Integrasi Sistem Peradilan Pemilihan Umum melalui Pembentukan Mahkamah Pemilihan Umum
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.31078/jk1834Keywords:
Election, Election Courts, Election Justice System, Election Issues, Supreme Election CourtsAbstract
Elections that do not end only in counting votes, and instead have to be resolved in the judiciary, have unwittingly become a measure that can legitimize and assess the quality of democracy. This situation confirms that the existence of a judicial institution has become an important part of the sustainability of the election process. This research tries to re-evaluate the implementation process of the Election justice system in Indonesia. By using doctrinal normative legal research collaborated with the Reform Oriented Research method, this study found the problems faced in the Electoral justice system in Indonesia. These problems include the tug of war over regional head election dispute resolution, disintegration and overlapping authority for resolving general election disputes, the accumulation of Election disputes in the Constitutional Court, as well as problems regarding recall system for DPR members by political parties. In resolving these problems, this study offers an idea in the form of integrating the entire Election dispute resolution process in a Supreme Election Court. The Supreme Election Court will be positioned parallel to the Constitutional Court and Supreme Court. The Supreme Election Court has the authority to judge at the first and last levels whose decisions are final and binding to decide on violations of the code of ethics of Election administrators, violations of Election administration, election process disputes, election crimes, over results disputes and post-election disputes
References
Ayllón, Sergio López. Democracia y Acceso a La Información. Vol. 9. Tribunal Electoral del Poder Judicial de la Federación, 2005.
Booth, John A. Costa Rica: Quest for Democracy. Routledge, 2018.
Butt, Simon. The Constitutional Court and Democracy in Indonesia. Brill, 2015.
Castro Ávila, Ana Mariela, Beatriz Morales Mora, and Rocío Montero Solano. Tribunal Supremo de Elecciones, 2018.
Chui, Wing Hong, and Mike McConville. Research Methods for Law. Vol. 104. Edinburgh University Press Edinburgh, 2007.
Efendi, Aan, Dyah Ochtorina Susanti, and Rahmadi Indra Tektona. Penelitian Hukum Doktrinal. Yogyakarta: LaksBang Justitia, n.d.
Farrell, David M. Electoral Systems: A Comparative Introduction. Macmillan International Higher Education, 2011.
Georg, Sorensen. Demokrasi Dan Demokratisasi. Pustaka Pelajar. Yogyakarta, 1993.
Jayus, S. H. Hukum Pemilu & Alternatif Penyelesaian Sengketa Hasil Pemilu. Jakad Media Publishing, 2019.
Orozco Henríquez, José de Jesús, Ayman Ayoub, and Andrew Ellis. Electoral Justice: The International IDEA Handbook. Handbook series. Stockholm, Sweden: International IDEA, 2010.
Santoso, Topo. Dkk., Penegakan Hukum Pemilu; Praktik Pemilu 2004, Kajian Pemilu 2009-2014. Tim Peneliti Perdulem, Jakarta, 2006.
Soekanto, Soerjono, and Sri Mamudji. Penelitian Hukum Normatif: Suatu Tinjauan Singkat. RajaGrafindo Persada, 2001.
Jurnal:
Albab, Abid Ulil. “PROBLEM KEWENANGAN MAHKAMAH KONSTITUSI MEMUTUS PERSELISIHAN HASIL PILKADA.” Jurnal Hukum & Pembangunan 48, no. 3 (December 5, 2018): 542. Accessed June 22, 2020. http://jhp.ui.ac.id/index.php/home/article/view/1745.
Ayuni, Qurrata. “Gagasan Pengadilan Khusus Untuk Sengketa Hasil Pemilihan Kepala Daerah.” Jurnal Hukum & Pembangunan 48, no. 1 (2018): 199–221.
Berruecos, Susana. “Electoral Justice in Mexico: The Role of the Electoral Tribunal under New Federalism.” Journal of Latin American Studies (2003): 801–825.
Fahmi, Khairul. “Menelusuri Konsep Keadilan Pemilihan Umum Menurut UUD 1945.” Jurnal Cita Hukum 4, no. 2 (2016).
Harun, Refly. “Rekonstruksi Kewenangan Penyelesaian Perselisihan Hasil Pemilihan Umum.” Jurnal Konstitusi 13, no. 1 (2016): 1–24.
Huda, Uu Nurul. Hukum Partai Politik Dan Pemilu Di Indonesia. Fokusmedia, 2018.
Jayus. “The General Election Results as the Manifestation of Popular Sovereignty.” JL Pol’y & Globalization 93 (2020): 169.
Junaidi, Veri, and Jim Della Giacoma. “Clock Watching and Electioin Complaint in Indonesia Constitutional Court” (n.d.).
Rauf, Muhamad Aljebra Aliksan, Marten Bunga, and Hardianto Djanggih. “Hak Recall Partai Politik Terhadap Status Keanggotaan Dewan Perwakilan Rakyat Dalam Sistem Ketatanegaraan Indonesia.” Jurnal Magister Hukum Udayana (Udayana Master Law Journal) 7, no. 4 (2018): 443–455.
Rois, Iwan, and Ratna Herawati. “Urgensi Pembentukan Peradilan Khusus Pemilu dalam rangka Mewujudkan Integritas Pemilu.” Jurnal Magister Hukum Udayana (Udayana Master Law Journal) 7, no. 2 (July 31, 2018): 267.
Saragih, Andre Dosdy Ananta. “Tinjauan Yuridis Pentingnya Pembentukan Peradilan Khusus Dalam PEMILU Serentak Menurut Undang-Undang Pemilihan Kepala Daerah.” Lex et Societatis 5, no. 3 (2017).
Satriawan, Muhammad Iwan, and Mukhlis Mukhlis. “Memurnikan Mahkamah Konstitusi” (n.d.): 12.
Shubhan, Hadi. “Recall: Antara Hak Partai Politik Dan Hak Berpolitik Anggota Parpol.” Jurnal Konstitusi 3, no. 4 (2006): 3057.
Ulum, Muhammad Bahrul, and Moch Marsa Taufiqurrohman. “Examining Recall of the House Member: How Does It Impact on Eradicating Corruption in Indonesia?” Lentera Hukum 7, no. 1 (2020): 101–116.
Wicaksono, Dian Agung, and Ola Anisa Ayutama. “INISIASI PENGADILAN KHUSUS PEMILIHAN KEPALA DAERAH DALAM MENGHADAPI KESERENTAKAN PEMILIHAN GUBERNUR, BUPATI, DAN WALIKOTA DI INDONESIA 1.” Jurnal Rechts Vinding: Media Pembinaan Hukum Nasional 4, no. 1 (2015): 157–179.
Peraturan Perundang-Undangan:
Bundesverfassung der Republik Österreich (Konstitusi Republik Federal Austria).
Constitución Política de la Republica de Costa Rica (Konstitusi Republik Kosta Rika).
Constitución Política de los Estados Unidos Mexicanos (Konstitusi Republik Meksiko).
Constitución Política de los Estados Unidos Mexicanos (Konstitusi Republik Meksiko).
Grundgesetz für die Bundesrepublik Deutschland (Konstitusi Republik Federal Jerman).
La Ley No. 1536 de la República de Costa Rica sebagaimana diubah terakhir dengan La Ley No. 8765 de la República de Costa Rica (Undang-Undang Pemilu Kosta Rika).
Ley Organica del Tribunal Electoral del Poder Judicial de la Federación (Undang-Undang Mahkamah Pemilu Meksiko).
Undang-Undang Dasar Negara Republik Indonesia Tahun1945.
Undang-Undang Nomor 24 Tahun 2014 tentang Pemerintahan Daerah, sebagaimana telah diubah terakhir dengan Undang-Undang Nomor 9 Tahun 2015 tentang Pemerintahan Daerah.
Undang-Undang Nomor 48 Tahun 2009 tentang Kekuasaan Kehakiman.
Undang-Undang Nomor 15 Tahun 2011 tentang Penyelenggara Pemilihan Umum
Undang-Undang Nomor 17 tahun 2014 sebagaimana diubah terakhir dengan Undang-Undang Nomor 13 tahun 2019 tentang MPR, DPR , DPD dan DPRD.
Undang-Undang Nomor 10 Tahun 2016 tentang Pemilihan Gubernur, Bupati, dan Walikota sebagaimana telah diubah terakhir dengan
Undang-Undang Nomor 6 tahun 2020 tentang Penetapan Peraturan Pemerintah Pengganti Undang-Undang Nomor 2 Tahun 2020 tentang Perubahan Ketiga atas Undang-Undang Nomor 1 Tahun 2015 tentang Penetapan Peraturan Pemerintah Pengganti Undang-Undang Nomor 1 Tahun 2014 tentang Pemilihan Gubernur, Bupati, dan Walikota Menjadi Undang-Undang.
Undang-Undang Nomor 7 Tahun 2017 tentang Pemilihan Umum.
Putusan MK Nomor: 72-73/PUU-II/2004;
Putusan MK Nomor: 14/PUU-XI/2013;
Putusan MK Nomor: 97/PUU-XI/2013;
Putusan MK Nomor: 1-2/PUU-XII/2014.
Internet:
“DPP PKB Recall Lily Wahid Dan Effendy Choirie | Republika Online.” Accessed October 20, 2020. https://republika.co.id/berita/breaking-news/nasional/11/03/14/169326-dpp-pkb-recall-lily-wahid-dan-effendy-choirie.
Indonesia, C. N. N. “Kasus Harun Masiku, Kader PDIP Didakwa Suap Rp600 Juta.” nasional. Accessed October 20, 2020. https://www.cnnindonesia.com/nasional/20200402135522-12-489583/kasus-harun-masiku-kader-pdip-didakwa-suap-rp600-juta.
“Putusan | Mahkamah Konstitusi Republik Indonesia.” Accessed September 15, 2020. https://mkri.id/index.php?page=web.Putusan&id=1&kat=1.
Downloads
Additional Files
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Copyright of the published articles will be transferred to the journal as the publisher of the manuscripts. Therefore, the author confirms that the copyright has been managed by the publisher.
- The publisher of Jurnal Konstitusi is The Registrar and Secretariat General of the Constitutional Court of the Republic of Indonesia.
- The copyright follows Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License: This license allows reusers to distribute, remix, adapt, and build upon the material in any medium or format for noncommercial purposes only, and only so long as attribution is given to the creator. If you remix, adapt, or build upon the material, you must license the modified material under identical terms.