Ideas for Applying the Purcell Principle in Revision of the General Election Law
Gagasan Penerapan Purcell Principle Dalam Revisi Undang-Undang Pemilihan Umum
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.31078/jk2318Keywords:
Purcell Principle, Law Revision, General ElectionAbstract
This article examines the Purcell Principle, a topic that has received limited attention from Indonesian constitutional law and political science scholars despite its relevance to the 2024 General Election. Originating from Purcell v. Gonzalez case in the United States, the principle requires courts to exercise restraint in altering election rules when an election is imminent, in order to prevent voter confusion and electoral disorder. Against this backdrop, Constitutional Court Decision No. 90/PUU-XXI/2023 has been widely criticized as a form of abusive judicial review that departed from the Purcell Principle. This article argues that lawmakers should revise Law No. 7 of 2017 on General Elections by incorporating the principle for the 2029 election cycle. To ensure its effective implementation, legal reform must also strengthen dialogue and collaborative action among election related state institutions to build a shared understanding of the urgency of the Purcell Principle in securing honest, fair, and stable elections.
References
Ali, Mohammad Mahrus, dkk. “Tindak Lanjut Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Yang Bersifat Konstitutional Bersyarat Serta Memuat Norma Baru.” Jurnal Konstitusi 12, no. 3 (2015): 631–62. https://doi.org/10.31078/jk12310. DOI: https://doi.org/10.31078/jk12310
Amir, Mushaddiq. “Keserentakan Pemilu 2024 Yang Paling Ideal Berdasarkan Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Republik Indonesia.” Al-Ishlah: Jurnal Ilmiah Hukum 23, no. 2 (2020): 129. DOI: https://doi.org/10.33096/aijih.v23i2.41
Antony, dkk. “Legal Reform in Indonesia’s Response to the Digital Manipulation Era: A Responsive Legal Theory Approach.” Trunojoyo Law Review (TLR) 8, no. 1 (2026): 1–26. https://doi.org/10.21107/tlr.v8i1.30732.
Arizona, Yance. “Politik Legislasi Presiden Joko Widodo Dan Independensi Mahkamah Konstitusi.” Jurnal Konstitusi 21, no. 1 (2024): 36–59. https://doi.org/10.31078/jk2113. DOI: https://doi.org/10.31078/jk2113
Ayatullah, Akbar. “Kedudukan Peraturan Bersama Menteri Dalam Tata Urutan Peraturan Perundang-Undangan (Studi Terhadap Undang-Undang Nomor 12 Tahun 2011 Tentang Pembentukan Peraturan Perundang-Undangan).” Tesis Magister, Universitas Andalas, 2018.
Bagja, Rahmat. Penegakan Hukum Administrasi Pemilu: Konsep, Implementasi, Dan Model Ideal Dalam Melindungi Hak Untuk Dipilih. Depok: Rajawali Pers, 2025.
Bagja, Rahmat, dkk. “Towards Electoral Justice: Redesigning an Ideal System for Enforcing Electoral Administrative Law in Indonesia?” Jambe Law Journal 8, no. 2 (2025): 781–814. https://doi.org/10.22437/jlj.8.2.781-814. DOI: https://doi.org/10.22437/9et5k513
Beirne, Piers, dan James W. Messerschmidt. Criminology: A Sociological Approach. New York: Oxford University Press, 2014.
Bernhard, Michael. “Democratic Backsliding in Poland and Hungary.” Slavic Review 80, no. 3 (2021): 585–607. https://doi.org/10.1017/slr.2021.145. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/slr.2021.145
Bickel, Alexander M. The Least Dangerous Branch. New Haven: Yale University Press, 1986. [tautan mencurigakan telah dihapus].
Boemiya, Helmy. “Changes To The Regional Medium-Term Development Plan During The Covid-19 Pandemic Period In The Legal Perspective Of Regional Government.” Trunojoyo Law Review (TLR) 5, no. 1 (2023): 66–84. https://doi.org/10.21107/tlr.v5i1.21053. DOI: https://doi.org/10.21107/tlr.v5i1.21053
Brody, Carly L. “Republican National Committee v. Democratic National Committee: Reinterpreting the Court’s Role in Election Law Challenges.” Maryland Law Review 80, no. 4 (2021): 1191.
Callen, Michael, dan James D. Long. “Institutional Corruption and Election Fraud: Evidence from A Field Experiment in Afghanistan.” The American Economic Review 105, no. 1 (2015): 354. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.20120427
Codrington III, Wilfred U. “Purcell In Pandemic.” New York University Law Review 96 (2021): 942–83. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3891775
D’Anieri, Paul. “Elections, Succession, and Legitimacy in Ukraine: Lessons from Six Presidential Transitions.” Communist and Post-Communist Studies (2023): 2–22. https://doi.org/10.1525/cpcs.2023.2001608. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1525/cpcs.2023.2001608
DeGirolami, Marc O., dan Kevin C. Walsh. “Judge Posner, Judge Wilkinson, and Judicial Critique of Constitutional Theory.” Notre Dame Law Review 90, no. 2 (2014): 636. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2399487
Dixon, Rosalind, dan David Landau. “1989–2019: From Democratic to Abusive Constitutional Borrowing.” International Journal of Constitutional Law 17, no. 2 (2019): 489–96. https://doi.org/10.1093/icon/moz038. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/icon/moz038
Dixon, Rosalind, dan Vicki C. Jackson. “Constitutions Inside Out: Outsider Interventions in Domestic Constitutional Contests.” UNSW Law Research Paper, no. 2012–53 (2012): 149–64. https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2174134.
Dodsworth, Harry B. “The Positive and Negative Purcell Principle.” Utah Law Review 2022, no. 5 (2022): 1082–1134.
Elklit, Jorgen, dan Palle Svensson. “What Makes Elections Free And Fair?” Journal of Democracy 8, no. 3 (1997): 32–46. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1353/jod.1997.0041
Faiz, Pan Mohamad. “Memperkuat Prinsip Pemilu Yang Teratur, Bebas, Dan Adil Melalui Pengujian Konstitusionalitas Undang-Undang.” Jurnal Konstitusi 14, no. 3 (2017): 672–700. https://doi.org/10.31078/jk14310. DOI: https://doi.org/10.31078/jk14310
Gans, David. “The Roberts Court, The Shadow Docket, and the Unraveling of Voting Rights Remedies.” Issue Brief, American Constitution Society, 2020: 1–19.
Gao, Ruoyun. “Why The Purcell Principle Should Be Abolished.” Duke Law Journal 71 (2022): 1140–74.
Gunawan, Adi, dan Febrina Heryanti. “Analisa Yuridis Potensi Revisi UU No.7 Tahun 2017 Tentang Pemilu.” Jurnal Pendidikan Dan Konseling 4, no. 5 (2022): 382–90.
Habibullah, Abd Wachid, dkk. “Actualization of Public Service Principles by the Ombudsman of the Republic of Indonesia.” Journal of Indonesian Constitutional Law 1, no. 2 (2024): 126–39. https://doi.org/10.71239/jicl.v1i2.30. DOI: https://doi.org/10.71239/jicl.v1i2.30
Hantoro, Bimo Fajar. “Originalisme Dan Syarat Keserentakan Pemilu Dalam Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi.” Undang: Jurnal Hukum 6, no. 1 (2023): 33–64. https://doi.org/10.22437/ujh.6.1.33-64.
Harijanti, Susi Dwi. “MK Dan ‘Abusive Judicial Review’: Eksaminasi Putusan No. 90/PUU-XXI/2023.” Makalah dipresentasikan pada Eksaminasi di FH UGM, Yogyakarta, 27 Oktober 2023.
Houston, Rachel. “Does Anybody Really Know What Time It Is?: How the US Supreme Court Defines ‘Time’ Using The Purcell Principle.” Nevada Law Journal 23, no. 3 (2023): 769–807. https://scholars.law.unlv.edu/nlj/vol23/iss3/5.
Huda, Ni’matul. “Gagasan Amandemen (Ulang) UUD 1945 (Usulan Untuk Penguatan DPD Dan Kekuasaan Kehakiman).” Jurnal Hukum Ius Quia Iustum 15, no. 3 (2008): 373–92. https://doi.org/10.20885/iustum.vol15.iss3.art4. DOI: https://doi.org/10.20885/iustum.vol15.iss3.art4
Hughes, Heather C., dan Israel Waismel-Manor. “The Macedonian Fake News Industry and the 2016 US Election.” PS: Political Science & Politics 54, no. 1 (2021): 19–23. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1049096520000992. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S1049096520000992
Junaidi. “Analisis Yuridis Keberadaan Peraturan Bersama Menteri Dalam Sistem Peraturan Perundang-Undangan Di Indonesia.” Jurnal PSMH UNTAN 9, no. 3 (2013): 1–15. https://jurnal.untan.ac.id/index.php/nestor/article/view/4445.
Kavanagh, Aileen. “Judicial Restraint in the Pursuit of Justice.” The University of Toronto Law Journal 60, no. 1 (2010): 23–29. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1353/tlj.0.0036
Krennerich, Michael. “Report on Electoral Law and Electoral Administration In Europe: Synthesis Study on Recurrent Challenges and Problematic Issues.” Venice Commission: Study No. 965/2019, 2020.
Kurniawaty, Yuniar. “Penggunaan Diskresi Dalam Pembentukan Produk Hukum.” Jurnal Legislasi Indonesia 13, no. 1 (2016): 59–60. DOI: https://doi.org/10.54629/jli.v13i1.140
Landau, David. “Abusive Constitutionalism.” U.C. Davis Law Review 47 (2013): 189–260. https://ir.law.fsu.edu/articles/555.
Landau, David, dan Rosalind Dixon. “Abusive Judicial Review: Courts Against Democracy.” U.C. Davis Law Review 53, no. 3 (2020): 1313–88. https://lawreview.law.ucdavis.edu/archives/53/3/abusive-judicial-review-courts-against-democracy.
Landman, Todd, dan Neil Robinson, eds. Handbook of Comparative Politics. California: Sage, 2009. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4135/9780857021083
Lowenstein, Daniel Hays, dkk. Election Law: Cases and Materials. Durham, North Carolina: Carolina Academic Press, 2022.
Mahfud MD, Moh. Konstitusi Dan Hukum Konstitusi Dalam Kontroversi Isu. Jakarta: Rajawali Pers, 2009.
Mahendra, Yusril Ihza. Dinamika Tata Negara Indonesia. Jakarta: Gema Insani Press, 1996.
Manan, Bagir. Perkembangan UUD 1945. Yogyakarta: FH UII Press, 2004.
Mares, David. Tinjauan buku Dismantling Democracy in Venezuela: The Chávez Authoritarian Experiment oleh Allan R. Brewer-Carias. Political Science Quarterly 126, no. 3 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1002/j.1538-165X.2011.tb02184.x. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/j.1538-165X.2011.tb02184.x
Maurer, Ardita Driza. “Legality, Separation of Powers, Stability of Electoral Law: The Impact of New Voting Technologies.” Disertasi Doktoral, University of Zurich, 2016.
Mendy, Ousu. “Constitutional Amendments in Indonesia: An Analytical Perspective of the Reformation Agenda.” Journal of Indonesian Constitutional Law 2, no. 3 (2025): 406–25. https://doi.org/10.71239/jicl.v2i3.201. DOI: https://doi.org/10.71239/jicl.v2i3.201
Morley, Michael T. “Postponing Federal Elections Due to Election Emergencies.” Washington and Lee Law Review Online 77, no. 1 (2020): 210–13. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3619213
Mudatsir, Ahmad, dan Samsuri. “Melacak Kerancuan Legal Reasoning Dalam Putusan MK 90/PUU-XXI/2023: Analisis Dengan Metode IRAC.” Peradaban Journal Of Law And Society 2, no. 2 (2023): 178–79. DOI: https://doi.org/10.59001/pjls.v2i2.132
Nanda, Arsyianti Mega, dan Erland Ferdinansyah. “Ius Constituendum Pengaturan Ambang Batas Parlemen Berdasarkan Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 116/PUU-XXI/2023.” Jurnal Hukum & Pembangunan 55, no. 3 (2025): 591–618. https://doi.org/10.21143/jhp.vol55.no.3.2004.
Nggilu, Novendri M. “Menggagas Sanksi Atas Tindakan Constitution Disobedience Terhadap Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi.” Jurnal Konstitusi 16, no. 1 (2019): 43–60. https://doi.org/10.31078/jk1613. DOI: https://doi.org/10.31078/jk1613
Nggilu, Novendri M., dkk. “Constitutional Crisis: Intensifying Disobedience to the Decisions of the Indonesian Constitutional Court.” Revista Chilena de Derecho 50, no. 2 (2023): 115–32. https://doi.org/10.7764/R.502.5. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7764/R.502.5
———. “Judicial Review of Constitutional Amendments: Comparison Between India, Germany, Colombia, and the Relevancy with Indonesia.” Lex Scientia Law Review 8, no. 1 (2024): 261–91. https://doi.org/10.15294/lslr.v8i1.1901. DOI: https://doi.org/10.15294/lslr.v8i1.1901
Nisa, Miskha Ainun, dan Adhitya Widya Kartika. “Eksistensi Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Dalam Rancangan Undang-Undang Pemilihan Kepala Daerah (Studi Putusan Nomor 60/PUU-XXII/2024 Dan Nomor 70/PUU-XXII/2024).” Jurnal Hukum Samudra Keadilan 20, no. 1 (2025): 62–77. https://doi.org/10.33059/jhsk.v20i1.11341. DOI: https://doi.org/10.33059/jhsk.v20i1.11341
Nugroho, Rahmat Muhajir, dkk. “Judicial Activism vs Electoral Justice: The Overlooked Purcell Principle in Indonesia.” Jurnal Hukum Ius Quia Iustum 32, no. 2 (2025): 361–85. https://doi.org/10.20885/iustum.vol32.iss2.art5. DOI: https://doi.org/10.20885/iustum.vol32.iss2.art5
Parmadi, Haru, dan Oppy Pramudya Wisnu Wardhana. “Konflik Kepentingan Dalam Putusan MK Nomor 90/PUU/XXI/2023.” Jurnal Maksigama 17, no. 2 (2023): 116–25.
Path, Kosal. “A Cambodian Fusion of Personality, Party and the State.” Current History 117, no. 800 (2018): 215–21. https://doi.org/10.1525/curh.2018.117.800.215. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1525/curh.2018.117.800.215
Perdana, Aditya, dan Muhammad Imam. “Judisialisasi Politik Dalam Putusan MK Terkait Batas Usia Cawapres Dalam Pilpres 2024.” Jurnal Bawaslu DKI Jakarta 8, no. 3 (2023): 69–92.
Posner, Richard A. “The Meaning of Judicial Self-Restraint.” Indiana Law Journal 59, no. 1 (1983): 1–24. https://www.repository.law.indiana.edu/ilj/vol59/iss1/1.
———. “The Rise and Fall of Judicial Self-Restraint.” California Law Review 100, no. 3 (2012): 520–56.
Pozen, David E. “Constitutional Bad Faith.” Harvard Law Review 129 (2016): 885–955. https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2672386.
Purnomowati, Reni. Implementasi Sistem Bikameral Dalam Parlemen Indonesia. Jakarta: PT. Rajagrafindo Persada, 2005.
Ristyawati, Aprista. “Penguatan Hak Konstitusional Warga Negara Indonesia Pasca Putusan Nomor 20/PUU-XVII/2019.” Administrative Law & Governance Journal 2, no. 2 (2019): 259–67. https://doi.org/10.14710/alj.v2i2.259-267. DOI: https://doi.org/10.14710/alj.v2i2.259-267
Ruiz, José Oliveros. “Report on Abusive Judicial Review of Electoral Matters.” Mexican Law Review 16, no. 1 (2023): 45–76. https://doi.org/10.22201/iij.24485306e.2023.1.18457. DOI: https://doi.org/10.22201/iij.24485306e.2023.1.18457
Saifulloh, Putra Perdana Ahmad, dkk. “Legal Standing to the Corruption Eradication Commission As a Applicant for the Dissolution of a Political Party at the Constitutional Court.” Jurnal Konstitusi 20, no. 2 (2023): 318–39. https://doi.org/10.31078/jk2028. DOI: https://doi.org/10.31078/jk2028
———. “Reconstruction of Restrictions on the President’s Power in Determining the Posture of Ministries in the Indonesian Government System.” Jambura Law Review 7, no. 2 (2025): 521–58. https://doi.org/10.33756/jlr.v7i2.29684.
Schmidt, Casey P. “Disrupting Election Day: Reconsidering the Purcell Principle as a Federalism Doctrine.” Virginia Law Review 110 (2024): 2–51.
Shamir, Ronen. “Landmark Cases and the Reproduction of Legitimacy: The Case of Israel’s High Court of Justice.” Law & Society Review 24, no. 3 (1990): 781. https://doi.org/10.2307/3053859. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/3053859
Shemtob, Zachary Baron. “Following Thayer: The Conflicting Models of Judicial Restraint.” Boston University Public Interest Law Journal 21, no. 1 (2011): 11.
Simabura, Charles. “Legislative Power In The Presidential Government System: A Comparative Study Between Indonesia And In The United States Of America.” Journal of Legal, Ethical and Regulatory Issues 24, no. 6 (2021): 1.
Soemantri, Sri. Prosedur Dan Sistem Perubahan Konstitusi. Bandung: Alumni, 1987.
Solomon, Robert C., dan Mark C. Murphy, eds. What Is Justice?: Classic and Contemporary Readings. New York: Oxford University Press, 1990.
Talmadge, Philip. “Understanding the Limits of Power: Judicial Restraint in General Jurisdiction Court Systems.” Seattle University Law Review 22, no. 2 (1999): 707.
Thayer, James B. The Origin and Scope of the American Doctrine of Constitutional Law. Boston: Little, Brown and Company, 1893. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/1322284
Tronconi, Filippo, dan Marco Valbruzzi. “Populism Put to the Polarisation Test: The 2019–20 Election Cycle in Italy.” South European Society and Politics 25, no. 3–4 (2020): 475–501. https://doi.org/10.1080/13608746.2020.1821465. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/13608746.2020.1821465
Tushnet, Mark. Weak Courts, Strong Rights: Judicial Review And Social Welfare Rights In Comparative Constitutional Law. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2008. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/9781400828159
Venice Commission. Compilation of Venice Commission Opinions And Reports Concerning The Stability of Electoral Law. Strasbourg: Venice Commission, 2020.
Watson, Danika Elizabeth. “Free and Fair: Judicial Intervention in Elections Beyond the Purcell Principle and Anderson-Burdick Balancing.” Fordham Law Review 90, no. 3 (2021): 991.
West, Lucy. “The Limits to Judicial Independence: Cambodia’s Political Culture and the Civil Law.” Democratization 26, no. 3 (2019): 537–38. https://doi.org/10.1080/13510347.2018.1553956. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/13510347.2018.1553956
Wicaksono, Dian Agung, dan Andi Sandi Antonius Tabusassa Tonralipu. “Mencari Jejak Konsep Judicial Restraint Dalam Praktik Kekuasaan Kehakiman Di Indonesia.” Jurnal Hukum & Pembangunan 51, no. 1 (2021): 178–201. https://doi.org/10.21143/jhp.vol51.no1.3014.
Wicaksono, Dian Agung, dan Garuda Era Ruhpinesthi. “Initiation of the Purcell Principle by the Constitutional Court in Judicial Review Related to the Law of General Elections.” Jurnal Konstitusi 22, no. 1 (2025): 109–36. https://doi.org/10.31078/jk2216. DOI: https://doi.org/10.31078/jk2216
Zamili, Ester, dan Timbul Dompak. “Perbandingan Sistem Pemilihan Presiden Indonesia Dengan Turki.” Prosiding Seminar Nasional Ilmu Sosial Dan Teknologi (SNISTEK) 6 (2024): 164–69.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Jurnal Konstitusi
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Copyright of the published articles will be transferred to the journal as the publisher of the manuscripts. Therefore, the author confirms that the copyright has been managed by the publisher.
- The publisher of Jurnal Konstitusi is The Registrar and Secretariat General of the Constitutional Court of the Republic of Indonesia.
- The copyright follows Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License: This license allows reusers to distribute, remix, adapt, and build upon the material in any medium or format for noncommercial purposes only, and only so long as attribution is given to the creator. If you remix, adapt, or build upon the material, you must license the modified material under identical terms.
