Legal Reasoning Pada Perkara Pengujian Undang-Undang (Studi Perbandingan)

Loura Hardjaloka

Abstract


Article 24 C of Third Amendment of Constitution Law 1945 is the basis of the Constitutional Court to give the final and binding decision in terms of law examination against Constitution Law 1945. Constitutional Court has a restriction to not examine the nebis in idem case unless there is a different substance of Constitutional Law 1945 which is used as the based of examination. In this paper, there are 12 (twelve) Constitutional Court’s decisions on law re-examination against the Constitutional Law 1945 because using different substance of Constitutional Law 1945 as the based of examination. Based on the research, which has been conducted, there are legal reasoning differences in accepting and deciding the cases which have been decided previously which the Court  uses  different  legal  interpretation  and  construction in deciding the case. Thus, this paper will examine and compare legal reasoning methods which are used in deciding the case.

Keywords


nebis in idem; legal reasoning; judicial review

References


Ahmad Rifai, 2010, “Penemuan Hukum oleh Hakim dalam Perspektif Hukum Progresif”, Jakarta: Sinar Grafika.

Bambang Sutiyoso, 2006, “Metode Penemuan Hukum: Upaya Mewujudkan Hukum yang Pasti dan Berkeadilan”, Yogyakarta: UII Press.

Bernard Arief Sidharta, 2009, “Refleksi tentang Struktur Ilmu Hukum: Sebuah Penelitian tentang Fundasi Kefilsafatan dan Sifat Keilmuan Ilmu Hukum sebagai Landasan Pengembangan Ilmu Hukum Nasional Indonesia”, Bandung: Mandar Maju.

Charles Grove Haines, 1944, “The Role of The Supreme Court in American Government and Politics 1789-1835”, London: Cambridge University Press.

Johnny Ibrahim, 2007, “Teori dan Metodologi Penelitian Hukum Normatif”, Malang: Bayumedia Publishing.

Patrick Nerhot, 1991, “Legal Knowledge and Analogy, Fragments of Legal Epistemology, Hermeneutics and Linguistics”, Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publisher.

Peter de Cruz, 1999, “Comparative Law in A Changing World”, London: Cavendish Publishing.

Philipus M. Hadjon dan Titiek Sri Djatmiati, 2009, “Argumentasi Hukum”, Yogyakarta: Gadjah Mada University Press.

Ronald Dworkin, 1986, “Law’s Empire”, London: The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.

Sudikno Mertokusumo, 2009, “Penemuan Hukum: Sebuah Pengantar”, Yogyakarta: Liberty.

Yudha Bhakti Ardhiwisastra, 2008, “Penafsiran dan Konstruksi Hukum”, Bandung: Alumni.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.31078/jk1216

Article Metrics

Abstract view : 683 times
PDF (Bahasa Indonesia) view : 416 times

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.