Menimbang Model Pengujian Keputusan Pejabat Publik oleh Mahkamah Konstitusi Republik Indonesia (Studi Perbandingan Indonesia dan Korea Selatan)

Authors

  • Yunita Nurwulantari Universitas Indonesia, Mahkamah Konstitusi Republik Indonesia
  • Anna Erliyana Fakultas Hukum Universitas Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.31078/jk1818

Keywords:

Constitutional Complaint, Constitutional Court, Testing Public Officials Decision, State Administrative Court

Abstract


Testing public officials decision in Indonesia, which has been the authority of the State Administrative Court (PTUN) should be done through a constitutional complaint mechanism, written under the authority of the Constitutional Court of the Republic of Indonesia (MKRI). This is due to all public officials have the potential to perform acts that violate or harm the constitutional rights of citizens as guaranteed in the 1945 Constitution (UUD 1945). This additional authority to examine and decide cases of constitutional complaints should be possible in the framework of carrying out the functions of the Constitutional Court as the guardian of the constitution as implemented in countries that apply the principle of constitutional supremacy, one of which is as applied in the Constitutional Court of The South Korea. Even though South Korea has an administrative court which also has the authority to examine the decision of public officials, South Korea still open space for its citizens to file constitutional complaint in Constitutional Court of South Korea when there is a public official decision that harm and violating the constitutional rights of the citizens that have been guaranteed in constitution. Thus, when all legal remedy for violations of constitutional rights as a result of the issuance of public official decision has been exhausted, but violations still occur, then this constitutional complaint mechanism into the need to provides maximum protection and respect the constitutional rights of citizens. Therefore, the additional authority to examine and decide constitutional complaint can not be separated from the authority of the Constitutional Court.

References

Buku
Attamimi, A. Hamid S., 1993, Hukum Tentang Peraturan Perundang-Undangan dan Peraturan Kebijakan (Hukum Tata Pengaturan), Jakarta: Fakultas Hukum UI.
Asshidiqqie, Jimly, 2006, Peradilan Konstitusi di Sepuluh Negara, Jakarta: Konstitusi Press.
Asshidiqqie, Jimly, 2007, Pokok-Pokok Hukum Tata Negara Indonesia Pasca Reformasi, Jakarta: Bhuana Imu Populer.
Basah, Sjahran, 1985, Eksistensi dan Tolak Ukur Badan Peradilan Administrasi di Indonesia, Bandung: Alumni.
Hadjon, Philipus M., 1987, Perlindungan Hukum Bagi Rakyat Indonesia, Surabaya: Bina Ilmu.
Hadjon, Philipus M., et.al., 2019, Pengantar Hukum Administrasi Indonesia, Yogyakarta: Gadjah Mada University Press.
Lopa, Baharuddin dan Andi Hamzah, 1991, Mengenal Peradilan Tata Usaha Negara, Jakarta: Sinar Grafika.
Lotulung, Paulus Effendi, 2013, Hukum Tata Usaha Negara dan Kekuasaan, Jakarta: Salemba Humanika.
Marbun, SF, 1997, Peradilan Administrasi dan Upaya Administratif di lndonesia, Yogyakarta: Liberty.
Majelis Permusyawaratan Rakyat, 2003, Panduan Dalam Memasyarakatkan Undang-Undang Dasar Negara Republik Indonesia, Jakarta: Sekretariat Jenderal MPR RI.
MD, Moh. Mahfud, 2001, Dasar dan Struktur Ketatanegaraan Indonesia, Yogyakarta: UII Press.
Muslimin, Amrah, 1985, Beberapa Asas dan Pengertian Pokok Tentang Administrasi Dan Hukum Administrasi, Bandung: Alumni.
Palguna, I Dewa Gede, 2013, Pengaduan Konstitusional (Constitutional Complaint), Jakarta: Sinar Grafika.
Sirajuddin dan Winardi, 2015, Dasar-Dasar Hukum Tata Negara Indonesia, Malang: Setara Press.
Soemitro, Rochmat, 1976, Masalah Peradilan Administrasi Dalam Hukum Pajak di Indonesia, Bandung: Eresco.
Soemaryono, dan Anna Erliyana, 1999, Tuntunan Praktek Beracara di Peradilan Tata Usaha Negara, Jakarta: PT. Premedya Pustaka.

Strong, C.F., 1952, Modern Political Constitutions, London: Sidgwick & Jackson Limited.
Jurnal
Lee, Hee-Jung, 2006, "The Structures and Roles in Judicial Review of Administrative Litigation in Korea", Journal of Korean Law, Volume 6, Nomor 1.
Tjandra, Riawan dan Willy, 2013, "Perbandingan Sistem Peradilan Tata Usaha Negara dan Conseil d’etat sebagai Institusi Pengawas Tindakan Hukum Tata Usaha Negara", Jurnal Hukum IUS QUIA IUSTUM, Nomor 3, Volume. 20, Juli.

Peraturan Perundang-Undangan
Indonesia, 1945, Undang-Undang Dasar Negara Republik Indonesia Tahun 1945.
Indonesia, 1986, Undang-Undang Tentang Peradilan Tata Usaha Negara, UU Nomor 5 Tahun 1986, LN. No. 77 Tahun 1986, TLN No. 3344.
Indonesia, 2004, Undang-Undang Tentang Perubahan atas Undang-Undang Nomor 5 Tahun 1986 tentang Peradilan Tata Usaha Negara, UU Nomor 9 Tahun 2004, LN No.35 Tahun 2004, TLN No. 4380.
Indonesia, 2009, Undang-Undang Tentang Kekuasaan Kehakiman, UU Nomor 48 Tahun 2009, LN No. 157, Tahun 2009, TLN No. 5076.
Indonesia, 2009, Undang-Undang Tentang Perubahan Kedua atas Undang-Undang Nomor 5 Tahun 1986 tentang Peradilan Tata Usaha Negara, UU Nomor 51 Tahun 2009, LN No.160 Tahun 2009, TLN No. 5079.
Indonesia, 2014, Undang-Undang Tentang Administrasi Pemerintahan, UU Nomor 30 Tahun 2014, LN No 292 Tahun 2014, TLN No. 5601.
South Korea, Korea (Republic of)'s Constitution of 1948 with Amendments through 1987.
South Korea, Constitutional Court Act of Korea.
South Korea, Act No. 15490 of 2018 concerning Court Organization.

Dokumen Lain
Soemitro, Rochmat, 1979, Peradilan Tata Usaha Negara dan Perlindungan Hak-Hak Azasi, kertas kerja disampaikan pada seminar hukum nasional IV di Jakarta.
The Constitutional Court of Korea, 2001, The First Ten Years of The Korean Constitutional Court, Seoul: The Constitutional Court.
The Constitutional Court of Korea, 2018, Thirty Years of the Constitutional Court of Korea, Seoul: The Constitutional Court.
Internet
Supreme Court of Korea, Supreme Court - Jurisdiction, diakes melalui https://eng.scourt.go.kr/eng/judiciary/organization/courts.jsp, pada tanggal 3 Desember 2020.
Supreme Court of Korea, 2020, High Court - Organization, Jurisdiction, diakses melalui https://eng.scourt.go.kr/eng/judiciary/organization/courts.jsp pada tanggal 2 Desember 2020.
Supreme Court of Korea, 2020, District Court & Branch Courts - Organization and Jurisdiction, diakes melalui https://eng.scourt.go.kr/eng/judiciary/organization/courts.jsp, pada tanggal 3 Desember 2020.
Supreme Court of Korea, 2020, Specialized Courts - Patent Court, Family Court, dan Adminstrative Court,, diakes melalui https://eng.scourt.go.kr/eng/judiciary/organization/courts.jsp, pada tanggal 3 Desember 2020.
Supreme Court of Korea, 2020, Administrative Court, diakses melalui https://eng.scourt.go.kr/eng/judiciary/organization/courts4.jsp#t403, pada tanggal 25 November 2020.
Supreme Court of Korea, 2020, The Judiciary Administrative, diakses melalui https://eng.scourt.go.kr/eng/judiciary/proceedings/administrative.jsp, diakses pada tanggal 28 November 2020.
Constitutional Court of Korea, History, diakses melalui http://english.ccourt.go.kr/cckhome/engNew/introduction/history/theConsCourtHistory.do, 4 Desember 2020.

Downloads

Published

2021-05-27

How to Cite

Nurwulantari, Yunita, and Anna Erliyana. 2021. “Menimbang Model Pengujian Keputusan Pejabat Publik Oleh Mahkamah Konstitusi Republik Indonesia (Studi Perbandingan Indonesia Dan Korea Selatan)”. Jurnal Konstitusi 18 (1):168-94. https://doi.org/10.31078/jk1818.

Issue

Section

Articles