Ideologi Welfare State dalam Dasar Negara Indonesia: Analisis Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Terkait Sistem Jaminan Sosial Nasional

Authors

  • Alfitri Alfitri Fakultas Syariah, STAIN Samarinda Jl. Abul Hasan No. 5 Samarinda Kalimantan Timur

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.31078/jk932

Keywords:

Welfare State, Institutional versus Residualist, Keadilan Sosial, Jaminan Sosial, Asuransi Sosial

Abstract


Are the objective of Indonesia “promoting the general welfare”, and the fifth principle of Pancasila “social justice for all people of Indonesia”, as well as the constitutional mandate to hold a social security system must be expressed in terms of the state positions itself to be responsible for ensuring a decent standard of living for all citizens? This paper will analyze whether the interpretation of welfare state ideology of the government in the Act No. 40/2004 on National Social Security System had violated the 1945 Constitution. This paper supports the argument of   the Constitutional Court holding that social insurance programs adopted by the government meet the constitutional criteria. The existence of the constitutional criteria makesthe welfare state ideology of Indonesia open to interpretation, and this argument is more appropriate to the context and realistic about the ability of Indonesia to provide social security for its citizens.

References

“Indonesia: Jamkesmas,” Joint Learning Network for Universal Health Coverage, http://www.jointlearningnetwork.org/content/jamkesmas (accessed Aug. 21, 2011).
“Langkah Linglung RUU BPJS,” Kompas.com: Nasional29/07/2011, http://nasional.kompas.com/read/2011/07/29/10212420/Langkah.Linglung.RUU.BPJS (accessed July 29, 2011).
“Mereka Menolak RUU BPJS” Kompas.com: Nasional 29/07/2011, http://nasional.kompas.com/read/2011/07/29/10354989/Mereka.Menolak.RUU.BPJS (accessed, Jul. 29, 2011).
“Profil Bisnis”, PT. Asabri: Tentang Kami, http://www.asabri.co.id/profilbisnis.php (accessed Aug. 24, 2011);
“UU Sistem Jaminan Sosial Nasional Eksploitasi Rakyat”, Mahkamah Konstitusi Repulbik Indonesia: Berita Internal 16/03/2011, http://www.mahkamahkonstitusi.go.id/index.php?page=website.BeritaInternalLengkap&id=5134# (accessed Aug. 24, 2011).
“Welfare State.”Encyclopaedia Britannica. http://www.britannica.com/print/ topic/639266(accessed May 28, 2012).
Adler, Michael. “Social Security and Social Welfare”. The Oxford Handbook of Empirical Legal Research, eds. Peter Cane and Herbert M. Kritzer, 399-423 . Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2010.
Ferragina, Emanuele andSeeleib-Kaiser, Martin. “Welfare Regime Debate: Past, Present, Futures,” Policy & Politics, vol. 39, no. 4, (2011): 583-611.
Harris, Neville. “Welfare State”.The New Oxford Companion to Law, eds. Peter Cane and Joanne Conaghan. Oxford University Press Inc. Oxford Reference Online. Oxford University Press. University of Washington.http://www.oxfordreference.com.offcampus.lib.washington.edu/views/ENTRY.html?subview=Main&entry=t287.e2323 (accessed 28 May 2012).
McLean, Ed Iain and McMillan, Alistair. MC. “Welfare State”.The Concise Oxford Dictionary of Politics. Oxford University Press 2009. Oxford Reference Online. Oxford University Press. University of Washington. http://www.oxfordreference.com.offcampus.lib.washington.edu/views/ENTRY. html?subview=Main&entry=t86.e1462 (accessed 28 May 2012).
Nuryartono, Nunung dan Saparini, Hendri. “Kesenjangan Ekonomi Sosial dan Kemiskinan.”Ekonomi Konstitusi: Haluan Baru Kebangkitan Ekonomi Indonesia,eds. Soegeng Sarjadi dan Iman Sugema, 269-295. Jakarta: Soegeng Sarjadi Syndicate, 2009.
Pasha, Musthafa Kamal,et.al.Pancasila dalam Tinjauan Historis, Yuridis dan Filosofis. Yogyakarta: Citra Karsa Mandiri, 2002.
PT. Jamsostek: Company Profile,http://www.jamsostek.co.id/content/i.php?mid=2 (accessed Aug. 24, 2011);
Rothstein, Bo.Just Institution Matter: The Moral and Political Logic of the Universal Welfare State (Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 1998), 18.
Schaefer, David Lewis. “Procedural versus Substantive Justice: Rawls and Nozick,” Social Philosophy and Policy Foundation (2007): 165.
Sekretariat Negara Republik Indonesia, Risalah Sidang Badan Penyelidik Usaha- Usaha Persiapan Kemerdekaan – Panitia Persiapan Kemerdekaan Indonesia 28 Mei 1945 – 22 Agustus 1945. Jakarta: Sekretariat Negara RI, 1995.
Sen, Amartya.Development as Freedom. New York: Anchor Books, 2000. Undang-Undang No. 40/2004 tentang Sistem Jaminan Sosial Nasional. Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi, No. 002/PUU-I/2003.
Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi No. 022/PUU-I/2003. Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi No 58-59-60/PUU-II/2004. Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi No. 007/PUU-III/2005.
Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi No. 50/PUU-VIII/2010. Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi No. 1/PUU-VII/2009.

Downloads

Published

2016-05-20

How to Cite

Alfitri, Alfitri. 2016. “Ideologi Welfare State Dalam Dasar Negara Indonesia: Analisis Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Terkait Sistem Jaminan Sosial Nasional”. Jurnal Konstitusi 9 (3):449-72. https://doi.org/10.31078/jk932.

Issue

Vol. 9 No. 3 (2012)

Section

Articles

License

Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:

  1. Copyright of the published articles will be transferred to the journal as the publisher of the manuscripts. Therefore, the author confirms that the copyright has been managed by the publisher.
  2. The publisher of Jurnal Konstitusi is The Registrar and Secretariat General of the Constitutional Court of the Republic of Indonesia.
  3. The copyright follows Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License: This license allows reusers to distribute, remix, adapt, and build upon the material in any medium or format for noncommercial purposes only, and only so long as attribution is given to the creator. If you remix, adapt, or build upon the material, you must license the modified material under identical terms.