Dampak Jaminan Fidusia Kredit Kendaraan Bermotor yang Tidak Didaftarkan terhadap Penerimaan Negara Bukan Pajak

Authors

  • Akhmad Yasin Badan Kebijakan Fiskal, Kementerian Keuangan

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.31078/jk1746

Keywords:

Fiduciary Guarantees, Motor Vehicles, and nontax state revenues

Abstract


Motor vehicles ownership through finance companies can be realized after going through a series of procedures before a notary and fiduciary registration office. However, this series of procedures are not done by finance companies in providing motor vehicle financing to consumers. Increasing consumer financing to the public for motor vehicles ownership should also increase the number of non-tax state revenues from fiduciary guarantees. The study purpose is to know the legal consequences for fiduciary recipients who did not register their fiduciary guarantees and to know the impact of unregistered fiduciary guarantees on non-tax state revenue (PNBP). The formulation of the problem in the research question is how the legal consequences for fiduciary recipients who do not register their fiduciary guarantees and how the impact of unregistered fiduciary guarantees on non-tax state revenue (PNBP). The research method used is descriptive qualitative normative legal research using secondary data. The study results found that fiduciary finance companies/ recipients did not register their fiduciary guarantee, so they committed illegal acts by utilizing third parties to execute motorized vehicles that were not actually burdened with fiduciary guarantees. The executor’s right to fiduciary recipient is legally flawed because he does not hold a fiduciary guarantee certificate as a result of not registering a motorized vehicle as a fiduciary guarantee. The impact on state finances because they were not registering motor vehicles as fiduciary guarantees at the fiduciary registration office resulting in non-tax revenue (PNBP) being not optimal for the state.

References

--------------, Republik Indonesia, Undang-Undang Nomor 9 Tahun 2018 Tentang Penerimaan Negara Bukan Pajak.
--------------, Republik Indonesia, Undang-Undang Nomor 42 Tahun 1999 Tentang Jaminan Fidusia.
Aermadepa, 2012, Pendaftaran Jaminan Fidusia, Masalah dan Dilema dalam Pelaksanaannya, Jurnal Ilmiah Abdi Ilmu.
Bahsan, 2007, Hukum Jaminan dan Jaminan Kredit Perbankan Indonesia, Jakarta: PT. Raja Grafindo Persada.
Darus, Badrulzaman, Mariam, 2000, Permasalahan Hukum Hak Jaminan, Jurnal Hukum Bisnis.
Husni Hasbullah, Frieda, 2009, Hukum Kebendaan Perdata, Hak-Hak Yang Memberi Jaminan, Jakarta: Ind Hill.
K. Harjono, Dhaniswara, 2011, Konsep Pembangunan Hukum dan Perannya Terhadap Sistem Ekonomi Pasar, Jurnal Hukum.
Nasution, Bismar, 2004, Mengkaji Ulang Hukum Sebagai Landasan Pembangunan Ekonomi, Orasi Ilmiah Pengukuhan Sebagai Guru Besar Pada Fakultas Hukum Universitas Sumatera Utara.
Satrio, J, 1991, Hukum Jaminan, Hak-Hak Jaminan Kebendaan, Bandung: PT Citra Aditya Bakti.
Setyorini, Arista dan Agus Muwarto, 2017, Akibat Hukum Perjanjian Pembiayaan Konsumen dengan Pembebanan Jaminan Fidusia yang Tidak Didaftarkan, Mimbar Keadilan.
Subekti, 1989, Jaminan-Jaminan untuk Pemberian Kredit Menurut Hukum Indonesia, Bandung: PT Citra Aditya Bakti.
Suyatno, Thomas, 1989, Dasar-Dasar Perkreditan, Jakarta: PT. Gramedia.
Trizna Wijaya, Happy, 2018, Akibat Hukum Peralihan Kredit Motor Dalam Pembiayaan Konsumen, Jurnal Hukum Magnum Opus.
Pengelolaan tak sesuai aturan, penerimaan PNBP kementerian lembaga belum optimal, https://nasional.kontan.co.id/news/pengelolaan-tak-sesuai-aturan-penerimaan-pnbp-kementerian-lembaga-belum-optimal?page=all diunduh 30 April 2020.

Downloads

Published

2021-01-25

How to Cite

Yasin, Akhmad. 2021. “Dampak Jaminan Fidusia Kredit Kendaraan Bermotor Yang Tidak Didaftarkan Terhadap Penerimaan Negara Bukan Pajak”. Jurnal Konstitusi 17 (4):828-48. https://doi.org/10.31078/jk1746.

Issue

Section

Articles