Korupsi dan Pembalikan Beban Pembuktian
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.31078/jk924Keywords:
Corruption, reversal burden of proof, limited reversal burden of proofAbstract
This paper was intended to answer a question on the extent of the effectiveness of a reversal burden of proof as stipulated in positive (prevailing) Indonesia law, that is, as provided for in Law Number 31 of 1999 on Eradication of Corruption Crime. Then, a problem that rose next was: could the application of reversal burden of proof in proving a corruption crime case prevent or reduce or even eliminate totally corruption crimes in Indonesia? This research built on a theoretical frame of thought from Roscoe Pound, who maintains that law is a tool of social engineering. This concept was cited by Muchtar Kusumaatmadja, who adapted it to Indonesia conditions and transformed it to be law as a social engineering medium. Law should be made as a medium of reforming and resolving all problems that emerge in community, including corruption crimes. One of the things to reform is the law of proof system, that is, from a conventional proof system to a reversal system. This paper was written by a juridical-normative method, that is, by studying legislations, both contained in laws and in literature/books on legal science, particularly legislations relating to reversal burden of proof. Then, the results, in a form of juridical aspect, were written in a descriptive-analytical form. The conclusion of this research was an answer to the problems put forward above, that is: Corruption crimes have been occurring continuously till now in Indonesia. Thus, Law Number 31 of 1999, Article 37, has not been effective yet in eradicating corruption crimes. Therefore, it needs to apply a pure reversal burden of proof by avoiding the incidence of bureaucratic chaos.
References
Adji, Oemar Seno. 1976. Hukum (Acara) Pidana dalam Prospeksi, Jakarta. Erangga.
Andi Hamzah. 2006. Hukum Acara Pidana Indonesia, Jakarta. Sinar Grafika.
Barda Nawawi Arief. 1996. Bunga Rampai Kebijakan Hukum Pidana, Cetakan Kesatu. Bandung, Penerbit PT. Citra Aditya Bakti.
Bonn, E. Sosrodanukusumo. Tt.t, Tunutan Pidana. Djakarta: Penerbit “Siliwangi”.
Prodjodikoro, Wirjono. 1967. Hukum Atjara Pidana di Indo. Djakarta : Penerbit “Sumur Bandung”.
P. Sitorus, 1998. Pengantar Ilmu Hukum (dilengkapi tanya jawab, Pasundan Law Faculty. Bandung. Alumnus Press.
Roscoe Pound, 1972. Pengantar Filsafat Hukum, Jakarta. Bharata.
Saleh, Roelan. 1983. Mengadili Sebagai Pergaulan Kemanusiaan. Jakarta : Aksara Baru.
Soedjono D. 1982. Pemeriksaan Pendahuluan Menurut KUHAP. Bandung: Alumni.
Tahir, Hadari Djenawi. 1981. Pokok-Pokok Pikian dalam KUHAP. Bandung: Alumni.
Tanusuboto. S. 1983. Peranan Praperadilan dalam Hukum Acara Pidana. Bandung: Alumni.
Tresna, R. tt.. Komentar HIR. Djakarta: Pradnya Paramita.
Undang-Undang :
Undang-Undang Nomor 8 Tahun 1981, tentang Hukum Acara Pidana.
Undang-Undang Nomor 31 Tahun 1999, tentang Pemberantasan Tindak Pidana Korupsi.
Andi Hamzah. 2006. Hukum Acara Pidana Indonesia, Jakarta. Sinar Grafika.
Barda Nawawi Arief. 1996. Bunga Rampai Kebijakan Hukum Pidana, Cetakan Kesatu. Bandung, Penerbit PT. Citra Aditya Bakti.
Bonn, E. Sosrodanukusumo. Tt.t, Tunutan Pidana. Djakarta: Penerbit “Siliwangi”.
Prodjodikoro, Wirjono. 1967. Hukum Atjara Pidana di Indo. Djakarta : Penerbit “Sumur Bandung”.
P. Sitorus, 1998. Pengantar Ilmu Hukum (dilengkapi tanya jawab, Pasundan Law Faculty. Bandung. Alumnus Press.
Roscoe Pound, 1972. Pengantar Filsafat Hukum, Jakarta. Bharata.
Saleh, Roelan. 1983. Mengadili Sebagai Pergaulan Kemanusiaan. Jakarta : Aksara Baru.
Soedjono D. 1982. Pemeriksaan Pendahuluan Menurut KUHAP. Bandung: Alumni.
Tahir, Hadari Djenawi. 1981. Pokok-Pokok Pikian dalam KUHAP. Bandung: Alumni.
Tanusuboto. S. 1983. Peranan Praperadilan dalam Hukum Acara Pidana. Bandung: Alumni.
Tresna, R. tt.. Komentar HIR. Djakarta: Pradnya Paramita.
Undang-Undang :
Undang-Undang Nomor 8 Tahun 1981, tentang Hukum Acara Pidana.
Undang-Undang Nomor 31 Tahun 1999, tentang Pemberantasan Tindak Pidana Korupsi.
Downloads
Published
2016-05-20
How to Cite
Wiriadinata, Wahyu. 2016. “Korupsi Dan Pembalikan Beban Pembuktian”. Jurnal Konstitusi 9 (2):313-32. https://doi.org/10.31078/jk924.
Issue
Section
Articles
License
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Copyright of the published articles will be transferred to the journal as the publisher of the manuscripts. Therefore, the author confirms that the copyright has been managed by the publisher.
- The publisher of Jurnal Konstitusi is The Registrar and Secretariat General of the Constitutional Court of the Republic of Indonesia.
- The copyright follows Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License: This license allows reusers to distribute, remix, adapt, and build upon the material in any medium or format for noncommercial purposes only, and only so long as attribution is given to the creator. If you remix, adapt, or build upon the material, you must license the modified material under identical terms.
