Intersection of Jurisdiction in Resolving Sharia Banking Disputes in General Court

Titik Singgung Wewenang Penyelesaian Sengketa Perbankan Syariah di Peradilan Umum

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.31078/jk2126

Keywords:

Religious Court, General Court, Sharia Banking Disputes, Intersection, Judicial Authority

Abstract


After the Constitutional Court Decision No.93/PUU-X/2012, there were still sharia banking disputes, which were resolved through the General Courts. As in the Padang District Court Decision No. 27/Pdt.G.S/2022/PN Pdg. This study aims to unravel the intersection of jurisdiction in resolving sharia banking disputes after Constitutional Court Decision. This study uses normative juridical methods. The results of the study show that after the Constitutional Court Decision, there is still legal uncertainty in the settlement of sharia banking disputes due to the existence of Article 50 paragraph (2) of the Law 7/1989 on Religious Courts. These provisions have resulted in a blurring of the points of contact for the authority to adjudicate the Religious Courts and the General Courts in resolving property rights disputes, unlawful acts disputes (PMH), and consumer disputes.

Author Biography

Almaududi Almaududi, Faculty of Law, Andalas University, Padang, West Sumatra, Indonesia

Almaududi (Dudi) was born in Batusangkar on November 11, 1991. Dudi is a Lecturer at the Faculty of Law, Universitas Andalas. Before becoming a Lecturer, Dudi worked as an Advocate & Legal Consultant in Jakarta. In 2014 he joined as Associate Lawyer at the Law Office of Prof. Dr. Sutan Remy Sjahdeini, S.H., FCBArb (Remy & Partners). In 2017, Dudi joined as Associate Partner at Feri Samad Law Firm. Dudi also has working experience in Legal and Industrial Relations in several national and multinational companies such as PT. Home Credit Indonesia and Morita Tjokro Group.

References

Alhadi, Muhammad Nurcholis. “Perkara Perbuatan Melawan Dalam Sengketa Ekonomi Syariah.” Veritas 7, no. 2 (2021): 37–58. https://uia.e-journal.id/veritas/article/ download/1451/904.

Dwianto, Arditio, Nurul Hanani, and Hizbulloh Hadziq. “Batasan Kompetensi Absolut Pengadilan Agama (Analisis Putusan Peninjauan Kembali Nomor 672 PK/Pdt/2016).” Mahakim: Journal of Islamic Family Law 6, no. 1 (2022): 1–23. https://doi.org/10.30762/ mahakim.v6i1.144.

Fatin Nandari, Ro’fah Setyowati, and Islamiyati. “Perlindungan Hukum Terhadap Nasabah Dalam Proses Penagihan Tunggakan Kartu Kredit Syariah (Syariah Card) Melalui Jasa Debt Collector Pada Industri Perbankan Syariah Di Indonesia.” Diponegoro Law Journal 5, no. 3 (2016): 1–21. http://www.ejournal-s1.undip.ac.id/index.php/dlr/%0APERLINDUNGAN.

Harahap, M Yahya. Hukum Acara Perdata. Sinar Grafika, 2014.

Isra, Saldi. “Titik Singgung Wewenang Mahkamah Agung Dengan Mahkamah Konstitusi.” Jurnal Hukum Dan Peradilan 4, no. 1 (2015): 17–30. https://doi.org/10.25216/ jhp.4.1.2015.17-30.

Jalil, Abdul. “Tumpang Tindih Kewenangan Dalam Penyelesaian Sengketa Perbankan Syariah.” Jurnal Konstitusi 10, no. 4 (2016): 627. https://doi.org/10.31078/jk1044.

Maroa, Mustating Daeng, and Arianti A Ogotan. “Batas Persinggungan Kewenangan Mengadili Sengketa Hak Milik Antara Pengadilan Agama Dengan Pengadilan Negeri.” Jurnal Yustisiabel 4, no. 2 (2020): 155-71. https://doi.org/10.32529/yustisiabel.v4i2.734.

Muhammad Rutabuz, Zaman. “Mendudukan Kompetensi Absolut Peradilan Agama Dalam Sengketa Lelang Eksekusi Hak Tanggungan Pada Bank Syariah.” MIYAH: Jurnal Studi Islam 14, no. 2 (2018): 148–59. http://ejournal.unkafa.ac.id/index.php/miyah/article/ view/152.

Noviarini, Wini. Perbuatan Hukum Dalam Hubungan Kontraktual. Universitas Indonesia, 2013.

Pratiwi, Endang, Theo Negoro, and Hassanain Haykal. “Teori Utilitarianisme Jeremy Bentham: Tujuan Hukum Atau Metode Pengujian Produk Hukum?” Jurnal Konstitusi 19, no. 2 (2022): 268–93. https://doi.org/10.31078/jk1922.

Qibtiyah, Dewi Mariyatul, and Abdul Mujib. “Kompetensi Hakim Dalam Gugatan Sederhana Sengketa Ekonomi Syariah Di Pengadilan Agama Bantul.” Media of Law and Sharia 4, no. 2 (2023): 104–14. https://doi.org/10.18196/mls.v4i2.5.

Rahmani, and Timorita Yulianti. “Sengketa Ekonomi Syari’ah (Antara Kompetensi Pengadilan Agama Dan Badan Arbitrase Syari’ah).” Al-Mawarid XVII (2007): 45–60. https://journal. uii.ac.id/JHI/article/view/204.

Subiyanto, Achmad Edi. “Mendesain Kewenangan Kekuasaan Kehakiman Setelah Perubahan UUD 1945.” Jurnal Konstitusi 9, no. 4 (2012): 665–67. https://doi.org/https://doi. org/10.31078/jk944.

Syaifullah, Hamli. “Penerapan Fatwa DSN-MUI Tentang Murabahah Di Bank Syariah.” Kordinat: Jurnal Komunikasi Antar Perguruan Tinggi Agama Islam 17, no. 2 (2019): 257-282. https://doi.org/10.15408/kordinat.v17i2.9612.

Umam, Khotibul. “Implikasi Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 93/PUU-X/2012 Bagi Penyelesaian Sengketa Bisnis Dan Keuangan Syariah.” Jurnal Konstitusi 12, no. 4 (2016): 691–715. https://doi.org/10.31078/jk1242.

Downloads

Published

2024-06-01

How to Cite

Almaududi, Almaududi. 2024. “Intersection of Jurisdiction in Resolving Sharia Banking Disputes in General Court: Titik Singgung Wewenang Penyelesaian Sengketa Perbankan Syariah Di Peradilan Umum”. Jurnal Konstitusi 21 (2):258-74. https://doi.org/10.31078/jk2126.

Issue

Vol. 21 No. 2 (2024)

Section

Articles

License

Copyright (c) 2024 Jurnal Konstitusi

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:

  1. Copyright of the published articles will be transferred to the journal as the publisher of the manuscripts. Therefore, the author confirms that the copyright has been managed by the publisher.
  2. The publisher of Jurnal Konstitusi is The Registrar and Secretariat General of the Constitutional Court of the Republic of Indonesia.
  3. The copyright follows Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License: This license allows reusers to distribute, remix, adapt, and build upon the material in any medium or format for noncommercial purposes only, and only so long as attribution is given to the creator. If you remix, adapt, or build upon the material, you must license the modified material under identical terms.