Implikasi Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 101/Puu-VII/2009 terhadap Pelaksanaan Profesi Advokat di Daerah Istimewa Yogyakarta

Pusat Kajian Hukum Konstitusi FH UJB

Abstract


The research showed that: (1) the response of the lawyers who have   not sworn by the high court of Yogyakarta is that the Constitutional  Court decision No. 101/PUU-VII/2009 expected to solve the problems KAI advocates, however, the constitutional court decision has not been carried out by competent  parties.

Recently, the KAI Advocate cannot administering the  advocate’s  oath in the open court  of high court  of Yogyakarta  (2) the decision of    the constitutional court no. No.  101/PUU-VII/2009  was  not  provide any implications for the organization advocates and implementation of professional lawyers in Yogyakarta, (3) the attitude of judges towards lawyers who are not appointed by the high court in the court’s proceedings, there was no difference attitude compared to the prior existence of the constitutional court decision.

Practically, judges allow lawyers who have not sworn to proceed and become a legal counsel at the hearing, the proceedings if the advocate or   be accompanied by legal counsel or stuck in a legal advocate and has  been sworn in, (4) there was not any action of   high court of Yogyakarta  as   the implementation of the constitutional court decision No. 101/PUU- VII/2009. This is due to the high court of Yogyakarta was not as a party   in the constitutional court decision, thus they were not implement the decision.


Keywords


The Constitutional Court Decision; Advocates; Yogyakarta

Full Text:

PDF

References


daftar Buku

Abdul Mukthie Fadjar, 2006, Hukum Konstitusi dan Mahkamah Konstitusi, Kerjasama Penerbit Konstitusi Press, Jakarta dan Citra Media, Yogyakarta.

Ahmad Syahrizal, 2006, Peradilan Konstitusi Suatu Studi Tentang Adjudikasi Konstitusionak Sebagai Mekanisme Penyelesaian Sengketa Normatif, Jakarta : PT Pradnya Paramita.

Ari Yusuf Amir, 2010, Strategi Bisnis Jasa Advokat, Navila Idea, Yogyakarta.

Bambang Sutiyoso, 2006, Hukum Acara Mahkamah Konstitusi Republik Indonesia, Citra Aditya Bakti, Bandung.

-------------------------, 2009, Tata Cara penyelesaian Sengketa di Lingkungan Mahkamah Konstitusi, UII Press, Yogyakarta.

Jimly Asshiddiqie, 2010, Hukum Acara Pengujian Undang-Undang, Edisi Kedua, Cetakan Pertama, Sinar Grafika, Jakarta.

Laica Marzuki, 2008, Dari Timur ke Barat Memandu Hukum, Jakarta : Sekretariat Jenderal dan Kepaniteraan Mahkamah Konstitusi RI.

Maria S.W. Soemardjono, 1997, Pedoman Pembuatan Usulan Penelitian, PT Gramedia Pustaka Utama, Jakarta, hal. 32.

Soerjono Soekanto, 1984, Pengantar Penelitian Hukum, Universitas Indonesia Press, Jakarta.

Sudikno Mertokusumo, Hukum Acara Perdata Indonesia, Liberty, Yogyakarta.

daftar Peraturan

Undang-Undang Republik Indonesia Nomor 18 Tahun 2003 Tentang Advokat.

Undang-Undang Republik Indonesia Nomor 24 Tahun 2003 Tentang Mahkamah Konstitusi.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.31078/jk768

Article Metrics

Abstract view : 174 times
PDF view : 43 times

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.