Menakar Independensi Hakim Pengadilan Pajak Pasca Putusan MK Nomor 10/PUU-XVIII/2020
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.31078/jk1748Keywords:
Judicial Independence, Judicial Power, Tax CourtAbstract
Judicial independence is the main foundation for the of justice and legal certainty. Regarding the discourse on the independence of judicial power, the Constitutional Court decided on Case Number 10/PUU-XVIII/2020 which examined Article 5 paragraph (2) and Article 8 paragraph (2) of Law Number 14 of 2002 concerning the Tax Court. The Petitioners challenged the authority of Ministry of Finance to develop the organization, administration and finance for the Tax Court, the authority of the Minister of Finance to propose the chairperson and deputy chairman of the Tax Court. Furthermore, the Court in its ruling states that “the Chairperson and Deputy Chairperson are appointed by the President who is elected from and by the Judges who are subsequently proposed through the Minister with the approval of the Chief Justice of the Supreme Court for 1 (one) term of office for 5 (five) years”. This study examined the independence of the tax court judges after the Constitutional Court Decision Number 10 / PUU-XVIII / 2020 with independent judicial theory approach. This study showed that the Court’s decision not only supports the independence of the tax court judges but also draws a demarcation line between judicial power and executive power.
References
DAFTAR PUSTAKA
Buku
Bell, John, 2006, Judiciaries Within Europe: a Comparative Review. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Graver, Hans Petter, 2015, Judges Against Justice On Judges When the Rule of Law is Under Attack, London: Springer.
Manan, Bagir, 2007, Kekuasaan Kehakiman Indonesia, dalam UU No. 4 Tahun 2004, Yogyakarta: FH UII.
Neudorf, Lorne, 2017, The Dynamics of Judicial Independence A Comparative Study of Courts in Malaysia and Pakistan, London: Springer International Publishing.
Saidi, Muhammad Djafar, 2007, Perlindungan Hukum Wajib Pajak Dalam Penyelesaian Sengketa, Jakarta: Rajagrafindo Persada, 2007.
Shetreet, Shimon (ed.), 2004, The Culture of Judicial Independence, Leiden: Brill-Nijhof.
Shetreet, Shimon, dan Christopher Forsyth (eds.), 2012, The Culture of Judicial Independence, Conceptual Foundations and Practical Challenges, Leiden: Martinus Nijhoff Publishers.
Shetreet, Simon dan Deschenes (eds.), 1985, Judicial Independence: The Contemporary Debate, Boston: Martinus Nijhoff.
Seibert-Fohr, Anja (ed.), 2012, Judicial Independence in Transition, New York: Springer Heidelberg.
Subki, Muhammad Sukri, dan Djumadi, 2007, Menyelesaikan Sengketa Melalui Pengadilan Pajak. Jakarta: Rajagrafindo Persada.
Jurnal/Majalah/Laporan
Ananian-Welsh, Rebecca dan George Williams, 2014, Judicial Independence From The Executive: A First-Principles Review of The Australian Cases, Monash University Law Review Volume 40, Nomor 3.
Neudorf, Lorne, 2015, Judicial Independence: The Judge As A Third Party To The Dispute, Oxford University Comparative Law Forum 2.
Neudorf, Lorne, 2012, The Supreme Court and The New Judicial Independence. Cambridge Journal International Comparative Law Volume 1 Issue 2.
Sitorus, Binsar, 2013 Independensi Hakim Dalam Sistem Peradilan Pajak di Indonesia, Yuridika: Volume 28 No 1, Januari-April.
Internet
Bangalore Principles https://www.unodc.org/pdf/crime/corruption/judicial_group/Bangalore_principles.pdf
Putusan Pengadilan
Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 10/PUU-XVIII/2020, tanggal 18 Agustus 2020.
Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 6/PUU-XIV/2016, tanggal 4 Agustus 2016
Regulasi
Undang-Undang Dasar 1945
Undang-undang Nomor14 Tahun 2002 tentang Pengadilan Pajak
Undang-Undang Nomor 48 Tahun 2009 tentang Kekuasaan Kehakiman
International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights
United Nations (1985) Basic Principles on the Independence of the Judiciary
Beijing Statement of Principles of the Independence of the Judiciary
Bangalore Principles, UN Doc E/RES/2006/23, cl 3.2.
Canadian Judicial Council (2004) Ethical Principles for Judges
Peraturan Mahkamah Agung Nomor 7 Tahun 2015 Tentang Organisasi dan Tata Kerja Kepaniteraan dan Kesekretariatan Peradilan
Buku
Bell, John, 2006, Judiciaries Within Europe: a Comparative Review. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Graver, Hans Petter, 2015, Judges Against Justice On Judges When the Rule of Law is Under Attack, London: Springer.
Manan, Bagir, 2007, Kekuasaan Kehakiman Indonesia, dalam UU No. 4 Tahun 2004, Yogyakarta: FH UII.
Neudorf, Lorne, 2017, The Dynamics of Judicial Independence A Comparative Study of Courts in Malaysia and Pakistan, London: Springer International Publishing.
Saidi, Muhammad Djafar, 2007, Perlindungan Hukum Wajib Pajak Dalam Penyelesaian Sengketa, Jakarta: Rajagrafindo Persada, 2007.
Shetreet, Shimon (ed.), 2004, The Culture of Judicial Independence, Leiden: Brill-Nijhof.
Shetreet, Shimon, dan Christopher Forsyth (eds.), 2012, The Culture of Judicial Independence, Conceptual Foundations and Practical Challenges, Leiden: Martinus Nijhoff Publishers.
Shetreet, Simon dan Deschenes (eds.), 1985, Judicial Independence: The Contemporary Debate, Boston: Martinus Nijhoff.
Seibert-Fohr, Anja (ed.), 2012, Judicial Independence in Transition, New York: Springer Heidelberg.
Subki, Muhammad Sukri, dan Djumadi, 2007, Menyelesaikan Sengketa Melalui Pengadilan Pajak. Jakarta: Rajagrafindo Persada.
Jurnal/Majalah/Laporan
Ananian-Welsh, Rebecca dan George Williams, 2014, Judicial Independence From The Executive: A First-Principles Review of The Australian Cases, Monash University Law Review Volume 40, Nomor 3.
Neudorf, Lorne, 2015, Judicial Independence: The Judge As A Third Party To The Dispute, Oxford University Comparative Law Forum 2.
Neudorf, Lorne, 2012, The Supreme Court and The New Judicial Independence. Cambridge Journal International Comparative Law Volume 1 Issue 2.
Sitorus, Binsar, 2013 Independensi Hakim Dalam Sistem Peradilan Pajak di Indonesia, Yuridika: Volume 28 No 1, Januari-April.
Internet
Bangalore Principles https://www.unodc.org/pdf/crime/corruption/judicial_group/Bangalore_principles.pdf
Putusan Pengadilan
Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 10/PUU-XVIII/2020, tanggal 18 Agustus 2020.
Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 6/PUU-XIV/2016, tanggal 4 Agustus 2016
Regulasi
Undang-Undang Dasar 1945
Undang-undang Nomor14 Tahun 2002 tentang Pengadilan Pajak
Undang-Undang Nomor 48 Tahun 2009 tentang Kekuasaan Kehakiman
International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights
United Nations (1985) Basic Principles on the Independence of the Judiciary
Beijing Statement of Principles of the Independence of the Judiciary
Bangalore Principles, UN Doc E/RES/2006/23, cl 3.2.
Canadian Judicial Council (2004) Ethical Principles for Judges
Peraturan Mahkamah Agung Nomor 7 Tahun 2015 Tentang Organisasi dan Tata Kerja Kepaniteraan dan Kesekretariatan Peradilan
Downloads
Published
2021-01-25
How to Cite
Devitasari, Ananthia Ayu. 2021. “Menakar Independensi Hakim Pengadilan Pajak Pasca Putusan MK Nomor 10 PUU-XVIII 2020”. Jurnal Konstitusi 17 (4):879-98. https://doi.org/10.31078/jk1748.
Issue
Section
Articles
License
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Copyright of the published articles will be transferred to the journal as the publisher of the manuscripts. Therefore, the author confirms that the copyright has been managed by the publisher.
- The publisher of Jurnal Konstitusi is The Registrar and Secretariat General of the Constitutional Court of the Republic of Indonesia.
- The copyright follows Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License: This license allows reusers to distribute, remix, adapt, and build upon the material in any medium or format for noncommercial purposes only, and only so long as attribution is given to the creator. If you remix, adapt, or build upon the material, you must license the modified material under identical terms.
