Perubahan Konstitusi Melalui Putusan MK: Telaah Atas Putusan Nomor 138/PUU-VII/2009
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.31078/jk722Keywords:
Perpu, jurisprudence, constitutional lawAbstract
The Constitutional Court’s decision state that the authority to examine Perpu is a positive new development in constitutional law not just Indonesia that not only binds the parties, but the jurisprudence of the constitutional law in Indonesia, with the decision, to the possibility of abuse of power through Perpu and systemic weaknesses in the UUD 1945 in overseeing the president is to be anticipated product which itself also will give more legal protection for the seeker of justice, the ruling which states the The Constitutional Court’s authorities to examine Perpu in testing comes as the functioning of the judiciary as an organ which not only uphold the law but also justice, by therefore, the decision was inspiring for judicial power in Indonesia to capitalize on his power to find justice.
References
Arinanto, Satya, 2007. “Lembaga Kepresidenan Dalam Perspejtif Hukum Tata Negara,” Majalah FIGUR, Edisi XI, Jakarta
Asshiddiqie, Jimly, 2006. Hukum Acara Pengujian Undang-undang, Cetakan Pertama, Jakarta: Konstitusi Press
Asshiddiqie, Jimly, 2006. Pengantar Ilmu Hukum Tata Negara Jilid I, Jakarta: Sekretariat Jenderal dan Kepaniteraan Mahkamah Konstitusi
Asshiddiqie, Jimly, 2006. Perihal Undang-Undang, Cetakan Pertama, Jakarta: Konstitusi Press
Balkin, Jack, “Framework Originalism and The Living Constitution,”Northwestern University Law Review, Vol. 103 No.2
Barnett, Randy, E., 1996. “The Relevance of The Framer’s Intent,” Harvard Journal of Law and Public Policy, Volume 19
Barton, David, “Liberty Equip: The Constitution, Original Intent
v. Living Document”, http://libertycavalier.wordpress.com/2010/05/18/liberty-equip-the-constitution-original-intent-v-living-document/, diakses pada 29 Juni 2010
DPR-RI, “DPR Hasil Pemilu 1955 Paska Dekrit Presiden 1959 (1959- 1965)”, http://www.dpr-ri.org/v2/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=60&Itemid=73, diakses tanggal 1 Juli 2010
Hardjono, 2009. “The Indonesian Constitutional Court”, makalah disampaikan dalam 6th Conference of Asian Constitutional Court Judges, Ulaanbaatar, Mongol: 24-26 September
Hautamaki, Veli-Pekka, 2002, “Authoritative Interpretation of The Constitution: A Comparison of Argumentation in Findland and Norway,” artikel dari disertasi Perustusla Auktoritatiivenen tulk inta , Helsinski
Indrayana, Denny, 2007. Amandemen UUD 1945: Antara Mitos dan Pembongkaran, Cetakan Kedua, Bandung: Mizan
Kusuma, Ananda RM.A.B., 2009. Lahirnya Undang-Undang Dasar 1945, Edisi Revisi, Jakarta: Badan Penerbit Fakultas Hukum Universitas Indonesia
Kusuma, R.M. A.B., 2007. “Keabsahan UUD 1945 Pasca Amandemen,” Jurnal Konstitusi , Volume 4 Nomor 1, Jakarta: Mahkamah Konstitusi
Limbach, Jutta, 2001. “The Concept of The Supremacy of The Constitution,” The Modern Law Review, Volume 64 No.1, 2001, Malden: Blackwell Publisher
Lubis, Solly, 2006. “MK dan Putusannya:Antara Harapan dan Kenyataan”, Jurnal Konstitusi , Volume 3 Nomor 4, Desember 2006, Jakarta: Mahkamah Konstitusi
M.D., Moh.Mahfud, 2009. “The Role of The Constitutional Court in The Development of Democracy in Indonesia,” makalah disampaikan dalam World Conference of Constitutional Justice, Cape Town: 23-24 Januari
Mahendra, Oka, 1991. “Konstitusionalisme di Indonesia: Peran DPR dan Masalah Judicial Review,” dalam Benny K. Harman & Hendardi, ed., Konstitusionalisme, Peran DPR dan Judicial Review, Jakarta: Yayasan LBH Indonesia & Jarim
Mahendra, Oka,.1991.”Konstitusionalisme Di Indonesia, Peranan DPR, dan Masalah Judicial Review ,” dalam Hendardi & Benny
K. Harman,ed.,Konstitusionalisme, Peran DPR, Dan Judicial Review, Jakarta: Yayasann LBH Indonesia & Jarim
MD, Mahfud, Moh., 2007. “Putusan MK Belum Tentu Benar,” Seputar Indonesia, Jakarta
MD, Mahfud, Moh., 2009. “The Role of The Constitutional Court in The Development of Democracy in Indonesia,”, World Conference of Constitutional Court, Cape Town, 23-24 Januari 2009
MD, Mahfud, Moh., 2009.Konstitusi dan Hukum dalam Kontroversi Isu, Jakarta: Rajawali Pers
Primaironline, “Akil: Gus Dur Jatuh Karena Dekrit Bubarkan MPR/DPR 7 Golkar”, http://www.primaironline.com/berita/detail.php?catid=Politik&artid=akil-gus-dur-dijatuhkan-karena-keluarkan-dekrit#, diakses tanggal 1 Juli 2010
Rehnquist, William, “The Notion of a Living Constitution”, Harvard Journal of Law & Public Policy, Vol. 29 No.2
Salman, Radian, 2008. “Sifat Kerugian Konstitusional dalam Judicial Review di MK,” Jurnal Konstitusi, Volume 5 Nomor 1, Juni 2008, Jakarta: Mahkamah Konstitusi
Schroeder, Christopher H., 2005. “Keeping The Faith With The Constitution,” Washington: American Constitution Society for Law and Policy
Smith, Edward. C., et.al, 1966. Dictionary of American Politics, New York: Barnes & Noble
Stockmann, Petra, 2007. The New Indonesian Constitutional Court: A Study of Its Beginnings and Its First Years of Work, Jakarta: Hans Seidel Foundation
Syahrizal, Ahmad, 2007. “Problem Implementasi Putusan MK”, Jurnal Konstitusi, Volume 4 Nomor 1, Maret 2007, Jakarta: Mahkamah Konstitusi
Wi g n j o s o e b ro t o , S o e t a n d y o , 1 9 9 1 . “ K o n s t i t u s i d a n Konstitusionalisme,”, dalam Benny K. Harman & Hendardi (ed), Konstitusionalisme, Peran DPR, dan Judicial Review, Jakarta: Yayasan LBH Indonesia
Yudho, Winarno, 2005. Mekanisme Impeachment dan Hukum Acara Mahkamah Konstitusi, Jakarta: Pusat Penelitian dan Pengkajian Sekretariat Jenderal Mahkamah Konstitusi Republik Indonesia
Indonesia, Undang-Undang No. 10 Tahun 2004 tentang Tata Urutan Perundang-undangan
Indonesia, Undang-Undang No. 24 Tahun 2003 tentang Mahkamah Konstitusi
Indonesia, Undang-Undang No. 4 tahun 2004 tentang Kekuasaan Kehakiman
Asshiddiqie, Jimly, 2006. Hukum Acara Pengujian Undang-undang, Cetakan Pertama, Jakarta: Konstitusi Press
Asshiddiqie, Jimly, 2006. Pengantar Ilmu Hukum Tata Negara Jilid I, Jakarta: Sekretariat Jenderal dan Kepaniteraan Mahkamah Konstitusi
Asshiddiqie, Jimly, 2006. Perihal Undang-Undang, Cetakan Pertama, Jakarta: Konstitusi Press
Balkin, Jack, “Framework Originalism and The Living Constitution,”Northwestern University Law Review, Vol. 103 No.2
Barnett, Randy, E., 1996. “The Relevance of The Framer’s Intent,” Harvard Journal of Law and Public Policy, Volume 19
Barton, David, “Liberty Equip: The Constitution, Original Intent
v. Living Document”, http://libertycavalier.wordpress.com/2010/05/18/liberty-equip-the-constitution-original-intent-v-living-document/, diakses pada 29 Juni 2010
DPR-RI, “DPR Hasil Pemilu 1955 Paska Dekrit Presiden 1959 (1959- 1965)”, http://www.dpr-ri.org/v2/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=60&Itemid=73, diakses tanggal 1 Juli 2010
Hardjono, 2009. “The Indonesian Constitutional Court”, makalah disampaikan dalam 6th Conference of Asian Constitutional Court Judges, Ulaanbaatar, Mongol: 24-26 September
Hautamaki, Veli-Pekka, 2002, “Authoritative Interpretation of The Constitution: A Comparison of Argumentation in Findland and Norway,” artikel dari disertasi Perustusla Auktoritatiivenen tulk inta , Helsinski
Indrayana, Denny, 2007. Amandemen UUD 1945: Antara Mitos dan Pembongkaran, Cetakan Kedua, Bandung: Mizan
Kusuma, Ananda RM.A.B., 2009. Lahirnya Undang-Undang Dasar 1945, Edisi Revisi, Jakarta: Badan Penerbit Fakultas Hukum Universitas Indonesia
Kusuma, R.M. A.B., 2007. “Keabsahan UUD 1945 Pasca Amandemen,” Jurnal Konstitusi , Volume 4 Nomor 1, Jakarta: Mahkamah Konstitusi
Limbach, Jutta, 2001. “The Concept of The Supremacy of The Constitution,” The Modern Law Review, Volume 64 No.1, 2001, Malden: Blackwell Publisher
Lubis, Solly, 2006. “MK dan Putusannya:Antara Harapan dan Kenyataan”, Jurnal Konstitusi , Volume 3 Nomor 4, Desember 2006, Jakarta: Mahkamah Konstitusi
M.D., Moh.Mahfud, 2009. “The Role of The Constitutional Court in The Development of Democracy in Indonesia,” makalah disampaikan dalam World Conference of Constitutional Justice, Cape Town: 23-24 Januari
Mahendra, Oka, 1991. “Konstitusionalisme di Indonesia: Peran DPR dan Masalah Judicial Review,” dalam Benny K. Harman & Hendardi, ed., Konstitusionalisme, Peran DPR dan Judicial Review, Jakarta: Yayasan LBH Indonesia & Jarim
Mahendra, Oka,.1991.”Konstitusionalisme Di Indonesia, Peranan DPR, dan Masalah Judicial Review ,” dalam Hendardi & Benny
K. Harman,ed.,Konstitusionalisme, Peran DPR, Dan Judicial Review, Jakarta: Yayasann LBH Indonesia & Jarim
MD, Mahfud, Moh., 2007. “Putusan MK Belum Tentu Benar,” Seputar Indonesia, Jakarta
MD, Mahfud, Moh., 2009. “The Role of The Constitutional Court in The Development of Democracy in Indonesia,”, World Conference of Constitutional Court, Cape Town, 23-24 Januari 2009
MD, Mahfud, Moh., 2009.Konstitusi dan Hukum dalam Kontroversi Isu, Jakarta: Rajawali Pers
Primaironline, “Akil: Gus Dur Jatuh Karena Dekrit Bubarkan MPR/DPR 7 Golkar”, http://www.primaironline.com/berita/detail.php?catid=Politik&artid=akil-gus-dur-dijatuhkan-karena-keluarkan-dekrit#, diakses tanggal 1 Juli 2010
Rehnquist, William, “The Notion of a Living Constitution”, Harvard Journal of Law & Public Policy, Vol. 29 No.2
Salman, Radian, 2008. “Sifat Kerugian Konstitusional dalam Judicial Review di MK,” Jurnal Konstitusi, Volume 5 Nomor 1, Juni 2008, Jakarta: Mahkamah Konstitusi
Schroeder, Christopher H., 2005. “Keeping The Faith With The Constitution,” Washington: American Constitution Society for Law and Policy
Smith, Edward. C., et.al, 1966. Dictionary of American Politics, New York: Barnes & Noble
Stockmann, Petra, 2007. The New Indonesian Constitutional Court: A Study of Its Beginnings and Its First Years of Work, Jakarta: Hans Seidel Foundation
Syahrizal, Ahmad, 2007. “Problem Implementasi Putusan MK”, Jurnal Konstitusi, Volume 4 Nomor 1, Maret 2007, Jakarta: Mahkamah Konstitusi
Wi g n j o s o e b ro t o , S o e t a n d y o , 1 9 9 1 . “ K o n s t i t u s i d a n Konstitusionalisme,”, dalam Benny K. Harman & Hendardi (ed), Konstitusionalisme, Peran DPR, dan Judicial Review, Jakarta: Yayasan LBH Indonesia
Yudho, Winarno, 2005. Mekanisme Impeachment dan Hukum Acara Mahkamah Konstitusi, Jakarta: Pusat Penelitian dan Pengkajian Sekretariat Jenderal Mahkamah Konstitusi Republik Indonesia
Indonesia, Undang-Undang No. 10 Tahun 2004 tentang Tata Urutan Perundang-undangan
Indonesia, Undang-Undang No. 24 Tahun 2003 tentang Mahkamah Konstitusi
Indonesia, Undang-Undang No. 4 tahun 2004 tentang Kekuasaan Kehakiman
Downloads
Published
2016-05-20
How to Cite
Wardaya, Manunggal K. 2016. “Perubahan Konstitusi Melalui Putusan MK: Telaah Atas Putusan Nomor 138 PUU-VII 2009”. Jurnal Konstitusi 7 (2):019-046. https://doi.org/10.31078/jk722.
Issue
Section
Articles
License
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Copyright of the published articles will be transferred to the journal as the publisher of the manuscripts. Therefore, the author confirms that the copyright has been managed by the publisher.
- The publisher of Jurnal Konstitusi is The Registrar and Secretariat General of the Constitutional Court of the Republic of Indonesia.
- The copyright follows Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License: This license allows reusers to distribute, remix, adapt, and build upon the material in any medium or format for noncommercial purposes only, and only so long as attribution is given to the creator. If you remix, adapt, or build upon the material, you must license the modified material under identical terms.
