Redesign of Positive Fictitious Efforts After the Job Creation Law

Redesain Upaya Fiktif Positif Pasca Undang-Undang Cipta Kerja

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.31078/jk2029

Keywords:

Job Creation law, Positive Fictitious, State Administrative Court, State Administrative Decision

Abstract


The Job Creation Law has not only changed positive-fictitious construction from ten to five days, but also abolished the administration court authority in deciding positive-fictitious applications. Naturally, every administrative action can be sued by the public to court with the aim that these actions follow legal rules and human rights values. Thus, the administrative court authority in deciding positive-fictitious applications is a control mechanism so that there is no abuse of authority from government. This article discuss: 1) the legal-historical and dynamics of positive-fictitious decisions; 2) the implications of positive-fictitious arrangements in job creation law, and 3) the redesign of positive-fictitious efforts after job creation law. The results of this research indicate that after the Job Creation Law, it is necessary to review the positive-fictitious decisions, especially by paying attention to the institution authorized to decide on fictitious applications, the use of AI applications, and the time of fictitious submissions.

Author Biographies

Zaka Firma Aditya, Indonesian Constitutional Court, Jakarta, Indonesia

Zaka Firma Aditya obtained his Bachelor of Laws (SH) degree from the Faculty of Law, State University of Semarang (UNNES), in 2014. He then earned his Master of Laws (MH) degree from the Faculty of Law, Airlangga University Surabaya, in 2017 through the LPDP scholarship from the Indonesian Ministry of Finance. The author is interested in writing and researching Constitutional Law, Comparative Constitutional Law, and Constitutional Jurisprudence. His writings have been published nationally and internationally in law journals and scientific proceedings. Currently, the author serves as an Expert Assistant to the Constitutional Judge at the Constitutional Court of the Republic of Indonesia.  

Sholahuddin Al-Fatih, Faculty of Law, University of Muhammadiyah Malang, Malang, Indonesia

Salahuddin Al-fatih obtained his Bachelor of Laws (SH) degree from the Faculty of Law, Universitas Brawijaya. He also holds a Master of Laws (MH) degree from the Faculty of Law, Universitas Airlangga Surabaya, which he obtained in 2017 through the LPDP scholarship from the Ministry of Finance of the Republic of Indonesia. He is pursuing a Doctor of Law degree at the Faculty of Law, Universitas Brawijaya. The author is a Lecturer at the Faculty of Law, Muhammadiyah University of Malang, and serves as the Editor-in-Chief of the Legality Journal: Journal of Legal Science (Scopus accredited). Apart from his role as a journal editor, he actively publishes papers in nationally and internationally accredited journals and books.  

References

Aditya, Zaka Firma. “Judicial Consistency dalam Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi tentang Pengujian Undang-Undang Penodaan Agama” Jurnal Konstitusi 17, no. 1 (2020): 080–103.

Aditya, Zaka Firma, and Abdul Basid Fuadi. Konsep Kedudukan Hukum Pemohon Dalam Perkara Pengujian Undang-Undang Di Mahkamah Konstitusi . Depok: Rajawali Pers, 2022.

Aditya, Zaka Firma, and Abdul Basid Fuadi. “Questioning the Legal Standing Conception in the Formal Review at Indonesian Constitutional Court.” International Journal of Civil Law and Legal Research 2, no. 1 (2021): 43–7.

Al-Fatih, Sholahuddin, and Ahmad Siboy. Menulis Artikel Karya Ilmiah Hukum Di Jurnal Nasional Dan Internasional Bereputasi. Malang: Inteligensia Media, 2021.

Anthony, Gordon. “Administrative Silence and UK Public Law.” The Juridical Current 34 (2008): 1-13.

Batalli, Mirlinda. “Consequences of Administrative Silence in Public Administration.” SEER Journal for Labour and Social Affairs in Eastern Europe 20, no. 1 (2017): 139–52.

Çani, Eralda (Methasani). “Administrative Silence: Omission of Public Administration to React as an Administrative Decision-Taking 1.” Studime Juridike (Juridical Studies), Juridical Scientific Journal XV, no. 4 (2014): 151-73.

Hughes, Owen E. Public Management and Administration, An Introduction. Springer, 1998.

Jaja, Tonye Clinton, and Zaka Firma Aditya. “Promoting the Good Governance by Advancing the Role of Parliamentarians and the Term Offices Limitation (Comparing Nigeria and Indonesia).” Journal of Indonesian Legal Studies 7, no. 1 (June 2022): 265–98.

Marzuki, Peter Mahmud. Penelitian Hukum. Jakarta: Kencana Prenada Media Group, 2014.

Parisio, Vera. “The Italian Administrative Procedure Act and Public Authorities’ Silence.” Hamline L. Rev. 36, no. 1 (2013): 1–25.

Simanjuntak, Enrico. “Perkara Fiktif Positif Dan Permasalahan Hukumnya.” Jurnal Hukum Dan Peradilan 6, no. 3 (2017): 379-98.

Simanjuntak, Enrico. “Prospek Prinsip Fiktif Positif Dalam Menunjang Kemudahan Berusaha Di Indonesia.” RechtsVinding 7, no. 2

Sugiarto, Laga. “Pemaknaan Surat Keputusan Yang Bersifat Deklaratif Dan Konstitutif (Implikasi SK Menkumham Tentang Pengesahan Perubahan Anggaran Dasar Rumah Tangga Serta Komposisi Dan Personalia Dewan Pimpinan Pusat Golongan Karya).” Jurnal Kajian Hukum 2, no. 2 (2017): 243–69.

Tim Penyusun. Anotasi Undang-Undang No. 30 Tahun 2014 Tentang Administrasi Pemerintahan. Jakarta: Universitas Indonesia – Center for Study of Governance and Administrative Reform, 2017.

Usman, Rachmadi. Aspek-Aspek Hukum Perorangan Dan Kekeluargaan Di Indonesia. Jakarta: Sinar Grafika, 2006.

Utama, Kartika Widya. “Surat Keputusan Tata Usaha Negara Yang Bersifat Fiktif Positif.” Notarius 8, no. 2 (2015): 141-51. https://ejournal.undip.ac.id/index.php/notarius/article/view/10259.

Wairocana, I Gusti Ngurah, I Wayan Bela Siki Layang, Ketut Sudiarta, Putu Ade Hariestha Martana, Kadek Agus Sudiarawan, and Bagus Hermanto. “Kendala Dan Cara Hakim Peradilan Tata Usaha Negara Pasca Uu Administrasi Pemerintahan: Suatu Pendekatan Atas Penanganan Perkara Fiktif Positif.” Jurnal Hukum & Pembangunan 50, no. 3 (2020): 563–85. https://scholarhub.ui.ac.id/jhp/vol50/iss3/2/

Wicaksono, Dian Agung, Hantoro, Bimo Fajar, Kurniawan, Dedy. “Quo Vadis Pengaturan Kewenangan Pengadilan Tata Usaha Negara Dalam Penerimaan Permohonan Fiktif Positif Pasca Penataan Regulasi Dalam Undang-Undang.” Jurnal Rechtsvinding 10, no. 2 (2021): 323–37.

Downloads

Published

2023-06-01

How to Cite

Aditya, Zaka Firma, and Sholahuddin Al-Fatih. 2023. “Redesign of Positive Fictitious Efforts After the Job Creation Law : Redesain Upaya Fiktif Positif Pasca Undang-Undang Cipta Kerja”. Jurnal Konstitusi 20 (2):340-57. https://doi.org/10.31078/jk2029.

Issue

Vol. 20 No. 2 (2023)

Section

Articles

License

Copyright (c) 2023 Jurnal Konstitusi

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:

  1. Copyright of the published articles will be transferred to the journal as the publisher of the manuscripts. Therefore, the author confirms that the copyright has been managed by the publisher.
  2. The publisher of Jurnal Konstitusi is The Registrar and Secretariat General of the Constitutional Court of the Republic of Indonesia.
  3. The copyright follows Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License: This license allows reusers to distribute, remix, adapt, and build upon the material in any medium or format for noncommercial purposes only, and only so long as attribution is given to the creator. If you remix, adapt, or build upon the material, you must license the modified material under identical terms.