Implikasi Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 101/Puu-VII/2009 terhadap Pelaksanaan Profesi Advokat di Daerah Istimewa Yogyakarta
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.31078/jk768Keywords:
The Constitutional Court Decision, Advocates, YogyakartaAbstract
The research showed that: (1) the response of the lawyers who have not sworn by the high court of Yogyakarta is that the Constitutional Court decision No. 101/PUU-VII/2009 expected to solve the problems KAI advocates, however, the constitutional court decision has not been carried out by competent parties.Recently, the KAI Advocate cannot administering the advocate’s oath in the open court of high court of Yogyakarta (2) the decision of the constitutional court no. No. 101/PUU-VII/2009 was not provide any implications for the organization advocates and implementation of professional lawyers in Yogyakarta, (3) the attitude of judges towards lawyers who are not appointed by the high court in the court’s proceedings, there was no difference attitude compared to the prior existence of the constitutional court decision.Practically, judges allow lawyers who have not sworn to proceed and become a legal counsel at the hearing, the proceedings if the advocate or be accompanied by legal counsel or stuck in a legal advocate and has been sworn in, (4) there was not any action of high court of Yogyakarta as the implementation of the constitutional court decision No. 101/PUU- VII/2009. This is due to the high court of Yogyakarta was not as a party in the constitutional court decision, thus they were not implement the decision.
References
daftar Buku
Abdul Mukthie Fadjar, 2006, Hukum Konstitusi dan Mahkamah Konstitusi, Kerjasama Penerbit Konstitusi Press, Jakarta dan Citra Media, Yogyakarta.
Ahmad Syahrizal, 2006, Peradilan Konstitusi Suatu Studi Tentang Adjudikasi Konstitusionak Sebagai Mekanisme Penyelesaian Sengketa Normatif, Jakarta : PT Pradnya Paramita.
Ari Yusuf Amir, 2010, Strategi Bisnis Jasa Advokat, Navila Idea, Yogyakarta.
Bambang Sutiyoso, 2006, Hukum Acara Mahkamah Konstitusi Republik Indonesia, Citra Aditya Bakti, Bandung.
-------------------------, 2009, Tata Cara penyelesaian Sengketa di Lingkungan Mahkamah Konstitusi, UII Press, Yogyakarta.
Jimly Asshiddiqie, 2010, Hukum Acara Pengujian Undang-Undang, Edisi Kedua, Cetakan Pertama, Sinar Grafika, Jakarta.
Laica Marzuki, 2008, Dari Timur ke Barat Memandu Hukum, Jakarta : Sekretariat Jenderal dan Kepaniteraan Mahkamah Konstitusi RI.
Maria S.W. Soemardjono, 1997, Pedoman Pembuatan Usulan Penelitian, PT Gramedia Pustaka Utama, Jakarta, hal. 32.
Soerjono Soekanto, 1984, Pengantar Penelitian Hukum, Universitas Indonesia Press, Jakarta.
Sudikno Mertokusumo, Hukum Acara Perdata Indonesia, Liberty, Yogyakarta.
daftar Peraturan
Undang-Undang Republik Indonesia Nomor 18 Tahun 2003 Tentang Advokat.
Undang-Undang Republik Indonesia Nomor 24 Tahun 2003 Tentang Mahkamah Konstitusi.
Abdul Mukthie Fadjar, 2006, Hukum Konstitusi dan Mahkamah Konstitusi, Kerjasama Penerbit Konstitusi Press, Jakarta dan Citra Media, Yogyakarta.
Ahmad Syahrizal, 2006, Peradilan Konstitusi Suatu Studi Tentang Adjudikasi Konstitusionak Sebagai Mekanisme Penyelesaian Sengketa Normatif, Jakarta : PT Pradnya Paramita.
Ari Yusuf Amir, 2010, Strategi Bisnis Jasa Advokat, Navila Idea, Yogyakarta.
Bambang Sutiyoso, 2006, Hukum Acara Mahkamah Konstitusi Republik Indonesia, Citra Aditya Bakti, Bandung.
-------------------------, 2009, Tata Cara penyelesaian Sengketa di Lingkungan Mahkamah Konstitusi, UII Press, Yogyakarta.
Jimly Asshiddiqie, 2010, Hukum Acara Pengujian Undang-Undang, Edisi Kedua, Cetakan Pertama, Sinar Grafika, Jakarta.
Laica Marzuki, 2008, Dari Timur ke Barat Memandu Hukum, Jakarta : Sekretariat Jenderal dan Kepaniteraan Mahkamah Konstitusi RI.
Maria S.W. Soemardjono, 1997, Pedoman Pembuatan Usulan Penelitian, PT Gramedia Pustaka Utama, Jakarta, hal. 32.
Soerjono Soekanto, 1984, Pengantar Penelitian Hukum, Universitas Indonesia Press, Jakarta.
Sudikno Mertokusumo, Hukum Acara Perdata Indonesia, Liberty, Yogyakarta.
daftar Peraturan
Undang-Undang Republik Indonesia Nomor 18 Tahun 2003 Tentang Advokat.
Undang-Undang Republik Indonesia Nomor 24 Tahun 2003 Tentang Mahkamah Konstitusi.
Downloads
Published
2016-05-20
How to Cite
FH UJB, Pusat Kajian Hukum Konstitusi. 2016. “Implikasi Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 101 Puu-VII 2009 Terhadap Pelaksanaan Profesi Advokat Di Daerah Istimewa Yogyakarta”. Jurnal Konstitusi 7 (6):291-334. https://doi.org/10.31078/jk768.
Issue
Section
Articles
License
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Copyright of the published articles will be transferred to the journal as the publisher of the manuscripts. Therefore, the author confirms that the copyright has been managed by the publisher.
- The publisher of Jurnal Konstitusi is The Registrar and Secretariat General of the Constitutional Court of the Republic of Indonesia.
- The copyright follows Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License: This license allows reusers to distribute, remix, adapt, and build upon the material in any medium or format for noncommercial purposes only, and only so long as attribution is given to the creator. If you remix, adapt, or build upon the material, you must license the modified material under identical terms.
