Perluasan Kewenangan Komisi Penyiaran Indonesia Terhadap Pengawasan Media Digital
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.31078/jk1916Keywords:
Kewenangan Komisi Penyiaraan Indonesia, Media Digital, Pengawasan Media DigitalAbstract
The problem of broadcasting is very complex, consisting of the definition and supervision of broadcasting which is still unclear and the authority of KPI is still weak to supervise digital media. The research objectives are: First, to look at the legal problems of the Indonesian Broadcasting Commission in supervising Digital Media. Second, the concept and practice of broadcasters on digital media surveillance in other countries. Third, the design of the Indonesian Broadcasting Commission's supervision of digital media supervision. The results of the study show that first, there are still legal problems with the position of KPI on digital media supervision. Second, digital media surveillance in Germany and Australia has been quite advanced which has strictly regulated broadcasting in digital with an integrated system. Third, the design is carried out by strengthening KPI institutions, institutional integration, and the "legislative convergence" approach.
References
BUKU
Ishaq. Metode Penelitian Hukum dan Penulisan Skripsi, Tesis, serta Disertasi. Bandung: Alfabeta, 2017.
Fietkiewicz, Kaja J. “The Law of Live Streaming: A Systematic Literature Review and Analysis of German Legal Framework.” In Lecture Notes in Computer Science (Including Subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics), 12194 LNCS:227–42, 2020. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-49570-1_16.
Keen, A. The Internet Is Not the Answer. London: Atlantic Books, 2015.
Mahmud Marzuki, Peter. Penelitian Hukum. Jurnal Penelitian Hukum. Jakarta: Kencana Prenada Media Group, 2011.
Schulz, Wolfgang, Thorsten Held, Stephan Dreyer, and Thilo Wind. Regulation of Broadcasting and Internet Services in Germany. Hamburg: Verlag Hans-Bredow-Institut, 2008.
Wilding, D., Fray, P., Molitorisz, S., and McKewon, E. The Impact of Digital Platforms on News and Journalistic Content, University of Technology Sydney, NSW, 2018.
JURNAL
Budiman, Ahmad. “Pengawasan Layanan Siaran Video On Demand”, Jurnal Info Singkat, Vol. XII, No. 3/I/Puslit (Februari, 2020):29.
Djulaeka dan Rhido Jusmadi. “Konvergensi Telematika, Arah Kebijakan Dan Pengaturannya Dalam Tata Hukum Indonesia”. Jurnal Yustisia. Vol. 2 No. 3 (September – Desember, 2013): 46-60.
Doly, Denico. “Upaya Penguatan Kelembagaan Komisi Penyiaran Indonesia Dalam Perspektif Hukum.” Negara Hukum: Membangun Hukum Untuk Keadilan Dan Kesejahteraan 6, no. 2 (2015): 149–67.
Guzman, J.D., and Neyza. “The Children of YouTube: How an Entertainment Industry Goes Around Child Labor Laws.” Child and Family Law Journal 8, no. 1 (2020): 95.
Rumata, Vience Mutiara. “Dinamika Tata Kelola Kebijakan Industri Penyiaran Dan Telekomunikasi Indonesia Menuju Konvergensi”, Jurnal Penelitian Pos dan Informatika, Vol. 5 No 1 (September, 2015): 90.
Sukendar, Astria Yuli Satyarini, Amanda Raissa, and Tomy Michael. “Authority Of The Indonesian Broadcasting Commission (KPI) Against Youtube And Netflix According To The Law Number 32 of 2002 Regarding Broadcasting”. Technium Social Sciences Journal, Vol. 8, 205-211 (June 2020): 205-211.
Valcic, Jasmine. “The Sharing of Abhorrent Violent Materials Act: The Realities and Implications of Australia’s New Laws Regulating Social Media Companies.” Bond Law Review (2021): 11. https://doi.org/10.53300/001c.19107.
Walker, Neil. “Out of Place and Out of Time: Law's Fading Co-ordinates”, Edinburgh Law Review, Vol. 14 (2010): 1-45.
Zurth, Patrick. “The German NetzDG as Role Model or Cautionary Tale? – Implications for the Debate on Social Media Liability.” SSRN Electronic Journal (2020): 1084-1153. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3668804.
MAKALAH
Wagner, Ben, Krisztina Rozgonyi, Marie Therese Sekwenz, Jennifer Cobbe, and Jatinder Singh. “Regulating Transparency? Facebook, Twitter and the German Network Enforcement Act.” In FAT* 2020 - Proceedings of the 2020 Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency, 261–71, 2020. https://doi.org/10.1145/3351095.3372856.
Karangan Esai dalam Buku Kumpulan Karangan
Australian Communication and Media Authority. "Restricted Access Systes Declaration", 2014.
Report Australian Communications and Media Authority. “Australian Communications and Media Authority response to the Australian Competition and Consumer Commission Digital Platforms Inquiry Preliminary Report 2019”. Australia: ACMA, 2019.
Stree, Alexandre De, Elise Defreyne, Hervé Jacquemin, Michèle Ledger, and Alejandra Michel. “Online Platforms' Moderation of Illegal Content Online (Law, Practices and Options for Reform)”, Policy Department for Economic, Scientific and Quality of Life Policies, European Parliament, Luxembourg, 2020.
INTERNET
Ayuwuragil, Kustin. “Penonton Youtube, Saingi Jumlah Netizen yang Tonton Televisi”. https://www.cnnindonesia.com/teknologi/20180509180435-185-297003/penonton-youtube-saingi-jumlah-netizen-yang-tonton-televisi.
Australia Government. Department of Infrastructure, Transport, Regional Development and Communications. https://www.communications.gov.au/what-we-do/television/media/acma-review/acma-legislated-functions/rule-enforcement.
Broadcasting Law in Germany. https://germanlawarchive.iuscomp.org/?p=386.
Bundesministerium der Justiz und für Verbraucherschutz, Tanpa Tahun, Directive Of The European Parliament And Of The Council amending Directive 2010/13/EU, 2018, https://eur-lex.europa.eu/eli/dir/2018/1808/oj.
Ferrisa, Winda. Kominfo. https://kominfo.go.id/content/detail/11711/ini-konten-negatif-yang-dominan-di-indonesia/0/sorotan_media.
Mahkamah Konstitusi. “Layanan Penyiaran Berbasis Internet Konstitusional”. https://www.mkri.id/index.php?page=web.Berita&id=16876&menu=2.
N. Dara. “Tolak KPI Awasi Youtube, Facebook, dan Netflix”, https://www.change.org/p/suprioagung-kpi-pusat-kami-tolak-kpi-awasi-youtube-facebook-netflix.
Pratomo, Yudha. "Kominfo: KPI Tak Bisa Awasi YouTube dan Netflix", https://tekno.kompas.com/read/2019/11/26/08430047/kominfo-kpi-tak-bisa-awasi youtube-dan-netflix.
Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi, 2021. https://www.mkri.id/index.php?page=web.Putusan&id=1&kat=2&cari=Penyiaran.
RG. “Wapres Dukung KPI Awasi Media Baru”. http://www.kpi.go.id/index.php/id/umum/38-dalam-negeri/35594-wapres-dukung-kpi-awasi-media-baru?detail3=7908&detail5=13582.
Seite leider nicht vorhanden, 2021, https://www.bmjv.de/SharedDocs/Gesetzgebungsverfahren/Dokumente/RegE_NetzDG.pdf;jsessionid=18261A35582BD251499E39708504A060.2_cid297?blob=publicationFile&v=2.
Warta Bromo. https://jatim.suara.com/read/2020/10/05/183602/belajar-dari-youtube-jenny-dan-4-teman-laki-lakinya-jajal-bikin-sabu.
Ishaq. Metode Penelitian Hukum dan Penulisan Skripsi, Tesis, serta Disertasi. Bandung: Alfabeta, 2017.
Fietkiewicz, Kaja J. “The Law of Live Streaming: A Systematic Literature Review and Analysis of German Legal Framework.” In Lecture Notes in Computer Science (Including Subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics), 12194 LNCS:227–42, 2020. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-49570-1_16.
Keen, A. The Internet Is Not the Answer. London: Atlantic Books, 2015.
Mahmud Marzuki, Peter. Penelitian Hukum. Jurnal Penelitian Hukum. Jakarta: Kencana Prenada Media Group, 2011.
Schulz, Wolfgang, Thorsten Held, Stephan Dreyer, and Thilo Wind. Regulation of Broadcasting and Internet Services in Germany. Hamburg: Verlag Hans-Bredow-Institut, 2008.
Wilding, D., Fray, P., Molitorisz, S., and McKewon, E. The Impact of Digital Platforms on News and Journalistic Content, University of Technology Sydney, NSW, 2018.
JURNAL
Budiman, Ahmad. “Pengawasan Layanan Siaran Video On Demand”, Jurnal Info Singkat, Vol. XII, No. 3/I/Puslit (Februari, 2020):29.
Djulaeka dan Rhido Jusmadi. “Konvergensi Telematika, Arah Kebijakan Dan Pengaturannya Dalam Tata Hukum Indonesia”. Jurnal Yustisia. Vol. 2 No. 3 (September – Desember, 2013): 46-60.
Doly, Denico. “Upaya Penguatan Kelembagaan Komisi Penyiaran Indonesia Dalam Perspektif Hukum.” Negara Hukum: Membangun Hukum Untuk Keadilan Dan Kesejahteraan 6, no. 2 (2015): 149–67.
Guzman, J.D., and Neyza. “The Children of YouTube: How an Entertainment Industry Goes Around Child Labor Laws.” Child and Family Law Journal 8, no. 1 (2020): 95.
Rumata, Vience Mutiara. “Dinamika Tata Kelola Kebijakan Industri Penyiaran Dan Telekomunikasi Indonesia Menuju Konvergensi”, Jurnal Penelitian Pos dan Informatika, Vol. 5 No 1 (September, 2015): 90.
Sukendar, Astria Yuli Satyarini, Amanda Raissa, and Tomy Michael. “Authority Of The Indonesian Broadcasting Commission (KPI) Against Youtube And Netflix According To The Law Number 32 of 2002 Regarding Broadcasting”. Technium Social Sciences Journal, Vol. 8, 205-211 (June 2020): 205-211.
Valcic, Jasmine. “The Sharing of Abhorrent Violent Materials Act: The Realities and Implications of Australia’s New Laws Regulating Social Media Companies.” Bond Law Review (2021): 11. https://doi.org/10.53300/001c.19107.
Walker, Neil. “Out of Place and Out of Time: Law's Fading Co-ordinates”, Edinburgh Law Review, Vol. 14 (2010): 1-45.
Zurth, Patrick. “The German NetzDG as Role Model or Cautionary Tale? – Implications for the Debate on Social Media Liability.” SSRN Electronic Journal (2020): 1084-1153. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3668804.
MAKALAH
Wagner, Ben, Krisztina Rozgonyi, Marie Therese Sekwenz, Jennifer Cobbe, and Jatinder Singh. “Regulating Transparency? Facebook, Twitter and the German Network Enforcement Act.” In FAT* 2020 - Proceedings of the 2020 Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency, 261–71, 2020. https://doi.org/10.1145/3351095.3372856.
Karangan Esai dalam Buku Kumpulan Karangan
Australian Communication and Media Authority. "Restricted Access Systes Declaration", 2014.
Report Australian Communications and Media Authority. “Australian Communications and Media Authority response to the Australian Competition and Consumer Commission Digital Platforms Inquiry Preliminary Report 2019”. Australia: ACMA, 2019.
Stree, Alexandre De, Elise Defreyne, Hervé Jacquemin, Michèle Ledger, and Alejandra Michel. “Online Platforms' Moderation of Illegal Content Online (Law, Practices and Options for Reform)”, Policy Department for Economic, Scientific and Quality of Life Policies, European Parliament, Luxembourg, 2020.
INTERNET
Ayuwuragil, Kustin. “Penonton Youtube, Saingi Jumlah Netizen yang Tonton Televisi”. https://www.cnnindonesia.com/teknologi/20180509180435-185-297003/penonton-youtube-saingi-jumlah-netizen-yang-tonton-televisi.
Australia Government. Department of Infrastructure, Transport, Regional Development and Communications. https://www.communications.gov.au/what-we-do/television/media/acma-review/acma-legislated-functions/rule-enforcement.
Broadcasting Law in Germany. https://germanlawarchive.iuscomp.org/?p=386.
Bundesministerium der Justiz und für Verbraucherschutz, Tanpa Tahun, Directive Of The European Parliament And Of The Council amending Directive 2010/13/EU, 2018, https://eur-lex.europa.eu/eli/dir/2018/1808/oj.
Ferrisa, Winda. Kominfo. https://kominfo.go.id/content/detail/11711/ini-konten-negatif-yang-dominan-di-indonesia/0/sorotan_media.
Mahkamah Konstitusi. “Layanan Penyiaran Berbasis Internet Konstitusional”. https://www.mkri.id/index.php?page=web.Berita&id=16876&menu=2.
N. Dara. “Tolak KPI Awasi Youtube, Facebook, dan Netflix”, https://www.change.org/p/suprioagung-kpi-pusat-kami-tolak-kpi-awasi-youtube-facebook-netflix.
Pratomo, Yudha. "Kominfo: KPI Tak Bisa Awasi YouTube dan Netflix", https://tekno.kompas.com/read/2019/11/26/08430047/kominfo-kpi-tak-bisa-awasi youtube-dan-netflix.
Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi, 2021. https://www.mkri.id/index.php?page=web.Putusan&id=1&kat=2&cari=Penyiaran.
RG. “Wapres Dukung KPI Awasi Media Baru”. http://www.kpi.go.id/index.php/id/umum/38-dalam-negeri/35594-wapres-dukung-kpi-awasi-media-baru?detail3=7908&detail5=13582.
Seite leider nicht vorhanden, 2021, https://www.bmjv.de/SharedDocs/Gesetzgebungsverfahren/Dokumente/RegE_NetzDG.pdf;jsessionid=18261A35582BD251499E39708504A060.2_cid297?blob=publicationFile&v=2.
Warta Bromo. https://jatim.suara.com/read/2020/10/05/183602/belajar-dari-youtube-jenny-dan-4-teman-laki-lakinya-jajal-bikin-sabu.
Downloads
Published
2022-03-28
How to Cite
Muhtar, Mohamad Hidayat, Zainal Abdul Aziz Hadju, Zamroni Abdussamad, and Rahmat Teguh Santoso Gobel. 2022. “Perluasan Kewenangan Komisi Penyiaran Indonesia Terhadap Pengawasan Media Digital”. Jurnal Konstitusi 19 (1):126-48. https://doi.org/10.31078/jk1916.
Issue
Section
Articles
License
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Copyright of the published articles will be transferred to the journal as the publisher of the manuscripts. Therefore, the author confirms that the copyright has been managed by the publisher.
- The publisher of Jurnal Konstitusi is The Registrar and Secretariat General of the Constitutional Court of the Republic of Indonesia.
- The copyright follows Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License: This license allows reusers to distribute, remix, adapt, and build upon the material in any medium or format for noncommercial purposes only, and only so long as attribution is given to the creator. If you remix, adapt, or build upon the material, you must license the modified material under identical terms.
