Overruling Mahkamah Konstitusi RI terkait Isu Korupsi
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.31078/jk1825Keywords:
Corruption, Overruling, the Indonesian Constitutional CourtAbstract
Overruling is a revision of a court’s previous judicial precedent, meaning the court replaces the precedent with a new rule. This article sees that overruling is legitimate to seek constitutional truth. In practice, the Constitutional Court of the Republic of Indonesia (CCRI) has overruled its own Decisions through judicial review. This article focuses on the CCRI’s overruling on corruption issues which are the status of the Indonesian Corruption Eradication Commission and the meaning of the phrase “may harm State’s financial” which is stated in Law No. 31 of 1999. This article argues that those Decisions are consistent with constitutional truth although the ratio decidendi of the Court of the latter issue is inadequate. A case approach and a conceptual approach are used in the analysis of this legal research.
References
Buku
Dicey, A.V., 1979, Introduction to the Study of the Law of the Constitution, London: The MacMillan Press Ltd.
Kelsen, Hans, 1960, General Theory of Law and State, New York: Russell & Russell.
Kurnia, Titon Slamet, 2014, Konstitusi HAM, Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.
Prakash, Saikrishna Bangalore, 2015, Imperial From The Beginning: The Constitution of the Original Executive, London: Yale University Press,
Whittington, Keith E., 2007, Political Foundations of Judicial Supremacy: The President, the Supreme Court and Constitutional Leadership in U.S. History, New Jersey: Princeton University Press.
Jurnal
Calabresi, Steven G., dan Saikrishna B. Prakash, 1994, “The President’s Power To Execute the Laws”, Yale Law Journal, Volume 104,.
Diesen, Christian, 2009, “Beyond Reasonable Doubt: Standard of Proof and Evaluation of Evidence in Criminal Cases”, Stockholm Institute for Scandinavian Law, Volume 40.
Fallon, Richard H., 2005, “Legitimacy and the Constitution”, Harvard Law Review, Volume 11.
Farber, Daniel A., 2006, “The Rule of Law and the Law of Precedents”, Minnesota Law Review, Volume 90, Nomor 5.
Gennaioli, Nicola dan Andrei Shleifer, 2007, “Overruling and the Instability of Law”, Journal of Comparative Economics, Volume 35.
Gerhardt, Michael J., 2006, “Super Precedents”, Minnesota Law Review, Volume 90.
Gray, Anthony, 2010, “The Common Law and the Constitution as Protector of Rights in Australia”, Common Law World Review, Volume 39, Nomor 119.
Harris, J.W., 1996, “Overruling Constitutional Interpretations” dalam Charles Sampford & Kim Preston, eds., Interpreting Constitutions: Theories, Principles and Institutions, Alexandria: The Federation Pres.
Pound, Roscoe, 1941, “What of Stare Decisis?”, Fordham Law Review, Volume 10, Nomor 1.
Lairg, Lord Irvine, 2001, “Sovereignty in Comparative Perspective: Constitutionalism in Britain and America”, New York University Law Review, Volume 76, Nomor 1.
Limbach, Jutta, 2001, “The Concept of the Supremacy of the Constitution”, Modern Law Review, Volume 64, Nomor 1.
Lijphart, Arend, 2012, Patterns of Democracy: Government Forms and Performance in Thirty-Six Countries, London: Yale University Press.
Maxeiner, James, 2007, “Legal Certainty and Legal Methods: An European Alternative to American Legal Indeterminacy?”, Tulane Journal of International and Comparative Law, Volume 15, Nomor 2.
Rauta, Umbu dan Ninon Melatyugra, 2018, “Hukum Internasional sebagai Alat Interpretasi dalam Pengujian Undang-Undang”, Jurnal Konstitusi, Volume 15, Nomor 1.
Selang, Daud Jonathan, 2012, “Kedudukan Keterangan Saksi untuk Pencarian Kebenaran Material dalam Perkara Pidana”, Lex Crimen, Volume 1, Nomor 2.
Soemantri, H.R. Sri, 2002 “Sistem Pemerintahan Republik Indonesia”, Jurnal Mimbar Hukum, Volume 10.
Yayla, Mehmet, 2013, “The Origin of “Beyond Reasonable Doubt” Standard and Application in United Sates Criminal Procedural Law”, Law and Justice Review, Volume 4, Nomor 1.
Young, Ernest A., 2007, “The Constitution Outside the Constitution”, Yale Law Journal, Volume 117, Nomor 3.
Laporan Penelitian
Umbu Rauta, Indirani Wauran dan Ninon Melatyugra, “Legitimasi Praktik Overruling di Mahkamah Konstitusi” Penelitian Kompetitif Kerjasama Mahkamah Konstitusi dengan Fakultas Hukum Universitas Kristen Satya Wacana, 2018.
Dicey, A.V., 1979, Introduction to the Study of the Law of the Constitution, London: The MacMillan Press Ltd.
Kelsen, Hans, 1960, General Theory of Law and State, New York: Russell & Russell.
Kurnia, Titon Slamet, 2014, Konstitusi HAM, Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.
Prakash, Saikrishna Bangalore, 2015, Imperial From The Beginning: The Constitution of the Original Executive, London: Yale University Press,
Whittington, Keith E., 2007, Political Foundations of Judicial Supremacy: The President, the Supreme Court and Constitutional Leadership in U.S. History, New Jersey: Princeton University Press.
Jurnal
Calabresi, Steven G., dan Saikrishna B. Prakash, 1994, “The President’s Power To Execute the Laws”, Yale Law Journal, Volume 104,.
Diesen, Christian, 2009, “Beyond Reasonable Doubt: Standard of Proof and Evaluation of Evidence in Criminal Cases”, Stockholm Institute for Scandinavian Law, Volume 40.
Fallon, Richard H., 2005, “Legitimacy and the Constitution”, Harvard Law Review, Volume 11.
Farber, Daniel A., 2006, “The Rule of Law and the Law of Precedents”, Minnesota Law Review, Volume 90, Nomor 5.
Gennaioli, Nicola dan Andrei Shleifer, 2007, “Overruling and the Instability of Law”, Journal of Comparative Economics, Volume 35.
Gerhardt, Michael J., 2006, “Super Precedents”, Minnesota Law Review, Volume 90.
Gray, Anthony, 2010, “The Common Law and the Constitution as Protector of Rights in Australia”, Common Law World Review, Volume 39, Nomor 119.
Harris, J.W., 1996, “Overruling Constitutional Interpretations” dalam Charles Sampford & Kim Preston, eds., Interpreting Constitutions: Theories, Principles and Institutions, Alexandria: The Federation Pres.
Pound, Roscoe, 1941, “What of Stare Decisis?”, Fordham Law Review, Volume 10, Nomor 1.
Lairg, Lord Irvine, 2001, “Sovereignty in Comparative Perspective: Constitutionalism in Britain and America”, New York University Law Review, Volume 76, Nomor 1.
Limbach, Jutta, 2001, “The Concept of the Supremacy of the Constitution”, Modern Law Review, Volume 64, Nomor 1.
Lijphart, Arend, 2012, Patterns of Democracy: Government Forms and Performance in Thirty-Six Countries, London: Yale University Press.
Maxeiner, James, 2007, “Legal Certainty and Legal Methods: An European Alternative to American Legal Indeterminacy?”, Tulane Journal of International and Comparative Law, Volume 15, Nomor 2.
Rauta, Umbu dan Ninon Melatyugra, 2018, “Hukum Internasional sebagai Alat Interpretasi dalam Pengujian Undang-Undang”, Jurnal Konstitusi, Volume 15, Nomor 1.
Selang, Daud Jonathan, 2012, “Kedudukan Keterangan Saksi untuk Pencarian Kebenaran Material dalam Perkara Pidana”, Lex Crimen, Volume 1, Nomor 2.
Soemantri, H.R. Sri, 2002 “Sistem Pemerintahan Republik Indonesia”, Jurnal Mimbar Hukum, Volume 10.
Yayla, Mehmet, 2013, “The Origin of “Beyond Reasonable Doubt” Standard and Application in United Sates Criminal Procedural Law”, Law and Justice Review, Volume 4, Nomor 1.
Young, Ernest A., 2007, “The Constitution Outside the Constitution”, Yale Law Journal, Volume 117, Nomor 3.
Laporan Penelitian
Umbu Rauta, Indirani Wauran dan Ninon Melatyugra, “Legitimasi Praktik Overruling di Mahkamah Konstitusi” Penelitian Kompetitif Kerjasama Mahkamah Konstitusi dengan Fakultas Hukum Universitas Kristen Satya Wacana, 2018.
Downloads
Published
2021-11-15
How to Cite
Melatyugra, Ninon, Umbu Rauta, and Indirani Wauran. 2021. “Overruling Mahkamah Konstitusi RI Terkait Isu Korupsi”. Jurnal Konstitusi 18 (2):368-90. https://doi.org/10.31078/jk1825.
Issue
Section
Articles
License
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Copyright of the published articles will be transferred to the journal as the publisher of the manuscripts. Therefore, the author confirms that the copyright has been managed by the publisher.
- The publisher of Jurnal Konstitusi is The Registrar and Secretariat General of the Constitutional Court of the Republic of Indonesia.
- The copyright follows Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License: This license allows reusers to distribute, remix, adapt, and build upon the material in any medium or format for noncommercial purposes only, and only so long as attribution is given to the creator. If you remix, adapt, or build upon the material, you must license the modified material under identical terms.
