Kontrak Karya PT Freeport Indonesia dalam Perspektif Pancasila dan UUD NRI 1945

Authors

  • Ahmad Redi Fakultas Hukum Univeristas Tarumanagara

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.31078/jk1337

Keywords:

Pancasila, UUD 1945, Contract of Work

Abstract

PT Freeport Indonesia (PT FI) has a Contract of Work (KK) to undertake mining materials in Grasberg and Ertsberg mining areas which has begun in 1967 and will end in 2021. Since the promulgation of Law No. 4 of 2009 on Mineral and Coal Mining (UU Minerba), regulation on mineral and coal undertaking has been in accordance with Pancasila (State Ideology) and the 1945 Constitution, however, because UU Minerba can only be effective for legal actions after its promulgation therefore items related to KK before the existence of that law cannot be regulated. On the other hand, the existence of KK of PT FI is considered to be in violation with Pancasila namely The Fifth Principle “Social Justice for The Whole People of Indonesia”, and Article 33 (3) of 1945 Constitution concerning the substance of land, water, and natural wealth ‘shall be controlled by the State’ and ‘for maximum use for people’s welfare’. This article shall discuss on whether KK of PT FI has been in accordance with Pancasila and the1945 Constitution? And what should Government do in order KK of PT FI can be regulated within the frame of Pancasila and the 1945 Constitution? The method used in this writing is juridical normative. Based on the writer’s analysis, KK of PT FI is violating Pancasila and the 1945 Constitution. The effort to adjust it to Pancasila and the 1945 Constitution shall be conducted through renegotiation of KK of PT FI based on “hardship” principle in UNIDROIT Principles of International Commercial Contracts and principle of natural resources for national interest and people’s welfare in the Resolution of General Assembly Resolution 1803 (XVII) of 14 December 1962, “Permanent Sovereignty Over Natural Resources.

References

D Darmodihardjo, Orientasi Singkat Pancasila. Dalam Christian Siregar, “Pancasila, Keadilan Sosial, dan Persatuan Indonesia”, Jurnal Humaniora Vol.5 No.1 April 2014: 107-112, hlm. 109
Damanhuri Fatah, “Teori Keadilan Menurut John Rawl”, Jurnal TAPIs Vol.9 No.2 Juli-Desember 2013, hlm.35.
David Miller, Principles of Social Justice, (London: Harvard University Press, 1999), hlm. 1
Departemen Energi dan Sumber Daya Mineral (sekarang Kementerian Energi dan Sumber Daya Mineral), Naskah Akademik Rancangan Undang-Undang tentang Pertambangan Mineral dan Batubara 12 Juli 2008, hlm. 20.
Enrique Ortega Girones, dkk, “Mineral Rights Cadastre: Promoting Transparent Access to Mineral Resources Extractive Industries for Development Series No. 4”, Washington DC, World Bank, 2009, hlm. 10-13.
Huala Adolf, Dasar-dasar Hukum Kontrak Internasional, (Bandung: Refika Aditama, cet. 2, 2008I, hlm. 29.
Jimly Assiddiqie, “Peran Konstitusional Keadilan Sosial”, Makalah, Malang, 12 April 2011,http://www.jimly.com/makalah/namafile/151/PESAN_KEADILAN_SOSIAL.pdf
John Rawls, A Theory of Justice (Revised Edition), (Massachusetts: Harvard University Press, 1999) hlm. 53
John Rawls, A. Theory of Justice, (London: Oxford University, 1973), hlm.10 lihat juga Damanhuri Fatah, “Teori Keadilan Menurut John Rawl”, Jurnal TAPIs Vol.9 No.2 Juli-Desember 2013, hlm.35.
Johnny Ibrahim, Teori dan Metodologi Penelitian Hukum Normatif, (Malang: Bayumedia, 2007), hlm. 300.
Kementerian Energi dan Sumber Daya Mineral, Briefing Sheet Menteri Energi dan Sumber Daya Mineral Pada Kunjungan President And Chief Executive Officer Freeport-Mcmoran Copper & Gold (Fcx), Senin, 28 November 2011, Lampiran III, hlm. 1
M. Sornarajah, The International Law on Foreign Invesment, second edition, (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2004), hlm. 278.
Mattherm B.Milles dan Michael Huberman, Qualitative Data Analysis, (London: Sage Publication Inc, 1974), hlm. 137.
Peter Mahmud Marzuki, Penelitian Hukum, Jakarta: Kencana Preneda Media Group, hlm.106-109.
PT Freeport Indonesia, Sekilas Tentang Freeport, diunduh http://www.ptfi.com/about/default.asp
Ratio legis secara sederhana diartikan alasan mengapa ada ketentuan tersebut.
(Lihat Peter Mahmud Marzuki, Penelitian Hukum, Jakarta: Kencana Preneda Media Group, hlm.104).
Ridwan Khairandy, Iktikad Baik Dalam Kebasan Berkontrak, (Jakarta : PPS Fakultas Hukum Universitas Indonesia, 2004), hlm. 27.
Ronald Dworkin, Legal Research, (Daedlus:Spring, 1973), Hal. 250.
Sektretariat Kabinet, Catatan Atas Rengosiasi Kontrak, 14 Juli 2015, diakses dari http://setkab.go.id/catatan-atas-renegosiasi-kontrak/ pada Senin 22 Februari 2016.
Sektretariat Kabinet, Catatan Atas Rengosiasi Kontrak, 14 Juli 2015, diakses dari http://setkab.go.id/catatan-atas-renegosiasi-kontrak/ pada Senin 22 Februari 2016.
Sorjono Soekanto dan Sri Mamudji, Penelitian Hukum Normatif, (Jakarta: Radjawali, 1985), hal.14.
Sunaryati Hartono, “Makna Nilai-Nilai Falsafah di Dalam Pancasila Sebagai Weltanschauung Bangsa dan Negara Republik Indonesia”, Majalah Hukum Nasional, hlm. 46, file:///Users/apple/Downloads/mhn120106.pdf
Sutan Remy Syahdeini, Kebebasan Berkontrak dan Perlindungan Yang Seimbang Bagi Para Pihak dalam Perjanjian Kredit Bank di Indonesia (buku 1), (Jakarta: Institut Bankir Indonesia, 1993), hlm. 185
Thamrin Sihite, Direktur Jenderal Mineral dan Batubara Kementerian Energi dan Sumber Daya Mineral sebagaimana diunduh dari www.bisniskeuangan.kompas.com/read/2012/02/29/.../Freeport.dan.Newmont.Minta.Kontrak.Karya.Dihromati diunduh pada Rabu, 29 februari 2012, pukul 08.05 WIB.

Published

2016-11-22

How to Cite

Redi, Ahmad. 2016. “Kontrak Karya PT Freeport Indonesia Dalam Perspektif Pancasila Dan UUD NRI 1945”. Jurnal Konstitusi 13 (3):613-38. https://doi.org/10.31078/jk1337.

Issue

Section

Articles