Kewenangan Mahkamah Konstitusi Mengadili Perselisihan Hasil Pemilukada
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.31078/jk748Abstract
This letters have a purpose to know and analyze authority basic of Constitution Lawcourt of Republic of Indonesia to judging the dispute from the results of district leader and district proxy leader election, and then transferring background about the authority to judging the dispute from the Results of District Leader and District Proxy Leader Election from Appellate Court to Constitution Lawcourt of Republic of Indonesia. So, to analyze basic of Constitution Lawcourt consideration that dispute objects of results of district leader and district proxy leader election don’t have the quantitative character only based on calculation voice results, but the qualitative character too, namely breaking the rules to general election principles, with the character likes ahead, general, free, secret, then downright and fairly that’s to influence the results of district leader and district proxy leader election. Analyze the election law is used by Constitution Lawcourt of Republic of Indonesia to judging the dispute in Undang-Undang Republik Indonesia No 24 Tahun 2003 about Constitution Lawcourt of Republic of Indonesia or Undang-Undang Republik Indonesia No 12 Tahun 2008 about Undang-Undang Republik Indonesia No 32 Tahun 2008 about District Governance, do not regulate punish the dispute event of district leader and district proxy leader election results.Result of letters indicate that massive and sistematic breaking is apart of the dispute from the results of district leader and district proxy leader election become legal consideration to sufficient the sense of public justice progressively cause from quantitative breaking aspect after candidate of district leader and district proxy leader has been elected based on recapitulation and calculation voice where their quantitative just with assessed breaking collision towards procedural and substantive justice both as siniquanom. Though attempt to accommodate overall of democracy aspects from sections and process district leader and district proxy leader election must be main essential to determine and set the results of recapitulation and calculation voice in district leader and district proxy leader election.As letters recommendation, needed regulation product ownself to regulate about mechanism of district leader and district proxy leader election where has been regulated in Undang-Undang Pemerintahan Daerah for all this time, so that affirmation that the district leader and district proxy leader election into the general election become less be clear. By conducting the ownself regulation, hence mechanism of district leader and district proxy leader election will be more clear, especially to overcome and solution the dispute from the results of district leader and district proxy leader election.
References
Abdul Latief dkk, 2009. Buku Ajar Hukum Acara Mahkamah Konstitusi, Total Media, Yogyakarta.
Arbi Sanit, Reformasi Politik, Pustaka Reflaksi, Yogyakarta
F.A.M. Stroink dan J.G. Steenbeek, 1985. Inleiding in het Staats-en Administratief Recht, Alphen aan den Rijn: Samson H.D Tjeenk Willink.
Laica Marzuki, 2008. Dari Timur Ke Barat Memandu Hukum, Sekretariat Jenderal dan Kepaniteraan Mahkamah Konstitusi Republik Indonesia, Jakarta 2008.
__________, Menjaga Denyut Konstitusi, Refleksi Satu Tahun Mahkamah Konstitusi, Konstitusi Press, Jakarta.
Mukhtie Fadjar, 2006. Hukum Konstitusi dan Mahkamah Konstitusi, Sekretariat Jenderal dan Kepaniteraan Mahkamah Konstitusi Republik Indonesia, Jakarta.
Phillipus M. Hadjon, Tentang Wewenang, Yuridika, No. 5&6 Tahun XII, Sep Des 1997, h.l (Philipus M. Hadjon III)
Topo Santoso, 2009. Peranan Peradilan dalam Kasus Pemilu. Buletin Komisi Yudisial, Vol. III, No. 5 .
Undang-Undang
Undang-Undang Dasar Negara Kesatuan Republik Indonesia Tahun 1945.
Arbi Sanit, Reformasi Politik, Pustaka Reflaksi, Yogyakarta
F.A.M. Stroink dan J.G. Steenbeek, 1985. Inleiding in het Staats-en Administratief Recht, Alphen aan den Rijn: Samson H.D Tjeenk Willink.
Laica Marzuki, 2008. Dari Timur Ke Barat Memandu Hukum, Sekretariat Jenderal dan Kepaniteraan Mahkamah Konstitusi Republik Indonesia, Jakarta 2008.
__________, Menjaga Denyut Konstitusi, Refleksi Satu Tahun Mahkamah Konstitusi, Konstitusi Press, Jakarta.
Mukhtie Fadjar, 2006. Hukum Konstitusi dan Mahkamah Konstitusi, Sekretariat Jenderal dan Kepaniteraan Mahkamah Konstitusi Republik Indonesia, Jakarta.
Phillipus M. Hadjon, Tentang Wewenang, Yuridika, No. 5&6 Tahun XII, Sep Des 1997, h.l (Philipus M. Hadjon III)
Topo Santoso, 2009. Peranan Peradilan dalam Kasus Pemilu. Buletin Komisi Yudisial, Vol. III, No. 5 .
Undang-Undang
Undang-Undang Dasar Negara Kesatuan Republik Indonesia Tahun 1945.
Downloads
Published
2016-05-20
How to Cite
Sudrajat, Hendra. 2016. “Kewenangan Mahkamah Konstitusi Mengadili Perselisihan Hasil Pemilukada”. Jurnal Konstitusi 7 (4):159-78. https://doi.org/10.31078/jk748.
Issue
Section
Articles
License
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Copyright of the published articles will be transferred to the journal as the publisher of the manuscripts. Therefore, the author confirms that the copyright has been managed by the publisher.
- The publisher of Jurnal Konstitusi is The Registrar and Secretariat General of the Constitutional Court of the Republic of Indonesia.
- The copyright follows Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License: This license allows reusers to distribute, remix, adapt, and build upon the material in any medium or format for noncommercial purposes only, and only so long as attribution is given to the creator. If you remix, adapt, or build upon the material, you must license the modified material under identical terms.
