Reformulation of Public Participation in Fast- Track Legislation in an Open Cumulative National Legislative Program

Reformulasi Partisipasi Publik dalam Pembentukan Undang-Undang secara Cepat pada Prolegnas Kumulatif Terbuka

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.31078/jk2047

Keywords:

Law, People, Participation

Abstract


One of the factors contributing to the suboptimal implementation of “meaningful participation” is the exploitation of legal loopholes to expedite the creation of open cumulative draft laws (RUU). This issue is further complicated by Constitutional Court Decision Number 90/PUU XVIII/2020, which states that the formation of open cumulative draft laws does not necessitate general public participation, thereby posing a distinct challenge. In the context of this matter, by employing a normative legal research method, the author examines the urgency of public participation in the development of open cumulative draft laws through a “fast track” legislative process. The study’s results cover three main topics: (1) the mechanism of open cumulative draft law design and its relationship to “fast track” legislation; (2) the legal implications stemming from the Constitutional Court’s considerations regarding public participation in the creation of open cumulative draft laws; (3) the essence of integrating public participation into open cumulative draft laws using the “fast track” legislative method.

Author Biographies

Anugerah Perdana, Faculty of Law, Islamic University of Indonesia, Yogyakarta, Indonesia

Muhammad Anugerah Perdana is a current undergraduate student at the Faculty of Law, Islamic University of Indonesia. He previously worked as a Staff Researcher at the Centre for Constitutional Law Studies, Islamic University of Indonesia. As a student, he actively wrote in various media outlets, such as KawanHukum.Id, on topics such as the Formil Test Process after the Revision of the PPP Law. He has also authored books, including Academic Script of the Fifth Amendment of the NRI Constitution on PPHN, published by MPR RI, Constitutional Resilience, published by PSHK UII Press, and finally, Anthology of Young Jurists, published by JPI Press.

Carolus Boromeus Enggal, Faculty of Law, Gadjah Mada University, Yogyakarta, Indonesia

Carolus Borromeus Enggal is a graduate of the Faculty of Law at Gadjah Mada University. He used to actively participate in competitions while he was a student, and achieved 3rd place in Legislative Drafting organized by the Sciensational Faculty of Law, University of Indonesia in 2021, as well as 3rd place in Legislative Drafting Mohamad Natsir Cup at the Islamic University of Indonesia.

Raden Mahdum, Faculty of Law, Islamic University of Indonesia, Yogyakarta, Indonesia

Raden Mahdum was born on February 10th, 2002 in Indramayu. He is an active member of the Indonesian Young Entrepreneurs Association of West Java and often writes articles on various topics for the internet. Some of his published works include "Looking Deeper into the Legality of Interfaith Marriage in Indonesia" on IDN Times, "SOEs: Solution to the Problems of Inflation in the Price of Edible Oil" on Kumparan, and "Omnibus Law Method Should be Regulated" on Geotimes.

Erna Listiawati, Faculty of Law, Islamic University of Nusantara, Bandung, Indonesia

Erna Listiawati has a Bachelor of Law degree from Universitas Islam Nusantara. During her college years, she was active in the organization of youth innovation development in West Java and scientific writing with a particular interest in social and legal issues. She successfully graduated in 3.5 years with a cum laude predicate. Erna was actively involved in writing journals such as "Dumpster Diving Threat In Personal Data Leakage Case In Indonesia," published by International Journal of EthnoSciences and Education Research; "Enigma of Intellectual Property Rights Protection Against Misappropriation by Foreign Parties in International Regulations," published by USM Law Review Journal; and "Access to Justice for Persons with Intellectual Disabilities: Criminal Justice as an Implementation of the Principle of Equality Before the Law," by Simbur Cahaya Journal.

References

Ali, Zainudin. Metode penelitian Hukum, Jakarta: Sinar Grafika 2016.

Arnstein, Sherry. “A Ladder of Citizen Participation” Journal of The American Institute of Planners, 35 No.4 (1969). 216-24. https://doi.org/10.1080/01944366908977225.

Arsil, Fitra. “Menggagas Pembatasan Pembentukan Dan Materi Muatan Perppu: Studi Perbandingan Pengaturan Dan Penggunaan perppu di negara-negara presidensial.” Jurnal Hukum & Pembangunan, 48 No. 1, (2018): 1-21. https://scholarhub.ui.ac.id/jhp/vol48/iss1/1/.

Aryanto, Bayu; Harijanti, Susi Dwi; dan Susanto, Mei. “Menggagas Model Fast-Track Legislation dalam Sistem Pembentukan Undang-Undang di Indonesia”, Jurnal Rechtsvinding 10, no. 2 (2021): 187-285. http://dx.doi.org/10.33331/rechtsvinding.v10i2.703.

Asshiddiqie, Jimly, Perihal Undang-Undang, Cetakan ke-4, Jakarta: Rajawali Press, 2017.

Attamini, A. Hamid S. UUD 1945, TAP MPR, Undang-undang (Kaitan Norma Hukum Ketiganya), Jakarta: Universitas Indonesia, 1981.

Buccus, Imraan “Rebuilding Active Public Participation after the COVID-19 Era: The South African Case.” Journal of Public Affairs, 21, no. 4 (2021): 1-8. https://doi.org/10.1002/pa.2720.

Carrier, Michael A. “All Aboard The Congressional Fast Track: From Trade to Beyond.” George Washington International Law and Economy 29 (1986): 687-735.

Chandranegara, Ibnu Sina. “Pengadopsian Mekanisme Fast-Track Legislation dalam Pengusulan Rancangan Undang-Undang oleh Presiden.” Jurnal Penelitian Hukum De Jure 21, no. 1 (2021): 123-40. http://dx.doi.org/10.30641/dejure.2021.V21.123-140.

Cruz, Peter d. Comparative Law in A Changing World, London: Cavendish Publishing Limited, 1999.

Dewan Perwakilan Rakyat Republik Indonesia. “Keputusan Dewan Perwakilan Rakyat Republik Indonesia Nomor 19/DPR RI/I/2018-2019 tentang Program Legislasi Nasional Rancangan Undang-Undang Prioritas dan Perubahan Program Legislasi Nasional Rancangan Undang-Undang Tahun 2015-2019.”

Diantha, I Made Pasek. Metodologi Penelitian Hukum Normatif dalam Justifikasi Teori Hukum, Jakarta: Prenada Media Group, 2016.

Farida, Maria. Ilmu Perundang-undangan Jilid I: Jenis, Fungsi, dan Materi Muatan, Edisi Revisi, Cetakan Pertama, Yogyakarta: Kanisius, 2020.

Gringer, Claudia. What’s the Hurry, New Zealand: Victoria University Press, 2011.

Hager, Barry M., Ther Rule of Law. A Lexicon for Policy Makers, Missoula: the Mansfield center for pacific affairs 2000.

House of Lords Select Committee on the Constitution. Fast Track Legislation: Constitutional Implications and Safeguards. Volume 1. London: House of Lords, 2009.

Hug, Walter. “The History of Comparative Law.” Harvard Law Review 45, no. 6 (1931): 1027-070. https://doi.org/10.2307/1332143.

Hujibers, Theo. Filsafat Hukum dalam Lintasan Sejarah. Yogyakarta: Kanisius, 1982.

Hukum Online. “Pandangan Ahli Terkait Pengujian Perubahan UU MK,” 25 Agustus 2021, https://www.hukumonline.com/berita/a/pandangan-ahli-terkait-pengujian-perubahanuu-mk-lt6125cd16097fa. Diakses pada tanggal 5 September 2022.

Idul Rishan. “Kedaulatan Rakyat dalam Pembentukan Undang-Undang.” Webinar HTN UII “Refleksi Perjalanan 77 Tahun Indonesia Sebagai Negara Hukum Yang Demokratis,” 18 Agustus 2022, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Fr8Ip2EhSP8.

Idul Rishan. “Retrogresi Aktivisme Yudisial di Mahkamah Konstitusi.” Kompas, 25 Juli 2022, https://www.kompas.id/baca/opini/2022/07/23/retrogresi-aktivisme-yudisial-di-mahkamahkonstitusi. Diakses pada 21 Agustus 2022.

Institute for Government UK. “Fast-tracked Legislation/Emergency Legislation.” https://www.instituteforgovernment.org.uk/explainers/fast-tracked-legislation. Diakses pada 28 November 2020.

Jati, Rahendro. “Partisipasi Masyarakat dalam Proses Pembentukan Undang-Undang yang Responsif.” Jurnal Rechtsvinding 1, no. 3 (2012): 329-42. http://dx.doi.org/10.33331/rechtsvinding.v1i3.88.

Koh, Harold Hongju. “The Fast Track and United States Trade Policy.” Brooklyn Journal of International Law 18, no. 1 (January 1992): 143-80. https://brooklynworks.brooklaw.edu/bjil/vol18/iss1/7.

Lane, Marcus B. “Public Participation in Planning: an intellectual history.” Australian Geographer 36, no. 3 (2005): 283-99. https://doi.org/10.1080/00049180500325694.

Lekipiouw, Sherlock Halmes. “Konstruksi Kelembagaan Perwakilan Dalam Pelaksanaan Asas Kedaulatan Rakyat.” Jurnal Sasi 24, no. 1 (2018): 73-83. https://doi.org/10.47268/sasi.v24i1.120.

Linarelli, John. “International Trade Relations and The Separation of Powers Under the United States Constitution.” Pennsylvania State International Law Review 13, no. 2 (January 1995): 203-39.

Lister, M. “Explaining Counter Terrorism in the UK: Normal Politics, Securitised Politics or Performativity of the Neo-Liberal State?” Critical Studies on Terrorism 12, no. 3 (2019): 416–39.

Mahkamah Konstitusi Republik Indonesia. Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 90/PUUXVIII/ 2020 tentang Pengujian Formil dan Materiil Undang-Undang Nomor 7 Tahun 2020 tentang Perubahan Ketiga Atas Undang-Undang Nomor 24 Tahun 2003 tentang Mahkamah Konstitusi terhadap Undang-Undang Dasar Negara Republik Indonesia Tahun 1945.

Mahkamah Konstitusi Republik Indonesia. Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 79/PUU-XII/2014 tentang Pengujian Undang- Undang Nomor 17 Tahun 2014 tentang Majelis Permusyawaratan Rakyat, Dewan Perwakilan Rakyat, Dewan Perwakilan Daerah, dan Dewan Perwakilan Rakyat Daerah.

Mahkamah Konstitusi Republik Indonesia. Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 34/PUU-X/2012 tentang Pengujian Undang-Undang Nomor 8 Tahun 2011 tentang Perubahan Atas Undang-Undang Nomor 24 Tahun2003 tentang Mahkamah Konstitusi terhadap Undang-Undang Dasar Negara Republik Indonesia Tahun 1945.

Mahkamah Konstitusi Republik Indonesia. Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 48/PUU-IX/2011 tentang Pengujian Undang-Undang Nomor 35 Tahun 2009 tentang Narkotika dan Undang-Undang Nomor 8 Tahun 2011 tentang Perubahan Atas Undang-Undang Nomor 24 Tahun 2003 tentang Mahkamah Konstitusi terhadap Undang-Undang Dasar Negara Republik Indonesia.

Mahkamah Konstitusi Republik Indonesia. Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 49/PUU-IX/2011 tentang Pengujian Undang-Undang Nomor 8 Tahun 2011 tentang Perubahan Atas Undang-Undang Nomor 24 Tahun 2003 tentang Mahkamah Konstitusi terhadap Undang-Undang Dasar Negara Republik Indonesia Tahun 1945.

Mahkamah Konstitusi Republik Indonesia. Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 68/PUU-IX/2011 Pengujian Undang-Undang Nomor 8 Tahun 2011 tentang Perubahan Atas Undang-Undang Nomor 24 Tahun 2003 tentang Mahkamah Konstitusi terhadap Undang-Undang Dasar Negara Republik Indonesia Tahun 1945.

Mahkamah Konstitusi Republik Indonesia. Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 7/PUU-XI/2013 Pengujian Undang-Undang Nomor 8 Tahun 2011 tentang Perubahan Atas Undang-Undang Nomor 24 Tahun 2003 tentang Mahkamah Konstitusi terhadap Undang-Undang Dasar Negara Republik Indonesia Tahun 1945.

Mahkamah Konstitusi Republik Indonesia. Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 91/PUU-XVIII/2020 tentang Pengujian Formil Undang-Undang Nomor 11 Tahun 2020 tentang Cipta Kerja terhadap Undang-Undang Dasar Negara Republik Indonesia Tahun 1945.

Marks, Stephen P. The Politics of the Possible: The Way Ahead for the Right to Development. Bonn: Friedrich Ebert-Stiftung, 2011.

Palguna, I Dewa Gede. Pengaduan Konstitusional (Constitutional Complaint): Upaya Hukum terhadap Pelanggaran Hak-hak Konstitusional Warga Negara. Cetakan Pertama. Jakarta: Sinar Grafika, 2013.

Prosiding Webinar Nasional Berseri, Perkembangan Hukum Tata Negara di Masa Pandemi, Penerbit FH UII Press, Yogyakarta, 2020 Pusat Studi Hukum dan Kebijakan Indonesia. “Revisi UU Mahkamah Konstitusi Dinilai Cacat Formil.” 2021. https://pshk.or.id/aktivitas/revisi-uu-mahkamah-konstitusi-dinilai-cacatformil/. Diakses pada 21 Agustus 2022.

Rasjidi, Lili, dan Rasjidi, Ira Tania. Dasar-dasar Filsafat dan Teori Hukum. Bandung: Citra Aditya Bakti, 2007.

Reh, Christine; Héritier, Adrienne; Bressanelli, Edoardo; Koop, Christel. “The Informal Politics of Legislation: Explaining Secluded Decision Making in the European Union.” Comparative Political Studies 46, no. 9 (2011): 1112-142. https://doi.org/10.1080/01402382.2012.706414.

Reh, Christine; Héritier, Adrienne; Bressanelli, Edoardo; Koop, Christel. “Codecision and Its Discontents: Intra-Organisational Politics and Institutional Reform in the European Parliament.” West European Politics 35, no. 5 (2012): 1134-157. https://doi.org/10.1177/0010414011426415.

Republik Indonesia. Undang-Undang Dasar Negara Republik Indonesia Tahun 1945.

Republik Indonesia. Undang-Undang Nomor 12 Tahun 2011 Tentang Pembentukan Peraturan Perundangan-undangan.

Republik Indonesia. Undang-Undang Nomor 13 Tahun 2019 tentang Perubahan Ketiga atas Undang-Undang Nomor 17 Tahun 2014 tentang Majelis Permusyawaratan Rakyat, Dewan Perwakilan Rakyat, Dewan Perwakilan Daerah, dan Dewan Perwakilan Rakyat Daerah.

Republik Indonesia. Undang-Undang Nomor 7 Tahun 2020 tentang Perubahan Ketiga atas Undang-Undang Nomor 24 Tahun 2003 tentang Mahkamah Konstitusi.

Republik Indonesia. Undang-Undang Nomor 13 Tahun 2022 tentang Perubahan Kedua atas Undang-Undang Nomor 12 Tahun 2011 tentang Pembentukan Peraturan Perundang-Undangan.

Saifudin. Partisipasi Publik dalam Pembentukan Peraturan Perundang-undangan. Cetakan Pertama. FH UII Press, Yogyakarta, 2009.

Satriawan, Iwan, dan Lailam, Tanto. “Open Legal Policy dalam Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi dan Pembentukan Undang-Undang.” Jurnal Konstitusi 16, no. 3 (September 2019): 559-84. https://doi.org/10.31078/jk1636.

Sim, Edmund Walter. “Derailing the Fast-Track for International Trade Agreements.” Florida Journal of International Law 5, no. 3 (June 1992): 472-521. https://scholarship.law.ufl.edu/fjil/vol5/iss3/6.

Simon Butt. “Indonesia at Melbourne, The 2020 Indonesian Constitutional Court Law, a gift to Judges?,” 20 September 2020. https://indonesiaatmelbourne.unimelb.edu.au/the-2020- constitutional-court-law-amendments-a-gift-to-judges/. Diakses pada 24 Agustus 2022.

Soekanto, Soerjono. Pengantar Penelitian Hukum. Jakarta: UI Press, 2007.

Sunggono, Bambang. Metodologi Penelitian Hukum. Cetakan ke-16. Jakarta: Rajawali Press, 2016.

Tempo. “Pembahasan Revisi UU Mahkamah Konstitusi Menuai Kontroversi.” 28 Agustus 2020. https://nasional.tempo.co/read/1380213/pembahasan-revisi-uu-mahkamahkonstitusi-menuai-kontroversi/. Diakses pada tanggal 21 Agustus 2022.

Setiadi, Wicipto. “Fast-Track Legislation sebagai Bentuk Peningkatan Supremasi Hukum.” Materi disampaikan dalam diskusi terbuka. Fakultas Hukum Universitas Padjadjaran, 17 Desember 2020.

Downloads

Published

2023-12-01

How to Cite

Perdana, Anugerah, Carolus Boromeus Enggal, Raden Mahdum, and Erna Listiawati. 2023. “Reformulation of Public Participation in Fast- Track Legislation in an Open Cumulative National Legislative Program: Reformulasi Partisipasi Publik Dalam Pembentukan Undang-Undang Secara Cepat Pada Prolegnas Kumulatif Terbuka”. Jurnal Konstitusi 20 (4):678-703. https://doi.org/10.31078/jk2047.

Issue

Vol. 20 No. 4 (2023)

Section

Articles

License

Copyright (c) 2023 Jurnal Konstitusi

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:

  1. Copyright of the published articles will be transferred to the journal as the publisher of the manuscripts. Therefore, the author confirms that the copyright has been managed by the publisher.
  2. The publisher of Jurnal Konstitusi is The Registrar and Secretariat General of the Constitutional Court of the Republic of Indonesia.
  3. The copyright follows Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License: This license allows reusers to distribute, remix, adapt, and build upon the material in any medium or format for noncommercial purposes only, and only so long as attribution is given to the creator. If you remix, adapt, or build upon the material, you must license the modified material under identical terms.