Mencermati Ratio Decidendi Mk Dalam Putusan Nomor 122/Puu-Vii/2009 Tentang Penderogasian Norma Hukum dan Sifat Putusan PTUN

Authors

  • Widodo Ekatjahjana Dosen Fakultas Hukum Universitas Jember. Ketua Umum Asosiasi Pengajar Hukum Acara Mahkamah Konstitusi (APHAMK).

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.31078/jk751

Keywords:

derogation, norm, erga omnes

Abstract


Ratio decidendi of the Constitutional Court that said he was not an organ that has an authority to review constitutional rights loss of applicant, beside contrary to constitutional protection principles, also contrary to functions of the Constitutional Court as the guardian of the constitution, the protector of citizen’s constitutional rights dan the protector of human rights. The Constitutional Court should avoid to put his legal reasoning (in his ratio decidendi) that verdict of administrative court has not a legal nature – erga omnes. He should become aware that an administrative dispute is a public dispute bound under public law principles.

References

Bruggink, Refleksi tentang Hukum, diterjemahkan B. Arief Sidharta, 1996, Bandung: Citra Aditya Bhakti
B. Arief Sidharta, Hukum dan Logika, 2002, Bandung : Alumni Hans Kelsen, General Theory of Law and State, 1973, New York: Russel & Russel
Sudikno dan A. Pitlo, Penemuan Hukum, 1993, Bandung: Citra Aditya Bakti
Sekretariat Jenderal dan Kepaniteraan Mahkamah Konstitusi RI, Enam Tahun Mengawal Konstitusi dan Demokrasi, 2008, Jakarta: Sekretariat Jenderal dan Kepaniteraan Mahkamah Konstitusi
Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Perdata
Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 122/PUU-VII/2009

Downloads

Published

2016-05-20

How to Cite

Ekatjahjana, Widodo. 2016. “Mencermati Ratio Decidendi Mk Dalam Putusan Nomor 122 Puu-Vii 2009 Tentang Penderogasian Norma Hukum Dan Sifat Putusan PTUN”. Jurnal Konstitusi 7 (5):001-012. https://doi.org/10.31078/jk751.

Issue

Vol. 7 No. 5 (2010)

Section

Articles

License

Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:

  1. Copyright of the published articles will be transferred to the journal as the publisher of the manuscripts. Therefore, the author confirms that the copyright has been managed by the publisher.
  2. The publisher of Jurnal Konstitusi is The Registrar and Secretariat General of the Constitutional Court of the Republic of Indonesia.
  3. The copyright follows Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License: This license allows reusers to distribute, remix, adapt, and build upon the material in any medium or format for noncommercial purposes only, and only so long as attribution is given to the creator. If you remix, adapt, or build upon the material, you must license the modified material under identical terms.