Faktor-Faktor yang Menyebabkan Materi Muatan Undang-Undang Bertentangan Dengan UUD 1945

Authors

  • Daniel Samosir Kantor Hukum Darmi Marasabessy, S.H., & Rekaan Jl. Margonda Raya No.18 Beji Kota Depok, Jawa Barat 16423

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.31078/jk1246

Keywords:

The Legislation, The Substance, Judicial Review of Legislation

Abstract


In the term of office of the legislators 2004/2009 period, a lot of the Bills which passed into legislation were not in favour of the people. Because of that, those      Bills became prejudice to the society due to the lack of conformation to what the people aspired to in the constitution (UUD 1945) which is the source and basis for the establishment of the legislation. Therefore, many legislation were tested with judicialreview by the constitutional court on the application of the public. Based on this judical review and the usage of normative research by the author, it is found that substances of the legislation are contrary to the constitution (UUD 1945). Because the legislation specified in the list of Prolegnas made by the parlement (DPR) and the President has not fully used clear, precise and consistent criteria. Therefore, the legislation established by parlement 2004/2009 period do not meet the principles of the establishment of the legislation according to the act Number  12 Year  2011 on the establishment of the legislation.

References

Badan Legislasi DPR RI. 2009. Kinerja dan Evaluasi Badan Legislasi Nasional 2005-2009.
Bagir Manan & Kuntana Magnar. 1997. Beberapa Masalah Hukum Tatat Negara Indonesia. Edisi Revisi. Bandung: PT Alumni.
Christine S.T. Kansil. 2010. Perbandingan Hukum Administrasi Negara. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta.
Jimly Asshiddiqie,2011. Perihal Undang-undang. Jakarta: Rajawali Pers.
Mafud MD, MK: 2012 Prosentase Pembatalan UU Meningkat http://www.djpp.kemenkumham.go.id/berita-hukum-dan-perundang-undangan/2366-mk-2012-prosentase-pembatalan-uu-meningkat.html,diunduh, 16 April 2015.
Mahkamah Konstitusi Rekapitulasi Perkara Pengujian Undang-Undang http://www.mahkamahkonstitusi.go.id/index.php?page=web.RekapPUU, diakses 21, April 2015.
Maria Farida S Indrati. 2007. Ilmu Perundang-undangan, Jenis, Fungsi, dan Materi Muatan. Yogyakarya: Kanisius.
Patiniari Siahaan. 2012. Politik Hukum Pembentukan Undang-undang Pasca Amandemen UUD 1945. Jakarta: Konpress, Oktober.
Soerjono Soekanto. 1986. Pengantar Penelitian Hukum. Jakarta: Universita Indonesia.
Sri Soemantri. 1982. Hak Uji Material di Indonesia. Bandung: Alumni.

Downloads

Published

2016-05-20

How to Cite

Samosir, Daniel. 2016. “Faktor-Faktor Yang Menyebabkan Materi Muatan Undang-Undang Bertentangan Dengan UUD 1945”. Jurnal Konstitusi 12 (4):773-94. https://doi.org/10.31078/jk1246.

Issue

Vol. 12 No. 4 (2015)

Section

Articles

License

Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:

  1. Copyright of the published articles will be transferred to the journal as the publisher of the manuscripts. Therefore, the author confirms that the copyright has been managed by the publisher.
  2. The publisher of Jurnal Konstitusi is The Registrar and Secretariat General of the Constitutional Court of the Republic of Indonesia.
  3. The copyright follows Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License: This license allows reusers to distribute, remix, adapt, and build upon the material in any medium or format for noncommercial purposes only, and only so long as attribution is given to the creator. If you remix, adapt, or build upon the material, you must license the modified material under identical terms.