Pembelajaran Hukum Melalui Perppu Nomor 1 Tahun 2013

Adventus Toding

Abstract


Government regulation in lieu of law is regulation released by president subjectively in force majeur condition. The change of law through the regulation is an extraordinary in nature. An extraordinary change through the government regulation in lieu of law depict a condition which put aside the change of law in normal way. The quality of the government regulation in lieu of law can be measured from the content of the regulation either from the changes made or the addition of something new that has not existed. As a regulation which contains the substance of law,  the presiden’s subjectivity must objectivized through the House of Representatives. The consequence is that the regulation must be accepted or unaccepted. If accepted, then the regulation will become law. The change of law through government regulation in lieu of law will increase the qualitiy of law because enforceability of the regulation is examined empirically by the House of Representatives. Otherwise, if not acepted, the regulation will not be enforceable and evrey provision contained therein will no longer have binding force of law. Thus, the former law will prevail.

Keywords


government regulation in lieu of law; law; force majeure

Full Text:

PDF

References


Ghoffar, Abdul, 2009, Perbandingan Kekuasaan Presiden Indonesia setelah Perubahan UUD 1945 dengan delapan Negara maju, Jakarta: Kencana.

Ibnu Sina Chandranegara, 2012, Pengujian Perppu Terkait Sengketa Kewenangan Konstitusional Antar-Lembaga Negara, Jurnal Yudisial, Volume V, nomor 01, April, h. 1-16.

Jimly Asshidiqqie, 2010, Perihal Undang-Undang, Jakarta: Rajawali Pers.

Kelsen, Hans, 2011, Teori Umum Tentang Hukum dan Negara, Bandung: Nusa Media.

Mahfud MD, Moh, 2011, Perdebatan Hukum Tata Negara Pasca amandemen, Jakarta: RajaGrafindo Persada.

_______, 2011, Politik Hukum di Indonesia, Jakarta: rajawali pers.

Mohammad Fajrul Falaakh, “Opini: Kesalahpahaman Tentang Pengawasan MK”, http://nasional.sindonews.com/read/2013/10/22/18/796807/kesalahpahaman-tentang-pengawasan-mk diunduh pada 25 Oktober 2013.

Peraturan Pemerintah Pengganti Undang-Undang Nomor 1 Tahun 2013 Tentang Perubahan Kedua Undang-Undang Nomor 24 Tahun 2003 Tentang Mahkamah Konstitusi, LN Nomor 167 TLN 2013.

Putusan MK Nomor 005/PUU-IV/2006

Republika online, “Jimly : Perppu MK Itu Inkonstitusional”, http://www.republika.co.id/berita/nasional/hukum/13/10/06/mu8wp6-jimly-perppu-mk-itu-inkonstitusional, diunduh tanggal 23 oktober 2013.

Saldi Isra, “Putusan Mahkmah Konstitusi Nomor 005/PUU-IV/2006 (isi, Implikasi, dan Masa Depan Komisi Yudisial)”, http://www.saldiisra.web.id/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=98:putusan-mahkamah-konstitusi- no-005puu-iv2006-isi-implikasi-dan-masa-depan-komisi-yudisial&catid=18:ju rnalnasional&Itemid=5 diunduh 25 Oktober 2013.

Soejito, Irawan, 1993, Teknik Membuat Undang-Undang, Jakarta: Pradnya Paramita.

Undang-Undang Dasar Negara Republik Indonesia Tahun 1945.

Undang-Undang Republik Indonesia Tahun 12 Tahun 2011 Tentang Pembentukan

Peraturan Perundang-Undangan, LN 82 TLN 2011.

Wheare, K.C., 1996, Konstitusi-Konstitusi Modern, Bandung: Nusa Media.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.31078/jk%25x

Article Metrics

Abstract view : 128 times
PDF view : 51 times

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.