Direct Regional Head Elections in Papua: Problems, Solutions, and Reforms
Pemilihan Kepala Daerah Langsung di Papua: Problematika, Solusi, dan Reformasi
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.31078/jk2249Keywords:
Local Democracy, Constitutional Court, Regional Head Election, Re-vote, Papua Regional ElectionAbstract
Direct regional head elections (Pilkada) in Papua persistently face fundamental challenges, including social conflict, vote manipulation, and the highest dispute rate in Indonesia, which often result in Constitutional Court-ordered re-votes (PSU). This recurring instability underscores the urgency of evaluating electoral governance and reforming the system to align with Papua’s unique geographical and socio-cultural context. This study employs a juridical-empirical method, analysing MK rulings (2012–2025), Bawaslu reports, and seven significant dispute cases. Findings reveal that core obstacles stem from complex geography, limited institutional capacity, the dominance of identity politics, and weak oversight mechanisms, leading to administrative irregularities and conflict. The study concludes that improving Pilkada requires short-term solutions, such as strengthening monitoring institutions and integrating digital verification, alongside long-term structural reforms featuring adaptive electoral designs tailored to local conditions.Direct regional head elections (Pilkada) in Papua persistently face fundamental challenges, including social conflict, vote manipulation, and the highest dispute rate in Indonesia, which often result in Constitutional Court-ordered re-votes (PSU). This recurring instability underscores the urgency of evaluating electoral governance and reforming the system to align with Papua’s unique geographical and socio-cultural context. This study employs a juridical-empirical method, analysing MK rulings (2012–2025), Bawaslu reports, and seven significant dispute cases. Findings reveal that core obstacles stem from complex geography, limited institutional capacity, the dominance of identity politics, and weak oversight mechanisms, leading to administrative irregularities and conflict. The study concludes that improving Pilkada requires short-term solutions, such as strengthening monitoring institutions and integrating digital verification, alongside long-term structural reforms featuring adaptive electoral designs tailored to local conditions.
References
Al Izzati, R. “Direct Elections and Trust in State and Political Institutions: Evidence from Indonesia.” Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization 221 (2024): 320–40. DOI: https://doi.org/10.56506/MMHA6573
Alvarez, R. Michael, dan Thad E. Hall. Electronic Elections: The Perils and Promises of Digital Democracy. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 2010. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctt7ss68
Alvarez, R. Michael, Lonna Rae Atkeson, dan Thad E. Hall. Evaluating Elections: A Handbook of Methods and Standards. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2013. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139226547
Ananta, Aris, Evi Nurvidya Arifin, M. Sairi Hasbullah, Nur Budi Handayani, dan Agus Pramono. Demography of Indonesia’s Ethnicity. Singapore: Institute of Southeast Asian Studies, 2015. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1355/9789814519885
Ananta, Aris, Evi Nurvidya Arifin, dan Leo Suryadinata. Indonesian Electoral Behaviour: A Statistical Perspective. Singapore: Institute of Southeast Asian Studies, 2004. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1355/9789812305350
ANTARA News. “Bawaslu nilai sistem noken di Papua perlu dievaluasi.” 30 Juni 2018. Diakses 3 Desember 2025. https://www.antaranews.com/berita/722879/bawaslu-nilai-sistem-noken-di-papua-perlu-dievaluasi.
Asian Network for Free Elections (ANFREL). Papua Gubernatorial Elections 2013: Study Mission Report. Bangkok: ANFREL, 2013.
Astuti, Rini. “Implementasi Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 47-81/PHPU.A-VII/2009 tentang Pemilu Noken di Kabupaten Yahukimo.” Tesis Magister Hukum, Universitas Sriwijaya, 2023.
Badan Pengawas Pemilihan Umum Provinsi Papua. Laporan Kinerja Instansi Pemerintah (LKIP) Bawaslu Provinsi Papua Tahun 2020. Jayapura: Bawaslu Provinsi Papua, 2021.
Badan Pengawas Pemilihan Umum Republik Indonesia. Indeks Kerawanan Pemilu (IKP) Pilkada Serentak 2020. Jakarta: Bawaslu RI, 2020. https://www.bawaslu.go.id/sites/default/files/publikasi/BUKU%20IKP%20PILKADA%20SERENTAK%202020.pdf.
———. Indeks Kerawanan Pemilu Pemilihan Kepala Daerah Tahun 2018. Jakarta: Bawaslu RI, 2018.
———. Kajian Evaluatif Penanganan Pelanggaran Pemilihan Kepala Daerah Serentak 2020. Jakarta: Bawaslu RI, 2021.
———. Membangun Demokrasi Damai: Strategi Komunikasi dan Manajemen Risiko Pilkada di Tanah Papua. Jakarta: Bawaslu RI, 2022.
BBC Indonesia. “Pilkada Serentak 2018 di Papua: Petugas Tewas, Penghitungan Suara Terhambat.” BBC.com, 28 Juni 2018. Diakses 4 Desember 2025. https://www.bbc.com/indonesia/indonesia-44642737.
Buehler, Michael. “Decentralisation and Local Democracy in Indonesia: The Marginalisation of the Public Sphere.” Dalam Problems of Democratisation in Indonesia: Elections, Institutions and Society, disunting oleh Edward Aspinall dan Marcus Mietzner, 267–85. Singapore: ISEAS, 2010. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1355/9789814279918-018
Buehler, Michael. “Direct Elections for Local Leaders (Pilkada): Causes and Consequences.” Makalah, Institute of Southeast Asian Studies (ISEAS), 2009.
Butt, Simon. “Indonesia’s Constitutional Court and Indonesia’s Electoral Systems.” Dalam Constitutional Courts in Asia: A Comparative Perspective, disunting oleh Albert H. Y. Chen dan Andrew Harding. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2018. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108163903.010. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108163903.010
Butt, Simon. The Constitutional Court and Democracy in Indonesia. Leiden: Brill Nijhoff, 2015. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004250598
Carnegie Endowment for International Peace. “In Kenya’s 2022 Elections, Technology and Data Protection Must Go Hand in Hand.” 8 Agustus 2022. Diakses 4 Desember 2025. https://carnegieendowment.org/posts/2022/08/in-kenyas-2022-elections-technology-and-data-protection-must-go-hand-in-hand.
Chakim, M. Lutfi. “Perubahan Sistem Pemilihan Kepala Daerah dalam Dinamika Pelaksanaan Demokrasi.” Jurnal Rechts Vinding: Media Pembinaan Hukum Nasional 3, no. 1 (2014): 113–27. DOI: https://doi.org/10.33331/rechtsvinding.v3i1.60
Commonwealth Secretariat. Sierra Leone National and Local Council Elections 2012: Final Report of the Commonwealth Observer Group. London: Commonwealth Secretariat, 2012. https://production-new-commonwealth-files.s3.eu-west-2.amazonaws.com/s3fs-public/documents/Sierra%20Leone%202012%20Election%20Report%20-%20Final.pdf.
Dawid, Olvya, Eugenius Paransi, dan Ollij A. Kereh. “Peran Badan Pengawas Pemilihan Umum dalam Sentra Penegakan Hukum Terpadu terhadap Pelaksanaan Pemilihan Kepala Daerah.” Lex Crimen 11, no. 4 (2022): 1–9.
Deliarnoor, Nandang Alamsah. “Evaluasi Politik Hukum Penyelenggaraan Pilkada Langsung di Papua.” Sosiohumaniora 17, no. 1 (2015): 49–55. https://doi.org/10.24198/sosiohumaniora.v17i1.5672. DOI: https://doi.org/10.24198/sosiohumaniora.v17i1.5672
Delmana, Lati Praja, Azwardi Zetra, dan Heru Koeswara. “Problematika dan Strategi Penanganan Politik Uang Pemilu Serentak 2019 di Indonesia.” Electoral Governance: Jurnal Tata Kelola Pemilu Indonesia 1, no. 2 (2020): 1–20. https://doi.org/10.46874/tkp.v1i2.61. DOI: https://doi.org/10.46874/tkp.v1i2.61
DetikNews. “Duduk Perkara Pilkada Yalimo Papua yang Berbuntut Pembakaran, Blokir Bandara.” 1 Juli 2021. Diakses 3 Desember 2025. https://news.detik.com/berita/d-5626806/duduk-perkara-pilkada-yalimo-papua-yang-berbuntut-pembakaran-blokir-bandara.
de Villiers, Bertus. “A Reflection on the ‘Noken’ Electoral System of Papua and the Legitimacy of Elections.” Dalam International Human Rights and Local Courts, disunting oleh Agnethe Sivertsen Tømte. Leiden: Brill, 2024.
de Villiers, Bertus. “‘Noken’ Electoral System of Papua and the Operation of Native Title in the Constitutional Court of Indonesia.” Dalam Twenty Years of the Constitutional Court of Indonesia: The Role of the Constitutional Court in the Protection of Fundamental Rights and Freedoms. Leiden: Brill, 2024.
Dewan Kehormatan Penyelenggara Pemilu (DKPP). Indeks Kepatuhan Etik Penyelenggara Pemilihan Umum (IKEPP) Tahun 2024. Jakarta: DKPP RI, 2024.
Dreef, Sabine. Designing Elections in Conflict-Prone Divided Societies. PRIF Report No. 122. Frankfurt: Peace Research Institute Frankfurt, 2013.
Dryzek, John S. Deliberative Democracy and Beyond: Liberals, Critics, Contestations. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2002. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/019925043X.001.0001
European Union. Handbook for European Union Election Observation. Edisi ke-2. Luxembourg: Office for Official Publications of the European Communities, 2008. Diakses 4 Desember 2025. https://eeas.europa.eu/eueom/pdf/handbook-eueom-en-2nd-edition_en.pdf.
European Union Election Observation Mission (EU EOM). Final Report: Presidential and Parliamentary Elections in Sierra Leone 2002. Brussels: European Commission, 2002. https://www.eeas.europa.eu/sites/default/files/eu_eom_sl_2002_final_report_0.pdf.
Faiz, Pan Mohamad, Saldi Isra, Irfan Nur Rachman, Abdul Ghoffar, dan Khairul Fahmi. “Big Man, Bag or Ballot Box? Upholding Legal Pluralism through Noken as a Traditional System of Voting in Elections in Papua, Indonesia.” Legal Pluralism and Critical Social Analysis 55, no. 3 (2023): 339–65. https://doi.org/10.1080/27706869.2023.2274167. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/27706869.2023.2274167
Faturohman, Deden. “Demokrasi Lokal dalam Pemilihan Kepala Daerah Langsung di Indonesia.” Legality: Jurnal Ilmiah Hukum (metadata volume/nomor/halaman tidak tersedia pada entri arsip OJS UMM). Diakses 3 Desember 2025. https://ejournal.umm.ac.id/index.php/legality/article/view/280.
Garda Papua. “IKP 2020: Bawaslu Petakan Kerawanan Pilkada, Pencegahan dan Pengawasan Maksimal Dibutuhkan.” 25 Februari 2020.
Global Protection Cluster. Protection During Elections: The Right of Internally Displaced Persons to Participate in Elections. Geneva: UNHCR, 2023. https://globalprotectioncluster.org/sites/default/files/2023-12/GPC%20Protection%20During%20Elections%20Brief%20%28September%202023%29.pdf.
Hadiz, Vedi R. Localising Power in Post-Authoritarian Indonesia: A Southeast Asia Perspective. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press, 2010.
Harahap, Devi. “Sengketa Pilkada Terbanyak di Papua, Sistem Noken dan Keamanan Dinilai Jadi Tantangan.” Media Indonesia, 21 Januari 2025. Diakses 3 Desember 2025. https://mediaindonesia.com/pilkada/736493/sengketa-pilkada-terbanyak-di-papua-sistem-noken-dan-keamanan-dinilai-jadi-tangangan.
Hukumonline.com. “MK: Permohonan Pilkada Terbanyak dari Papua.” 5 Januari 2016. Diakses 3 Desember 2025. https://www.hukumonline.com/berita/a/mk--permohonan-pilkada-terbanyak-dari-papua-lt568bcd9a6d937/.
Hyde, Susan D. “How International Election Observers Detect and Deter Fraud.” Dalam Election Fraud: Detecting and Deterring Electoral Manipulation, disunting oleh R. Michael Alvarez, Thad E. Hall, dan Susan D. Hyde. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press, 2008.
Hyde, Susan D. The Pseudo-Democrat’s Dilemma: Why Election Observation Became an International Norm. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 2011. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7591/cornell/9780801449666.001.0001
Institute for Policy Analysis of Conflict (IPAC). Indonesia: Election Credibility in Papua Requires Ending “Noken”. IPAC Report No. 100. Jakarta: IPAC, 2025.
———. The 2018 Local Elections in Papua: Places and Issues to Watch. IPAC Report No. 45. Jakarta: IPAC, 2018.
International Foundation for Electoral Systems (IFES). Briefing Paper: Cybersecurity of Election Results Management Systems. Arlington, VA: IFES, 2022. https://www.ifes.org/sites/default/files/2022-05/IFES%20Cybersecurity%20of%20Election%20Results%20Management%20Systems%20Briefing%20Paper%20ENG.pdf.
———. “In Kenya, Using Technology for Safer Elections.” 22 Juni 2012. Diakses 4 Desember 2025. https://www.ifes.org/news/kenya-using-technology-safer-elections.
International IDEA. Electoral Management Design: The International IDEA Handbook. Edisi diperbarui. Stockholm: International IDEA, 2014.
James, Toby S. Comparative Electoral Management: Performance, Networks and Instruments. London: Routledge, 2020. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315545172
Jaring.id. “Kemelut Yalimo Usai Putusan MK.” 10 Juli 2021. Diakses 3 Desember 2025. https://jaring.id/kemelut-yalimo-usai-putusan-mk/.
Kelliher, Camden, Saldi Isra, dan Yuliandri. “Unconstitutional Authority of Indonesia’s Constitutional Court: The Resolution of Pilkada Result Disputes.” Election Law Journal: Rules, Politics, and Policy 18, no. 3 (2019): 297–308. https://doi.org/10.1089/elj.2018.0535. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1089/elj.2018.0535
Komisi Pemilihan Umum Republik Indonesia. Indeks Partisipasi Pemilu pada Pemilihan Umum Tahun 2024. Jakarta: KPU RI, 2024.
Lagman, Gus A. Understanding the Automated Election System. Quezon City: NAMFREL, 2017. https://www.namfrel.ph/wp-content/uploads/2017/10/Understanding_AES-Revised-2.pdf.
Levaan, Ave. “Politik Identitas dan Masa Depan Demokrasi di Papua.” Dalam Politik Identitas dan Masa Depan Demokrasi di Papua. Jayapura: Lembaga Penelitian Universitas Cenderawasih, 2021.
Lijphart, Arend. Patterns of Democracy: Government Forms and Performance in Thirty-Six Countries. Edisi ke-2. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 2012.
Lindawaty, Debora Sanur. “Evaluasi Sistem Pemilihan Pasca Konflik Pemilu dan Pilkada di Puncak Jaya Papua Tengah.” Info Singkat Komisi II XVII, no. 7/I/PUSAKA/APRIL/2025. Jakarta: Pusat Analisis Keparlemenan DPR RI, 2025.
Lipset, Seymour Martin, dan Stein Rokkan. “Cleavage Structures, Party Systems and Voter Alignments: An Introduction.” Dalam Party Systems and Voter Alignments: Cross-National Perspectives, disunting oleh Seymour Martin Lipset dan Stein Rokkan, 1–64. New York: Free Press, 1967.
Mahkamah Konstitusi Republik Indonesia. Putusan Nomor 302/PHPU.GUB-XXIII/2025 (Bagian H. 76 Permohonan Sengketa PHP Kada 2024 Tanah Papua di MK).
———. Putusan Nomor 304/PHPU.GUB-XXIII/2025 tentang Perselisihan Hasil Pemilihan Gubernur dan Wakil Gubernur Papua Tahun 2024. Jakarta: Mahkamah Konstitusi, 2025.
———. Putusan Nomor 305/PHPU.BUP-XXIII/2025 tentang Perselisihan Hasil Pemilihan Bupati dan Wakil Bupati Kabupaten Puncak Jaya Tahun 2024. Jakarta: Mahkamah Konstitusi, 2025.
———. Putusan Nomor 39/PHPU.D-X/2012 tentang Perselisihan Hasil Pemilihan Umum Bupati dan Wakil Bupati Kabupaten Puncak Jaya Tahun 2012. Jakarta: Mahkamah Konstitusi, 2012.
———. Putusan Nomor 42/PHP.BUP-XV/2017 tentang Perselisihan Hasil Pemilihan Bupati dan Wakil Bupati Kabupaten Puncak Jaya Tahun 2017. Jakarta: Mahkamah Konstitusi, 2017.
———. Putusan Nomor 47-81/PHPU.A-VII/2009 tentang Perselisihan Hasil Pemilihan Umum Anggota DPRD Kabupaten Yahukimo, Provinsi Papua Tahun 2009. Jakarta: Mahkamah Konstitusi, 2009.
———. Putusan Nomor 50/PHP.BUP-XV/2017 tentang Perselisihan Hasil Pemilihan Bupati dan Wakil Bupati Kabupaten Intan Jaya Tahun 2017. Jakarta: Mahkamah Konstitusi, 2017.
———. Putusan Nomor 78/PHPU.D-X/2012 tentang Perselisihan Hasil Pemilihan Umum Kepala Daerah dan Wakil Kepala Daerah Kabupaten Paniai. Jakarta: Mahkamah Konstitusi, 2012.
———. Putusan Nomor 82/PHPU.D-X/2012 tentang Perselisihan Hasil Pemilihan Umum Kepala Daerah dan Wakil Kepala Daerah Kabupaten Paniai Periode 2012–2017. Jakarta: Mahkamah Konstitusi, 2012.
———. Putusan Nomor 84/PHP.BUP-XIX/2021 tentang Perselisihan Hasil Pemilihan Bupati dan Wakil Bupati Kabupaten Nabire Tahun 2020. Jakarta: Mahkamah Konstitusi, 2021.
———. Putusan Nomor 97/PHP.BUP-XIX/2021 tentang Keberatan terhadap Penetapan Perolehan Suara Hasil Pemilihan Bupati dan Wakil Bupati Yalimo Tahun 2020. Jakarta: Mahkamah Konstitusi, 2021.
———. Putusan Nomor 145/PHP.BUP-XIX/2021 tentang Perselisihan Hasil Pemilihan Bupati dan Wakil Bupati Kabupaten Yalimo Tahun 2020. Jakarta: Mahkamah Konstitusi, 2021.
Marzuki, Peter Mahmud. Penelitian Hukum. Edisi revisi. Jakarta: Kencana, 2017.
Meisburger, Tim. “Domestic Monitoring and Election Integrity: A Case Study of the 1999 National Election in Indonesia.” ACE Electoral Knowledge Network, 2001. Diakses 3 Desember 2025. https://aceproject.org/ero-en/topics/electoral-dispute-resolution/ConfPaper_Indonesia_FINAL.pdf.
Mochtar, Zainal Arifin. “Guarding Democracy: Judicial Activism in the Indonesian Constitutional Court Decisions in Regional Head Electoral Disputes.” Constitutional Review 11, no. 1 (2025): 36–62. DOI: https://doi.org/10.31078/consrev1112
Mozaffar, Said, dan Andreas Schedler. “The Comparative Study of Electoral Governance—Introduction.” International Political Science Review 23, no. 1 (2002): 5–27. https://doi.org/10.1177/0192512102023001001. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0192512102023001001
Mulyani, Tri, A. Heru Nuswanto, dan Sukimin. “Sistem Noken di Provinsi Papua: Studi Putusan MK Nomor 47-81/PHPU.A-VII/2009.” Jurnal Ius Constituendum 5, no. 1 (2020): 83–110. https://doi.org/10.26623/jic.v5i1.2219. DOI: https://doi.org/10.26623/jic.v5i1.2133
Nashrullah, Jauhar. “Tantangan Penyelenggaraan Pemilu dan Pilkada Serentak Nasional 2024 di Empat Provinsi Baru Papua.” Lex Renaissance 8, no. 2 (2024): 214–33. DOI: https://doi.org/10.20885/JLR.vol8.iss2.art2
ND, Mukti Fajar, dan Yulianto Achmad. Dualisme Penelitian Hukum Normatif & Empiris. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar, 2010.
Nie, Norman H., G. Bingham Powell Jr., dan Kenneth Prewitt. “Social Structure and Political Participation: Developmental Relationships, II.” American Political Science Review 63, no. 3 (1969): 808–32. https://doi.org/10.2307/1954430. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/1954430
Norris, Pippa. Democratic Phoenix: Reinventing Political Activism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2002. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511610073
Norris, Pippa. Why Electoral Integrity Matters. New York: Cambridge University Press, 2014. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781107280861
Norris, Pippa, Richard W. Frank, dan Ferran Martínez i Coma. “Assessing the Quality of Elections.” Journal of Democracy 24, no. 4 (2013): 124–35. https://doi.org/10.1353/jod.2013.0063. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1353/jod.2013.0063
Norris, Pippa, Richard W. Frank, dan Ferran Martínez i Coma. “Measuring Electoral Integrity Around the World: A New Dataset.” PS: Political Science & Politics 47, no. 4 (2014): 803–17. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S1049096514001061
North, Douglass C. Institutions, Institutional Change and Economic Performance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1990. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511808678
North, Douglass C. “Institutions.” Journal of Economic Perspectives 5, no. 1 (1991): 97–112. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1257/jep.5.1.97
Nugroho, Ibnu. “Transformasi Konflik Pilkada di Tanah Papua.” Electoral Governance: Jurnal Tata Kelola Pemilu Indonesia 4, no. 1 (2022): 22–48. https://doi.org/10.46874/tkp.v4i1.475. DOI: https://doi.org/10.46874/tkp.v4i1.475
Pasaribu, Kholilullah. “Noken dan Konflik Pemilu: Laporan Awal Pilkada Serentak di Papua.” Perludem, 3 April 2018. Diakses 3 Desember 2025. https://perludem.org/2018/04/03/noken-dan-konflik-pemilu-laporan-awal-pilkada-serentak-di-papua/.
Pasaribu, Kholilullah. Noken dan Konflik Pemilu: Laporan Awal Pilkada Serentak di Papua. Jakarta: Perludem, 2016.
Pasaribu, Kholilullah. Tambal Sulam Sistem Noken: Laporan Lanjutan Pilkada Serentak di Papua. Jakarta: Perludem, 2017.
Pastor, Robert A. “The Role of Electoral Administration in Democratic Transitions: Implications for Policy and Research.” Democratisation 6, no. 4 (1999): 1–27. https://doi.org/10.1080/13510349908403630. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/13510349908403630
Privacy International. Election Technology in Kenya. London: Privacy International, 2024. https://privacyinternational.org/sites/default/files/2024-09/Election%20Technology%20in%20Kenya.pdf.
Ramadhan, Nur Habibie, dkk. “Analisis Faktor-Faktor Non-Elektoral Potensi Pemicu Konflik Pemilu Tahun 2024.” Electoral Governance: Jurnal Tata Kelola Pemilu Indonesia 5, no. 1 (2023): 94–112. DOI: https://doi.org/10.46874/tkp.v5i1.964
Reilly, Benjamin. Democracy in Divided Societies: Electoral Engineering for Conflict Management. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2001. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511491108
Republik Indonesia. Undang-Undang Dasar Negara Republik Indonesia Tahun 1945.
———. Undang-Undang Nomor 10 Tahun 2016 tentang Perubahan Kedua atas Undang-Undang Nomor 1 Tahun 2015 tentang Penetapan Peraturan Pemerintah Pengganti Undang-Undang Nomor 1 Tahun 2014 tentang Pemilihan Gubernur, Bupati, dan Wali Kota Menjadi Undang-Undang.
———. Undang-Undang Nomor 2 Tahun 2021 tentang Perubahan Kedua atas Undang-Undang Nomor 21 Tahun 2001 tentang Otonomi Khusus bagi Provinsi Papua. DOI: https://doi.org/10.14421/staatsrecht.v2i2.2813
———. Undang-Undang Nomor 32 Tahun 2004 tentang Pemerintahan Daerah.
Reynolds, Andrew, Ben Reilly, dan Andrew Ellis. Electoral System Design: The New International IDEA Handbook. Stockholm: International IDEA, 2005.
Rojani, Deden Muhammad. “Bawaslu: Kabupaten Manokwari Paling Rawan di Pilkada 2020.” Media Indonesia, 25 Februari 2020.
Romli, Lili. “Pilkada Langsung, Calon Tunggal, dan Masa Depan Demokrasi Lokal.” Jurnal Penelitian Politik 15, no. 2 (2018): 143–60. https://doi.org/10.14203/jpp.v15i2.757. DOI: https://doi.org/10.14203/jpp.v15i2.757
Ronsumbre, N. “Sistem Noken Papua: Manifestasi Demokrasi Berbasis Kearifan Lokal.” Jurnal Sosial Politik 5, no. 2 (2019): 261–76. DOI: https://doi.org/10.22219/sospol.v5i2.7388
Sasmita, A. Sudiana. “Ethnicity and Democracy: Managing Political Complexities in West Papua.” Muslim Politics Review 2, no. 1 (2023): 112–32. DOI: https://doi.org/10.56529/mpr.v2i1.145
Sekretariat Wakil Presiden Republik Indonesia. “Persiapan dan Tantangan Pemilu 2024 di DOB Papua.” 24 Oktober 2023. Diakses 3 Desember 2025. https://www.wapresri.go.id/setwapres-selenggarakan-diskusi-bahas-persiapan-dan-tantangan-pemilu-2024-di-dob-papua/.
———. “Ukur Potensi Kerawanan Pilkada Serentak Tahun 2020 dengan IKP.” 25 Februari 2020. Diakses 3 Desember 2025. https://www.wapresri.go.id/ukur-potensi-kerawanan-pilkada-serentak-tahun-2020-dengan-ikp/.
Senis, Yotam, Dwia Aries Tina Pulubuhu, Suparman Abdullah, dan Sakaria. “Indonesian Nationalism and Papuan Ethnicity: Responding to the Dynamics of Social Conflict and Finding Sustainable Solutions.” Pakistan Journal of Life and Social Sciences 22, no. 2 (2024): 12802–15. https://doi.org/10.57239/PJLSS-2024-22.2.00916. DOI: https://doi.org/10.57239/PJLSS-2024-22.2.00916
Shoesmith, Dennis, Nathan Franklin, dan Rachmat Hidayat. “Decentralised Governance in Indonesia’s Disadvantaged Regions: A Critique of the Underperforming Model of Local Governance in Eastern Indonesia.” Journal of Current Southeast Asian Affairs 39, no. 3 (2020): 359–80. https://doi.org/10.1177/1868103420963140. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1868103420963140
Smartmatic. “The Philippines: The First-Ever Automated Elections in Southeast Asia.” 2010. Diakses 4 Desember 2025. https://www.smartmatic.com/case-studies/the-philippines-the-first-ever-automated-elections-in-southeast-asia/.
Snanfi, Ferinandus Leonardo, Muhadjir Darwin, dan Setiadi. “Politik Identitas Etnik Asli Papua Berkontestasi dalam Pemilihan Kepala Daerah di Kota Sorong.” Sosiohumaniora: Jurnal Ilmu-Ilmu Sosial dan Humaniora 20, no. 2 (2018): 122–31. https://doi.org/10.24198/sosiohumaniora.v20i2.15089. DOI: https://doi.org/10.24198/sosiohumaniora.v20i2.15089
Special Inspector General for Afghanistan Reconstruction (SIGAR). Elections: Lessons from the U.S. Experience in Afghanistan. SIGAR 21-16-LL. Arlington, VA: SIGAR, 2021.
Sumertana, Made, I Nyoman Lemes, dan I Nyoman Gede Remaja. “Peran Sentra Penegakan Hukum Terpadu (Gakkumdu) dalam Pelaksanaan Penegakan Hukum Terkait Tindak Pidana Pemilihan Umum (Studi pada Badan Pengawas Pemilihan Umum Kabupaten Buleleng).” Kertha Widya: Jurnal Hukum 9, no. 2 (Desember 2021): 25–53. DOI: https://doi.org/10.37637/kw.v9i2.885
Taruh Barguna, Veronica Theresia. “Wilayah Indonesia Timur Dominasi Sengketa Pilkada 2024.” IDN Times, 22 Desember 2024. Diakses 3 Desember 2025. https://www.idntimes.com/news/indonesia/wilayah-indonesia-timur-dominasi-sengketa-pilkada-2024-00-q3pclnc2b8k.
The Asia Foundation. Demokrasi di Indonesia: Sebuah Survey Pemilih Indonesia 2003. Jakarta: The Asia Foundation, 2003.
The Asia Foundation. Elections and Good Governance in Indonesia. Jakarta: The Asia Foundation, 2007.
The Asia Foundation. Elections and Political Processes in Asia. San Francisco: The Asia Foundation, 2013.
The Carter Center. March 7, 2018 Presidential and Parliamentary Elections in Sierra Leone: Final Report. Atlanta, GA: The Carter Center, 2018. https://www.cartercenter.org/resources/pdfs/news/peace_publications/election_reports/sierra-leone-report-032318.pdf.
The Carter Center. “Timor-Leste.” Profil program. Diakses 4 Desember 2025. https://www.cartercenter.org/country/timor-leste/.
The Carter Center. Timor-Leste Parliamentary Election Observation 2007: Final Report. Atlanta, GA: The Carter Center, 2007. https://www.cartercenter.org/resources/pdfs/news/peace_publications/election_reports/timor-leste-2007-final-rpt.pdf.
Torres, Luis Eduardo Medina, dan Edwin Cuitláhuac Ramírez Díaz. “Electoral Governance: More than Just Electoral Administration.” Mexican Law Review 8, no. 1 (2015): 33–46. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mexlaw.2015.12.002. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mexlaw.2015.12.002
United Nations Development Programme. Election Evaluation Mission: Afghan Voter Registration and Elections Project. New York: UNDP, 2006.
United Nations Development Programme. Promoting Local Election Management as Part of an Electoral Cycle Approach. Bangkok: UNDP Asia-Pacific, 2013.
United Nations Mission in Sudan (UNMIS). “Safeguarding Elections.” In Sudan, Februari 2010. Diakses 4 Desember 2025. https://unmis.unmissions.org/sites/default/files/1_18.pdf.
USAID, dan Creative Associates International. Electoral Security Framework: Technical Guidance Handbook for Democracy and Governance Officers. Washington, DC: USAID, 2010.
Verba, Sidney, Norman H. Nie, dan Jae-on Kim. Participation and Political Equality: A Seven-Nation Comparison. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1978.
Waluyo. “Model Pemilu dengan Sistem Noken Berbasis Budaya dan Kearifan Lokal.” Jurnal Hukum Samudra Keadilan 13, no. 2 (2018): 295–308. DOI: https://doi.org/10.33059/jhsk.v13i2.1065
Wolf, Peter, dkk. Introducing Biometric Technology in Elections. Stockholm: International IDEA, 2017.
Yunus, A. “Multilayered Democracy in Papua: A Comparison of ‘Noken’ System and Electoral College System in the United States.” Dalam The Recognition of Customary Land Rights at the Constitutional Court of Indonesia. London: Hart Publishing, 2019. DOI: https://doi.org/10.20956/halrev.v6i3.2892
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Jurnal Konstitusi
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Copyright of the published articles will be transferred to the journal as the publisher of the manuscripts. Therefore, the author confirms that the copyright has been managed by the publisher.
- The publisher of Jurnal Konstitusi is The Registrar and Secretariat General of the Constitutional Court of the Republic of Indonesia.
- The copyright follows Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License: This license allows reusers to distribute, remix, adapt, and build upon the material in any medium or format for noncommercial purposes only, and only so long as attribution is given to the creator. If you remix, adapt, or build upon the material, you must license the modified material under identical terms.
