemerintahan Indonesia: Pendekatan Teori Dan Praktek Konstitusi Undang-Undang Dasar 1945.” Jurnal Legislasi Indonesia 15, no. 2 (2018): 55–68.
Valchev, Daniel. “Democracy and Courts Beyond the Ideological Banality.” In Courts, Politics and Constitutional Law Judicialization of Politics and Politicization of the Judiciary, edited by Martin Belov, 1–254. New York: Routledge, 2019.
Wheare, K.C. Konstitusi-Konstitusi Modern. Surabaya: Pustaka Eureka, 2003.
Zamboni, Mauro. Law and Politics: A Dilemma for Contemporary Legal Theory. Berlin: Springer, 2008. https://link.springer.com/book/10.1007/978-3-540-73926-5.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Jurnal Konstitusi
![Creative Commons License](http://i.creativecommons.org/l/by-nc-sa/4.0/88x31.png)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Copyright of the published articles will be transferred to the journal as the publisher of the manuscripts. Therefore, the author confirms that the copyright has been managed by the publisher.
- The publisher of Jurnal Konstitusi is The Registrar and Secretariat General of the Constitutional Court of the Republic of Indonesia.
- The copyright follows Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License: This license allows reusers to distribute, remix, adapt, and build upon the material in any medium or format for noncommercial purposes only, and only so long as attribution is given to the creator. If you remix, adapt, or build upon the material, you must license the modified material under identical terms.