Penerapan Pasal 1 ayat (2) Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Pidana dalam Perspektif Kontemporer

Authors

  • Damian Agata Yuvens Universitas Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.31078/jk1343

Keywords:

Article 1 paragraph (2) Indonesian Criminal Code, Implementation, Contemporary

Abstract

Article 1 paragraph (2) Indonesian Criminal Code is an article designed as bridge between the old and new criminal provisions. Recalling the “age” of Article 1 paragraph (2) Indonesian Criminal Code that is so old, there is an urgency to conduct analysis in contemporary perspective whether or not Article 1 paragraph (2) Indonesian Criminal Code can be implemented under the current law regime in Indonesia. In implementing Article 1 paragraph (2) Indonesian Criminal Code, elements that shall be regarded are: (i) defendant; (ii) change of laws and regulations after the crime is committed; (iii) most favourable provision. There should be an adjustment on the method of interpreting both elements of defendant and change of law and regulations; on the other hand, there must be a case-by-case study to answer the element of most favourable provision. Aside from elements of Article 1 paragraph (2) Indonesian Criminal Code, there should also be a consideration on transitional provisions of the changed law to determine whether or not Article 1 paragraph (2) Indonesian Criminal Code could be implemented.

References

Adisapoetra, R. Kosim, 1978, Pengantar Ilmu Administrasi Negara, Jakarta: Pradnya Paramita.
Arief, Barda Nawawi, 2003, Kapita Selekta Hukum Pidana. Bandung: PT. Citra Aditya Bakti.
Asy’ari, Syukri, Meyrinda Rahmawaty Hilipito dan Mohammad Mahrus Ali, 2013, “Model dan Implementasi Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi dalam Pengujian Undang-Undang (Studi Putusan Tahun 2003-2012)” Jurnal Konstitusi, Volume 10, Nomor 4, Desember, h. 675-708.
Atmosudirjo, Prajudi, 1983, Hukum Administrasi Negara. Jakarta: Ghalia Indonesia.
Bintari, Aninditya Eka, 2013, “Mahkamah Konstitusi sebagai Negative Legislator dalam Penegakan Hukum Tata Negara,” Pandecta, Volume 8, Nomor 1, Januari, h. 83-91.
Hamzah, Andi, 1985, Pengantar Hukum Acara Pidana Indonesia, Jakarta: Ghalia Indonesia.
Harahap, M. Yahya, 2000, Pembahasan Permasalahan dan Penerapan KUHAP, Penyidikan dan Penuntutan. Jakarta: Sinar Grafika.
Lamintang, P.A.F., 1990, Dasar-Dasar Hukum Pidana Indonesia. Bandung: Sinar Baru.
Lotulong, Paulus E., dkk. ed., 2005, Sistem Hukum Indonesia, Jakarta: Mahkamah Agung Republik Indonesia dan Fakultas Hukum Universitas Indonesia.
M., Akbarika Mega, Dinda Anasthasia dan Melati Evalusyana I., 2015, “Tinjauan Yuridis Vonis Ultra Petita dalam Hukum Acara Pidana,” Jurnal Hukum Acara UNS (Verstek), Volume 3, Nomor 2, h. 1-12.
M.D., Moh. Mahfud, 2010, Konstitusi dan Hukum dalam Kontroversi Isu, Jakarta: Rajawali Pers.
Muladi, 1995, Kapita Selekta Sistem Peradilan Pidana. Badan Penerbit Undip: Semarang.
_______, 2002, Demokratisasi, Hak Asasi Manusia dan Reformasi Hukum di Indonesia. Jakarta: The Habibie Center.
Prakoso, Djoko, 1988, Surat Dakwaan, Tuntutan Pidana dan Eksaminasi Perkara di dalam Proses Pidana. Yogyakarta: Liberty.
Remmelink, Jan, 2003, Hukum Pidana: Komentar atas Pasal-Pasal Terpenting dari Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Pidana Belanda dan Padanannya dalam Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Pidana Indonesia. Jakarta: PT. Gramedia Pustaka Utama.
Rifai, Eddy, 2014, “Perspektif Pertanggungjawaban Pidana Korporasi sebagai Pelaku Tindak Pidana Korupsi.” Mimbar Hukum, Volume 26, Nomor 1, Februari, h. 84-97.

Published

2016-12-20

How to Cite

Yuvens, Damian Agata. 2016. “Penerapan Pasal 1 Ayat (2) Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Pidana Dalam Perspektif Kontemporer”. Jurnal Konstitusi 13 (4):743-65. https://doi.org/10.31078/jk1343.

Issue

Section

Articles