Legitimacy of Non-Formal Constitutional Reforms and Restrictions on Constitutionalism

Legitimasi Perubahan Konstitusi Non-formal dan Pembatasannya dalam Paham Konstitusionalisme

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.31078/jk2024

Keywords:

Non-formal Constitutional Change, Judicial Interpretation, Legitimacy and Limitation, Legislative Interpretation

Abstract


Non-formal constitutional change through legislative and judicial interpretation raises issues of legitimacy, and restrictions on non-formal changes can be made. This research aims to determine the legitimacy and explore the limitations of non-formal constitutional changes. This research uses normative legal methods with statutory, conceptual and case approaches. The results show that the legitimacy of non-formal constitutional changes is measured based on procedural legitimacy; that is, non-formal changes must be based on authority, and these changes do not affect the meaning of the Constitution as a whole. It is also measured based on substantial legitimacy; namely, non-formal changes to protect human rights. The limitation on changing the non-formal constitution is based on the main substance, which cannot be changed through non-formal changes such as constitutional structure, human rights, restrictions on authority and restrictions based on the moral constitution of the oath of office to implement and enforce the constitution.

Author Biographies

Fajlurrahman Jurdi, Faculty of Law, Hasanuddin University, Makassar, Indonesia

Fajlurrahman Jurdi is an Assistant Professor at the Department of Constitutional Law, Faculty of Law, Hasanuddin University. He has written 33 books and dozens of scientific articles, served as the editor for hundreds of books covering various themes, and contributed hundreds of opinions to different media outlets. Additionally, he has presented dozens of papers at various seminars and dialogue forums. He has spoken in numerous seminars, dialogues, and discussion forums. He has also made appearances on local television and radio, as well as conducted research in the field of constitutional law studies. His research has focused on law, policy, and state institutions. Moreover, he has provided consultation services to prepare academic papers on local regulations in several regions. At the end of 2022, he received two awards from Koran Identitas for being the most productive book writer among lecturers and the most productive article writer at Hasanuddin University.  

Ahmad Yani, Faculty of Law, Gadjah Mada University, Yogyakarta, Indonesia

Ahmad Yani was born in Waji Village in 1996. He graduated from the Faculty of Law at Hasanuddin University in 2018. Currently, he is a Postgraduate student at the Faculty of Law, Gadjah Mada University, Yogyakarta, since 2022, under the LPDP Scholarship of the Indonesian Ministry of Finance. Furthermore, the author has been a permanent employee at the General Election Commission of South Sulawesi Province since 2020.  

References

Ajie, Radita. “Batasan Pilihan Kebijakan Pembentuk Undang-Undang (Open Legal Policy) Dalam Pembentukan Peraturan Perundang-Undangan Berdasarkan Tafsir Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi.” Jurnal Legislasi Indonsia 13, no. 02 (2016): 111-20.

Albert, Richard. “Quasi-Constitutional Amendments.” Buffalo Law Review 65, no. 4 (2017): 739-70. https://digitalcommons.law.buffalo.edu/buffalolawreview/vol65/iss4/2/.

Dicey, A.V. Pengantar Studi Hukum Konstitusi-Terjemahan. Bandung: Nusa Media, 2015.

Doyle, Oran. “Informal Constitutional Change.” Buffalo Law Review 65, no. 5 (2017): 1021- 038. https://digitalcommons.law.buffalo.edu/buffalolawreview/vol65/iss5/2/.

Faiz, Pan Mohammad. Amandemen Konstitusi Komparasi Negara Kesatuan Dan Negara Federal. Jakarta: PT RajaGRafindo, 2019.

Falaakh, Mohammad Fajrul. Model Dan Pertumbuhan Konstitusi. Yogyakarta: Gadjah Mada University Press, 2014.

Gaffar, Janedjri M. “Peran Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Dalam Perlindungan Hak Asasi Manusia Terkait Penyelenggaraan Pemilu.” Jurnal Konstitusi 10, no. 1 (2013): 1-32.

Harijanti, Susi Dwi. “20 Tahun Mempertahankan Konstitusi Hasil Reformasi.” In Konferensi Nasional Hukum Tata Negara VII, Malang, 2022.

Herlambang, Unu P. “The Doctrine of Unconstitutional Constitutional Amendments.” Al Wasath Jurnal Ilmu Hukum 3, no. 1 (2022): 69-77. http://journal.unusia.ac.id/index. php/alwasath/article/download/348/247.

Isra, S, and F Amsari. “Perubahan Konstitusi Melalui Tafsir Hakim.” Bphn. Go. Id, 2019. http://bphn.go.id/data/documents/makalah_fgd.rtf.

Kurnia, Titon Slemet. Konstitusi HAM Undang-Undang Dasar Negara Republik Indonesia Tahun 1945 & Mahkamah Konstitusi Republik Indonesia. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar, 2014.

Lailam, Iwan Satriawan dan Tanto. “Open Legal Policy Dalam Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Dan Pembentukan Undang-Undang.” Jurnal Konstitusi 16, no. 1 (2019): 559-84.

Martin, Craign. “The Legitimacy of Informal Constitutional Amendment and The ‘Reinterpretation’ of Japan’s War Powers.” Fordham International Law Journal 40, no. 1 (2017): 427-521. https://ssrn.com/abstract=2931163.

Marzuki, Peter Mahmud. Penelitian Hukum. Jakarta: Kencana Penada Media Group, 2010.

Mochtar, Zainal Arifin. Kekuasaan Kehakiman Mahkamah Konstitusi Diskursus Judicial Activism Vs Judicial Restraint. Jakarta: PT RajaGRafindo, 2021.

Nasution, Adnan Buyung. Aspirasi Pemerintahan Konstitusional Studi Sosio-Legal Atas Konstituante 1956-1959. Jakarta: Pustaka Utama Grafiti, 1995.

Nurbaningsih, Enny. “Bahan Ajar Mata Kuliah Teori Dan Hukum Konstitusi.” In Bahan Ajar, 2022.

Passchier, Reijer. “Formal an Informal Constitutional Change in The Netherlands.” Change in The Netherlands”, Eleven Publishers, Forthcoming, 2018: 1-13. https:// dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2975751.

Reininda, Veri Junaidi dan Violla. “Relasi Presiden Dan DPR Dalam Pembentukan Undang- Undang Pada Sistem Pemerintahan Presidensial Multipartai.” Jurnal Jentera 3, no. 1 (2020): 216-39. https://jurnal.jentera.ac.id/index.php/jentera/article/ view/18.

Rosalind Dixon and David Landau. Abusive Constitutional Borrowing: Legal Globalization and the Subversion of Liberal Democracy. UK: Oxford University Press, 2021.

Roznai, Yaniv. “The Theory and Practice ‘Supra-Constitutional’ Limits on Constitutional Amendments.” The International and Comparative Law Quarterly 62, no. 3 (2013): 557- 97. https://www.jstor.org/stable/43301579.

Said, Aldiansyah dan Muhtar. “Perubahan Non-Formal Konstitusi Di Indonesia Pasca Reformasi Berdasarkan Pemikiran Fajrul Falaakh.” Al Wasath Jurnal Ilmu Hukum 2, no. 2 (2021): 89-96. https://journal.unusia.ac.id/index.php/alwasath/article/download/253/203.

Soemantri, Sri. Prosedur Dan Sistem Perubahan Konstitusi. Bandung: Alumni, 1978.

Strong, C.F. Konstitusi-Konstitusi Politik Modern-Terjemahan. Bandung: Nusa Media, 2015.

Sumardjono, Maria SW. Metodelogi Penelitian Ilmu Hukum. Yogyakarta: Fakultas Hukum Gadjah Mada, 2021.

Umbu Rauta, Indirani Wauran, Ninon Melatyugra. “Legitimasi Praktik Overruling Di Mahkamah Konstitusi.” Jakarta, 2018.

Wardaya, Manunggal K. “Perubahan Konstitusi Melalui Putusan MK: Telaah Atas Putusan Nomor 138/PUU-VII/2009.” Jurnal Konstitusi 7, no. 2 (2010): 19-45.

Wheare, K.C. Konstitusi-Konstitusi Modern-Terjemahan. Bandung: Nusa Media, n.d.

Wibowo, Mardian. Asas-Asas Pengujian Undang-Undang. Jakarta: PT RajaGRafindo, 2020.

Winata, Muhammad Reza. Pengujian Konstitusionalitas Undang-Undang: Rigiditas Tindak Lanjut Dalam Pembentukan Undang-Undang. Jakarta: PT RajaGRafindo, 2020.

Yani, Ahmad. “Periodic Review Terhadap Undang-Undang Untuk Mewujudkan Good Legislation.” Civic Hukum 7, no. 2 (2022): 138-47.

Downloads

Published

2023-06-01

How to Cite

Jurdi, Fajlurrahman, and Ahmad Yani. 2023. “Legitimacy of Non-Formal Constitutional Reforms and Restrictions on Constitutionalism: Legitimasi Perubahan Konstitusi Non-Formal Dan Pembatasannya Dalam Paham Konstitusionalisme”. Jurnal Konstitusi 20 (2):238-56. https://doi.org/10.31078/jk2024.

Issue

Section

Articles