Perlindungan Hak Konstitusional Ekonomi Warga Negara Melalui Hak Paten di Indonesia


  • Lukman Hakim FH Universitas Widyagama
  • Nalom Kurniwan Mahkamah Konstitusi Republik Indonesia



Economic Constitutional Rights, Patent Rights, Piracy of Works, Protection


Cases of piracy against patents or trademarks are cases that often occur in Indonesia. Responding to these challenges, this study aims to find out how the legal protection of citizens economic constitutional laws through patents in Indonesia. This research is prescriptive legal research and was carried out using systematic literature review methods. The research data is sourced from rules and regulations in force in Indonesia, books, and articles from national and international journals that discuss patent rights. The researcher then analyzed the data collected in a descriptive qualitative manner. The results of this study indicate that the Indonesian government protects the constitutional rights of its citizens through patents by registering their work or products by the provisions in force in Indonesia. However, when the work or product is not registered, the product is not protected by law. For this reason, citizens who have works and products that are economically valuable that allow them to be reproduced are advised to register their products or works through patents.


Brereton, P., Kitchenham, B. A., Budgen, D., Turner, M., & Khalil, M. (2007). Lessons from applying the systematic literature review process within the software engineering domain. The Journal of Systems and Software, 80, 571-583. doi:10.1016/j.jss.2006.07.009
Burgers, C., Brugman, B. C., & Boeynaems, A. (2019, May). Systematic literature reviews: Four applications for interdisciplinary research. Journal of Pragmatics, 145, 102-109. doi:
Caplanova, A. (2016). Intellectual property. In F. Pacheco-Torgal, E. Rasmussen, C.-G. Granqvist, V. Ivanov, A. Kaklauskas, & S. Makonin (Eds.), Start-Up Creation (pp. 105-126). Woodhead Publishing. doi:
Cullen, F. T., Clark, G. A., Mathers, R. A., & Cullen, J. B. (1983). Public support for punishing white-collar crime: Blaming the victim revisited? Journal of Criminal Justice, 11(6), 481-493. doi:
Duening, T. N., Hisrich, R. D., & Lechter, M. A. (2010). Intellectual property management and protection. In T. N. Duening, R. D. Hisrich, & M. A. Lechter, Technology Entrepreneurship (pp. 201-246). Academic Press. doi:
Duening, T. N., Hisrich, R. D., & Lechter, M. A. (2015). Protecting your intellectual property. In T. N. Duening, R. D. Hisrich, & M. A. Lechter, Technology Entrepreneurship (2 ed., pp. 83-126). Academic Press. doi:
Durfee, W. K., & Iaizzo, P. A. (2019). The medical device innovation process. In P. A. Iaizzo (Ed.), Engineering in Medicine (pp. 495-509). Academic Press. doi:
Eathon, M. L. (2007). Ethical issues and challenges facing the pharmaceutical industry. In J. B. Taylor, & D. J. Triggle (Eds.), Comprehensive Medicinal Chemistry II (Vol. 1, pp. 709-723). Elsevier Science. doi:
Ferrell, O. C., Harrison, D. E., Ferrell, L., & Hair, J. F. (February, 2019). Business ethics, corporate social responsibility, and brand attitudes: An exploratory study. Journal of Business Research, 95, 491-501. doi:
Goel, M., & Ramanathan, P. E. (2014). Business ethics and corporate social responsibility-Is there a dividing line? Procedia Economics and Finance, 11, 49-59. doi:10.1016/S2212-5671(14)00175-0
Gottschal, P., Filstad, C., Glomseth, R., & Solli-Sæther, H. (2011, June). Information management for investigation and prevention of white-collar crime. International Journal of Information Management, 31(3), 226-233. doi:
Haeffner, E., Gliubislavich, V., & Lintner, K. (2009). Global patent and trade mark strategies: A must for everybody? In K. Lintner (Ed.), Global Regulatory Issues for the Cosmetics Industry (Vol. 2, pp. 235-250). William Andrew. doi:
Hidayah, K. (2012, July). Patent rights protection in the study of Islamic law and the role of Islam in science and technology. De Jure, 4(1), 85-95. doi:10.18860/j-fsh.v4i1.2160
Holtfreter, K., Van Slyke, S., Bratton, J., & Gertz, M. (2008). Public perceptions of white-collar crime and punishment. Journal of Criminal Justice, 36, 50–60. doi:10.1016/j.jcrimjus.2007.12.006
Jabalnur. (2017, September). Protection of paten rights on special inventors. Holrev, 1(2), 278-290. doi:10.33561/holrev.v1i2.3646
Kansil, C. (1990). Intellectual property rights. Jakarta: Bumi Aksara.
Koutsos, T. M., Menexes, G. C., & Dordas, C. A. (2019, September 10). An efficient framework for conducting systematic literature reviews in agricultural sciences. Science of The Total Environment, 682, 106-117. doi:
Krishna, A., Dangayach, G. S., & Jainabc, R. (2011). Business ethics: A sustainability approach. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 25, 281 – 286. doi:10.1016/j.sbspro.2011.10.548
Marzuki, P. M. (2005). Legal research. Jakarta: Prenada Media.
Maulana, I. B. (2000). Patent implementation from Law of Patent No 6 of 1989 to Law of Patent No 13 of 1997: Indonesian experience, in capita selecta of intellectual property rights. Yogyakarta: Law Central Studies of UII Yogyakarta in cooperation with Klinik HAKI Foundation of Jakarta.
McCrie, R. (2016). Global leadership for optimal security operations. In R. McCrie, Security Operations Management (3 ed., pp. 363-406). Butterworth-Heinemann. doi:
Mengist, W., Soromessa, T., & Legese, G. (2020). Method for conducting systematic literature review and meta-analysis for environmental science research. MethodsX, 7, 100777. doi:
Muhammad, A. K. (1999). Indonesian company law. Bandung: PT Citra Aditya Bhakti.
Öberg, Å. (2004). Medical device research and design. In J. F. Dyro (Ed.), Clinical Engineering Handbook (pp. 350-352). Academic Press. doi:
Ouellette, L. L., & Tutt, A. (2020, March). How do patent incentives affect university researchers? International Review of Law and Economics, 61, 105883. doi:
Pandiangan, C. R. (2018, December 18). Paten rights and patent holder. doi:
Pentland, A. P., Connolly, N. L., & Fahner-Vihtelic, J. E. (2012, March). Patents and growth. Journal of Investigative Dermatology, 132(3), 1037-1041. doi:
Pfeifer, M. (2009). Design requirements. In M. Pfeifer, Materials Enabled Designs (pp. 23-50). Butterworth-Heinemann. doi:
Ramli, T. S., & Putri, S. A. (2018, November). Legal review on differences in the transfer of patents with license agreements in civil law. Dialogia Iuridica, 10(1), 96-100. doi:10.28932/di.v10i1.1012
Rendtorff, J. D. (2012). Business ethics, overview. In R. Chadwick (Ed.), Encyclopedia of Applied Ethics (2 ed., pp. 365-372). Academic Press. doi:
Saidin. (1997). Aspects of intellectual property rights. Jakarta: PT Raja Grafindo Persada.
Santoso, B. (2008). Introduction to intellectual property rights. Semarang: Pustaka Magister.
Shapiro, S. P. (2001). Crime: White-collar. In N. J. Smelser, & P. B. Baltes (Eds.), International Encyclopedia of the Social & Behavioral Sciences (pp. 2941-2945). Pergamon. doi:
Sharma, B. (2018). Patent. In D. Vohora, & G. Singh (Eds.), Pharmaceutical Medicine and Translational Clinical Research (pp. 287-292). Academic Press. doi:
Simatupang, T. H. (2017, June). Law system of intellectual property protection in order to improve people prosperity. De Jure, 17(2), 195 - 208. doi:10.30641/dejure.2017.V17.195-208
Snyder, H. (2019). Literature review as a research methodology: An overview and guidelines. Journal of Business Research, 104, 333-339. doi:
Sroka, W., & Lőrinczy, M. (2015). The perception of ethics in business: Analysis of research results. Procedia Economics and Finance, 34, 156-163. doi:
Stedeford, T. (2009). Patents. In P. J. Hakkinen, A. Mohapatra, P. Wexler, & S. G. Gilbert (Eds.), Information Resources in Toxicology (4 ed., pp. 711-716). Academic Press. doi:
Sugiharto, I. B. (1999). Anti monopoly and unhealthy trading competition, ethical perspective. Membenahi Perilaku Bisnis Melalui UU No 5 tahun 1999.
Sumantoro. (1990). Criminal aspects in economy. Jakarta: Ghalia Indonesia.
Tota, I., & Shehu, H. (2012). The dilemma of business ethics. Procedia Economics and Finance, 3, 555-559. doi:10.1016/S2212-5671(12)00195-5
Tranfield, D., Denyer, D., & Smart, P. (2003). Towards a methodology for developing evidence-informed management knowledge by means of systematic review. British Journal of Management, 14, 207–222. doi:
Utama, K. W. (2012, July). The benefit of paten license for IT industry in Indonesia. Masalah-masalah Hukum, 41(3), 385-391. doi:10.14710/mmh.41.3.2012.385-391
Varma, B. K. (2014). Intellectual property rights and the technology transfer process. In S. Seetharaman (Ed.), Treatise on Process Metallurgy (Vol. 3, pp. 1249-1289). Elsevier. doi:
Widjaja, G. (2001). Business license law series. Jakarta: Rajawali Press.
Wu, B. (2011). Enterprise leadership management. In B. Wu, Consumption and Management (pp. 331-387). Chandos Publishing. doi:
Yodo, S. (2016, October-December). Patent protection (Comparative study on scope protection in many countries). Fiat Justisia, 10(4), 587-814. doi:10.25041/fiatjustisia.v10no4.821
Zulkarnain, M. F. (2018, December 19). Who is the patent holder and what should be avoided before proposing patent. doi:10.31219/

Peraturan perundang-undangan
UU Nomor 14 Tahun 2001 tentang Paten.
UU Nomor 13 Tahun 2016 tentang Paten.
UU Nomor 5 Tahun 1999 tentang Larangan Praktek Monopoli dan Persaingan Usaha Tidak Sehat.




How to Cite

Hakim, Lukman, and Nalom Kurniwan. 2020. “Perlindungan Hak Konstitusional Ekonomi Warga Negara Melalui Hak Paten Di Indonesia”. Jurnal Konstitusi 17 (3):582-604.