Menggagas Paradigma Quo Vadis Mahkamah Konstitusi Dalam Putusan Inkonstitusional Bersyarat : Pengaturan Inkonstitusional Bersyarat pada Kewenangan Pengujian Formil Undang–Undang terhadap Undang-Undang Dasar

Meri Yarni; Khofifah Rizki Amanda

doi:10.31078/jk2146

Authors

Meri Yarni Fakultas Hukum, Universitas Jambi, Jambi, Indonesia https://orcid.org/0009-0002-2085-9907
Khofifah Rizki Amanda Fakultas Hukum, Universitas Jambi, Jambi, Indonesia https://orcid.org/0009-0007-9784-9674

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.31078/jk2146

Keywords:

Constitutional Court, Conditional Unconstitutional Decision, Regulation

Abstract

The purpose of this research is to examine and analyze the Conditional Unconstitutionality Provisions in the authority of formal review of laws against the 1945 Constitution of Indonesia. This study analyzes the legal legitimacy of the Constitutional Court’s conditional unconstitutional decisions, specifically Decision Number 91/PUU-XVIII/2020 concerning the Job Creation Law, and the Ius Constituendum of Conditional Unconstitutionality in the context of formal review for law examination. A normative juridical research method with qualitative descriptive analysis was employed. The findings reveal that the legal force of conditional unconstitutional decisions is binding and mandatory, recommending the revision of laws to clarify the scope and legal standing of conditional unconstitutional decisions, ensure compliance with constitutional mandates, and support the principle of checks and balances. The Ius Constituendum in the Constitutional Court’s decisions emphasizes the improvement of relevant laws and collaboration among state institutions. The author’s recommendations include the establishment of a legal basis through the revision of the Constitutional Court Law to incorporate conditional decisions as a foundation for implementing the constitutional judiciary’s authority.

References

Ali, Mohammad Mahrus, Meyrinda Rahmawaty Hilipito, dan Syukri Asy. “Tindak Lanjut Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi yang Bersifat Konstitusional Bersyarat serta Memuat Norma Baru (The Implementation of Constitutional Court Verdict on Conditionally Constitutional and New Legal Norm).” Jurnal Konstitusi 12, no. 3 (2015): 637.

Aninditya Eka Bintari. “Mahkamah Konstitusi Sebagai Negative Legislator dalam Penegakan Hukum Tata Negara.” Pandecta: Jurnal Penelitian Ilmu Hukum (Research Law Journal) 8, no. 1 (2013): 136.

Asy’ari, Syukri. Model dan Implementasi Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi dalam Pengujian Undang–Undang (Studi Putusan Tahun 2003–2012). Jakarta: Pusat Penelitian dan Pengkajian Perkara, Pengelolaan Teknologi Informasi dan Komunikasi Mahkamah Konstitusi Republik Indonesia, 2013.

Bar-Siman Tov, Ittai. “The Puzzling Resistance to Judicial Review of the Legislative Process.” Boston University Law Review 91, no. 6 (2011): 1922–23.

Bisariyadi. “Yudisialisasi Politik dan Sikap Menahan Diri: Peran Mahkamah Konstitusi dalam Menguji Undang-Undang (Judicialization of Politics and Judicial Restraint: The Role of the Constitutional Court on the Review of Laws).” Jurnal Konstitusi 12, no. 3 (2015): 479.

Butt, Simon. “Conditional Constitutionality and Conditional Unconstitutionality in Indonesia.” Dalam Constitutional Remedies in Asia, diedit oleh Po Jen Yap, 81. London: Routledge, 2019. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429435485-6.

Christiawan, Rio. Omnibus Law: Teori dan Penerapannya. Jakarta Timur: Sinar Grafika, 2021.

Ence, Iriyanto A. Baso. Negara Hukum dan Hak Uji Konstitusionalitas: Telaah Terhadap Kewenangan Mahkamah Konstitusi. Bandung: Alumni, 2008.

Harjono. Konstitusi Sebagai Rumah Bangsa. Jakarta: Sekretariat Jenderal dan Kepaniteraan Mahkamah Konstitusi Republik Indonesia, 2008.

Helmi. “Kedudukan UU Cipta Kerja terhadap UU-PPLH dan Implikasinya.” Jurnal Ilmu Hukum 10, no. 2 (2021): 257. https://doi.org/10.30652/jih.v10i2.8167.

Hermawan, Muhammad Ilham. Teori Penafsiran Konstitusi: Implikasi Pengujian Konstitusional di Mahkamah Konstitusi. Jakarta: Kencana, 2020.

Info, Article. “In Formal Constitutional Review by the Constitutional Menakar Kompatibilitas Putusan Bersyarat dalam Pengujian Formil Undang-Undang oleh Mahkamah Konstitusi.” Jurnal Konstitusi 20, no. 3 (2023): 478.

Kansil, Cst. Kamus Istilah Hukum. Jakarta: Gramedia Pustaka Utama, 2009.

Laksono, Fajar. “Inkonstitusional Bersyarat dan Mengapa MK Memodifikasi Putusan?” Hukum Online, 2021. https://www.hukumonline.com/berita/a/inkonstitusional-bersyarat-lt61c929b89241c?page=2.

Laksono Soeroso, Fajar. “Aspek Keadilan dalam Sifat Final Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi.” Jurnal Konstitusi 11, no. 1 (2016): 78. https://doi.org/10.31078/jk1114.

Lin, Chien-Chih. “Dialogic Judicial Review and Its Problems in East Asia.” International Journal of Constitutional Law 17, no. 2 (2019): 708. https://doi.org/10.1093/icon/moz044.

Mahfud MD. Konstitusi dan Hukum dalam Kontroversi Isu. Jakarta: Rajawali Pers, 2010.

Mahkamah Konstitusi. Hukum Acara Mahkamah Konstitusi. Jakarta: Sekretariat Jenderal dan Kepaniteraan Mahkamah Konstitusi, 2010.

———. “Eksistensi Putusan Judicial Review oleh Mahkamah Konstitusi.” Lex Administratum 1, no. 2 (2013): 19.

———. “MK: Inkonstitusional Bersyarat, UU Cipta Kerja Harus Diperbaiki dalam Jangka Waktu Dua Tahun.” https://www.mkri.id/index.php?page=web.Berita&id=17816.

Maruarar Siahaan. Hukum Acara Mahkamah Konstitusi. Jakarta: Sinar Grafika, 2015.

Maulidi, M. Agus. “Menyoal Kekuatan Eksekutorial Putusan Final dan Mengikat Mahkamah Konstitusi.” Jurnal Konstitusi 16, no. 2 (2019): 10–11. https://doi.org/10.31078/jk1627.

Michael, Tomy. “Bentuk Pemerintahan Perspektif Omnibus Law.” Jurnal Ius Constituendum 5, no. 1 (2020): 164. https://doi.org/10.26623/jic.v5i1.2222.

Navot, Suzie. “Judicial Review of the Legislative Process.” Israel Law Review 39, no. 2 (2006): 195. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0021223700013066.

Nasution, Bahder Johan. Metode Penelitian Ilmu Hukum. Bandung: Mandar Maju, 2008.

Nopitasari, Ayu, dan Yohanes Suwanto. “Konsep Omnibus Law dalam Penyusunan Undang-Undang Cipta Kerja Berdasarkan Teori Penyusunan Produk Hukum yang Baik.” Jurnal Demokrasi dan Ketahanan Nasional 1, no. 1 (2022): 99.

Nurhayati, Yati, et al. “Investment in Indonesia After Constitutional Court’s Decision in the Review of Job Creation Law.” Lentera Hukum 9, no. 3 (2022): 441–58. https://doi.org/10.19184/ejlh.v9i3.32368.

Prasetya, H. I. “The Law of Lawmaking as Quasi Constitutional Legislation: Undang-Undang Pembentukan Peraturan Perundang-Undangan Sebagai Legislasi Kuasi Konstitusional.” Jurnal Konstitusi (2023): 37. https://jurnalkonstitusi.mkri.id/index.php/jk/article/view/2160.

Rachmin, Kania Venisa, Sumurung Tua Sagala Christo, dan Mulyono Eddy. “Omnibus Law dalam Konstitusi Indonesia (Studi Perbandingan Indonesia, Amerika Serikat, dan Filipina).” Ajudikasi: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum 7, no. 1 (2023): 22.

Rahman, Faiz. “Anomali Penerapan Klausul Bersyarat dalam Putusan Pengujian Undang-Undang terhadap Undang-Undang Dasar.” Jurnal Konstitusi 17, no. 1 (2020): 402. https://doi.org/10.31078/jk1712.

Rahman, Faiz, dan Agung Wicaksono. “Eksistensi dan Karakteristik Putusan Bersyarat Mahkamah Konstitusi.” Jurnal Konstitusi 13, no. 2 (2016): 352.

Rishan, Idul. “Konsep Pengujian Formil Undang-Undang di Mahkamah Konstitusi: The Concept of Judicial Review of the Legislative Process.” Jurnal Konstitusi 18 (2021): 3. https://jurnalkonstitusi.mkri.id/index.php/jk/article/view/1811/pdf.

Sambuari, Fista. “Eksistensi Putusan Judicial Review oleh Mahkamah Konstitusi.” Lex Administratum 1, no. 2 (2013): 19.

Saebani, Beni Ahmad. Hukum Ketenagakerjaan dalam Perspektif Undang-Undang Cipta Kerja (Omnibus Law). Bandung: CV Pustaka Setia, 2021.

Stone Sweet, Alec. “The Politics of Constitutional Review in France and Europe.” International Journal of Constitutional Law 5, no. 1 (2007): 22. https://doi.org/10.1093/icon/mol041.

Widiastuti, Retno, dan Ahmad Ilham Wibowo. “Pola Pembuktian dalam Putusan Pengujian Formil Undang-Undang di Mahkamah Konstitusi.” Jurnal Konstitusi 18, no. 4 (2022): 803–809. https://doi.org/10.31078/jk1844.

Waltemath, Charles. “Judicial Review.” Economist 385, no. 8552 (2007): 4. https://doi.org/10.14393/rfadir-50.2.2022.65622.333-353.

Yasin, Ikhsan Fatah. “Keadilan Substantif dalam Ultra Petita Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi.” Justicia Islamica 15, no. 1 (2018): 20, 24. https://doi.org/10.21154/justicia.v15i1.1252.

Zipper, Reut Dahan Tzipi. “To Review or Not to Review? A Comparative Perspective of Judicial Review over the Legislative Process.” The Indonesian Journal of International & Comparative Law 7, no. 3 (2020): 329–84. https://international.vlex.com/vid/to-review-or-not-847281197.