Pembelajaran Hukum Melalui Perppu Nomor 1 Tahun 2013
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.31078/jk1043Keywords:
government regulation in lieu of law, law, force majeureAbstract
Government regulation in lieu of law is regulation released by president subjectively in force majeur condition. The change of law through the regulation is an extraordinary in nature. An extraordinary change through the government regulation in lieu of law depict a condition which put aside the change of law in normal way. The quality of the government regulation in lieu of law can be measured from the content of the regulation either from the changes made or the addition of something new that has not existed. As a regulation which contains the substance of law, the presiden’s subjectivity must objectivized through the House of Representatives. The consequence is that the regulation must be accepted or unaccepted. If accepted, then the regulation will become law. The change of law through government regulation in lieu of law will increase the qualitiy of law because enforceability of the regulation is examined empirically by the House of Representatives. Otherwise, if not acepted, the regulation will not be enforceable and evrey provision contained therein will no longer have binding force of law. Thus, the former law will prevail.
References
Ghoffar, Abdul, 2009, Perbandingan Kekuasaan Presiden Indonesia setelah Perubahan UUD 1945 dengan delapan Negara maju, Jakarta: Kencana.
Ibnu Sina Chandranegara, 2012, Pengujian Perppu Terkait Sengketa Kewenangan Konstitusional Antar-Lembaga Negara, Jurnal Yudisial, Volume V, nomor 01, April, h. 1-16.
Jimly Asshidiqqie, 2010, Perihal Undang-Undang, Jakarta: Rajawali Pers.
Kelsen, Hans, 2011, Teori Umum Tentang Hukum dan Negara, Bandung: Nusa Media.
Mahfud MD, Moh, 2011, Perdebatan Hukum Tata Negara Pasca amandemen, Jakarta: RajaGrafindo Persada.
_______, 2011, Politik Hukum di Indonesia, Jakarta: rajawali pers.
Mohammad Fajrul Falaakh, “Opini: Kesalahpahaman Tentang Pengawasan MK”, http://nasional.sindonews.com/read/2013/10/22/18/796807/kesalahpahaman-tentang-pengawasan-mk diunduh pada 25 Oktober 2013.
Peraturan Pemerintah Pengganti Undang-Undang Nomor 1 Tahun 2013 Tentang Perubahan Kedua Undang-Undang Nomor 24 Tahun 2003 Tentang Mahkamah Konstitusi, LN Nomor 167 TLN 2013.
Putusan MK Nomor 005/PUU-IV/2006
Republika online, “Jimly : Perppu MK Itu Inkonstitusional”, http://www.republika.co.id/berita/nasional/hukum/13/10/06/mu8wp6-jimly-perppu-mk-itu-inkonstitusional, diunduh tanggal 23 oktober 2013.
Saldi Isra, “Putusan Mahkmah Konstitusi Nomor 005/PUU-IV/2006 (isi, Implikasi, dan Masa Depan Komisi Yudisial)”, http://www.saldiisra.web.id/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=98:putusan-mahkamah-konstitusi- no-005puu-iv2006-isi-implikasi-dan-masa-depan-komisi-yudisial&catid=18:ju rnalnasional&Itemid=5 diunduh 25 Oktober 2013.
Soejito, Irawan, 1993, Teknik Membuat Undang-Undang, Jakarta: Pradnya Paramita.
Undang-Undang Dasar Negara Republik Indonesia Tahun 1945.
Undang-Undang Republik Indonesia Tahun 12 Tahun 2011 Tentang Pembentukan
Peraturan Perundang-Undangan, LN 82 TLN 2011.
Wheare, K.C., 1996, Konstitusi-Konstitusi Modern, Bandung: Nusa Media.
Ibnu Sina Chandranegara, 2012, Pengujian Perppu Terkait Sengketa Kewenangan Konstitusional Antar-Lembaga Negara, Jurnal Yudisial, Volume V, nomor 01, April, h. 1-16.
Jimly Asshidiqqie, 2010, Perihal Undang-Undang, Jakarta: Rajawali Pers.
Kelsen, Hans, 2011, Teori Umum Tentang Hukum dan Negara, Bandung: Nusa Media.
Mahfud MD, Moh, 2011, Perdebatan Hukum Tata Negara Pasca amandemen, Jakarta: RajaGrafindo Persada.
_______, 2011, Politik Hukum di Indonesia, Jakarta: rajawali pers.
Mohammad Fajrul Falaakh, “Opini: Kesalahpahaman Tentang Pengawasan MK”, http://nasional.sindonews.com/read/2013/10/22/18/796807/kesalahpahaman-tentang-pengawasan-mk diunduh pada 25 Oktober 2013.
Peraturan Pemerintah Pengganti Undang-Undang Nomor 1 Tahun 2013 Tentang Perubahan Kedua Undang-Undang Nomor 24 Tahun 2003 Tentang Mahkamah Konstitusi, LN Nomor 167 TLN 2013.
Putusan MK Nomor 005/PUU-IV/2006
Republika online, “Jimly : Perppu MK Itu Inkonstitusional”, http://www.republika.co.id/berita/nasional/hukum/13/10/06/mu8wp6-jimly-perppu-mk-itu-inkonstitusional, diunduh tanggal 23 oktober 2013.
Saldi Isra, “Putusan Mahkmah Konstitusi Nomor 005/PUU-IV/2006 (isi, Implikasi, dan Masa Depan Komisi Yudisial)”, http://www.saldiisra.web.id/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=98:putusan-mahkamah-konstitusi- no-005puu-iv2006-isi-implikasi-dan-masa-depan-komisi-yudisial&catid=18:ju rnalnasional&Itemid=5 diunduh 25 Oktober 2013.
Soejito, Irawan, 1993, Teknik Membuat Undang-Undang, Jakarta: Pradnya Paramita.
Undang-Undang Dasar Negara Republik Indonesia Tahun 1945.
Undang-Undang Republik Indonesia Tahun 12 Tahun 2011 Tentang Pembentukan
Peraturan Perundang-Undangan, LN 82 TLN 2011.
Wheare, K.C., 1996, Konstitusi-Konstitusi Modern, Bandung: Nusa Media.
Downloads
Published
2016-05-20
How to Cite
Toding, Adventus. 2016. “Pembelajaran Hukum Melalui Perppu Nomor 1 Tahun 2013”. Jurnal Konstitusi 10 (4):605-26. https://doi.org/10.31078/jk1043.
Issue
Section
Articles
License
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Copyright of the published articles will be transferred to the journal as the publisher of the manuscripts. Therefore, the author confirms that the copyright has been managed by the publisher.
- The publisher of Jurnal Konstitusi is The Registrar and Secretariat General of the Constitutional Court of the Republic of Indonesia.
- The copyright follows Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License: This license allows reusers to distribute, remix, adapt, and build upon the material in any medium or format for noncommercial purposes only, and only so long as attribution is given to the creator. If you remix, adapt, or build upon the material, you must license the modified material under identical terms.
