Overruling Mahkamah Konstitusi RI terkait Isu Korupsi

Ninon Melatyugra, Umbu Rauta, Indirani Wauran

Abstract


Overruling merupakan perubahan pendirian yudisial suatu pengadilan yang berbeda dari pendirian yudisial terdahulu dimana hal ini sah dilakukan dalam rangka pencarian kebenaran konstitusional. Pada praktiknya, Mahkamah Konstitusi RI melakukan overruling terhadap putusannya terdahulu melalui pengujian undang-undang. Tulisan ini akan fokus membahas overruling Mahkamah Konstitusi RI yang berkenaan dengan isu korupsi, tepatnya pada isu status Komisi Pemberantasan Korupsi dan pemaknaan frasa “dapat merugikan keuangan negara” yang terkandung dalam Undang-Undang Tindak Pidana Korupsi. Tulisan ini berargumen bahwa kedua putusan yang bersifat overruling tersebut telah sesuai dengan kebenaran konstitusional, meski ratio decidendi Mahkamah Konstitusi RI pada isu yang kedua merupakan argumen yang kurang memadai. Pendekatan kasus dan konseptual digunakan dalam analisis tulisan ini yang merupakan hasil penelitian hukum.


Keywords


Overruling; Mahkamah Konstitusi RI; Korupsi.

References


Buku

Dicey, A.V., 1979, Introduction to the Study of the Law of the Constitution, London: The MacMillan Press Ltd.

Kelsen, Hans, 1960, General Theory of Law and State, New York: Russell & Russell.

Kurnia, Titon Slamet, 2014, Konstitusi HAM, Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.

Prakash, Saikrishna Bangalore, 2015, Imperial From The Beginning: The Constitution of the Original Executive, London: Yale University Press,

Whittington, Keith E., 2007, Political Foundations of Judicial Supremacy: The President, the Supreme Court and Constitutional Leadership in U.S. History, New Jersey: Princeton University Press.

Jurnal

Calabresi, Steven G., dan Saikrishna B. Prakash, 1994, “The President’s Power To Execute the Laws”, Yale Law Journal, Volume 104,.

Diesen, Christian, 2009, “Beyond Reasonable Doubt: Standard of Proof and Evaluation of Evidence in Criminal Cases”, Stockholm Institute for Scandinavian Law, Volume 40.

Fallon, Richard H., 2005, “Legitimacy and the Constitution”, Harvard Law Review, Volume 11.

Farber, Daniel A., 2006, “The Rule of Law and the Law of Precedents”, Minnesota Law Review, Volume 90, Nomor 5.

Gennaioli, Nicola dan Andrei Shleifer, 2007, “Overruling and the Instability of Law”, Journal of Comparative Economics, Volume 35.

Gerhardt, Michael J., 2006, “Super Precedents”, Minnesota Law Review, Volume 90.

Gray, Anthony, 2010, “The Common Law and the Constitution as Protector of Rights in Australia”, Common Law World Review, Volume 39, Nomor 119.

Harris, J.W., 1996, “Overruling Constitutional Interpretations” dalam Charles Sampford & Kim Preston, eds., Interpreting Constitutions: Theories, Principles and Institutions, Alexandria: The Federation Pres.

Pound, Roscoe, 1941, “What of Stare Decisis?”, Fordham Law Review, Volume 10, Nomor 1.

Lairg, Lord Irvine, 2001, “Sovereignty in Comparative Perspective: Constitutionalism in Britain and America”, New York University Law Review, Volume 76, Nomor 1.

Limbach, Jutta, 2001, “The Concept of the Supremacy of the Constitution”, Modern Law Review, Volume 64, Nomor 1.

Lijphart, Arend, 2012, Patterns of Democracy: Government Forms and Performance in Thirty-Six Countries, London: Yale University Press.

Maxeiner, James, 2007, “Legal Certainty and Legal Methods: An European Alternative to American Legal Indeterminacy?”, Tulane Journal of International and Comparative Law, Volume 15, Nomor 2.

Rauta, Umbu dan Ninon Melatyugra, 2018, “Hukum Internasional sebagai Alat Interpretasi dalam Pengujian Undang-Undang”, Jurnal Konstitusi, Volume 15, Nomor 1.

Selang, Daud Jonathan, 2012, “Kedudukan Keterangan Saksi untuk Pencarian Kebenaran Material dalam Perkara Pidana”, Lex Crimen, Volume 1, Nomor 2.

Soemantri, H.R. Sri, 2002 “Sistem Pemerintahan Republik Indonesia”, Jurnal Mimbar Hukum, Volume 10.

Yayla, Mehmet, 2013, “The Origin of “Beyond Reasonable Doubt” Standard and Application in United Sates Criminal Procedural Law”, Law and Justice Review, Volume 4, Nomor 1.

Young, Ernest A., 2007, “The Constitution Outside the Constitution”, Yale Law Journal, Volume 117, Nomor 3.

Laporan Penelitian

Umbu Rauta, Indirani Wauran dan Ninon Melatyugra, “Legitimasi Praktik Overruling di Mahkamah Konstitusi” Penelitian Kompetitif Kerjasama Mahkamah Konstitusi dengan Fakultas Hukum Universitas Kristen Satya Wacana, 2018.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.31078/jk1825

Article Metrics

Abstract view : 0 times
PDF (Bahasa Indonesia) view : 0 times

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.




           
© Copyright of Jurnal Konstitusi (p-ISSN: 1829-7706 e-ISSN: 2548-1657). Published by The Constitutional Court of The Republic of Indonesia