Penyelesaian Sengketa Pilkada Setelah Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 97/PUU-XI/2013

R. Nazriyah

Abstract


The problem to be studied in this paper is which body has the authority to resolve election disputes after the decision of the Constitutional Court? What  are the considerations that the court overturned its own authority to resolve dispute elections? Based on the results of analysis it can be concluded that; first, based on the decision No. 97 / PUU-XI / 2013 of the Constitutional Court, it is considered that, “... the legislators are also able to determine that direct elections were not part of  the formal Election as mentioned in section 22E of the 1945 Constitution. So that the dispute of the result is determined as an additional authority of the Supreme Court .. . “The second, the most appropriate agency to handle election disputes is the Supreme Court, which then delegates to the High Court in each region. If litigants are not satisfied with the decision of the High Court, they may appeal to  the Supreme Court. Meanwhile, Law No. 1 2015 About Election of governors, regents, and mayors, was handed over to the Constitutional Court (although temporary) to resolve the election disputes. Therefore, it is immediate to establish regulations particularly the governing competent institution to resolve election disputes.


Keywords


Election Dispute; Judgment; the Constitutional Court

References


Bagir Manan, 2004, “Menyongsong Fajar Otonomi Daerah”, Yogyakarta, Cet. III, FH UII.

Cakra Arbas, 2012, “Jalan Terjal Calon Independen Pada Pemilukada Di Provinsi Aceh”, Jakarta, Sofmedia.

Leo Agustina, 2009, “Pilkada dan Dinamika Politik Lokal”, Cetakan I, Yogyakarta, Pustaka Pelajar.

Maria Farida Indrati, “Sengketa Pemilukada, Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi, dan Pelaksanaan Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi”, Prosiding Seminar Nasional Evaluasi Pemilihan umum Kepala Daerah, Jakarta, 24 – 26 Januari 2012.

Maruarar Siahaan, 2005, “Hukum Acara Mahkamah Konstitusi Republik Indonesia”, Cetakan Pertama, Jakarta, Konstitusi Press.

Moh. Mahfud MD, “Evaluasi Pemilukada Dalam Perspektif Demokrasi dan Hukum” Ceramah Kunci dalam Seminar Nasional Evaluasi Pemilukada: Antara Teori dan Praktik, diselenggarakan oleh Mahkamah Konstitusi pada Rabu-Kamis, 25-26 Januari 2012 di Hotel Sultan Jakarta.

----------------, 2011, “Perdebatan Hukum Tata Negara Pasca Amandemen Konstitusi”, Cetakan ke-2, Jakarta, RajaGrafindo Persada.

Morison, 2005, “Hukum Tata Negara Era Reformasi”, Jakarta, Ramdina Prakarsa.

Muchamad Isnaeni Ramdhan, 2009, “Kompedium Pemilihan Kepala Daerah (Pilkada), Badan Pembinaan Hukum Nasional Departemen hukum dan HAM RI”, Jakarta.

Mustafa Lutfi, 2010, “Hukum Sengketa Pemilukada Di Indonesia Gagasan Perluasan Kewenangan Konstitusional Mahkamah Konstitusi”, Cetakan Pertama, Yogyakarta, UII Press.

Retno Saraswati, 2011, “Calon Perseorangan: Pergeseran Paradigma Kekuasaan Dalam Pemilukada” , dalam Masalah-Masalah Hukum, Nomor 2 Jilid 40, April.

Samsul Wahidin, 2008, “Hukum Pemerintahan Daerah Mengawasi Pemilihan Umum Kepala Daerah”, Cetakan 1, Yogyakarta, Pustaka Pelajar.

Suharizal, 2011, “Pemilukada, Dinamika, dan Konsep Mendatang”, Jakarta, Raja Grafindo Persada.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.31078/jk1232

Article Metrics

Abstract view : 241 times
PDF (Bahasa Indonesia) view : 486 times

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.