Irregularity Protection of Citizens' Constitutional Rights to the Administrative Silence:   Ketidakteraturan Perlindungan Hak Konstitusional Warga Negara Atas Sikap Diam Badan dan/atau Pejabat Pemerintahan

Umar Dani Umar

doi:10.31078/jk2035

Authors

Umar Dani Umar Serang State Administrative Court, Banten, Indonesia https://orcid.org/0009-0001-7516-8495

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.31078/jk2035

Keywords:

Negative Fictional, Positive Fictional, Constitutional Rights, Administrative Silence

Abstract

The Administrative's silence legally was an administrative error, however there are no standard to rule the mechanisms for protecting citizens against those an administrative error. This Research have two objectives. First of all, to analyze whether the changes of negative fictitional to positive fictitional are form of legal irregularity, secondly to study regulatory impact of Positive fictional after the issuance of Law number 11 of 2020 against on the protection of citizens' rights. This Research use normative legal research. The Result of this research showed that repeal of norm can be done by changing those law itself or because of the constitutional court decision. negation of negative fictitional validity into chapter 3 law number 5 of 1986 to the positive fictitional through chapter 53 law number 11 of 2020 impact two things. First, remove access of constitutional citizens right, second, automatic approval decision without supervision can be used as a legality tool and may harm the third parties

Author Biography

Umar Dani Umar, Serang State Administrative Court, Banten, Indonesia

Umar Dani was born in Penanjung Panjang, Kepahiang-Bengkulu, on April 29th, 1979. He completed his Bachelor of Law at the Faculty of Law, University of Bengkulu in 2003, his Master of Law at Andalas University in 2010, and his doctoral program at the Faculty of Law, University of Islam Indonesia in 2019. His career began as a judge, and he is currently on duty at the Serang State Administrative Court. Additionally, he is frequently invited as an expert by several government agencies to teach government legal staff. He is registered as a Trainer and Researcher at the Supreme Court Education and Training Center (Pusdiklat MA RI). Moreover, he has written many scientific papers and books, with the most popular one entitled "Konsep Dasar dan Prinsip-prinsip Peradilan Tata Usaha Negara" (Rajawali Press, 2022).

References

Akmal, Diya Ul, dan Dea Linta Arlianti. “Dinamika Perlindungan Hak Konstitusional Warga Negara Dalam Implementasi Pengujian Undang-Undang di Mahkamah Konstitusi.” Mulawarman Law Review 7, no. 1 (30 Juni 2022): 49–70. https://doi.org/10.30872/mulrev.v7i1.780.

Azhar, Muhamad. “Relevansi Asas-Asas Umum Pemerintahan Yang Baik Dalam.” Notarius 8, no. 2 (2015): 274–87. http://download.garuda.kemdikbud.go.id/article.php?article=1402036&val=1276&title=RELEVANSI ASAS-ASAS UMUM PEMERINTAHAN YANG BAIK DALAM SISTEM PENYELENGGARAAN ADMINISTRASI NEGARA.

Bedner, Adriaan. “Indonesian Legal Scholarship and Jurisprudence as an Obstacle for Transplanting Legal Institutions.” Hague Journal on the Rule of Law 5, no. 02 (10 September 2013): 253–73. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1876404512001145.

Dani, Umar. Konsep Dasar dan Prinsip-Prinsip Peradilan Tata Usaha Negara. Jakarta: Rajawali Pers, 2022.

Djati, Daniel Mulia, Dwi Jatmiko Cahyono, dan H Dedi Candra Wijaya Orpa Lintin. “Penafsiran Asas Kepastian Hukum dan Kekosongan Hukum dalam Keputusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Terhadap Undang-Undang Nomor 11 Tentang Cipta Kerja (Kajian Keputusan Nomor 91/PUU-XVIII/2020).” Jurnal IKAMAKUM 2, no. 1 (2022): 587–600.

Faisal, Faisal. “Menelusuri Teori Chaos dalam Hukum Melalui Paradigma Critical Theory.” Yustisia Jurnal Hukum 3, no. 2 (3 Agustus 2014): 131–36. https://doi.org/10.20961/yustisia.v3i2.11108.

Fajarwati, Meirina. “Upaya Hukum untuk Melindungi Hak Konstitusional Warga Negara Melalui Mahkamah Konstitusi (Legal Remedies to Protect Citizen’s Constitutional Rights through Constitutional Court).” Jurnal Legislasi Indonesia 13, no. 3 (2016): 321–32.

Heriyanto, Bambang. “Problematika Penyelesaian Perkara ‘Fiktif Positif’ Di Pengadilan Tata Usaha Negara.” Palar | Pakuan Law Review 5, no. 1 (2019): 38–56. https://doi.org/10.33751/palar.v5i1.1185.

Irfani, Nurfaqih. “Asas Lex Superior, Lex Specialis, Dan Lex Pesterior: Pemaknaan, Problematika, Dan Penggunaannya Dalam Penalaran Dan Argumentasi Hukum.” Jurnal Legislasi Indonesia 17, no. 3 (2020): 305–25. https://doi.org/10.54629/jli.v17i3.711.

Mahkamah Agung Republik Indonesia. Peraturan Mahkamah Agung Nomor 8 Tahun 2017 tentang Pedoman Beracara Untuk Memperoleh Putusan Atas Penerimaan Permohonan Guna Mendapatkan Keputusan dan/atau Tindakan Badan Dan/Atau Pejabat Pemerintahan, Pub. L. No. 8 (2017).

Mahkamah Agung Republik Indonesia. Surat Edaran Mahkamah Agung Nomor 1 Tahun 2017 tentang Pemberlakuan Hasil Rapat Pleno Kamar Mahkamah Agung Tahun 2017 Sebagai Pedoman Pelaksanaan Tugas Bagi Pengadilan (2017).

Mahkamah Agung Republik Indonesia. Surat Edaran Mahkamah Agung Nomor 5 Tahun 2021 tentang Pemberlakuan Hasil Rapat Pleno Kamar Mahkamah Agung Tahun 2021 Sebagai Pedoman Pelaksanaan Tugas Bagi Pengadilan (2021).

Mahkamah Konstitusi Republik Indonesia. Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 91/PUU-XVIII/2020 (2020).

Nicolas Gimon, Daniel. “Pengaturan Hak Konstitusional Warga Negara Dan Bentuk Perlindugan HakKonstitus.” Lex Administratum VI, no. 4 (2018): 173–80.

Palguna, I Dewa Gede. Pengaduan Konstitusional (Constitutional Complaint): Upaya Hukum Terhadap Hak-Hak Konstitusional Warga Negara. Jakarta: Sinar Grafika, 2013.

Republik Indonesia. Undang-Undang Nomor 11 Tahun 2020 tentang Cipta Kerja, 2020, LN.2020/No.245, TLN No.6573 (2020).

Republik Indonesia. Undang-Undang Nomor 25 Tahun 2009 tentang Pelayanan Publik, 2009, LN. 2009/ No.112 , TLN NO. 5038 (2009).

Republik Indonesia. Undang-Undang Nomor 37 Tahun 2008 tentang Ombudsman Republik Indonesia, 2008, LN.2008/NO.139, TLN NO.4899 (2008).

Rodding, Budiamin. “Keputusan Fiktif Negatif dan Fiktif Positif Dalam Peningkatan Kualitas Pelayanan Publik.” Tanjungpura Law Journal 1, no. 1 (2017): 26–37.

Sagala, Budiman B. “Kekuasaan Kehakiman yang Merdeka.” Jurnal Hukum & Pembangunan 16, no. 2 (2017): 153. https://doi.org/10.21143/jhp.vol16.no2.1197.

Simanjuntak, Enrico. Kewenangan Peradilan Tata Usaha Negara Mengadili Perkara Perbuatan Melawan Hukum Pemerintah. Jakarta: Rajawali Pers, 2021.

Simanjuntak, Enrico. “Perkara Fiktif Positif dan Permasalahan Hukumnya.” Jurnal Hukum dan Peradilan 6, no. 3 (30 November 2017): 379–98. https://doi.org/10.25216/jhp.6.3.2017.379-398.

Sudiyana, Sudiyana, dan Suswoto Suswoto. “Kajian Kritis Terhadap Teori Positivisme Hukum Dalam Mencari Keadilan Substantif.” Jurnal Ilmiah Ilmu Hukum Qistie 11, no. 1 (1 Mei 2018): 107–36. https://doi.org/10.31942/jqi.v11i1.2225.

Umar, Nasarudin. “Konsep Hukum Modern: Suatu Perspektif Keindonesiaan, Integrasi Sistem Hukum Agama Dan Sistem Hukum Nasional.” Walisongo: Jurnal Penelitian Sosial Keagamaan 22, no. 1 (15 Juni 2014): 157–80. https://doi.org/10.21580/ws.22.1.263.

Yuniza, Mailinda Eka, dan Melodia Puji Inggarwari. “Peluang dan Tantangan Penerapan Keputusan Fiktif Positif Setelah Undang-Undang Cipta Kerja Diundangkan.” Jurnal de Jure 13, no. 2 (2021): 1–21.